Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup

Quote of the Week:

Give me a faster computer and I will give you the wrong result sooner.” Malcolm Ross upon reading that the MET Office claimed that it failed to predict the cold December and January in Britain because its new computer was too slow.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Number of the Week: 65

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –


By Ken Haapala, Executive Vice President, Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP)

Early last Saturday morning, the US House of Representatives passed a budget resolution that threatens the environmental industry – the resolution eliminated the $13 Million proposed by the Obama administration to go to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Immediately, the environmental industry and other alarmists decried this action.

Roy Spencer, who was with the IPCC at the beginning, praised the action and states that the climate change deniers have no one to blame but themselves – that is, the deniers who think that climate change began with their birth and deny natural climate change. Spencer also states the IPCC is not a scientific organization and was formed to regulate carbon dioxide emissions. Claims of human-cause global warming are only a means to that goal. Consequently, the physical evidence that contradicts the central claim that carbon dioxide controls the climate is ignored.

This action, of course, is being opposed by the administration and by many in the US Senate. A brief recap: last year Congress failed to pass a budget. The Federal government has been operating under a series of continuing resolutions, the latest expires on March 4. The US House passed a budget to fund the Federal government to the end of the fiscal year, September 30, 2011, but removed funding of the IPCC and certain EPA and Department of Energy programs. Congress has been on vacation this week and the Senate has to pass budget which the President must sign by March 4 or the government may shut down – other options, such as short term extensions, are possible. It should be an interesting week in Washington.

The House bill cut the EPA budget by about 29% and included prohibitions to fund programs implementing carbon dioxide regulations and regulation of cement plants. For their efforts, the Republicans who dominate the House were accused of being anti-science and dirty energy promoters.

Please see Article # 1, articles under “Let the Games Begin,” and under “Below the Bottom Line.”


Last Friday, John Holdren, the President’s science advisor, testified before the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Holdren claimed that climate scientists embrace the orthodox view and likened the skeptics to those who denied the link between smoking and lung cancer. He has termed skeptics as deniers and heretics. In a TV interview in 2006, Holren claimed that global warming will cause a sea level rise of up to 4 meters (13 feet) by 2100.

Holdren’s testimony was apparently not very convincing to the House members who voted to eliminate US funding of the IPCC. Also the Chairman of the Committee, Ralph Hall, introduced an amendment on the House budget bill to remove funding of NOAA’s Climate Services which passed. Please see articles under “Defenders of the Orthodoxy” and “Extreme Weather.”


Several articles this week unintentionally exposed the extent to which the alternative energy industry, such as wind power, depends on political favoritism. First, developers receive loan guarantees, or similar inducements, which minimize their risks to bad outcomes including their own poor decisions. (The new House budget will eliminate the loan guarantee program.) Developers also receive construction subsidies. In the US, wind developers can receive a grant from the Treasury that covers 30% of the cost of the project rather than the production from the project. This grant is in lieu of a 10 year production tax credit based upon actual energy production. (A tax credit is equivalent to a tax payment, which is different from deduction from taxable income.)

In many states, and in countries such as the UK and Germany, developers have a guaranteed market for their electricity, protected from low-cost competition. These can be in several forms, including renewable energy standards, which require the consumers (such as electricity distributors) to buy a given percentage of electricity from alternative producers, or feed in tariffs, which set the price at which consumers must buy the electricity. The guaranteed market results in alternative energy producers receiving higher prices than their competitors and protects them market changes, such as a glut of electricity. Unlike their competitors, alternative producers are also protected from dire consequences, such as heavy fees and fines, if they unexpectedly fail to produce electricity.

With this array of political favors, no wonder wind power is a growth industry in many jurisdictions. Under such schemes, buggy manufacturing would be a growth industry in transportation.

Please see articles referenced “Subsidies and Mandates Forever.”


In an unfortunate development, the Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard has announced a plan to impose taxes on carbon, followed by a shift to an emissions trading scheme. This venture apparently contradicts campaign promises. But what are campaign promises when one can join the world in the rush to expensive, unreliable electricity?

In more positive news, the House of Representatives of New Hampshire voted to pull out of a cap and trade scheme encompassing 10 states of in the northeastern US. Apparently, citizens are angered over increasing electricity bills, especially when the moneys go to special interests. The scheme was designed by current EPA administrator Lisa Jackson.

Please see articles under “Cap-and-Trade and Carbon Taxes.”


In Article #2 Fred Singer praises the latest efforts to provide an independent review of surface-air temperatures – a task sorely needed.


An editorial in the Investor’s Business Daily praises the response of the citizens of New Zealand in their response to the devastating earthquake in Christchurch. Unfortunately, the editorial does no mention New Zealand’s disaster relief program which Bob Carter praised in an article in last week’s TWTW. Please see Article # 3.


In a speech to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Dale Klein, former chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, stated that the current US program of failing to use spent nuclear fuel is a waste of resources. Please see Article #4.


The Inspector General of the Commerce Department, of which the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is part, released a report of its investigation on possible improper actions by members of NOAA related to Climategate. Two versions of the results and the entire report are referenced under “Climategate Continued.”

Also, as stated above, the House budget calls for the elimination of NOAA’s Climate Services division. A small section of that division, called CIS, has produce solid reports discussing human influence on extreme weather events. Several such reports are referenced under “Extreme Weather.”


An interesting press release from the National Science Foundation reports that a widespread drought struck Africa and Southern Asia 16,000 to 17,000 years ago. The report attributes the drought to a change in the tropical rain belt that changed the pattern of monsoons. This change was attributed to the melting of the great ice sheets covering much of the Northern Hemisphere between 15,000 and 18,000 years ago.

However, the dates do not match well with the data of temperature change from the Greenland GISP2 Ice Cores discussed in the January 29 TWTW and sea level rise. As presented by Don Easterbrook, the GISP2 data reveal a warming of about 10 deg C (from minus 55 deg C) starting about 24,000 years ago, followed by an abrupt cooling, then a period of oscillating warming and cooling. This period was followed by a very abrupt warming about 15,000 years ago of about 12 deg C followed by an abrupt cooling than another abrupt warming about 14,000 years ago of about 4.5 deg C. As shown in Figure 17 of the 2008 NIPCC report, the most dramatic increases in sea levels began about 15,000 years ago and tapered off about 8,000 years ago. The temperature changes are unrelated to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, which are also measured in the GISP2 ice cores.

These data reveal that Greenland was up to 2.5 deg C warmer than today between 5000 and 8,000 years ago. A time in which, according to H.H. Lamb and others, the Sahara was quite wet. Lamb suggested that the drying of the Sahara may have been due to a shift in the intertropical convergence zone and its associated rain belt. Regardless of the exact cause, this is another dramatic example of significant climate change not associated with atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations or humans. Please see articles under “The Changing Climate.”


Number of the Week: 65. According to the European Nuclear Society, there are 65 nuclear reactors under construction world-wide. China has 27 under construction (the World Nuclear Association now reports more than 25), The Russian Federation 11, India 5, Republic of Korea 5, Bulgaria, Taiwan, Japan, Slovak Republic, Ukraine have 2 each, Argentina, Brazil, Finland, France, Iran, Pakistan, and US have 1 each. Please see article under “Energy Issues.” That Japan, the only country to experience the hostile use of nuclear weapons, and that the Ukraine, the country that experienced the greatest nuclear plant disaster, are building nuclear reactors reveals the extent to which nuclear fears control policies in other countries.

Readers in Australia, UK, US may wish to alert their legislators that their countries are losing the nuclear power race with Bulgaria and the Slovak Republic!

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –


For the numbered articles below please see:


1. On the House Vote to Defund the IPCC

By Roy Spencer, drroyspencer.com, Feb 19, 2011


2. What do Climate Data Really Show? The Berkeley Climate Data Project

By S. Fred Singer, American Thinker, Feb 19, 2011


[SEPP Comment: Unfortunately the article does not mention the world class disaster relief program discussed in an article by Bob Carter appearing in last week’s TWTW.]

3. Stronger Than Disaster

Editorial, IBD, Feb 22, 2011


4. Spent Nuclear Fuel Is Anything but Waste

By Staff Writers, Science Daily, Feb 21, 2011 H/t Toshio Fujita]


[“Failure to pursue a program for recycling spent nuclear fuel has put the U.S. far behind other countries and represents a missed opportunity to enhance the nation’s energy security and influence other countries, the former chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission said.”]

5. $100 Oil Is Devil’s Due For Drilling Bans

Editorial, IBD, Feb 23, 2011


– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –


Climategate Continued

IG Finds NOAA Climategate Emails ‘Warrant Further Investigation.’ Top Scientist Thwarts Transparency Law

Press Release, Senator Inhofe, [H/t Anthony Watts, WUWT]


[SEPP Comment: This is Version # 1]

Scientists Are Cleared of Misuse of Data

By Leslie Kaufman, NYT, Feb 24, 2011


[SEPP Comment: This is Version # 2]

United States Department of Commerce

The Inspector General

Report of Investigation of NOAA: Feb 18, 2011


[SEPP Comment: Actual report]

Defenders of the Orthodoxy

White House Science Advisor: Climate Change Skeptics are ‘Heretics’

By Cris Neefus, CNSNews, Feb 17, 2011 [H/t Bud Bromley]


War and Peace Over Holdren’s Climate Testimony

By Jeffrey Mervis, Science Insider, Feb 18, 2011 [H/t Toshio Fujita]


Models guiding climate policy are ‘dangerously optimistic’

Computer models predicting future climate change are underestimating emissions and overestimating technology, warns climate scientist Kevin Anderson

By Nadya Anscombe, Guardian, UK, Feb 24, 2011 [H/t Marc Morano, Climate Depot]

[SEPP Comment: Same headline but different argument: none of the models indicate any possibility of a future ice age.]

‘Black carbon’ key to tackling climate threat: UN report

By Staff Writers (AFP) Feb 23, 2011 [H/t Toshio Fujita]


Extreme Weather

Can Record Snowstorms & Global Warming Coexist?

By David Herring & Wayne Higgins & Mike Halpert, NOAA Climate Services, Mar 25, 2010 [H/t Anthony Watts, WUWT]


“Our modern understanding of the difference between weather, climate variability, and climate change reinforces the important points that not all parts of the globe will warm at the same rate, nor will warming proceed continuously.”

NOAA Climate Services

CSI: NOAA Climate Scene Investigators


Floods are manmade, you say now?

By JoNova, Australia, Feb 21, 2011


La Niña – she’s the wild child of weather and she’s causing havoc here and around the world.

Insight, SBS, Australia, Feb 22, 2011 [H/t Stewart Franks]



BP Oil Spill and Administration Control of Drilling

BP could have prevented blowout: investigator

By Staff Writers, AFP, Feb 20, 2011 [H/t Toshio Fujita]


Energy independence means more domestic production

By Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Washington Examiner, Feb 24, 2011


Pressures Mount to Resume Drilling

By Tennille Tracy and Ryan Tracy, NYT, Feb 25, 2011


Let the Games Begin

House Passes Luetkemeyer Amendment to Halt Taxpayer Financing of UN Climate Panel

Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer, Press Release, Feb 19, 2011


Put the REINS on EPA

The “Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny” Act could put the kibosh on the EPA’s greenhouse regulatory surge.

By Marlo Lewis, Pajamas Media, Feb 25, 2011


Congress to NASA: Study Space! (Not Climate. That’s Not Space)

The budget battle has come to NASA, where a massive amount of money is being spent on something that has nothing to do with NASA’s mission.

By Art Norn, Pajamas Media, Feb 18, 2011 [H/t Timothy Wise]


Environmental groups launch effort to pressure House GOP on spending votes

By Andrew Restuccia, The Hill, Feb 19, 2011


Congress should stop funding Big Green lawsuits against the government

By Ron Arnold, Washington Examiner, Feb 24, 2011


Cap-and-Trade and Carbon Taxes

PM to set price on carbon from July 1, 2012

By Anna Caldwell and Steven Scott, Courier-Mail, Feb 24, 2011 [H/t WUWT]


[SEPP Comment: Sad news from Australia]

Does the lie matter? Only if you think Democracy does

By Jo Anne Nova, JoNova, Feb 26, 2011


[SEPP Comment: In response to Australia’s proposed tax on carbon]

New Hampshire smacks down cap and trade

By Phil Kerpen, Daily Caller, Feb 23, 2011 [H/t Bud Bromley]


EPA and other Regulators on the March

E.P.A. Scales back Emission Rules

By John Broder, NYT, Feb 23, 2011 [H/t David Manuta]


The EPA’s Latest Unscientific Power Grab

By Jeff Stier, Townhall, Feb 23, 2011


Subsidies and Mandates Forever

Robbing California of energy

The House’s decision to rescind about $2 billion in Recovery Act funds and loan authority has jeopardized some $40 billion of private industry investment in clean energy.

By US Senator Dianne Feinstein, Los Angeles Times, Feb 23, 2011

[SEPP Comment: The Federal government stopping certain taxpayer funded, highly questionable alternative energy programs is robbing California?]

Non-recourse finance set to increase in offshore wind sector

By Alison Ebbage, Wind Energy Update, Feb 16, 2011


“Markets that have favourable regulatory regimes will benefit most. Currently Germany, the UK and Belgium appeal most to lenders, as all have regulation in place to support offshore windfarm development as well as subsidies such as feed-in tariffs (FiTs) or Renewable Obligation Certificates (ROCs), which offer a guaranteed output price and thus reduce risk further for lenders.”

Your Tax Dollars at Risk

By Donn, Power America, Feb 23, 2011


[SEPP Comment: Another example of subsidizing alternative energy. There is some discrepancy between the cited costs of construction for new power facilities compared to those newly announced by the US Energy Information Administration. Also, SEPP has been unable to find any wind farm that publicly reports its production with an annual capacity significantly above 30%.]

Wind power will cost RI taxpayers $1.5 M

By Tim White & Ted Nesi, WRPI com, Feb 18, 2011 [H/t Brad at Prescott]


“In 2009, New Englanders got 42 percent of their electricity by burning natural gas and another 30 from nuclear power, according to ISO New England, the organization that manages the region’s 8,000-mile power grid. The next-biggest sources were coal, 12 percent; hydropower, 6 percent; and other renewables, 6 percent.” [SEPP Comment: No wonder so many attorney generals from New England are willing to beef up their political portfolios by demonizing coal.]

Energy Issues

Nuclear Reactors under Construction Worldwide

European Nuclear Society, Jan 19, 2011


Westinghouse Launches Small Modular Reactor Design

By Staff Writers, Power News, Feb 23, 2011


Oil and Natural Gas – the Future or the Past?

Drilling for an Oil Crisis

By Michael Lynch, NYT, Feb 24, 2011


[SEPP Comment: Peak oil is overblown.]

East Africa basks in big gas strikes

By Staff Writers, UPI, Feb 17, 2011 [H/t Toshio Fujitat]


U.P.S. Finds a Substitute for Diesel: Natural Gas, at 260 Degrees Below Zero

By Matthew Wald, NYT, Feb 22, 2011


Alternative, Green Energy

Plant closure bursts Ga.’s biomass bubble

By Dan Chapman, Atlanta Journal Constitution, Feb 15, 2010 [H/t Jim Rust]


Panel: Green jobs company endorsed by Obama and Biden squandered $535 million in stimulus money

By John Rossomando, Daily Caller, Feb 22, 2011 [H/t Catharine French]


Obama’s jolt to economy: ‘Tripling’ your electric bill

Experts forecast costs will skyrocket under burden of power-line financing

By Gene Koprowski, WorldNetDaily, Jan 9, 2011 [H/t Catherine French]


Obama’s deprivation nation

Administration goes green while Europe retreats

Editorial, Washington Times, Feb, 22, 2011 [H/t Randy Randol]


California Dreaming

Solar Energy Faces Tests On Greenness

By Todd Woody, NYT, Feb 23, 2011


[SEPP Comment: The green industry is opposed to coal, natural gas, oil, hydro, wind power, transmission lines, and now solar. It is opposed to electricity.]

Oh Mann!

A Climate Skeptic With a Bully Pulpit in Virginia Finds an Ear in Congress

By John Collins Rudolf, NYT, Feb 22, 2011


Review of Recent Scientific Articles by NIPCC

For a full list of articles see


Arctic vs. Global Air Temperature Change

Reference: Chylek, P., Folland, C.K., Lesins, G., Dubey, M.K. and Wang, M. 2009. Arctic air temperature change amplification and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. Geophysical Research Letters 36: 10.1029/2009GL038777.


Millennial-Scale Cycling of Climate in China’s Salawusu River Valley

Reference: Lu, Y., Li, B., Wen, X., Qiu, S., Wang, F., Niu, D. and Li, Z. 2010. Millennial-centennial scales climate changes of Holocene indicated by magnetic susceptibility of high-resolution section in Salawusu River Valley, China. Chinese Geographical Science 20: 243-251.


Effects of Seawater acidification on Phytoplankton Growth Rates

Reference: Berge, T., Daugbjerg, N., Andersen, B.B. and Hansen, P.J. 2010. Effect of lowered pH on marine phytoplankton growth rates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 416: 10.3354/meps08780.


Soil Moisture Trends: IPCC Simulations vs. Real-Real-World Observations

Reference: Li, H., Robock, A. and Wild, M. 2007. Evaluation of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment soil moisture simulations for the second half of the twentieth century. Journal of Geophysical Research 112: 10.1029/2006JD007455.


The Changing Climate

Ancient Catastrophic Drought Leads to Question: How Severe Can Climate Change Become?

Extreme megadrought in Afro-Asian region likely had consequences for Paleolithic cultures

Press Release, National Science Foundation, Feb 24, 2011 [H/t WUWT]


[SEPP Comment: The alarmist tone of the press release takes away from the contents of the research.]

Pitt-Led Researchers Report 6,000-Year Climate Record Suggests Longer Droughts, Drier Wet Periods for Pacific Northwest

By Morgan Kelly, U. of Pittsburg News, Feb 21, 2011 [H/t Anthony Watts, WUWT]


[“The multi-university team used a sediment core from Washington state’s Castor Lake to unravel regional wet/dry cycles since 4,000 BCE and found longer, more extreme periods have occurred since 1200 AD, possibly associated with changing El Niño/La Niña patterns, according to a report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences”]

Other Scientific Issues

Worldwide Government Spending On Space To Flatten Over The Next Five Years

By Staff Writers, SPX, Feb 18, 2011 [H/t Toshio Fujita]


[SEPP Comment: Several experts in space travel have privately commented to SEPP that China is aggressively moving forward with space exploration with the intent of colonizing the moon. If true, and if successful, this would be a true sputnik moment.]

Scientists say ocean currents cause microbes to filter light

By Denise Brehm, MIT Press Release, Feb 23, 2011 [H/t Anthony Watts, WUWT]


Greater Germ Exposure Cuts Asthma Risk

By Shirley Want, WSJ, Feb 23, 2011


[SEPP Comment: May be behind a paywall.]

Mud made of fish poop

Fish excrement found in seafloor sediment forces scientists to rethink the way they reconstruct earth’s climate history

By Hannah Waters, F1000, Feb 22, 2011 [H/t Catherine French]


Other Issues that May Be Of Interest

A Mini-Compromise in California’s Water Wars

By Felicity Barringer, NYT, Feb 25, 2011


– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –


A Budget Blow to Our Climate

By Christina Simeane, Repower America, Feb 22, 2011


[SEPP Comment: Carbon dioxide is now called global warming pollution.]

The Dirty Energy Party

Editorial, NYT, Feb 21, 2011


[SEPP Comment: Those who dare question the orthodoxy are in favor of dirty energy – please do not tell plants carbon dioxide is dirty.]


PLEASE NOTE: The complete TWTW, including the full text of the articles, can be downloaded in an easily printable form at this web site: http://www.sepp.org/the-week-that-was.cfm…

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 27, 2011 11:16 am

Ha! I love the quote of the week! Reminds me of that old-time compute joke, “This new processor is so fast, it’ll execute an infinite loop in under 10 minutes!” 🙂

Jeff Wiita
February 27, 2011 11:17 am

I like Dr. Roy Spencer.
“the climate change deniers have no one to blame but themselves – that is, the deniers who think that climate change began with their birth and deny natural climate change.”
Maybe we can talk him into running for President.

CRS, Dr.P.H.
February 27, 2011 12:32 pm

Dr. Spencer’s article should be required reading:
” Making our most abundant and affordable sources of energy artificially more expensive with laws and regulations will end up killing millions of people. And that’s why I speak out. Poverty kills. Those who argue otherwise from their positions of fossil-fueled health and wealth are like spoiled children.”

Dan in California
February 27, 2011 1:22 pm

I think it’s time the environmental industry stops getting its free ride via their tax-exempt status. Special interest groups such as Greenpeace and WWF clearly are not interested in the good of mankind. Indeed, many of them see humans as a blight on the planet. Much of their money comes from donations only made because the donations are tax deductible. The organizations themselves have highly paid employees on a scale similar to other big businesses. They use legal subterfuge to hurt people, for example the disastrous central California economic depression that resulted from the court decision to stop pumping Sacramento River water for irrigation purposes. Of course the court was only shown the terrible inconvenience being done to the poor Smelt fish by the pumps, and alternative pump inlet screens were not allowed that would have benefited both humans and fish.
Lawyers contribute Pro Bono time to these organizations and deduct the donated time from their taxes. Declaring the special interest groups as not being eligible for tax exempt status would bring environmental discussions back to a level playing field. Since they are not charitable organizations, why should they and their donors not pay taxes? Companies that create wealth are taxed. Special interest groups that destroy productivity and wealth should pay taxes too.

February 27, 2011 1:36 pm

Off topic……….here’s a nice local (not for me) article on the side of the angels:
“Kobus recalled how some scientists said warm winters in recent years were caused by global warming.
“Now the same people are blaming global warming (for the more severe weather),” he said.
“I don’t buy it. (Global warming) is a hoax.””

February 27, 2011 1:38 pm

Dan in California says:
February 27, 2011 at 1:22 pm
Yes, and Greenpeace, WWF, and the Suzuki Foundation get huge donations from particular trusts that have a political agenda. If you look deep into the trusts, there are huge financial interests that can benefit from the activities of the trust beneficiaries. As always, follow the money. I think many of the green activists have no idea they are being manipulated, but some do, and that is why you have seen some top executives in these organizations resign over recent years. They know.

February 27, 2011 2:48 pm

“This period was followed by a very abrupt warming about 15,000 years ago of about 12 deg C followed by an abrupt cooling than another abrupt warming about 14,000 years ago of about 4.5 deg C. As shown in Figure 17 of the 2008 NIPCC report, the most dramatic increases in sea levels began about 15,000 years ago and tapered off about 8,000 years ago. ”
And yet yesterday we read in a National Geographic piece on nuclear winter that a net change of 2 deg C would doom mankind.

Adolf Balik
February 27, 2011 2:59 pm

The author noticed that Japan and Ukraine have got down to a new nuclear power-plant building in spite of their catastrophic experiences with nuclear energy. He also highlighted Bulgaria and Slovakia who beat developed countries in nuclear energy. But they also have their experiences with nuclear energy danger. Bulgaria was driven to stop its nuclear power-plant by pressure of EU as it was declared as the most dangerous nuclear plant of the world. Slovakia experienced crash of nuclear power-plant so about 30 years ago. An operator operational failure while fuel filling developed into very dangerous situation that included melting of active zone and radioactive leaking. It was kept under control without radioactive infestation of the facility surrounding but the production block was doomed.

February 27, 2011 4:23 pm

The link to the report below doesn’t seem to work.
United States Department of Commerce
The Inspector General
Report of Investigation of NOAA: Feb 18, 2011
[SEPP Comment: Actual report]

Mike Haseler
February 27, 2011 4:59 pm

Thinking about withholding the EPA funding – why did I suddenly have a vision of the borg collective from starwars – suddenly realising that they were under threat?

February 27, 2011 5:27 pm

This one has the courage, the gavel of the House Science Committee.
Congressman Ralph Hall
Ask for his Science Committee lady she’s nice and Ralph understands the issues.
He is from East of Dallas and has the east Texas area of the old oil fields in his district.
Texas understands energy, it is what we are.

February 27, 2011 6:38 pm

Great post and comment,
Those that work with models know that “Garbage in” equals “Garbage out”. Translated into this quote, I assume the point is Faster Garbage Out (FGO) is more reliable than Slower Garbage Out (SGO)… So lets invest more in FGO so that we get a faster backfire for our buck, without regard to data accuracy.
Another observation to this post regards the continued references to extreme climate events as a result of “climate disruption” or whatever tag they are giving to CAGW today. What a joke, has any of these alarmists lived through any portion of a 100,000 year period of glaciation? We’ve had twenty in the last 2.5 million years. That seems to be a bit before human settlements created CO2.
There is a related post about severe storms. Perhaps these folk should convene a séance with the last Viking settlers in Greenland about the affects of CAGW on their doomed colony.
It seems to keep coming back to measured data vs. models (guess games) of how assumptions should react in the future. At least Briffa and Mann looked at tree ring data, even though their own analyses showed that these were imperfect climate surrogates (hide the decline). I suppose they have learned their lesson since then and now wish to avoid using measured data in lieu of very “sophisticated ” models, unless they can adjust the data (Hansen).
I used to be proud to be a member of the AGU because of their great articles related to paleo information from a variety of cross correlating sources. Since they have now gotten in bed with this climate crowd, I’ve abandoned them, as an organization taken over by trough-fed, pseudo-scientists (“climate scientists”). This entire generation of a new “scientific” discipline has been coerced over the cliff by Senior Lemmings. You’d think they would be smart enough to wake up before taking the plunge. Someone crash the cymbals and ready the bucket of cold water.
Great quote!

Alan the Brit
February 28, 2011 1:50 am

Quote of the Week:
“Give me a faster computer and I will give you the wrong result sooner.” Malcolm Ross upon reading that the MET Office claimed that it failed to predict the cold December and January in Britain because its new computer was too slow.
No, I think it was the Wet Office who were too slow, their puter is just fine!

John Marshall
February 28, 2011 1:53 am

It does not matter how fast a computer is it is input that counts. The UK Met Office have yet to understand this simple fact.

Jeff K
February 28, 2011 7:41 am

“If they unexpectedly fail to produce electricity.” What a joke. My hamster could produce more reliable energy , but I’ll sign Squeekie up for one of those tariffs anyway.

R. de Haan
March 8, 2011 10:42 am

As for the bio fuel scam:
Bio Ethanol is a debacle.
Here is why:
You must really wonder how the idiots in government force us to use products like bio fuel blends mixing ethanol with gasoline.
Because Bio Ethanol blended with gasoline has a limited expiration date of three months and the alcohol mixes with water in your tank, sooner or later you will have to deal with damaged fuel pumps or engines that refuse to start. Especially if you drive a cabriolet with a summer license which is garaged for six months during the winter times.
But if you love to take risks and make your car unreliable because it makes your life more interesting and adventurous, be my guest.
Green solutions are plain sabotage.

%d bloggers like this: