UPDATES: New NSIDC data and a press release from them added below.
While some folks (Joe Romm in particular) are touting the recent University of Bremen press release suggesting a new record low has been met, declaring record minimum Arctic extent was reached on Sept 8 at 4.24 million km2, (See http://iup.physik.uni-bremen.de:8084/amsr/minimum2011-en.pdf) five other sources of sea ice data, NSIDC and JAXA, DMI, Cryosphere Today, and NANSEN don’t agree with that new record claim (at least not yet). While still far from certain, as weather, wind, and ocean currents could still force a turn downwards, the NSIDC graph suggests we may have turned the corner this year.

[UPDATE: This extent graph above (dated 9/12) was updated by NSIDC since posting this story ~ 6AM this morning, and it shows further deviation from 2007, compare to the NSIDC graph of 9/11 below.]
Below, I’ve added a vertical line to show the turning point for the 1979-2000 average (in red) and how it compares to the current NSIDC data.

The JAXA graph, which uses a different satellite sensor (AMSRE vs SSMI) also suggests that we didn’t yet reach a new record low and that we may have turned the corner.
![AMSRE_Sea_Ice_Extent_L[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/amsre_sea_ice_extent_l1.png?resize=640%2C400&quality=75)
![icecover_current[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/icecover_current1.png?resize=600%2C400&quality=75)
![ssmi1_ice_ext[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/ssmi1_ice_ext1.png?resize=640%2C479&quality=75)
![seaice.anomaly.arctic[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/seaice-anomaly-arctic1.png?resize=640%2C520&quality=75)
For extent, only the University of Bremen (shown below) shows this year to be lower, and has no turn. It uses the same SSMI sensor as NANSEN and NSIDC, it uses the same AMSRE sensor as JAXA, which doesn’t show a record low, so the difference must be in processing of the data:
![ice_ext_n[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/ice_ext_n1.png?resize=640%2C457&quality=75)
The wording from their press release hardly seems scientific and more than a bit over the top:
Alerting message from the Arctic: The extent the the Arctic sea ice has reached on Sep. 8 with 4.240 million km2 a new historic minimum (Figure 1). Physicists of the University of Bremen now confirm the apprehension existing since July 2011 that the ice melt in the Arctic could further proceed and even exceed the previous historic minimum of 2007. It seems to be clear that this is a further consequence of the man-made global warming with global consequences. Directly, the livehood of small animals, algae, fishes and mammals like polar bears and seals is more and more reduced.
The answer to why such language might be used, perhaps prematurely in the face of other datasets which presently disagree, may be found in the proximity of the upcoming Climate Reality Project (aka the Gore-a-thon) on September 14-15. Al needs something to hold up as an example of gloom, since sea ice didn’t repeat the 2007 low in 2008, 2009, or 2010, and the Antarctic has not been cooperative with the melt meme at all, remaining boringly “normal” and even above normal last year.
We’ll know the answer when we see if this Bremen missive is included in Al’s upcoming presentation.
As for whether or not Arctic sea ice extent turned the corner this year, note below that in the prime ice areas, surface air temperature is well below freezing. So. it is up to the wind and ocean currents and other vagaries of weather to determine if we have in fact bottomed out, or if there’s still some loss to come.
If it has turned the corner, it will be about a full week earlier than usual. There could still be another downward blip, as happened in 2010 and in 2007, so I’m not ready to call a turn for certain yet, but it does look encouraging.
Stay updated with all of the latest plots and maps at the WUWT Sea Ice Reference page. Readers may also be interested in the WUWT forecast submission to ARCUS and the notes with it.
==================================
UPDATE2: NSIDC has posted an update in their Sea Ice News section, which I’m reposting below in entirety for WUWT readers:
Overview of conditions
On September 10, Arctic sea ice extent was 4.34 million square kilometers (1.68 million square miles). This was 110,000 square kilometers (42,500 square miles) above the 2007 value on the same date. The record minimum Arctic sea ice extent, recorded in 2007, was 4.17* million square kilometers (1.61 million square miles).
The rate of decline has flattened considerably the last few days: Arctic sea ice is likely near its minimum value for the year. However, weather patterns could still push the ice extent lower. NSIDC scientists will make an announcement when ice extent has stopped declining and has expanded for several days in a row, indicating that the Arctic sea ice has reached its lowest extent for the year and has begun freezing over. During the first week of October, after data are processed and analyzed for the month of September, NSIDC scientists will issue a more detailed analysis of this year’s melt season and the state of the sea ice.
NSIDC’s sea ice data come from the Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder (SSMIS) sensor on the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) F17 satellite. This data record, using the NASA Team algorithm developed by scientists at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, is the longest time series of sea ice extent data, extending back to 1979.
Other sea ice data are available from other data providers, using different satellite sensors and sea ice algorithms. For example, data from the University of Bremen indicate that sea ice extent from their algorithm fell below the 2007 minimum. They employ an algorithm that uses high resolution information from the JAXA AMSR-E sensor on the NASA Aqua satellite. This resolution allows small ice and open water features to be detected that are not observed by other products. This year the ice cover is more dispersed than 2007 with many of these small open water areas within the ice pack. While the University of Bremen and other data may show slightly different numbers, all of the data agree that Arctic sea ice is continuing its long-term decline.
For more information about the Arctic sea ice minimum, see the NSIDC Icelights article, Heading Towards the Summer Minimum Ice Extent.
*Near-real-time data initially recorded the 2007 record low as 4.13 million square kilometers 1.59 million square miles). The final data, reprocessed by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center using slightly different processing and quality control procedures, record the number as 4.17 million square kilometers (1.61 million square miles). NSIDC reports daily extent as a 5-day average. For more about the data, see the FAQ, Do your data undergo quality control?
![sfctmp_01.fnl[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/sfctmp_01-fnl1.gif?resize=640%2C494)
Richard says:
September 13, 2011 at 8:39 am
How do you manage to sleep at night? – with all that dread? I’d suggest saving some electricity by turning your computer off, etc… /sarc 🙂
As others have noted, a meagre 30 year set of records is hardly representative of the arctic climate and its variability – even less so, when we consider pre, post and interglacial conditions known to have existed previously.
I suppose, if you want to really really believe that AGW is the cause, thats a matter of personal opinion – but the only ‘dread’ I have is the one where all the warmists become like lemmings and throw themselves off cliffs as they cannot stand the guilt from their irresponsible earth damaging lives! (do I or should I really need to put /sarc here? :- )
Walt Meier says:
September 13, 2011 at 7:38 am
Two points:…
______________
Thank you, Sir.
Cryosphere Today do keep a record of daily sea ice area values, which can be found here (although not in very user-friendly form) :
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/timeseries.anom.1979-2008
Strictly in the interests of scientific accuracy, the all-time lowest value was set yesterday at 2, 904, 739 sq km, compared with the previous lowest value of 2, 917, 439 sq. km, set on September 7th. 2007.
The lowest ever anomaly figure, which is what Cryosphere Today chooses to display graphically, is – 2,634, 739 sq km, set on 19th October 2007.
Check. Previous all-time lowest value should read 2,919,439 sq km.
Richard says:
September 13, 2011 at 8:39 am
“Even if (a big if) this seasons extent minimum barely avoids breaking `07s minimum, it`s still been a disastrous melt season for the Arctic. And if there was any old ice left at the beginning of the melt, it`s surely gone by now,,,or very close to being gone. I dread what next summer will do to the ice cap.”
Check out the post on Real-Science regarding the “old ice”, growing not retreating buddy. : )
http://www.Real-Science.com/uncategorized/september-myi-forecast#more-42941
The original Alarmist idea was that open water would reduce albedo and create a positive feedback loop, due to sunshine warming the waters more. It has since been learned that most of the water’s warming was trasported north by currents. Also that by this time of year the albedo of open water is the same as ice, as the sun is so low it bounces off the surface. Once the sun goes down open water loses heat more readily to clear skies than ice-covered water.
In other words, the positive feedback loop isn’t happening. The only reason for alarm, when ice melts a lot up north, is due to the fact it gives Alarmists something to toot their horns about.
Far more interesting to me is the fact the cold air is not locked up in the arctic, which would increase ice cover, but instead comes charging much further south, which reduces the size of both ice cover and crops, due to late and early frosts.
Frost coming to Iowa this weekend. Focus there, and not on the north pole.
Remind me why we care about melting sea ice, other than its effect on sea levels? Fortunately sea level rise is decelerating…
I think reports of a new low in the short term sea ice record is actually bad news for AGW supporters because as the sea ice gradually returns like the longer sea ice records suggests it will, it will be seen by the scientific community complete unscientific alarmist tripe that it actually is, and therefore be discredited as being caused by Anthropogenic Climate change.
If, (big if), all arctic sea ice melted in summer, wouldn’t this result in more water vapour in the arctic regions resulting in more precipitation to build up the glaciers?
Jay Neumark says: “Again, a “thank you” to Walt Meier for interacting with the public. As society becomes more connected and open it is essential to have the experts explain and work with those that are interested in their work. Scientists who refuse to do so and work to keep their work secret only breed skepticism of their integrity and further conspiracy theories….”
Right, Jay!
September 12 plots from nsidc is showing continued uptick. I think they average their timeseries so we’ll probably see the curve up level off during the next couple of days. As mentioned, whether it turns down again is anyone’s guess, but it doesn’t have much time.
For some reason, when Joe Romm makes any sort of “in recorded history” claim, it reminds me of this clip from my favourite Irish sit-com.
fp you write “Remind me why we care about melting sea ice, other than its effect on sea levels? Fortunately sea level rise is decelerating…”
The ONLY reason that Arctic sea ice is important is because the warmaholics SAID it was important; no other reason whatsoever. What we are hoping is that, as Sparks points out, when (and not if) the Arctic sea ice returns to more normal levels, the warmaholics will, once again, have been proved to be wrong.
fp says:
September 13, 2011 at 9:36 am
Sea ice is floating. It has no effect on sea level when it melts. Try it at home with a glass, warm water, and some ice.
It will be interesting to see if there is more loss or not. Thank you for sharing such a informative article.
We may have turned the corner. Or maybe not. The temp chart is for 80 degrees latitude. Barrow, AK, at 71 degrees is going to have a high in the upper 40s F tomorrow. If further loss occurs, it will be at the extremities, not the center.
This disucssion seems to have fallen back into the old assumption that temperature is the only factor affecting arctic ice. We’ve seen before that Arctic winds can push ice past Greenland and into the North Atlantic. What is happening with winds this year?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/mar/22/wind-sea-ice-loss-arctic
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/22/the-guardian-sees-the-light-on-wind-driven-arctic-ice-loss/
There was a great animation showing winds apparently from the Bering Sea ripping apart the ice north of Alaska and driving it past Greenland. Are there similar movies showing ice behavior this year?
http://nsidc.org/news/press/2007_seaiceminimum/images/20070822_oldice.gif
Eye of the needle threaded nicely. Could still have a late dip but hasn’t bobbed above the line early on the approach so unlikely IMHO. http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/1614/20110912.png
I am confident that the ice will freeze again like it always has until it achieves a maximum around March. There may even be a new record maximum next year. Stay tuned.
I went out on the limb yesterday on this with Sept 9 as the min day.
http://www.runnersworld.com/community/forums/general-discussion/rants-raves
Wind? About a month ago I started eyeballing jet stream forecast at http://www.stormsurf.com/ with the other eye on the dips on Arctic ROOS and DMI COI and when ever there was a jet stream push into the arctic there was a quick dip in the ice. … no big pushes of jet stream into the arctic in the forecast!
“Physicists of the University of Bremen now confirm the apprehension”
They are NOT reporting on the weather in the arctic, they are reporting on their emotional apprehension. It’s an emotion report and NOT a scientific report of the objective facts.
“…I am confident that the ice will freeze again…” Meant to say “melted ice will freeze again…”
By the way…near record low temperatures forecast for Thursday night here in NH…
Sea Ice is boring stuff. The Sun is about to set up there, and winter will howl for the next 6 months.
All that appears to be happening is that Arctic Sea Ice levels are running in a different track than 1979-2000. They will probably continue in this 2001-2011 track for the next 20 years, and one year may go lower than 2007.
I imagine there are those who sit on the edge of thier Lazy Boy chairs while waiting for breakup to see if they have won the jackpot. There are also those who simply tear up their ticket upon losing, and walk away.
1. I would have waited until Oct. 1st to say anything about Arctic sea ice minimums;
2. Regardless of which ice extent one prefers, 2011 is near an “historic” minimum (for 32 years anyway);
3. The comments from University of Bremem are outrageously stupid. Whatever happened to the days when scientists reported on the science and politicians make outrageous and misleading claims from there?
4. Why can’t we say that 1979 was an “historic” maximum for sea ice and that we’re back to more “normal” levels – despite increasing CO2 levels?
5. I wish Al Gore luck. He’ll need it. And he’s not getting my $10.00. Driving a green agenda into a possible recession is a fool’s errand.
I wonder if the University of Bremen will end up revising or retracting their claim of a record low. If Gore cites this claim and it’s also retracted, his run of “bad luck” could have a real signal moment.