
Guest Post by Ryan Maue:
Starting Friday, April 15 in Washington DC, we will be able to witness an absolutely surreal public display of anti-capitalist, extreme far-left community organizing, all wrapped in the cloak of climate change / clean energy activism: The Power Shift Youth Climate Conference. Can we finally stipulate that there exists a well-organized nexus of scientists/politicians/organizations that wish to solve the “climate crisis”, and are using the issue as a political tool to further their leftist agenda? From the list of speakers, partners, and Workshop Titles, there is certainly no doubt about the motivations of this collection of greens. Arrogant, condescending scientists and politicians sneer at so-called anti-science, Big Oil Republicans and demand global warming adherence as a litmus test for elected office. Instead, advocate scientists and environmentalists should be continually questioned about their motivations prior to consideration of their extreme|draconian policy prescriptions. I’m getting really tired of their holier-than-thou-attitude.

After this, you will know the true meaning of the acronym of Win The Future.
Noel Sheppard at newsbusters.org provides a nice summary of the speaker line up, including EPA administrator Lisa Jackson, everyone’s (especially Glenn Beck’s) favorite communist and former Green Jobs Czar Van Jones, and, of course, Nobel Prize winner Al Gore! Keynote speaker list.
Perusing the program of this Youth Climate Conference should immediately disabuse you of all preconceived notions that climate change is not a political issue:
Plain and simple: Power Shift 2011 is a mission to recruit 10,000 youth leaders from every walk of life to be on the front lines in the fight for a clean energy future.
We are moving far beyond the pursuit of building a crowd for a weekend conference. Power Shift 2011 attendees – young faith leaders, entrepreneurs, student government leaders, social justice advocates and blue-collar workers – are signing up for the launch of critical, focused, and strategic campaign efforts in their communities.
“Our Power Shift 2011 “training boot camp” will yield 10,000 leaders, equipped with the game plans, tools, and strategies to WIN on the frontlines of every community across this country.”
Dr. James Hansen of NASA death trains/coal protesting infamy should like this workshop:

Is it too much to dream of an America where polluters are held accountable for their disasters? Is it too much to dream of an America where people aren’t burdened with the cost of pollution? Is it too much to dream of an America where citizens are in charge of our energy decisions, not big polluters? We don’t think so.
Then we will form two marches, one storming Capitol Hill to lobby and hold our elected leaders accountable, the other will march from one corporate polluter’s office to another and return to Lafeyette Park for a dance party.
Here are a list of other Workshop Titles: Link to many, many more
Sex and Sustainability
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Dirty Money, Chamberleaks, and how to win back Main Street
Ethical Solutions to Environmental Classism – Case Studies around the World
What would Jesus/Moses/The Buddha Drive? An Inter-Faith Discussion on Religious Environmental Activism
From the BP Oil Spill to the Japanese Nuclear Crisis: Why Capitalism is Killing the Planet:
Panelists
Finding the Billions for Clean Energy and Climate Justice Now!
Regulating Greenhouse Gases (GHGS) Under the Clean Air Act
Stop the Tar Sands Invasion
Climate Voices — The Human Rights of Climate Change
High School and Junior High Organizing
Exposing the Climate Denial Machine
What to do when the President’s just not that into you (program excerpt below)
Despite the hopes of millions that President Obama would champion clean energy and help solve the climate crisis, his response has fallen far short of what’s necessary. At best, his record and rhetoric have been mixed. At worst, he’s actively obstructed progress by boosting offshore drilling, recently announcing a huge expansion of coal mining on public lands, and financing environmentally destructive products overseas. President Obama has also treated the environmental movement, and especially the youth climate movement, with relative disdain: while there are many examples, the most visible was refusing to speak to the 2009 Powershift conference, and then attending a Washington Wizards basketball game just two blocks away. The panel will explore some key questions that have bedeviled our movement since Obama’s inauguration: What is President Obama’s climate/environment record? How should the climate movement deal with the White House? What can we learn from other movements’ response to the White House? Is there a possibility for a pro-environment, progressive challenger to Obama in the 2012 primaries? Is that a good idea? To answer these questions, and share inside knowledge, we’ll feature some of the brightest thinkers on climate politics and movements.
Next Steps for White Allies (program excerpt below)
“Now that you understand the importance of diversity and inclusion to the climate change movement, how do you practice being a strong white ally? For the most part, white folks have little opportunity to talk about race, racism or how to be an ally to people of color. Indeed, we are socialized to not notice or talk about such things. It can be lonely being a white ally.”

What is perhaps ironic here is many if not most of the kids and adults can attribute their quality of life and standard of living to capitalism. What is it they say about biting the hand that feeds you? Ignorance is not bliss.
@Smokey “The choice is green totalitarianism, or freedom. Take your pick.”
not an intelligent statement.
alan says:
April 13, 2011 at 8:05 pm
eadler says:
“There are however a group of people in US politics who are quite and totally mad – the tea party,”
From eadler’s comment we can see how today’s socialists would treat those of us who dare to oppose their utopia. This is how the Soviet socialist elite dealt with their critics, declared them mentally ill and forced them in asylums. Soviet psychiatry was no more a science than today’s climate establishment.
Hmm. You left out the part of my post where I quote Douglas, who called the Socialist protesters “mad quite mad”. Shouldn’t he be in line for some criticism from you also? Could it be that the principle of calling people mad to stigmatize them is not really a problem in your mind? It only seems to be wrong to you, if you agree with the people being called mad.
Sorry about an error of attribution in my last post. It was Rob who said “mad quite mad”, not Douglas.
[snip, eadler you know better than to claim somebody is “certifiably mad” without having anything to back it up other than your emotions. Show us the certificate, otherwise refrain. – Anthony]
Smokey says:
April 15, 2011 at 5:28 am
Reverting to the original U.S. Constitution would cure about 99.8% of everything that has gone wrong in this great country. That explains why Adler is attempting to demonize the Constitutional principles that have made our country such a tremendous success. Adler advocates the policies of socialistic failure, but it is an indisputable fact that the more socialist any country is, the worse off its citizens are. You can start with comparing North Korea vs South Korea.
The choice is green totalitarianism, or freedom. Take your pick.
Spare us your false dichotomy.
The US Constitution is a flexible document. In particular the Interstate Commerce Clause has been interpreted to allow much of what you decry – environmental regulation, cap and trade for sulfate pollution. There is also the general welfare clause. It seems that you and the other right wingers, including the Tea Party, believe falsely, either that these clauses are not really in the constitution, or don’t mean what they say.
There is a lot more background and current involvement of the Socialist International in this SPPI paper, The United (Socialist) Nations – Progress on Global Governance via Climate Change, Sustainable Development and Bio-Diversity.
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/un_progress_governance_via_climate_change.html
eadler says:
April 15, 2011 at 2:50 pm
[snip, eadler you know better than to claim somebody is “certifiably mad” without having anything to back it up other than your emotions. Show us the certificate, otherwise refrain. – Anthony]
[Snip. Arguing with Anthony’s very reasonable decision is a waste of everyone’s time. ~dbs, mod.]