Two press release on this this week, both below
From the University of Manchester
Researchers discover particle which could ‘cool the planet’
In a breakthrough paper published in Science, researchers from The University of Manchester, The University of Bristol and Sandia National Laboratories report the potentially revolutionary effects of Criegee biradicals.
These invisible chemical intermediates are powerful oxidisers of pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide, produced by combustion, and can naturally clean up the atmosphere.
Although these chemical intermediates were hypothesised in the 1950s, it is only now that they have been detected. Scientists now believe that, with further research, these species could play a major role in off-setting climate change.
The detection of the Criegee biradical and measurement of how fast it reacts was made possible by a unique apparatus, designed by Sandia researchers, that uses light from a third-generation synchrotron facility, at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s Advanced Light Source.
The intense, tunable light from the synchrotron allowed researchers to discern the formation and removal of different isomeric species – molecules that contain the same atoms but arranged in different combinations.
The researchers found that the Criegee biradicals react more rapidly than first thought and will accelerate the formation of sulphate and nitrate in the atmosphere. These compounds will lead to aerosol formation and ultimately to cloud formation with the potential to cool the planet.
The formation of Criegee biradicals was first postulated by Rudolf Criegee in the 1950s. However, despite their importance, it has not been possible to directly study these important species in the laboratory.
In the last 100 years, Earth’s average surface temperature increased by about 0.8 °C with about two thirds of the increase occurring over just the last three decades.
Most countries have agreed that drastic cuts in greenhouse gas emissions are required, and that future global warming should be limited to below 2.0 °C (3.6 °F).
Dr Carl Percival, Reader in Atmospheric Chemistry at The University of Manchester and one of the authors of the paper, believes there could be significant research possibilities arising from the discovery of the Criegee biradicals.
He said: “Criegee radicals have been impossible to measure until this work carried out at the Advanced Light Source. We have been able to quantify how fast Criegee radicals react for the first time.
“Our results will have a significant impact on our understanding of the oxidising capacity of the atmosphere and have wide ranging implications for pollution and climate change.
“The main source of these Criegee biradicals does not depend on sunlight and so these processes take place throughout the day and night.”
Professor Dudley Shallcross, Professor in Atmospheric Chemistry at The University of Bristol, added: “A significant ingredient required for the production of these Criegee biradicals comes from chemicals released quite naturally by plants, so natural ecosystems could be playing a significant role in off-setting warming.’
From DOE/Sandia National Laboratories
Sandia, UK partners publish groundbreaking work on Criegee intermediates in Science magazine
![]() |
||||
LIVERMORE, Calif. — In a breakthrough paper published in this week’s issue of Science magazine, researchers from Sandia’s Combustion Research Facility, the University of Manchester and Bristol University report direct measurements of reactions of a gas-phase Criegee intermediate using photoionization mass spectrometry. (visit www.youtube.com/SandiaLabs to see a short video of Sandia combustion chemists discussing the research.)
Criegee intermediates – carbonyl oxides – are implicated in autoignition chemistry and are pivotal atmospheric reactants, but only indirect knowledge of their reaction kinetics had previously been available. The article, titled Direct Kinetic Measurements of Criegee Intermediate (CH2OO) Formed by Reaction of CH2I with O2, reports the first direct kinetics measurements made of reactions of any Criegee species, in this case formaldehyde oxide (CH2OO). These measurements determine rate coefficients with key species, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and provide new insight into the reactivity of these transient molecules.
The detection and measurement of the Criegee intermediate reactions was made possible by a unique apparatus, designed by Sandia researchers, that uses light from a third-generation synchrotron user facility, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s Advanced Light Source, to investigate chemical reactions that are critical in hydrocarbon oxidation. The intense tunable light from the synchrotron allows researchers to discern the formation and removal of different isomeric species – molecules that contain the same atoms but arranged in different combinations.
In the present case, CH2OO can be distinguished from its more stable isomer, formic acid (HCOOH), because of their differing thresholds for photoionization. The Manchester and Bristol researchers recognized that this apparatus could elucidate not only combustion reactions but also important tropospheric oxidation processes, such as ozonolysis.
Ozonolysis, or the cleavage of carbon-carbon double bonds through reaction with ozone, is a reaction that plays a key role in a number of fields, including synthetic chemistry and tropospheric removal of unsaturated hydrocarbons. In the 1950s, Rudolf Criegee proposed that ozonolysis of alkenes occurs via the carbonyl oxide biradicals, now called Criegee intermediates. Criegee intermediates also have been calculated to be markers of critical chain-branching steps in hydrocarbon autoignition chemistry.
However, until 2008 no gas-phase Criegee intermediate had been observed, and rate coefficients derived from indirect measurements spanned orders of magnitude.
In the Science publication, Sandia researchers reported a new means of producing gas-phase Criegee intermediates and used this method to prepare enough CH2OO to measure its reactions with water, SO2, nitric oxide (NO), and NO2. The ability to reliably produce Criegee intermediates will facilitate studies of their role in ignition and other oxidation systems.
In particular, the present measurements show that the reactions of CH2OO with SO2 and NO2 are far more rapid than previously thought. Moreover, the Bristol and Manchester investigators demonstrated that these kinetics results imply a much greater role of carbonyl oxides in tropospheric sulfate and nitrate chemistry than models had assumed, a conclusion that will substantially impact existing atmospheric chemistry mechanisms. For example, SO2 oxidation is the source of sulfate species that nucleate atmospheric aerosols. Because the oxidation of SO2 by Criegee intermediate is much faster than modelers assumed, Criegee reactions may be a major tropospheric sulfate source, changing predictions of tropospheric aerosol formation.
This capability breakthrough was funded by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES) within the Office of Science in the U.S. Department of Energy, and conducted using the Advanced Light Source, a scientific user facility supported by BES.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin company, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration. With main facilities in Albuquerque, N.M., and Livermore, Calif., Sandia has major R&D responsibilities in national security, energy and environmental technologies, and economic competitiveness.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

What frightens me about this is that someone might get the bright idea to synthesize this stuff and try spraying it everywhere in hopes of cooling the planet. Not particularly inviting when the globe is already cooling.
totally cool!!!!!!!!!!!!
lol, so, I guess Spencer and Lindzen won the argument and clouds definitely cool the planet. That’s nice that accepted science finally realizes this. Are we now going to see apologies from the warmists for all the snide and nasty behavior regarding clouds?
Wow! Exciting indeed.
Another indication of how much more there is to know and discover out there!
Me thinks this is very interesting. I read about it the other day. Me thinks the ability of this new identified trace particle to substantially affect climate is as much a pipe dread as AGW. Then I am not a physicist so what do I know.
Mike Bromley the Canucklehead:
And trigger the next Ice Age. Wonderful.
We may be witnessing a metamorphosis. A few hundred billion more dollars could easily find their way into the hands of the alarmists for them to “research” this exciting development. They would then be able to deploy this solution and save face by claiming that their efforts saved the planet. Of course the only proof that they will have will be the cyclic cooling trend that is already in the works.
Monsanto will be selling these invisible MonCriegee biradicals as a GM licensed product, All natural producing production of MonCriegee biradicals patients will be prosecuted or destroyed in order to protect the planet saving MonCriegee biradicals from abusive use by nature or skeptics. Anybody caught breathing or digesting the product will have to purchase a right of use license. Snarc off!
Yes mike I think you’ve nailed it.
Mike Bromley the Canucklehead says:
January 13, 2012 at 8:21 pm
What frightens me about this is that someone might get the bright idea to synthesize this stuff and try spraying it everywhere in hopes of cooling the planet. Not particularly inviting when the globe is already cooling.
They get this stuff from red wine? Kidding! ☺
Interesting stuff. Thanks.
Clive
Up here we have snowflakes. I am pretty sure they cool the planet at most stages of their part of the hydrologic cycle.
May I have a grant please?
While normally I love hearing about cool science news, I read too many dystopian stories where this sort of discovery gets badly out of hand. I’m not worried about the planet, it’s resiliant, but we sure can make life hard for ourselves without half trying.
IPPC: The science is settled!
The fast reaction speed with SO2 and NO2 means that the half-life of “creegys” (oxyformaldehyde or polar diradicals) is very short. There’s even a chance that they react with other atmospheric species (especially in the presence of UV radiation), such as H2O, as mentioned above, or with each other to produce…methane! O, the horror! I’m skeptical. I’d like a second opinion.
What cooling trend is that?
Hey Halfwise, I have snowflakes too. Doing a good job of cooling. It is minus 7 right now, going to minus 19 by Sunday night. Who decided cold was what we wanted?
Powerful oxidisers…that could clean up the atmosphere…What is the risk introducing a strong carcinogen into our atmosphere ? When I hear “oxidisers” that nasty and dirty desease pops up into my head.
Most of the uncertainty in GCMs is from aerosols and cloud formation. It sounds like this work will be useful in reducing that uncertainly somewhat.
This one (Note the gray arrow is labelled CO2. The other is rolling 10-yr temps):
http://c3headlines.typepad.com/.a/6a010536b58035970c015433764317970c-pi
“Dennis Nikols, P. Geo. says:
January 13, 2012 at 8:31 pm
…. Then I am not a physicist so what do I know”
But, you did stay at a Holiday Inn
“A significant ingredient required for the production of these Criegee biradicals comes from chemicals released quite naturally by plants, so natural ecosystems could be playing a significant role in off-setting warming.’
In other words, as there is more CO2, there are more plants and bigger ones, more Criegee biradicals, and thus more clouds and it cools. Result, without us having to do anything, the plants will naturally offset the warming (if any) of the CO2’s greenhouse effect.
Second, if CO2 actually warms the planet, this means in northern climes there will be a longer growing season, more and bigger plants, see above.
Warmer planet means more evaporation, more rain, less deserts, more plants, see above.
Ice age comes, less plants, less Criegee, less clouds, helps keep it from getting too cold and freezing the entire planet over.
Kinda explains how the planet has managed to keep such an even temperature despite everything, right? Soooo…what was it we were supposed to be so all fired up worried about agian?
Oh, this could not *possibly* go wrong.
Regardless of whether it comes from “Criegee biradicals” and or a host of other natural mechanisms, the climate system feedback to CO2 induced (or any other temperature forced) warming is “negative”. How anyone can look at the past 500,000 years of climate history and not understand that is simply beyond me.
“A significant ingredient required for the production of these Criegee biradicals comes from chemicals released quite naturally by plants, so natural ecosystems could be playing a significant role in off-setting warming.’”
Yeah, that’s is what has off set the warming! Crieglee biradicals have temporarily offset the warming. This has moved the tipping point of certain doom to exactly five years from now. So we must act immediately to stop the warming before it comes back and kills us all!
Oh wait. What off-setting of the warming? The warming is there! It is just hiding in the pipeline!
Oh wait, the warming isn’t hiding in the pipeline. It is right there in the surface temperature record. You just have to look at it using the appropriate statistical methods. If you subtract the ENSO and divide the AMO by the square root of the third derivative of the PDO, and then squint your eyes just right, there’s the warming!
Oh wait, the warming is there but you can’t see it. And you shouldn’t expect to be able to see it over such a short time frame. Warming doesn’t become visible for
1012131517 years. Yeah that’s it, 17 years!Oh wait. Uh, whats the story this week? The “quiet sun”, which we now think may have a convenient ad hoc cooling effect that will soon be overwhelmed by CO2, but which in no way could have caused any warming whatsoever between 1900 and 1998? Chinese aerosols? Low level volcanic activity? “Natural variation”?
Ooooh, look! Ocean acidification!
Yes JJ,
You have covered all the bases and if you haven’t Hansen and Co will dream up another excuse. Trouble is people have bigger issues to face than supposed whatever when they see snow in the middle of summer as we have just had in Victoria. Not forgetting the cost of power exacebated by REC and associated subsidies. My bullsh@t metre is focusing on a myriad of climate change “studies” proving they were right all along despite data to the contrary which makes me think they are close to panic as the great scam unwinds and the grants dry up. We need the US to defund climate science and the UN as part of their austerity measures. Sooner rather than later Obama or congress has to rein in spending and those spurious expenditures should be the first to go.
Claude Harvey says:
January 13, 2012 at 10:59 pm
“Regardless of whether it comes from “Criegee biradicals” and or a host of other natural mechanisms, the climate system feedback to CO2 induced (or any other temperature forced) warming is “negative”. How anyone can look at the past 500,000 years of climate history and not understand that is simply beyond me.”
Great comment, and gets to the nub of the problem. The paleo data clearly shows that temperature leads CO2, thus the current IPCC cabal of cargo cult climate scientists have got the link between them the wrong way round. It would seem cause and effect can be denied, if it conflicts with a belief system.
That temperature lead CO2 levels can also be seen in the recent record, where the CAGW catastrophists find it harder to cast doubt than it is with the less reliable paleo record…
http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/549/94485986.png
Make your own mind up about what’s really happening.