Hansen: "Humans have overwhelmed the natural, slow changes that occur on geologic timescales"

From NASA Goddard/GISS: same-o, same-o

Paleoclimate Record Points Toward Potential Rapid Climate Changes

temperature map of earth
The average global surface temperature of Earth has risen by .8 degrees Celsius since 1880, and is now increasing at a rate of about .1 degree Celsius per decade. This image shows how 2010 temperatures compare to average temperatures from a baseline period of 1951-1980, as analyzed by scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies. Credit: NASA GISS

New research into the Earth’s paleoclimate history by NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies director James E. Hansen suggests the potential for rapid climate changes this century, including multiple meters of sea level rise, if global warming is not abated.

By looking at how the Earth’s climate responded to past natural changes, Hansen sought insight into a fundamental question raised by ongoing human-caused climate change: “What is the dangerous level of global warming?” Some international leaders have suggested a goal of limiting warming to 2 degrees Celsius from pre-industrial times in order to avert catastrophic change. But Hansen said at a press briefing at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco on Tues, Dec. 6, that warming of 2 degrees Celsius would lead to drastic changes, such as significant ice sheet loss in Greenland and Antarctica.

Based on Hansen’s temperature analysis work at the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, the Earth’s average global surface temperature has already risen .8 degrees Celsius since 1880, and is now warming at a rate of more than .1 degree Celsius every decade. This warming is largely driven by increased greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, particularly carbon dioxide, emitted by the burning of fossil fuels at power plants, in cars and in industry. At the current rate of fossil fuel burning, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will have doubled from pre-industrial times by the middle of this century. A doubling of carbon dioxide would cause an eventual warming of several degrees, Hansen said.

In recent research, Hansen and co-author Makiko Sato, also of Goddard Institute for Space Studies, compared the climate of today, the Holocene, with previous similar “interglacial” epochs – periods when polar ice caps existed but the world was not dominated by glaciers. In studying cores drilled from both ice sheets and deep ocean sediments, Hansen found that global mean temperatures during the Eemian period, which began about 130,000 years ago and lasted about 15,000 years, were less than 1 degree Celsius warmer than today. If temperatures were to rise 2 degrees Celsius over pre-industrial times, global mean temperature would far exceed that of the Eemian, when sea level was four to six meters higher than today, Hansen said.

“The paleoclimate record reveals a more sensitive climate than thought, even as of a few years ago. Limiting human-caused warming to 2 degrees is not sufficient,” Hansen said. “It would be a prescription for disaster.”

Hansen focused much of his new work on how the polar regions and in particular the ice sheets of Antarctica and Greenland will react to a warming world.

Two degrees Celsius of warming would make Earth much warmer than during the Eemian, and would move Earth closer to Pliocene-like conditions, when sea level was in the range of 25 meters higher than today, Hansen said. In using Earth’s climate history to learn more about the level of sensitivity that governs our planet’s response to warming today, Hansen said the paleoclimate record suggests that every degree Celsius of global temperature rise will ultimately equate to 20 meters of sea level rise. However, that sea level increase due to ice sheet loss would be expected to occur over centuries, and large uncertainties remain in predicting how that ice loss would unfold.

Hansen notes that ice sheet disintegration will not be a linear process. This non-linear deterioration has already been seen in vulnerable places such as Pine Island Glacier in West Antarctica, where the rate of ice mass loss has continued accelerating over the past decade. Data from NASA’s Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite is already consistent with a rate of ice sheet mass loss in Greenland and West Antarctica that doubles every ten years. The GRACE record is too short to confirm this with great certainty; however, the trend in the past few years does not rule it out, Hansen said. This continued rate of ice loss could cause multiple meters of sea level rise by 2100, Hansen said.

Ice and ocean sediment cores from the polar regions indicate that temperatures at the poles during previous epochs – when sea level was tens of meters higher – is not too far removed from the temperatures Earth could reach this century on a “business as usual” trajectory.

“We don’t have a substantial cushion between today’s climate and dangerous warming,” Hansen said. “Earth is poised to experience strong amplifying feedbacks in response to moderate additional global warming.”

Detailed considerations of a new warming target and how to get there are beyond the scope of this research, Hansen said. But this research is consistent with Hansen’s earlier findings that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would need to be rolled back from about 390 parts per million in the atmosphere today to 350 parts per million in order to stabilize the climate in the long term. While leaders continue to discuss a framework for reducing emissions, global carbon dioxide emissions have remained stable or increased in recent years.

Hansen and others noted that while the paleoclimate evidence paints a clear picture of what Earth’s earlier climate looked like, but that using it to predict precisely how the climate might change on much smaller timescales in response to human-induced rather than natural climate change remains difficult. But, Hansen noted, the Earth system is already showing signs of responding, even in the cases of “slow feedbacks” such as ice sheet changes.

The human-caused release of increased carbon dioxide into the atmosphere also presents climate scientists with something they’ve never seen in the 65 million year record of carbon dioxide levels – a drastic rate of increase that makes it difficult to predict how rapidly the Earth will respond. In periods when carbon dioxide has increased due to natural causes, the rate of increase averaged about .0001 parts per million per year – in other words, one hundred parts per million every million years. Fossil fuel burning is now causing carbon dioxide concentrations to increase at two parts per million per year.

“Humans have overwhelmed the natural, slow changes that occur on geologic timescales,” Hansen said.

Patrick Lynch

NASA’s Earth Science News Team

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

187 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
December 11, 2011 8:13 pm

Jim D,
I understand radiative physics. What I don’t understand is your confused belief that although ΔT has always preceded ΔCO2, that ‘this time it’s different’. That is a scientifically baseless belief for which there is no testable, empirical evidence. It is simply a belief. On a scale of months to hundreds of millennia CO2 always follows temperature. But now it’s the other way around? Not really. You’re still learning – and from the wrong folks.
If you want to learn, use the WUWT archive search, and get up to speed on the real science: any effect from CO2 is so minuscule that it is unmeasurable; it’s down in the noise. You can accept that or not. But there is ample evidence for it, while there is no testable evidence, per the scientific method, showing that rises in CO2 precede and cause rises in temperature. None.

savethesharks
December 11, 2011 8:25 pm

Anybody ever FOIA’d Hansen’s annual salary and pension benefits? What gives him the “right” or the authority…as a public servant…to air his opinions like this?
This is illegal at best…and treasonous…at worst.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA

Jim D
December 11, 2011 8:33 pm

Smokey, this time is different from the ice ages because CO2 is changing first. You can understand this by cause and effect. Man increases the CO2 due to fossil fuel injection. I don’t think you are suggesting the temperature could be changing first and causing man to use fossil fuels, so I don’t understand your argument. Maybe you are one of the people who believes the CO2 comes out of the ocean which somehow also manages to acidify at the same time. I have seen all these arguments before.

savethesharks
December 11, 2011 8:57 pm

Jim D says:
December 11, 2011 at 8:33 pm
Smokey, this time is different from the ice ages because CO2 is changing first. You can understand this by cause and effect. Man increases the CO2 due to fossil fuel injection. I don’t think you are suggesting the temperature could be changing first and causing man to use fossil fuels, so I don’t understand your argument. Maybe you are one of the people who believes the CO2 comes out of the ocean which somehow also manages to acidify at the same time. I have seen all these arguments before.
===============================
Uh huh. And we have seen all of yours as well. Perhaps too many to stomach at one time!
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA

December 12, 2011 12:21 am

savethesharks,
Jim D can’t help himself; he’s been brainwashed by BelieveProgress, Pseudo-Skeptical Pseudo-Science, RealClimatePropaganda, Tamina, and other censoring anti-science blogs.
Note that Jim avoids the numerous links I’ve helpfully provided in a fruitless attempt to educate him with verifiable, real world facts. Now he’s on the “ocean acidification” narrative, which has been thoroughly debunked here by Willis and Dave Middleton. Jim could simply search the archives and find out there is zero empirical evidence to support the “acidification” nonsense, but Jim’s mind is made up and closed tight. He just doesn’t want to learn. Jim is a True Believer in the repeatedly falsified CO2=CAGW nonsense. Poor Jim.

Werner Brozek
December 12, 2011 10:47 am

I agree that in the past, CO2 followed temperature rise since oceans can dissolve less CO2 at higher temperatures. But at the present time, due to man’s emissions, we have increased the CO2 from 280 ppm in 1750 to 390 ppm at the present time. After all, our emissions of CO2 over the last 260 years have to end up somewhere. For a very comprehensive discussion of CO2 levels, see:
http://www.ferdinand-engelbeen.be/klimaat/co2_measurements.html
But the important point is not how much the CO2 has gone up, but whether its affect is catastrophic for our temperatures. All indications are that it is nothing to worry about.

Brian H
December 14, 2011 6:00 am

Walter;
Careful about what presumptions and assumptions you let pass. Integrate this: the tropics’ termites generate 10X more CO2/annum than humans.
Yet humans’ puny emissions have increased the atmospheric load of CO2 by (390-280)/280 x 100% = ~40%??
Fails the Reasonableness Test.

Brian H
December 14, 2011 6:01 am

typo: Werner, not “Walter”.

1 6 7 8