BBC – 30 May, 2011
Germany pledges to end all nuclear power by 2022
Germany’s ruling coalition says it has agreed a date of 2022 for the shutdown of all of its nuclear power plants.
Environment Minister Norbert Rottgen made the announcement after a meeting of the ruling coalition that lasted into the early hours of Monday.
Story here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13592208

Interestingly the weather is causing problems to France’s nuclear reactors
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8546573/French-drought-fears-cause-government-to-set-up-surveillance-cell.html
Lack of cooling water
Enginer says:
As a Registered Professional Chemical Engineer (with no proof) I believe that cold fusion has been adequately demonstrated and will be proven this fall.
The e-cat is really exiting stuff, but since it’s really too good to be true, I remain skeptical (while growingly optimistic) until this fall. If this invention holds its promise, it will change the world forever in ways we still can’t even imagine (just imagine e.g. no more need to be connected to the power grid – can you?).
Anthony would need a new twist to his blog, though, CAGW will be such a non-issue then 😉
Alex says at May 30, 2011 at 1:52 pm
“Climate forecast: Warming makes parts of the Arctic impassable”
Wasn’t it supposed to be the opposit? Any way Germans has some experience of it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_auxiliary_cruiser_Komet
Re: Joe Public says:
May 30, 2011 at 3:08 am
“You guys DO know that 3 of the reactors are in meldown right? TEPCO only like 2 weeks ago finally fessed up to there being a meltdown since 16 hours after the tsunami struck, meaning, meltdown has been in full effect since March 11.
Unbelievable.”
I second your expressions of bafflement. We have three nuclear units with breached pressure vessels and containment structures, at least one of those reactors with its entire fuel load sitting as a molten blob in the dry well underneath its pressure vessel, unit four reactor building leaning like the Tower Of Pizza with a triple load of fuel rods sitting in its spent fuel pool on the upper level and three reactors leaking so badly that “once through” cooling is necessary and the entire plant site is awash in a rising tide of highly reactive water that continues to exit those reactors. Yet, no matter how bad the news becomes (and it continues to get worse by the day) I continue to see entrenched and impassioned comments that stagger my sense of reality.
Early in this unfolding disaster, I tried to convey on this blog the seriousness of the situation at Fukushima with little effect. At that time, nuke proponents were denying “meltdown” and claiming the news media was “over-reacting”. Now that the crippled plant’s documented failures have progressed to just about the worst possible outcome for a boiling water reactor facility, I’m still reading “over-reaction”.
While I acknowledge that Germany’s abandoning nuclear without an economically viable plan for replacement power seems more politically reactionary than rational, I find many of the comments to this article to be, as you put it, unbelievable.
This irrational fear is in no way limited to power generation. There is a widespread ‘fear of flying’ which is, today, completely irrational. It is much, much safer to fly than to travel by train, boat, and especially by car (by far the most dangerous mode of transport). Yet how do most people travel? by road.
The same with power. Nukes are the safest by far, coal and hydro are very bad in comparison as per fatalities, and if you count health risks to coal miners (similar to smoking in past times), that takes top billing, I think.
I have yet to see any figures on wind and solar. I imagine they would be low, but then if there were enough to generate what we currently do with fossils and nukes, and then adding 33% to power all those ‘poley-bear friendly’ electric cars, we’d probaly be decapitating people every day with torn off turbine blades travelling at a hundred miles an hour.
They go through this after every other election and keep bumping the date back, though only by one year this time. Note that all the powerplants are supposed to shut down in the last 2 years, it never happens that way in the real world, replacement is gradual. But by that time the current politicians plan to be retired.
Germany exported electricity, so they could get away with shifting to ‘Green Power’ by exporting shortages to the rest of the EU, but this plan looks like they are through the fat and into the muscle and bone. 2011 would be interesting, but by then it will have been delayed several more times
There’s a graphic depiction in the Atlantic of what this means now. Expect more of the same.
Hoffnung und Wandel….
Some were due for replacement. Lets wait and see if they do something sensible and engineer their way out of an energy shortage with LiFTR technology. These are Germans we are talking about here. They know a thing or two about engineering.
Hoser says at 8:29.
Very nice post Hoser. I’m a little less tense now!
One word: “Nuts!”
Some unintended humor: Environmental tax threatens green energy research in UK
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/may/30/environmental-tax-threatens-green-energy-research
Claude Harvey says at 4:40pm
“unbelievable”
Claude you suffer from engineer worry. Why not worry about all the people who died in the tsunami or all the Americans who died in the recent torandoes. But no, lets worry about a contained breakdown of technology in a country that has no oil or coal and yet has achieved the scale of the worlds second largest economy.
Yes times are tough for the Japanese nuclear industry. So you do a Germany and run for the hills. Japan will rebuild. They will clean up the mess. They will climb back. Meanwhile Germany will have morphed into Don Quixote, not quite sure why they are tilting at windmills but certain that if it looks green then follow it .
Perhaps not as silly as might first seem mon ami. Exxon has been drilling test wells for shale gas since 2009. Maybe the government knows something that hasn’t been released yet? They have a lot of coal and a huge basin for shale gas. Hard to compete with natural gas on cost per kW/hr.
Jerome, actually wind and solar have rather high hazards. Remember that the most common form of industrial accident is falling. As of 2008, wind power in Germany had accounted for 21 fatalities, 20 in construction and maintenance and one bystander (a parachutist who landed on a turbine). Since then, I don’t have precise figures but I understand that the routine fatalities have averaged about two per year. There was one incident of a turbine falling on a highway and killing three motorists.
When you consider this per unit of energy produced, wind turns out to be nearly as dangerous as modern industrial coal mining. It works out to somewhere between 600-800 deaths per TWyear. Nuclear is about 15, hydro in the OECD is about 30-50, hydro in the 3rd world is about 900, coal is about 1,000, and liquefied petrochemicals are about 2,000. The definitive numbers on this, of which these are approximations, is produced by the Paul Scherrer Institut.
Claude, it still amounts to a ‘so what’. Doses to the public have been and will be negligible, no worker has received more than 200 mSv, which is the maximum permissible under emergency conditions, and there have been zero radiation related deaths or significant injuries. Your “highly radioactive” water will still not constitute a significant radiation dose to either the public or to the biosphere.
Excellent rebuttals, etc.
Do you happen to know what kind of conventional plant the Deutsche-gov is planning to use for the mandatory 100% (new) backup of wind and solar? That should be an interesting explification!
Well with any luck the new reactors that runs on fairy dust that is derived from unobtanium will come on line in 2020 so they will be okay.
Yes, perhaps that’s the Secret Sauce. It would even allow a certain amount of Wobbly Green power generation to take place, and dilute or offset its humongous cost per kwh.
Hmmm. So politicians speak and some people actually believe them. Silly them.
Is Guantanamo closed yet?
Merkel is just surviving short term while the Fukushima hysteria passes.
As this shutdown approaches, with brownouts, probably energy rationing, and of course ‘energy prices necessarily skyrocketing,’ reality will set in and plans will change.
A country with Germany’s economy needs abundant and reliable energy. Their only other option other than coal is natural gas, which will make them Russian puppets.
TRM says:
May 30, 2011 at 6:38 pm
“Perhaps not as silly as might first seem mon ami. Exxon has been drilling test wells for shale gas since 2009. Maybe the government knows something that hasn’t been released yet? They have a lot of coal and a huge basin for shale gas. Hard to compete with natural gas on cost per kW/hr.”
Agree. But with the loony Greens there it seems hard to imagine that that will ever happen in Germany. Greens have even put the brakes on it in the US. And the US doesn’t have a large proportion of the population playing weekend ‘Wild Indians’ and imagining that Karl May juvenile fiction is history. As we know from history, once a ‘movement’ gets going there things can get exceptionally… hmmm… rabid.
Any of you geniuses care to estimate what it might take to decontaminate 600 square kilometers of soil? I’ve seen $ millions spent decontaminating a single acre.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05-30/japan-risks-chernobyl-like-dead-zone-as-fukushima-soil-radiation-soars.html
The maximum cumulative dose allowed by the Japanese government for the cleanup personnel is 250 mSv, not the 200 dose cited by “Colin”. It was raised from Japan’s standard 100 mSv limitation in order to avoid having to use “jumpers” for even routine chores at the crippled plant. Two workers are now reported to have received in excess of 250 mSv (reputedly the equivalent of 400 medical X-rays to the gut – there’s a reason why your X-ray technician covers some of your vitals with a lead blanket and hides behind a lead wall before unleashing the shot).
The catch-22 is that no one really knows what dosages were inflicted in the early days of the accident because nearly all the monitoring and recording equipment was disabled and the crew ran out of dosimeters very early on.
Great! I know the country in which I will initiate my pyramid scheme for selling perpetual motion generators!
Repeatedly asserted; wholly unsubstantiated (cross ventilating I could see; one panel on one side does not cross ventilating make!).
You’re referring, of course, to the panel that has been showed to be popped off the east side of the upper level of Reactor bldg #2.
That particular installation saw an explosion in the ‘torus’ structure awhile back –
Were you aware of that facet?
.
Bldg #3 suffered a greater-intensity explosion; please point me to the pictures you used to make this ‘leaning’ determination of #4.
As of a few weeks ago, inspecting a number of pictures I saw no Tower of Pizza lean on #4 …
.
http://www.thestreet.mobi/story/11064385/1/8-nuclear-stocks-with-upside.html
http://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Are-Uranium-Prices-Ready-to-Rally.html
I’m with T.C. …buying uranium producers.
Jumping straight from the objective (citing Reactor #1’s “radiation reading”) into total subjection with but one, related factoid between.
If you could have bridged that gap with a least something resembling rationality, your final-line delivery might carry some legitimacy …
.