By Paul L. Vaughan, M.Sc.
The amplitude of Earth’s zonal winds is modulated by the solar cycle. Here’s a concise visual update based on the latest data:
LOD’ = rate of change of length of day
Data
ftp://ftp.iers.org/products/eop/long-term/c04_08/iau2000/eopc04_08_IAU2000.62-now ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/STP/SOLAR_DATA/COSMIC_RAYS/STATION_DATA/Monthly_data/moscow.tab
Ulric Lyons says:
December 28, 2011 at 7:39 pm
Given the consistency of the relationship between solar wind speed trends and changes in the ENSO index that I have identified, I see no reason to be swayed by opinion.
I am not sure if you saw my comment, so repeating just in case.
“I have not seen this relationship. Do you have something to back up your claim?”
Leif Svalgaard says:
December 27, 2011 at 5:26 pm
Carla says:
December 27, 2011 at 4:44 pm
With the availability of a new generation of magnetic field models based on high-accuracy satellite magnetic measurements, it becomes increasingly important to account for these smaller current systems.
You are missing the important point: that these currents are so small that it is only now with super-sensitive satellite measurements that we can even measure them. They have no significant effect on anything.
~
Well just that they exist is interesting enough. Are they always present? How do they vary? Are diamagnetic drifts ubiquitous? What exactly is their contribution to the current system?
But forget that for now..lol..
It is a LOD angular momentum thread after all..
So how do we slow down or speed up axial force?
Diamagnetism??
Electron Diamagnetic Effect on Axial Force in an Expanding Plasma: Experiments and Theory
Kazunori Takahashi,1,2,* Trevor Lafleur,1 Christine Charles,1 Peter Alexander,1 and Rod W. Boswell1
(Received 16 June 2011; published 28 November 2011)
The axial force imparted from a magnetically expanding current-free plasma is directly measured for
three different experimental configurations and compared with a two-dimensional fluid theory. The force
component solely resulting from the expanding field is directly measured and identified as an axial force
produced by the azimuthal current due to an electron diamagnetic drift and the radial component of the
magnetic field. The experimentally measured forces are well described by the theory.
..For instance, acceleration processes
in current-driven plasmas such as applied-field
magnetoplasma-dynamic arcjet plasmas have been investigated
[5,6]. Recent theoretical studies concerning the
spontaneous formation of electric double layers (DLs)
have shown that no additional net momentum is delivered
by the DLs [7,8]. Instead, one- and two-dimensional theories
have shown enhancements of the net axial force [7,9]
from an expanding cross section or an expanding magnetic
field (called thrust in the field of electric propulsion), even
in current-free plasmas such as radio frequency (rf ) inductively
coupled or helicon mode discharges. Although direct
measurements of the net force from magnetically expanding
current-free plasmas are presently under investigation
[10–12], the role of the expanding magnetic field on the
gain or loss of the axial force in current-free plasmas has
not yet been described. In the present Letter, the axial force
imparted from the magnetically expanding current-free
plasma is directly measured for three different experimental
configurations and compared with a two-dimensional
fluid theory..
..Hence, the present theory
clearly identifies the gain (loss) of the net axial force for
negative (positive) radial gradient of the electron pressure
in an expanding magnetic field in addition to the electron
pressure term Ts inside the source tube.
..In summary, the direct measurements of the axial force
imparted from magnetically expanding current-free plasmas
have been performed in three different configurations
and compared with a two-dimensional fluid theory. The
gain of axial force by the presence of the expanding
magnetic field is clearly demonstrated in the experiments.
A fluid theory is developed which shows that the axial
force is enhanced by the azimuthal current of the electron
diamagnetic drift and the radial magnetic field. The directly
measured and theoretical forces are in fairly good
agreement..
From above post, ..axial
force is enhanced by the azimuthal current of the electron
diamagnetic drift and the radial magnetic field..
And from an earlier post..
..While the stronger daytime wind-driven currents have been extensively studied, gravity and diamagnetic currents in the ionosphere have received very little attention but can have substantial effects even during the night. .
And in the cusps during CEPs (cusp energetic particle) events we find CDCs (cusp diamagnetic cavities) enhanced, weak or sometimes absent.
From the next article which is my new find of the New Year.
This article will forever change the view on how we perceive solar energetic particle events and the reconnection process..
I call it Dayside Reconnection..
Cusp energetic ions as tracers for particle transport into the
magnetosphere
Trattner, K.J.1, S.M. Petrinec1, S.A. Fuselier1, W.K. Peterson2 and R. Friedel3
Short Title: Cusp Energetic Ions
Abstract
The magnetospheric cusps are focal points in studies of both magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause
and plasma entry into the magnetosphere. Contrary to a well-understood precipitating thermal
magnetosheath ion population, the origins of energetic ions in the cusp regions are still a matter of
controversy. It has been suggested that these Cusp Energetic Particles (CEP) with significant fluxes from
magnetosheath energies up to several hundred keV/e are accelerated locally in the cusp. A recent paper has
suggested local plasma conditions conducive to CEP acceleration in the Cusp Diamagnetic Cavity (CDC).
An alternative source region for CEP events is the quasi-parallel bow shock, which is a well known particle
accelerator. Energetic ions accelerated at the bow shock can be transported downstream and enter the cusp
along newly reconnected field lines. Composition and energy spectra of these CEP events resemble those
of bow shock energetic diffuse ions.
We use recently developed techniques to determine the location of the reconnection site at the
magnetopause, draping interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) lines over the magnetopause and mapping those
field lines back into the solar wind to show the magnetic connection between the cusp regions, the Earth
bow shock, and the upstream region. Several cusp crossings by the Polar satellite during variable IMF
conditions are analyzed for patterns between the cusp, their connection to the upstream region and the
appearance of energetic ions in the cusp. Local plasma conditions in the cusp are also documented. This
analysis reveals that the occurrence of CEP events is not uniquely determined by local plasma conditions.
The flux of CEP ions depends on the location of the quasi-parallel bow shock and the magnetic topology in
the magnetosheath. Our analysis allows us to use CEP ions as tracers for plasma transport into the cusp and
to better understand the magnetic topology between the solar wind and the ionosphere
http://lasp.colorado.edu/home/timas/files/2011/03/Trattner_2008_JGR.pdf
@Geoff Sharp says:
December 28, 2011 at 9:46 pm
Ulric Lyons says:
December 28, 2011 at 7:39 pm
Given the consistency of the relationship between solar wind speed trends and changes in the ENSO index that I have identified, I see no reason to be swayed by opinion.
>>I have not seen this relationship. Do you have something to back up your claim?
Yes the ENSO and OMNI data, study it for yourself.