Sorry for the title, I couldn’t resist. This article is calling to Mike Rowe, of “Dirty Jobs” fame, who makes “poo” his specialty. While this brown, er green, story isn’t our normal fare on WUWT, but I found it interesting. Public sanitation systems have done more to advance public health and longevity than any other modern convenience, and recently some eco zealot who got a guest post in the Guardian during COP16 called for “…radically abandoning the flush toilet – one of the world’s most destructive habits“. Well poo on him, maybe he needs to check out the Poo Gloo. – Anthony
Igloo-shaped ‘Poo-Gloos’ eat sewage
Growing towns can save mllions; study shows devices cut pollutants

SALT LAKE CITY, January 10, 2011 – Inexpensive igloo-shaped, pollution-eating devices nicknamed “Poo-Gloos” can clean up sewage just as effectively as multimillion-dollar treatment facilities for towns outgrowing their waste-treatment lagoons, according to a new study.
“The results of this study show that it is possible to save communities with existing lagoon systems hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars, by retrofitting their existing wastewater treatment facilities with Poo-Gloos,” says Fred Jaeger, chief executive officer of Wastewater Compliance Systems, Inc., which sells the Poo-Gloo under the name Bio-Dome.
Kraig Johnson, chief technology officer for Wastewater Compliance Systems, will present the study Jan. 13 in Miami during the Water Environment Federation’s Impaired Water Symposium. It also will be published in the symposium program.
Wastewater treatment in small, rural communities is an important and challenging engineering task. Proper treatment includes disinfection and the removal of unwanted pollutants. Most rural communities rely on wastewater lagoons as their primary method of treatment because they are simple and inexpensive to operate. Lagoons are large ponds in which sewage is held for a month to a year so that solids settle and sunlight, bacteria, wind and other natural processes clean the water, sometimes with the help of aeration.
But as communities grow and-or pollution discharge requirements become more stringent, typical wastewater lagoons no longer can provide adequate treatment. Until now, the only alternative for these communities was to replace lagoons with mechanical treatment plants, which are expensive to build and operate. Mechanical plants treat water in 30 days or less, using moving parts to mix and aerate the sewage, speeding the cleanup. They require electricity, manpower and sometimes chemicals.
Johnson and his research team developed the Poo-Gloo when he worked as a research assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Utah. The Poo-Gloo was designed to address the problem faced by communities outgrowing their sewage lagoons. The device provides a large surface area on which bacteria can grow, providing the microbes with air and a dark environment so they consume wastewater pollutants continuously with minimal competition from algae.
The new study outlines results of a pilot project conducted in 2009 at Salt Lake City’s Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility. Wastewater Compliance Systems obtained an exclusive license from the University of Utah to commercialize Poo-Gloos, so the devices now have been deployed in six states in either full-scale installations or pilot demonstrations. Every installation showed Poo-Gloos provide treatment that meets pollution-control requirements.
Lynn Forsberg, public works director for Elko County, Nev., recently started using Poo-Gloos in a county sewage treatment lagoon system in Jackpot, Nev., after a successful pilot test. “Our alternative was to go with a full-blown [mechanical] treatment plant that would cost about four times as much and be much more labor intensive,” he says.
How Poo-Gloos Work

Poo-Gloos use a thriving bacterial biofilm to consume pollutants. Two dozen or more igloo-shaped Poo-Gloos are installed on the bottom of the lagoon, fully submerged and arrayed in rows. Each Poo-Gloo consists of a set of four progressively smaller, plastic domes nested within each other like Russian nesting dolls and filled with plastic packing to provide a large surface area for bacterial growth.
Rings of bubble-release tubes sit at the base of every Poo-Gloo and bubble air up through the cavities between domes. The air exits a hole in the top of each dome. As air moves through the dome, it draws water from the bottom of the lagoon up through the dome and out the top.
Each Poo-Gloo occupies 28 square feet of space on the bottom of a lagoon while creating 2,800 square feet of surface area for bacterial growth. The combination of large surface area, aeration, constant mixing and a dark environment that limits algae make Poo-Gloos capable of consuming pollutants at rates comparable with mechanical plants.
The Study: How Much Poo Can a Poo-Gloo Remove?

Johnson spent time in the wastewater industry before obtaining his master’s and doctoral degrees in civil and environmental engineering. In 2002, he set about developing a product that could be used to retrofit wastewater lagoons easily and inexpensively. After seven years, with the help of fellow professors, graduate students and a lot of laboratory tests, Johnson was ready for his first field test.
Johnson built a pilot unit using a large construction dumpster welded shut so it was water-tight. The container held seven Poo-Gloos. Johnson enlisted the help of Salt Lake’s Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility to test it. The researchers ran multiple tests using untreated wastewater from the plant to determine the extent to which commonly regulated pollutants could be removed from the wastewater before discharge back to the treatment facility.
The study aimed to determine optimal operating conditions for Poo-Gloos and evaluate their performance at different water temperatures, levels of aeration, and sewage volumes and concentrations. The study found the devices consistently achieved high levels of treatment that were affected only slightly by changing water temperatures and aeration levels:
- Biological oxygen demand – a measure of organic waste in water – was reduced consistently by 85 percent using Poo-Gloos, and by as much as 92 percent.
- Total suspended solids fell consistently by 85 percent, and by as much as 95 percent.
- Ammonia levels dropped more than 98 percent with Poo-Gloo treatment in warmer water and, more important, by as much as 93 percent when temperatures dropped below 50 degrees Fahrenheit – conditions that normally slow bacterial breakdown of sewage.
- Total nitrogen levels fell 68 percent in warmer water and 55 percent in cooler water.
“The removal rates we saw during the pilot test are comparable to removal rates from a rotating biological contactor, which is a commonly used device in mechanical treatment facilities,” Johnson says. “We couldn’t be happier with the performance of the Poo-Gloos.”
Johnson conducted the study with Hua Xu, a postdoctoral fellow in civil and environmental engineering at the University of Utah, and Youngik Choi, a professor of environmental engineering at Dong-A University in South Korea.
There may be uses for the Poo-Gloos beyond municipal wastewater treatment.
“The bugs will adapt to consume whatever is available,” says Johnson, “In addition to the pollutants discussed in our paper, we’ve also seen great results in the consumption of other significant pollutants that I can’t discuss now because we’re in the process of filing patents. Poo-Gloos – or Bio-Domes as we call them – have a lot of potential, and we’ve only just scratched the surface.”
Johnson and his team originally nicknamed the devices Poo-Gloos because they are shaped like igloos. But as possible uses began to expand to industries beyond municipal sewage treatment, Wastewater Compliance Systems decided to sell them as Bio-Domes.
From Nevada to Alabama and Wisconsin, Poo-Gloos to the Rescue
“Every day I speak with community officials who need to upgrade their treatment facilities,” says Taylor Reynolds, director of sales for Wastewater Compliance Systems. “They come to us because they receive an engineering report recommending a $4 million to $10 million mechanical plant project that is impossible for them to pay for with their existing tax base. Not only can our Poo-Gloos or Bio-Domes help communities comply with pollution limits, but most of the projects I quote cost between $150,000 and $500,000, and the operating expenses are a fraction those at a mechanical plant.”
Each Poo-Gloo requires little maintenance and the same amount of electricity as a 75-watt bulb, putting operating costs for Poo-Gloo systems at hundreds of dollars per month rather than thousands, which is typical of mechanical treatment plants. And some communities may operate Poo-Gloos “off-the-grid” by powering them with solar or wind energy systems.
The results of the new study prompted a number of communities to abandon more expensive alternatives in favor of installing Poo-Gloos. These early adopters can be found in the Nevada town of Jackpot in Elko County, Glacier National Park in Montana, and Plain City and Wellsville in Utah. Wastewater Compliance Systems also has deployed mobile pilot Poo-Gloos in Louisiana, Alabama and Wisconsin so potential customers, engineering firms and regulators can see first-hand how well they work before they commit tax dollars to the new technology.
“We know that small communities have limited budgets,” Reynolds says. “That’s why we developed our mobile pilot units. Even when our technology has the potential to save hundreds of thousands of dollars on an upgrade project, we like to provide our customers with peace of mind in knowing that our products will solve their problems for years to come. ”
For more information on the Poo-Gloos and Wastewater Compliance Systems, please visit: www.wastewater-compliance-systems.com
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Pat Frank says:
January 9, 2011 at 12:45 pm
“Haven’t read all the comments yet, and so this may have already been offered, but on reading the poo-gloo story, one is forced to ask: ‘How much poo do a Poo-Gloo-do, if a Poo-Gloo do do poo?” :-)”
Well I’ve read all the comments and several commenters above have answered your question: at first, a lot. Then diddly-poo after a while.
A good idea to reduce the nitrate load on sewage plants is to piss on the grass, or better still on the roots of your fruit trees. Most men tend to have no problem with that. However women think it is icky.
Bruce of Newcastle says: “Those things are going to last about 6 months before they clog up with goop. Why is it that scientists with no engineering experience come up with these ideas which work for a short time then fail?”
They’ve been in service for a lot longer than 6 months, having been under development for the better part of 10 years and fully field tested. As the post clearly states: “Johnson and his research team developed the Poo-Gloo when he worked as a research assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Utah.”
Yabut… can it eat CO2?
Regarding the wastage of water by Human Beans, probably 90%+ of city users just use it temporarily, i.e. showers, baths, toilets, cooking etc. It just gets detoured through houses before going back to nature. Watering outside does remove some water, but due to asphalt roads and storm sewers more water gets to the rivers than if there were no roads.
Who says people don’t conserve water? The cost of water should never rise, just the cost of treating it — so anyone saying we need to raise the price of water to conserve it is full of BS. The only reason to raise the price of water is to purify it for our initial use, and cleanup it up for its return to the rivers.
Agree entirely, my Grandfather came out from Scotland at the end of the 19th Century and helped, as a Master Plumber, set up proper sanitation in Sydney that assisted in controlling Plague outbreaks and raising public awareness. My father followed the tradition.
In Canberra, Australia’s largest inland city with over 300k people we have a US designed sewerage system (coyly called the Lower Molonglo Water Quality Control Centre) treating water to Tertiary standard and water released into the Murrumbidgee river, is cleaner, I believe than the water upstream. Solids become fertiliser.
As good as this idea seems to be,I find it odd that existing US communities rely on passive ponds to treat waste. and that the treatment mechanism is left to these communities to design and finance, with different treatment standards a result.
How we treat our waste is the mark of an advanced civilisation.
Odd….. A couple of weeks ago I was looking at similar systems because my daughter’s place needs its waste water management system upgrading. I came across this:
http://www.wte-ltd.co.uk/biorock_wastewater_plant.html
and
http://www.wte-ltd.co.uk/sewage_treatment_options.html
In the UK, open lagons are seriously frowned upon and do not get planning permission.
Also there are very tight regulations about what can be done with the resultant ‘clean’ water. However, the Water Authorities seem to like this system and are more tolerant of the outflow going into watercourses than into soakaways.
http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/118753.aspx
Certainly worth investigating deeper.
john r
@ur momisugly john ratcliffe says:
January 9, 2011 at 3:53 pm
Odd….. A couple of weeks ago I was looking at similar systems because my daughter’s place needs its waste water management system upgrading.
REPLY: Hello, John! These Scots make nice kit, give them a shout:
http://www.balmoral-group.com/tnk/wastewater-microsite/1-wastewater-index.aspx
Great idea. I wonder if there is a version that could work for private septic systems, for homesites where the lot won’t perc. If so that could be a big seller. I’d also like to suggest a brand name, how about calling them Ickloos?
Hi all,
I’ve really enjoyed reading your posts regarding our press release. I’d like to address a few of the questions or doubts that are floating around out there.
Re: Cold Weather
WTF is absolutely right that traditionally biological systems “poop” out below 40 degrees F. We have data showing significant treatment down to 33 degrees F. In fact we’re running a pilot study in Wisconsin right now to gather as much cold weather data as possible. I’d be happy to share that with anyone that wants to see it. Also, the installation in Jackpot NV began operating in Nov 2010 and even in the face of an average water temperature of 35 degrees F throughout December as it was developing the bio-film managed to reduce the BOD 87%, TSS 77% and Ammonia 80%.
Re: Aeration
WTF is again spot on. It’s important to maintain the air but not as difficult as you might believe. Our systems utilize centrifugal blowers that sit on the side of the lagoon to provide the air, and as long as the blowers are serviced according to the manufacturers recommendations we’ve never had an issue.
Re: Plugging
That’s generally the first question out of engineers mouth’s when we introduce this to them. The poo-gloos with packing are intended only for secondary or tertiary treatment where suspended solids don’t pose a threat of clogging. We have a different design for primary ponds where there are larger “solids.” As far as the biological growth is concerned, the aeration actually provides a micro-scrubbing affect that causes old growth to slough off and settle out the bottom. We’ve performed a number of Autopsies on the poo-gloos after a year or so of operation just to see what they look like inside so that we know, and clogging is a non-issue.
I hope that answers some of your questions and I’m happy to respond to any others you might have. Feel free to visit our site and submit requests for more information.
Ian H, Jan 9 @2:36
Instead of burning your lawn, try reaching :), into the compost bin, the biota will love the neutral liquid containing phosphorus, potassium and urea. But don’t over do it ( the frequency not the reach) and having a high fence helps.
What?! Someone following up on a press release? Answering questions? Using humour? Treating a press release as some kind of — I don’t know — communication?!
I’m sorry, Taylor, but you’re completely screwing with my sense of reality here.
I am really glad that Taylor addressed the plugging issue. It was really nagging me as to why these the biofilms wouldn’t overgrow the device. There might also be some other limits on their thickness due to the need to exchange oxygen and nutrients between the top and bottom layers of the film. If a region started to grow over the supplies of O2 and nutrients would drop and the film would die back. In pipes, this would only happen as the pipe blockage became extreme but in this dome shape there is a lot of volume where the flow can go through so as one area is growing, another is dyeing back.
I wonder, could the dead film flakes be collected for biomass use (either dry then burn or ferment) or would that take more energy to accomplish than would be worth it. If one was processing the solids for biomass (for energy or producing chemicals for industry that would normally require petroleum) you should be able to suck the flakes out and mix them with your solids.
Sorry for the lack of proofreading on that last comment of mine.
It’s nothing new. Domestic fish pond filters have been using a similar, simple clean-up technology for years.
These things will never get off the ground, now that the article revealed that each of these evil domes will suck up as much electricity as a 75 WATT BULB-the planet can not take it any more. These engineers the world over need to just stop thinking things up and go to their outhouses for a spell.
As the civil engineers say, “It may be sh*t to you, but it’s bread-and-butter to me”.
Frank:
Sorry to cause so much mental anxiety.
SnakeOil Barron:
Great Thought! We’re actually doing something similar to that at our installation in Wellsville UT. They have very strict Phosphorous removal requirements, and we’re using a “luxury uptake – kill off” cycle to concentrate the phosphorous in a holding lagoon for land application. They’re spraying the concentrated effluent on a alfalfa field. Honestly, it’s quite a bit of work and isn’t going to be a great fit for every potential customer. Usually we just allow the dead growth to settle to the bottom where it is digested anaerobically.
UK Skeptic
You are absolutely right, we’re not claiming any revolutionary new science. Attached Growth, or fixed film science has been understood for a long time. Our innovation comes in having created a device that can be retrofitted into an existing lagoon to take advantage of the existing infrastructure, as well as achieving performance in cold waters. Our focus as a company is to save communities from having to upgrade to a mechanical plant before their tax base is able to support it, while keeping them in compliance with discharge regulations.
How much poo could a Poo-Gloo chew,
if a Poo-Gloo could chew poo?
Say it 5 times as fast as you can.
Taylor says (January 10, 2011 at 7:12 am): we’re not claiming any revolutionary new science. Attached Growth, or fixed film science has been understood for a long time. Our innovation comes in having created a device that can be retrofitted into an existing lagoon to take advantage of the existing infrastructure, as well as achieving performance in cold waters.
Yes, nothing wrong with being innovative – it accounts for most of our technological growth. Invention is actually a very small part (necessary, but small). Anyway, this is a great idea adapted to sewage treatment that is effective and reduces cost – all good things.
Someone had Chinese food on their mind! LOL
Novel idea!