From the House Appropriations Committee: Summary — Final Fiscal Year 2011 Continuing Resolution: PDF
Page 2: Commerce, Justice, Science: “This section of the CR also prohibits funding for: the establishment of a Climate Service at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.”
Here is the dream website of the NOAA Climate Service.
Now, NOAA can get back to essential services like severe weather warnings, hurricane hunting, and fisheries.
Hopefully people won’t die, as Bill Hopkins, the NWS Employees Organization vice president predicted last month (WUWT post link) if the House’s original budget cuts were implemented:
Bill Hopkins, vice president of the NWS Employees Organization, said the public may be in real danger a House bill is passed that would slash The National Weather Service’s budget by $126 million.”It could potentially lead to a loss of lives, not necessarily in San Antonio, but it could in other parts of the county,” Hopkins said.Local NWS offices would likely deal with rolling closures and furloughs, leaving the Corpus Christi NWS office to take over issuing warnings for the San Antonio area.”Not only will they be watching your area, but they will also be watching their area, and there will be no increase in personnel to do this,” Hopkins said.The national NWS office said President Obama has opposed to such harsh cuts. Hopkins said the cuts would significantly affect those along the Gulf Coast.”The National Hurricane Center would be reduced to 32 hours a week,” Hopkins said.There would also be far fewer hurricane hunter flights, which are often vital parts of hurricane forecasts.According to Hopkins, large amounts of weather data would be lost.”Can you imagine flying into an airport and they lose all their surface data? There’s really drastic impacts in this cut,” Hopkins said.
Maybe they can still fund the climate service by turning it into a non-profit organization and selling merchandise like PBS…you know, the “I Luv Climate Science” tote bag, an autographed copy of an “An Inconvenient Truth,” the Sheryl Crow individual sheet toilet paper dispenser…
And why is USHCN maintained by an agency called the Carbon Dioxide Information and Alarmism Center (CDIAC) 😉 rather than directly by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)?
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/epubs/ndp/ushcn/ushcn.html
Matthew says:
April 12, 2011 at 12:35 pm
“Explain why, exactly, one wants known fraudsters doing important research?”
Because it is highly important research, critical to the survival of mankind. This research must be done at all cost. With out it, we would miss important findings, such as the discovery of Piltdown Man.
Dear Bill Hopkins,
You have been wrong so many times on the gloom and doom predictions of global warming. How can we trust you now, on your gloom and doom prediction of budget cutting?
This is what happens when you lose your credibility, nobody can trust you or believe you anymore.
About time…
NOAA Climate Service funding axed in budget CR
Good news comes in many small ways, but this is a big $126 million one.
What are all those poor ex-highly paid modelers and climate manipulators going to do now, mybe they can go to work for Google?
Yahoo, some sanity arriving in politics at last. Shame its not in the UK. To try and force the pace in the UK there’s a suggested petition titled:
“Repeal the climate change act and stop green energy subsidies to save our economy and democracy”, located at http://38degrees.uservoice.com/forums/78585-campaign-suggestions/suggestions/1708173-repeal-the-climate-change-act-and-stop-green-energ?ref=title
It has the following preamble:
Climate change happens naturally, The empirical (real) evidence shows that global temperatures have flattened for the last ten years and there is no “carbon” signature in the temperature record.
Manmade global warming is the rallying cry of anti-democratic forces operating via the UN to establish world government for the enrichment of the political and moneyed classes to the detriment of ordinary people.
The taxes involved to pay subsidies for green energy will increase energy poverty and severely harm the economic prosperity of the nation and will benefit the likes of David Cameron’s father in law and Nick Clegg’s wife who have substantial financial interests in green energy
I urge all to vote for this petition so that it will get selected, if only for the fact that most petitions suggested on the 38 degrees website are very left leaning. Should be fun!
This is just the start.
While layoffs are sure to come, more budget cuts are going to be
necessary to get some of the key climate scientists to start whistle-blowing.
Finally.
Any government organization that has promoted AGW should have their budgets slashed until they no longer have the personnel who promoted AGW.
I am thinking NASA, EPA, Teachers union, NPR, NOAA, etc. etc.
There needs to be accountability in the government, and that looks like low hanging fruit to me.
Hopefully, this is just a start. There are a plethora of governmental agencies at the “climate change” trough.
Steve did a post called,
Icons Of The Gravy Train. While I don’t think it is all inclusive, it gives us an idea how exactly how much we’re spending to promote the alarmism. $126 million is just a start, almost merely symbolic.
Well very little actual cutting is going to happen. The vast majority of the “cuts” are simply deletions from previous CRs.
I think there may actually be $2B of real actual cuts. That’s just beer money. The plan is to spend 40 Trillions over the next decade; that’s Trillions with a T; not Billions with a B.
@Brian
I don’t care if they don’t roll over. I don’t care what they do. I just want their funding stopped. I’m tired of paying for it with money borrowed from China!
Genghis says:
April 12, 2011 at 2:51 pm
There needs to be accountability in the government, and that looks like low hanging fruit to me.
Any chance that the Khan side of the family could be available to carry out the "harvesting"?
Sorry AW and mods! Lively mouse.
From watching the budget fights, I came to a few very good conclusions:
Any part of the Government that has money to fund commercials to convince the Gov. into giving them more money has too much money.
Any part of the Government that has to resort to scare tactics just to get more money probably does not need it.
The NOAA is weather, not climate…were we not all told that these are two different things from the same people? Just do your jobs and don’t take on extra ones…just my two cents.
Hu McCulloch says:
April 12, 2011 at 1:58 pm
Let Congress slash away at NCDC until it becomes directly responsible/accoutable for USHCN again. CDIAC is most likely a bureaucratic growth layer, nonessential. Defund it.
Kevin G wrote: “Actually, I think your URL is wrong.
The real dream website of NOAA Climate Service is http://www.climate.gov.
You’ll all love the Global Climate Dashboard.”
I debunk their dashboard presentation here: http://oi49.tinypic.com/2mpg0tz.jpg
benfromMO says:
April 12, 2011 at 3:26 pm
From watching the budget fights, I came to a few very good conclusions:
Any part of the Government that has money to fund commercials to convince the Gov. into giving them more money has too much money.
Any part of the Government that has to resort to scare tactics just to get more money probably does not need it.
The NOAA is weather, not climate…were we not all told that these are two different things from the same people? Just do your jobs and don’t take on extra ones…just my two cents.
================================================
Worth repeating. In a time that was seemingly a lifetime ago, I used to work for the government. One of the ideas that was drilled into my mind, stated, and then reinforced, and then reinforced again, was ……. “First, do no harm.”
This is an idea that is impossible to entirely attain, but it is a worthwhile aspiration. These people, the individuals who work for us, the idea has never crossed their mind.
@george E. Smith
“Well now if NASA can get back to Space , it would be great too.”
OMG! But when did they start hiring qualified engineers again?
Fantastic News.
Now we need to completely defund GISS.
Weather forecasting — what an amazing idea! Would be nice if we had some of that here in Buffalo.
Rain called for, for Sunday & Monday, with thunderstorms as well on Monday. Results? Nada .. zilch .. zero … not even a rumble in the distance. More insulting yet was the timeliness of their high wind advisory on Monday — an hour or so after the wind tore through, knocking down some yard tools and the (full) trash can (which sets against the side of the house, normally protected from the full force of the wind).
So great, get the heck out of the climate business and get to work on those weather forecasting skills, at least to the point where you’re at least in the ballpark and can issue advisories before an event happens..
[Full disclosure – I admit that there were a few showers racing through the region on Monday, but if they say 100% chance of rain, I expect to see something. Tomorrow’s story is that there’s a 50% chance of rain, so if I run some quick errands, I’ll probably get soaked to the skin.]
Those cuts are a weak start. Funding should be more drammatically reduced. Not just the global warming alarmism… Cut the core NASA funding and be done.
What really is the point of NASA now? There are private companies sending stuff to space with plans to send humans as well… And they’re doing it for much lower costs than does NASA. So, if the job can be done by private corporations, why do we need the bloated, ineffective beast that NASA has become?
Bruce
“Hopkins said.There would also be far fewer hurricane hunter flights…”
And when states cut there budget the teachers will get the axe;
And when the Feds cut the budget they will close Yosemite, (even though it generates money)
It never ends, there is no excess in admistration in the schools, there is no extra money in yet another new math book, etc, etc. Bottom line, if management can not effectively liminate least necessary services, get new management.
Living on the “Space Coast” as I do, one meets people every day who have lost or are about to lose their jobs at the Kennedy Space Center. Why are these folks being let go while useless twits such as James Hansen still have jobs?
What would happen if NOAA was defunded in its entirety? Do they provide the radar and info to the news stations? If not, it seems like this function could be handled more cheaply (free to taxpayers) by local stations.