Roman Period "megadrought" found in the USA southwest

From the University of Arizona, one wonders how such a thing could happen when CO2 was at “safe” levels. They are using bristlecone pines again, which may very well be a better proxy for rainfall than for temperature. At least there was no competition bias from sheep ranching then. It seems they also confirmed a drought in the medieval warm period in the 12th century.

UA scientists find evidence of Roman period megadrought

A new study at the University of Arizona’s Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research has revealed a previously unknown multi-decade drought period in the second century A.D.

IMAGE: Dendrochronologists extract a small, pencil-shaped sample of wood from a tree with a tool called an increment borer. The tiny hole left in the tree’s trunk quickly heals as the…Click here for more information.

Almost nine hundred years ago, in the mid-12th century, the southwestern U.S. was in the middle of a multi-decade megadrought. It was the most recent extended period of severe drought known for this region. But it was not the first.

The second century A.D. saw an extended dry period of more than 100 years characterized by a multi-decade drought lasting nearly 50 years, says a new study from scientists at the University of Arizona.

UA geoscientists Cody Routson, Connie Woodhouse and Jonathan Overpeck conducted a study of the southern San Juan Mountains in south-central Colorado. The region serves as a primary drainage site for the Rio Grande and San Juan rivers.

“These mountains are very important for both the San Juan River and the Rio Grande River,” said Routson, a doctoral candidate in the environmental studies laboratory of the UA’s department of geosciences and the primary author of the study, which is upcoming in Geophysical Research Letters.

The San Juan River is a tributary for the Colorado River, meaning any climate changes that affect the San Juan drainage also likely would affect the Colorado River and its watershed. Said Routson: “We wanted to develop as long a record as possible for that region.”

Dendrochronology is a precise science of using annual growth rings of trees to understand climate in the past. Because trees add a normally clearly defined growth ring around their trunk each year, counting the rings backwards from a tree’s bark allows scientists to determine not only the age of the tree, but which years were good for growth and which years were more difficult.

IMAGE: A cross section of wood shows the annual growth rings trees add with each growing season. Dark bands of latewood form the boundary between each ring and the next. Counting…Click here for more information.

“If it’s a wet year, they grow a wide ring, and if it’s a dry year, they grow a narrow ring,” said Routson. “If you average that pattern across trees in a region you can develop a chronology that shows what years were drier or wetter for that particular region.”

Darker wood, referred to as latewood because it develops in the latter part of the year at the end of the growing season, forms a usually distinct boundary between one ring and the next. The latewood is darker because growth at the end of the growing season has slowed and the cells are more compact.

To develop their chronology, the researchers looked for indications of climate in the past in the growth rings of the oldest trees in the southern San Juan region. “We drove around and looked for old trees,” said Routson.

Literally nothing is older than a bristlecone pine tree: The oldest and longest-living species on the planet, these pine trees normally are found clinging to bare rocky landscapes of alpine or near-alpine mountain slopes. The trees, the oldest of which are more than 4,000 years old, are capable of withstanding extreme drought conditions.

“We did a lot of hiking and found a couple of sites of bristlecone pines, and one in particular that we honed in on,” said Routson.

To sample the trees without damaging them, the dendrochronologists used a tool like a metal screw that bores a tiny hole in the trunk of the tree and allows them to extract a sample, called a core. “We take a piece of wood about the size and shape of a pencil from the tree,” explained Routson.

“We also sampled dead wood that was lying about the land. We took our samples back to the lab where we used a visual, graphic technique to match where the annual growth patterns of the living trees overlap with the patterns in the dead wood. Once we have the pattern matched we measure the rings and average these values to generate a site chronology.”

“In our chronology for the south San Juan mountains we created a record that extends back 2,200 years,” said Routson. “It was pretty profound that we were able to get back that far.”

IMAGE: Doctoral candidate Cody Routson of the environmental studies laboratory at the University of Arizona’s department of geosciences scrambles up a mountain slope to sample a bristlecone pine tree. Click here for more information.

The chronology extends many years earlier than the medieval period, during which two major drought events in that region already were known from previous chronologies.

“The medieval period extends roughly from 800 to 1300 A.D.,” said Routson. “During that period there was a lot of evidence from previous studies for increased aridity, in particular two major droughts: one in the middle of the 12th century, and one at the end of the 13th century.”

“Very few records are long enough to assess the global conditions associated with these two periods of Southwestern aridity,” said Routson. “And the available records have uncertainties.”

But the chronology from the San Juan bristlecone pines showed something completely new:

“There was another period of increased aridity even earlier,” said Routson. “This new record shows that in addition to known droughts from the medieval period, there is also evidence for an earlier megadrought during the second century A.D.”

“What we can see from our record is that it was a period of basically 50 consecutive years of below-average growth,” said Routson. “And that’s within a much broader period that extends from around 124 A.D. to 210 A.D. – about a 100-year-long period of dry conditions.”

“We’re showing that there are multiple extreme drought events that happened during our past in this region,” said Routson. “These megadroughts lasted for decades, which is much longer than our current drought. And the climatic events behind these previous dry periods are really similar to what we’re experiencing today.”

The prolonged drought in the 12th century and the newly discovered event in the second century A.D. may both have been influenced by warmer-than-average Northern Hemisphere temperatures, Routson said: “The limited records indicate there may have been similar La Nina-like background conditions in the tropical Pacific Ocean, which are known to influence modern drought, during the two periods.”

Although natural climate variation has led to extended dry periods in the southwestern U.S. in the past, there is reason to believe that human-driven climate change will increase the frequency of extreme droughts in the future, said Routson. In other words, we should expect similar multi-decade droughts in a future predicted to be even warmer than the past.

###

Routson’s research is funded by fellowships from the National Science Foundation and the Science Foundation Arizona. His advisors, Woodhouse of the School of Geography and Development and Overpeck of the department of geosciences and co-director of the UA’s Institute of the Environment, are co-authors of the study.

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

193 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 4, 2011 4:39 pm

So Bristlecones are acceptable now?

Latitude
November 4, 2011 4:42 pm

“Dendrochronology is a precise science of using annual growth rings of trees to understand climate in the past”
“What we can see from our record is that it was a period of basically 50 consecutive years of below-average growth,” said Routson. “And that’s within a much broader period that extends from around 124 A.D. to 210 A.D. – about a 100-year-long period of dry conditions.”
===================================================
…or about a 100 years long period of below normal temperatures
http://www.drroyspencer.com/library/pics/2000-years-of-global-temperature.jpg

MikeN
November 4, 2011 4:50 pm

This is in line with Mann’s statements that global warming would lead to more droughts and hurricanes in the Southwest. The other implication is that warming from carbon dioxide will produce more LaNina’s, giving a negative feedback that lowers the overall global temperature. This is the reason that Mann says there was no Medieval Warm Period, that the tropics had LaNina like effects. When asked if this meant a negative feedback and models were vastly overstating warming, he said I agree with that… I think there’s a missing negative feedback.

Bruce Cobb
November 4, 2011 4:51 pm

Sneaky buggers. Here I thought I was reading about some actual science being done, and then they had to spoil it right at the end with their manmade climate crapola.
Still, I suppose it was a requirement to pay the obligatory lip service to the CAGW meme for funding. Science in the service of ideology, how refreshing.

November 4, 2011 4:56 pm

If they had narrower tree rings, doesn’t that mean instead that it was colder?
MBH 98 said so.
How did this get past Professor Hughes?

Jim Masterson
November 4, 2011 5:00 pm

>>
Although natural climate variation has led to extended dry periods in the southwestern U.S. in the past, there is reason to believe that human-driven climate change will increase the frequency of extreme droughts in the future, said Routson.
<<
In climate science, you always have to add a hat-tip AGW.
Jim

2kevin
November 4, 2011 5:07 pm

It’s only a virtual sample extracted from the code at Real Climate.

Mike Davis
November 4, 2011 5:09 pm

They wasted money to find something that was already known. The times they are talking about are known transition periods from warm to cold. Maybe they should have studied historical climate records first!

Katherine
November 4, 2011 5:14 pm

Although natural climate variation has led to extended dry periods in the southwestern U.S. in the past, there is reason to believe that human-driven climate change will increase the frequency of extreme droughts in the future, said Routson. In other words, we should expect similar multi-decade droughts in a future predicted to be even warmer than the past.
Based on what reasoning? Naturally Routson needed that CYA statement to get past CAGW censors. After all, his research was funded by the NSF.

Brian H
November 4, 2011 5:24 pm

And none of it has diddly to do with CO2. Climate sh** happens. The Windmill Gods won’t help you.

loren anderson
November 4, 2011 5:29 pm

that doctoral candidate should be advised that Rio means River, thus there is no Rio Grande River.

Gail Combs
November 4, 2011 5:37 pm

No mention of the Anasazi collapse of 800 years ago????
I am disappointed.

Chuck Nolan
November 4, 2011 5:42 pm

MikeN says:
November 4, 2011 at 4:50 pm
This is in line with Mann’s statements that global warming would lead to more droughts and hurricanes in the Southwest.
———————
Mike, isn’t this like a “one for one” in that for every hurricane you get don’t you lose one drought?
It sounds like Dr. Mann is covering his ……………..bases.

North of 43 and south of 44
November 4, 2011 5:45 pm

Latitude says:
November 4, 2011 at 4:42 pm
“Dendrochronology is a precise science of using annual growth rings of trees to understand climate in the past”
“What we can see from our record is that it was a period of basically 50 consecutive years of below-average growth,” said Routson. “And that’s within a much broader period that extends from around 124 A.D. to 210 A.D. – about a 100-year-long period of dry conditions.”
===================================================
…or about a 100 years long period of below normal temperatures
http://www.drroyspencer.com/library/pics/2000-years-of-global-temperature.jpg
___________________________________________________________________
Or 100 years of lack of fertilizer from animals.

Nick Shaw
November 4, 2011 5:49 pm

There is so much to take from every pithy comment so far!!!
How come the researchers didn’t make any connection between the Roman and Medieval Warm Periods to their drought induced tree rings (if it wasn’t cold, that is, that immediately followed!)? Why does it somehow indicate it has something to do with AGW or CO2 in the future when neither of those things were mitigating factors in the past?
Statements such as this just make me want to throttle somebody and yell into their faces, “Get a clue, dumbass!!”

peterhodges
November 4, 2011 5:50 pm

I have tracked down a ream of papers on the local paleoclimate, all of which confirm these findings of droughts for the Southwest during the warm periods…the Medieval Optimum, the Roman Optimum, and the entire first half of the Holocene.
Here in the Eastern Sierra, there have been three major climate regimes in the recent past…the last glacial, the first half of the Holocene, and the present climate.
Although in the last ten years winter, spring, and fall temperatures have fallen 10F, and precipitation has increased ~150%. Summers have cooled a few degrees. If this weather becomes the new norm, I suspect the climate may shift to that of the previous glacial.
Wonder how long that takes?

kuhnkat
November 4, 2011 5:53 pm

MikeN,
yes, extreme weather events happened in the past and will probably happen again. Mann’s bloviating shows that he simply wants to try and assign blame to his preferred cause if one does happen in the near future!! Unfortunately he has no mechanism and no studies to back up his mouth.

Editor
November 4, 2011 5:58 pm

“During that period there was a lot of evidence from previous studies for increased aridity, in particular two major droughts: one in the middle of the 12th century, and one at the end of the 13th century.”

For more information about the societal effects of these droughts, I found a couple links that are well worth reading.
http://www.thefurtrapper.com/anasazi.htm : The unraveling of the Chaco society began with a drought in 1130 A.D. Lack of rain depleted the storehouses and made the farmers question the power of the Chaco priests. The Chaco Phenomena was over.
http://www.thefurtrapper.com/mesa_verde.htm : After 1150 A.D., the Mesa Verde area of the San Juan Basin had the largest number of people in the Southwest. Increases in the number of people in cliff dwellings reduced the inhabitant’s ability to raise enough agriculture products to feed themselves. Around 1276, a long drought began that continued until the end of the century. Even without a drought, trying to raise enough food on the mesas and getting water out of the canyons played a big part in the abandonment of the Four Corners area

Latitude
November 4, 2011 6:00 pm

“What we can see from our record is that it was a period of basically 50 consecutive years of below-average growth,” said Routson. “And that’s within a much broader period that extends from around 124 A.D. to 210 A.D. – about a 100-year-long period of dry conditions.”
========================================================
Unfortunately, It looks like they used the official UofArizona 2000 year temp reconstruction, which show the Mann hockey stick. Looking at that, they didn’t see anything in the temp record, so looked for something else…..and called it a 50 year drought….within a 100 year period of slower growth….
http://www.atmo.arizona.edu/students/courselinks/spring06/atmo336/lectures/sec5/2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png
If they had looked at other 2000 year temp reconstructions, they would have seen that 50 year low spike in temps…..
http://notrickszone.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/spencer1.jpg
So was it drought? cold temps? combination of both?………….we’ll never really know.
Dendrochronology is a precise science……………….

November 4, 2011 6:08 pm

“And the climatic events behind these previous dry periods are really similar to what we’re experiencing today.”
Far from it. From glacial advance in Sierra Nevada, and the Alps and Norway from the early 2nd century, you can be sure this was a cold period: http://www.geo.arizona.edu/palynology/geos462/holobib.html
As for the 12th century, there were very cold periods in the 1120`s, 1140`s and 1170`s, as can be seen in these English records:
http://booty.org.uk/booty.weather/climate/1100_1199.htm
and accounts from Syria:
http://syrcom.cua.edu/Hugoye/Vol3No2/HV3N2Morony.html

Barbara Skolaut
November 4, 2011 6:10 pm

“It seems they also confirmed a drought in the medieval warm period in the 12th century.”
Would that be the Medieval Warm Period that supposedly never existed?
Did any heads explode while researching this? Inquiring minds, etc. . . .

DesertYote
November 4, 2011 6:11 pm

This is new??? I guess when the propagandists whant to respin old knowledge to swerver there anti-human ends, they have to claim that it is new knowledge.

rbateman
November 4, 2011 6:27 pm

Mike Davis says:
November 4, 2011 at 5:09 pm
They wasted more money because Cook and others already did that study, and found the Southwest Megadrought that extended clear into Mexico.
Not only that, but when you compare instrumental readings with tree rings from the same area, the temperature does NOT correlate well (it’s very poor), but does a much better job when compared to precipitation.
Still at it wasting taxpayer money, which NSF gets from the Fed. Govt.
When are these climate gurus going to get it that climate has 4 states, not 2?

Kevin MacDonald
November 4, 2011 6:29 pm

Anthony Watts says:
“one wonders how such a thing could happens when CO2 was at “safe” levels”

Only if “one” believes that CO­² is the driver for all climate change events, which nobody does. Pointless straw man comments like that do nothing to help the tone of the debate.

davidmhoffer
November 4, 2011 6:34 pm

Wait…
They found a drought in North America during the Medieval Warm Period using Bristle Cone Pines? Would that be the same MWP that Mann et al insist was localized to Europe?
Then, having offended the self appointed demi-g_ds of dendrochronology, who will no doubt demand the resignation of the journal the paper was published in for having failed to consult with “modellers” first, they then spew out this gem:
Dendrochronology is a precise science of using annual growth rings of trees to understand climate in the past.
OK, took me a bit to stop laughing. How they untangle temperature, sunlight, CO2 levels, rainfall, soil nutrients, passing fertilizer deposition bio-life forms (goats going poop) from each other from the tree ring data, I’m not certain. That it isn’t precise… of that I am certain.

1 2 3 8
Verified by MonsterInsights