Newsbytes from Dr. Benny Peiser of the Global Warming Policy Foundation
Britain should brace itself for another freezing winter with the return of La Niña, a climate phenomenon known to disrupt global weather, ministers have warned. The warning coincides with research from the Met Office suggesting Europe could be facing a return of the “little ice age” that gripped Britain 300 years ago, causing decades of bitter winters. The prediction, to be published in Nature, is based on observations showing a slight fall in the sun’s emissions of ultraviolet radiation, which over a long period may trigger mini ice ages in Europe. –Jonathan Leake, The Sunday Times, 9 October 2011
BRITAIN is set to suffer a mini ice age that could last for decades and bring with it a series of bitterly cold winters. And it could all begin within weeks as experts said last night that the mercury may soon plunge below the record -20C endured last year. Latest evidence shows La Nina, linked to extreme winter weather in America and with a knock-on effect on Britain, is in force and will gradually strengthen as the year ends. It coincides with research from the Met Office indicating the nation could be facing a repeat of the “little ice age” that gripped the country 300 years ago, causing decades of harsh winters. –Laura Caroe, Daily Express, 10 October 2011
Some scientists predict that the Sun is heading for a long slump in solar activity known as a Grand Solar Minimum. If this happens, it is possible that Britain could return to conditions similar to those 350 years ago when sunspots vanished during “the Little Ice Age”, when ice fairs were often held on the frozen Thames in London. –Paul Simons, The Times, 10 October 2011
Investment in more winter equipment may not be economical given rarity of British snow, says RAC Foundation chairman. The row over the need for a multimillion-pound investment in snowploughs, de-icing equipment and salt stocks deepened this morning with the publication of a government-backed report using Met Office predictions that successive hard winters are rare. Quarmby said the Met Office remained convinced that the severe cold snap is a one-off phenomenon. “We cannot say this is an annual event,” he said. –Dan Milmo, The Guardian, 23 December 2010
The Met Office is working with academics to try and predict the likelihood of severe winters over the next 20-30 years. The work aims to help transport authorities understand the risks of further severe winters after the coldest December since records began in 1910. But the work was criticised this week by Benny Peiser, director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation. “I would strongly advise not to rely on any 20-30 year winter forecasts,” he said. “The point is that nobody really understands the basic feedbacks and climate dynamics that drive annual winter variability, let alone that long in advance.” –Local Transport Today, 25 February 2011
In October 2009 the Met Office predicted a mild winter because of El Nino. Temperatures in December would be above average, they said. In reality December temperatures were a whopping 1.1 degrees below the recent average. In 2010, contributing to the Quarmby Report, the Met Office advised to assume that the chance of a severe winter in 2010–11 is no greater (or less) than the current general probability of 1 in 20. Boy, were they wrong! Mean temperatures over the UK were 5.0 °C below average during December and 0.3 °C below average in January. –-David Whitehouse, The Observatory, 10 October 2011
The fact is that nobody knows if the forthcoming winter will be severe or mild. The only wise advice that can be given is to plan as if 2011 is going to be like the previous three winters, and one doesn’t need multi-million pound computers to make it. –-David Whitehouse, The Observatory, 10 October 2011
Snow is starting to disappear from our lives. Sledges, snowmen, snowballs and the excitement of waking to find that the stuff has settled outside are all a rapidly diminishing part of Britain’s culture, as warmer winters – which scientists are attributing to global climate change – produce not only fewer white Christmases, but fewer white Januaries and Februaries. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”. “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said. –The Independent, 20 March 2000
Green thinking represents a challenge to the status quo? That’s a laughable idea. From schools and universities to every corner of the Western political sphere, the climate-change outlook is the status quo. In fact, it’s the new conservatism. –Brendan O’Neil, The Australian, 8 October 2011

Somewhat ( or even greatly )exaggerated
Here I compare 30 year periods of the England’s temperatures
1685 – 1715 Maunder Minimum
1945 – 1970 Solar (grand) maximum
1981 – 2011 Current period
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/30yCET.htm
Just get an extra woolly top.
Thank God for this warning of a little ice age. Coming from the British Met office, that same organisation which has not had one correct prediction for the past four years or so, I am pretty sure that this predicted little ice age will not materialise. Knowing how wrong the Met office has been, most probably it will be a mild winter.
I wonder if Piers Corbyn would have something to say about this. He mostly always gets it right
I’ve just ordered heating oil to top up the tank for winter; the log store is full; the freezers are full, the larder is full. Unfortunately I still rely on an external electricity supply, so I am still reliant on past government decisions, which mean windmills have replaced firm supply – I must get that generator installed..
This can’t be right, Mann proved (sic.) that the Little Ice Age did not exist, so how can we even theorise about a return to conditions such as existed at that time?!
It was covered on the radio this morning. The interviewee — I think from the UK Met Office — was at pains to point out that the total heat in the system remained the same but was simply distributed differently as a result of changes to the jet stream caused by lower UV. So northern Europe gets colder but overall AGW remains on track. You have to admire them!
Please oh please let this be the death blow to “global (whatever weather they want) panic” I mean I hate for Britain to suffer now that they can’t afford to heat their homes but maybe its what we need.
Today the UK Department of Health and the Met Office stood down their 2011 Heatwave Warning system – until next year. Cold kills more people than heat, but heatwaves fit in with the alarmist script.
Can we now look forward to the removal of all tax on fossil fuels in a drive to emit more CO2 and stave off the predicted cooling?? I won’t hold my breath. The crooks that rule us are only interested in solutions that increase their power and/or taxation.
Brian R says:
October 10, 2011 at 11:31 am
I can’t wait for the AGW group to claim that a “Little Ice-Age” is exactly what one should expect from a warming world.
__________________________________________
Oh, but they do make such claims, Bryan and with monotonous regularity.
You do remember claims that recent record snowfalls, etc. have been due to a warming world because “warm air holds more moisture” (regardless of accompanying record cold temps,) don’t you?
For nearly 4 years nowI have been attempting to draw those very features that are only now being widely acknowledged into an overall scenario that seems to accord with both observations and basic physics.
Details here:
http://www.irishweatheronline.com/news/environment/climate-news/wilde-weather/feature-how-the-sun-could-control-earths-temperature/290.html
as regards the top down solar effects,
here:
http://www.irishweatheronline.com/news/environment/climate-news/wilde-weather/setting-and-maintaining-of-earth%E2%80%99s-equilibrium-temperature/18931.html
as regards the bottom up oceanic effects and,
here:
http://www.irishweatheronline.com/news/environment/climate-news/wilde-weather/feature-the-unifying-theory-of-earth%E2%80%99s-climate/36375.html
as regards the interaction between the top down and bottom up processes.
I think there are substantial merits in my approach as a new starting point for the climate debate.
Well Anthony: Are you also kind enough to provide us the title of that Nature paper in which the article is published? So I can verify and read the source and not some media statements in which I am not interested in. The media has done more than enough damage on both sides of the climate debate.
“The trend to milder and wetter winters is expected to continue, with snow and frost becoming less of a feature in the future. The famously cold winter of 1962/63 is now expected to occur about once every 1,000 years or more”, according to the UK Met office (2009). http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2009/pr20090225.html So there! All prophecies of cold winters are refuted by science. Climate science no less.
By the way, did you try to follow that link? Well, you will find that this prediction of Peter Stott (Met. Office climate scientist) has now been deleted from the Met, Office website; rather like the lead character in George Orwell’s novel ‘1984’ (the Big Brother novel), whose job it is to respectively delete or alter embarrassing statements from historical records. But if you click on ‘Check for the page in the web archive’, you may still find it. If not, try the national archive at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2009/pr20090225.html
Now, after a succession of mild winters around the turn of the century, which led to the famous declaration that ‘Snowfalls are just now a thing of the past’, we have now had 3 very severe winters in a row, with 2010 being the coldest December since records began! No wonder they deleted it!
So, for you statisticians -what are the chances of that?
I am sure the term ‘climate disruption’ will become prevalent again!
But then again, the current ‘climate change’ term is a perfect catch all, isn’t it? I think we should all keep to the original officially touted title of ‘Global Warming’ – let’s at least keep reminding the bar stewards of CAGW that that’s what THEY started!
Let’s name the first snowfall each year David Viner day – he probably won’t mind if we leave off the Dr. part.
Why does anyone listen to these half wits?
It is a bit like the UK budget – leak something beforehand that is really bad so when the real news comes out people do not think it is that awful. Another cold winter but the world is really heating up – yeah right! What happened to the Hockey – get inverted? – did Mann have it upside down after all!
polistra says:
October 10, 2011 at 11:33 am
PMSL – AND I’d pay to watch! (though maybe not every orifice!).
On a more serious note, those of us in the UK unable to pay the exagerrated price of ‘carbon’ due to the scaremongering by the likes of Jones et al, will be the ones who actually suffer. Jones and the many other brown nosing AGW scammers (I refuse to call them scientists) have doubtless milked enough from the public funded ‘research’ to pay for their fuel bills!
“…Britain should brace itself for another freezing winter with the return of La Niña, a climate phenomenon known to disrupt global weather, ministers have warned….”
Umm. If British Ministers tell you the sun goes down at night you should start preparing for 24 hours of daytime. They lie even when there is no need to, just to keep in habit. They are regularly beaten by bankers, estate agent and lawyers in truth contests. They would give Australian politicians a run for their money…
Because as we all know, “La Nina” is Spanish for “Little Ice Age”. /sarc
I liked it better when they were predicting we’d all roast to death.
Just two winters to start talking about LIA. Trash the same level of CAGW.
I like how they say “300 years ago” when, if I recall correctly, the LIA ended about 100 years ago. I guess if they pointed out such inconvenient facts then it might weaken the global warming narrative and the validity of showing surface station records that are only 100 years old.
Noooo, it was about the sun you see … go back and read it again.
in the last 30 years la nina has tended to give us mild winters in the UK, however the sun was very active prior to that la nina gave cold winters.
Last December we had a very cold month but then we had a milder January and February.
Unfortunately the weather is chaotic so their predictions cannot be relied upon (remember the barbecue Summer!).
What is true is due to weaker UV from the Sun we are getting more waves on the jet stream which cause long term blocking patterns so we are now getting longer periods of higher or lower temperatures than have been present for over a century and if the Sun becomes less active maybe the jet stream will move to a more equatorial position. If this happens food production will fall this is not a good outcome, however we have no control over this 🙁
Not much here bar disgusting insults by the likes of ‘Polistra’ and ‘Iggy Slanter’, the usual snark by most and a good deal of final nail hammering.
Such has been the mill run of WUWT for years, I expect it to continue.
The truth is that these solar UV effects, if they turn out to be real, are regional and that cold in one place is more than cancelled out by warmth elsewhere. In the UK this year the Central England Temperature is running at around a top ten 1C above normal…Expect a year of record global warmth soon is my prediction. Yes, I know what that makes me ‘thanks’….
@jazznick
The BBC Radio 4 “Today” programme carried an interview with Prof Joanna Haigh this morning.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b015mzkp
1 hour 19 minutes into the broadcast.
Cold winters neatly explained away.
richard telford says:
October 10, 2011 at 11:41 am
“I don’t think David Whitehouse understands probabilities. If I predict that there is only a one in six chance of a six occurring when a fair die is rolled, am I incorrect when a six does occur? ”
How big, Richard, then, is the chance of two sixes in a row. How big is the chance of three sixes in a row. Express the resulting probability in percent. Compare with the IPCC’s definition of the phrase “highly unlikely”. How many percent is “Highly Unlikely”?
See you in the class tomorrow.