A regional approach to the medieval warm period and the little ice age

Nicola Scafetta sends this along, I found this figure quite interesting, but there are many more in the full PDF available below.

 

A regional approach to the medieval warm period and the little ice age

Fredrik Charpentier Ljungqvist

Stockholm University

Sweden

1. Introduction

In order to gain knowledge of the temperature variability prior to the establishment of a widespread network of instrumental measurements c. AD 1850, we have to draw information from proxy data sensitive to temperature variations. Such data can be extracted from various natural recorders of climate variability, such as corals, fossil pollen, ice-cores, lake and marine sediments, speleothems, and tree-ring width and density, as well as from historical records (for a review, see IPCC 2007; Jones et al. 2009; NRC 2006). Considerable effort has been made during the last decade to reconstruct global or northern hemispheric temperatures for the past 1000 to 2000 years in order to place the observed 20th century warming in a long-term perspective (e.g., Briffa, 2000; Cook et al., 2004; Crowley and Lowery, 2000; D’Arrigo, 2006; Esper et al., 2002; Hegerl et al., 2007; Jones et al., 1998; Jones and Mann, 2004; Juckes et al., 2007; Ljungqvist, 2010; Loehle, 2007; Mann et al., 1999; Mann et al., 2008; Mann et al., 2009; Mann and Jones, 2003; Moberg et al., 2005; Osborn and Briffa, 2006).

Less effort has been put into investigating the key question of to what extent earlier warm periods have been as homogeneous in timing and amplitude in different geographical regions as the present warming.

It has been suggested that late-Holocene long-term temperature variations, such as the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) and the Little Ice Age (LIA), have been restricted to the circum-North Atlantic region (including Europe) and have not occurred synchronic in time with warm and cold periods respectively in other regions (Hughes and Diaz, 1994; Mann et al., 1999; Mann and Jones, 2003). This view has, however, been increasingly challenged through the ever growing amount of evidence of a global (or at least northern hemispheric) extent of the MWP and the LIA that have become available (see, for example, Esper and Frank, 2009; Ljungqvist, 2009, 2010; Moberg et al., 2005; Wanner et al., 2008).

A main obstacle in large-scale temperature reconstructions continues to be the limited and unevenly distributed number of quantitative palaeotemperature records extending back a millennium or more. The limited number of records have rendered it impossible to be very

selective in the choice of data. Palaeotemperature records used in a large-scale temperature reconstruction should preferably be accurately dated, have a high sample resolution and have a high correlation with the local instrumental temperature record in the calibration period (see the discussion in Jones et al., 2009).

The number of long quantitative palaeotemperature records from across the globe, of which a majority are well suited for being used in large-scale temperature reconstructions, have been rapidly increasing in recent years (Ljungqvist, 2009). Thus, it has now become possible to make regional temperature reconstructions for many regions that can help us to assess the spatio-temporal pattern and the MWP and LIA. Only by a regional approach can we truly gain an understanding of the temperature variability in the past 1–2 millennia and assess the possible occurrence of globally coherent warm and cold periods. Presently, only four regional multi-proxy temperature reconstructions exist: two for eastern Asia (Yang et al., 2002; Ge et al., 2010), one for the Arctic (Kaufman et al., 2009), and one for South America (Neukom et al., 2010). Six new quantitative regional multi-proxy temperature reconstructions will here be presented in order to improve our understanding of the regional patterns of past temperature variability.

4. Conclusion

The presently available palaeotemperature proxy data records do not support the

assumption that late 20th century temperatures exceeded those of the MWP in most regions, although it is clear that the temperatures of the last few decades exceed those of any multidecadal period in the last 700–800 years. Previous conclusions (e.g., IPCC, 2007) in the opposite direction have either been based on too few proxy records or been based on instrumental temperatures spliced to the proxy reconstructions. It is also clear that temperature changes, on centennial time-scales, occurred rather coherently in all the investigated regions – Scandinavia, Siberia, Greenland, Central Europe, China, and North

America – with data coverage to enable regional reconstructions. Large-scale patterns as the MWP, the LIA and the 20th century warming occur quite coherently in all the regional reconstructions presented here but both their relative and absolute amplitude are not always the same. Exceptional warming in the 10th century is seen in all six regional reconstructions.

Assumptions that, in particular, the MWP was restricted to the North Atlantic region can be rejected. Generally, temperature changes during the past 12 centuries in the high latitudes are larger than those in the lower latitudes and changes in annual temperatures also seem to be larger than those of warm season temperatures. In order to truly assess the possible global or hemispheric significance of the observed pattern, we need much more data. The

unevenly distributed palaeotemperature data coverage still seriously restricts our possibility to set the observed 20th century warming in a global long-term perspective and investigate the relative importance of natural and anthropogenic forcings behind the modern warming.

 

Full report here (PDF)

a_regional_approach_to_the_medieval_warm_period_and_the_little_ice_age

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

94 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Editor
November 24, 2010 11:58 pm

Alan Simpson not from Friends of the Earth says:
“November 24, 2010 at 3:58 pm
So you have; tonyb, ( payed alarmist ) and “eadler” anonymous troll. This is on the eve of the warmists’ biggest (I”ll try my luck ) wankfests? they can only marshal one poster and his glove puppet? A bit like the EURO they are boned.”
Ithink your comprehension needs a little refining. The idea that I am a paid alarmist will be hilarious to those that follow my posts here or read my articles on historic examples of climate change.
You might start on your education by reading something of mine such as this seasonal offering of mine;
http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/bah-humbug/
Numerous other articles and records of temperatures from 1660 can be found on my web site here.
http://climatereason.com/LittleIceAgeThermometers/
You might like to then apologise publicly for your stupid, ill considered, and offensive comments.
Tonyb
[Note: tonyb is a regular and well respected contributor to this site. ~dbs, mod.]

EFS_Junior
November 25, 2010 12:05 am

I believe that I’ve found an error in Figure 2 based on the data in Tables 1 and 2.
Figure 2 has the “correct” locations for Greenland numbered 10-15 in Table 1.
Based on these six station bounding (lat/lon) coordinates I obtained the following;
81.21N,-69.30W (NE corner)
60.40N,-29.60W (SW corner)
Figure 2 shows E, F, and G as being within these bounding coordinates. While Table 2 shows that the letters for Greenland are actually G, H, and I.
Could someone else, or the author of this paper, check/validate my coordinates/Figure 2/Table 1/Table 2?
If I’m right, and this paper has already been published (physical and/or electronic formats) as is, why didn’t the peer review process/editors catch such a glaringly obvious bookkeeping/tabulation error?
If I’m wrong, oh well, we all make mistakes.

November 25, 2010 12:06 am

Leif Svalgaard says: “Nice hockey stick. The blade is a bit small, though.
The hockey stick was their global warming phallus …
Strange what a dose of cold reality does … more like turkey giblets than the tower of Pisa!

MikeA
November 25, 2010 12:31 am

More hockey sticks for the team

EFS_Junior
November 25, 2010 12:31 am

Following the 1st link from this post (thanks to Ed Waage);
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/11/24/a-regional-approach-to-the-medieval-warm-period-and-the-little-ice-age/#comment-536643
or directly;
http://blogs.su.se/fchar/
This paper is actually the 1st chapter in the following edited edition of this book;
http://www.intechopen.com/books/show/title/climate-change-and-variability
The book is free, just download 379.zip from the above link.
So a couple questions come to mind; 1) Why is this book for free and bot for sale (behind a pay wall), and 2) this is not published in a well respected peer reviewed climate science journal, why is that, and will the author publish this in something mildly resembling a peer reviewed publication of any sort?
Note, his previous paper (2009 paleo-reconstruction) was published in some rather obscure (IMHO) Scandinavian geography journal. If it were ground breaking or new original research, I’d expect something of this nature to be published in a much more respected journal, from purely a climate science perspective.

November 25, 2010 1:30 am

Notice, that the “small hockey stick” occurred in 1900-1940 period, when the climate was still virgin. FYI, until 1990 Greenland cooled back to 19th century level and then warmed back to the level of 40ties. Not much of CO2 forcing manifested up there.

kwik
November 25, 2010 1:46 am

eadler says:
I never heard of Fredrik Charpentier Ljungqvist, so I tried to find out using Google. It seems he is a graduate student in the department of history at Stockholm U.
Yes, keep on Googling!
Maybe the guy smokes? Black-list him!
Maybe he believed in Jesus when he was 5 years old? Heaven forbid!
Maybe he bought a litter to oil to his car ? Oh no! Big Oil!
Maybe he doesnt work for the swedish Government? Private industry !! Banned!!
And for crying out loud! Dont you ever read any of his arguments?! It could ruin the little world Al Gore built for you.

Rob
November 25, 2010 1:47 am

Anthony,
In fact, scepticalscience did a pretty good story on Ljungvist 2010 :
http://www.skepticalscience.com/new-remperature-reconstruction-vindicates.html
Which shows the comparison of all major temperature reconstructions, including the ones accumulated for Ljungvist 2010, and the differences and communalities between them.
In contrast, you only show a local temp record from Greenland (sent to you by Scafetta), without any mentioning of any peer-reviewed paper where that graph is presented, nor where the data came from.
And then your story from Ljungvist. What are you trying to prove with that ?
Ljungvist 2010 itself mentions in the conclusions :
“Although partly different data and methods have been used in our reconstruction than in Moberg et al. (2005) and Mann et al. (2008), the result is surprisingly similar. The inclusion of additional records would probably not substantially change the overall picture of the temperature variability.”
So Anthony, the question really is : What are you trying to say in this post, and why are you cherry-picking a local temperature record when the global record is widely different from it, even as confirmed by Ljungvist himself ?

Robert Thomson
November 25, 2010 2:01 am

I was taken by this quote from the paper – “Late 20th century temperatures are lower than those of the MWP in the Scandinavia, Siberia and especially in the Greenland temperature reconstruction and equal to the medieval warming in the North America reconstruction. However, in the China and the Central Europe reconstructions late 20th century warming exceeds the medieval one, although this is not clear from the proxy reconstructions themselves but only from the instrumental temperature data spliced to the reconstructions.” End Quote
This made me think of the Chinese temperature records, which seem to have Phil Jones’s fingerprints all over them, ensuring that there are no UHI corrections applied. Could this be the reason that the temperature records from China stand out as being high, when they are spliced to the reconstructions?

stephen richards
November 25, 2010 2:03 am

November 24, 2010 at 11:17 pm
Stephen Wilde says:
November 24, 2010 at 2:37 pm
Now, the critical question:
This is something about climate research that has bugged me for ages. When training to be an EE&E1radio engineer my mentor always used to say “go to the source”. I’ll just explain that in case you think its the well :); He used to put faults onto circuits and then I had to find them. Being a youngster, I used to head straight for the component I thought the symptons indicated and invariably got it wrong. Go to the source.
In weather climate you get, for example, ” The cold weather in coming to the UK because the jet stream has moved south” Yes BUT WHY. See what I mean? They never go to the source. In the teams example, its back to the model which they think is the source. Its sooo annoying.

Rob
November 25, 2010 2:17 am

Anthony :
Another comment on the Greenland graph :
Ljungqvist himself mentions about this graph (Fig 7 in his paper) :
“The Greenland temperature reconstruction has been calibrated against the annual mean temperature from the 85–60°N × 15–70°W CRUTEM3 grid cells (Fig. 7).”
In other words, this graph represents the diversion from the CRUTEM record.
It is NOT a representation of absolute temperature in the Greenland area.
So not only are you cherry-picking a local record which is not representative for the Northern Hemisphere (let alone the global record), you do not even present the actual temperature trend for the region. Just the difference between two records.

David L
November 25, 2010 3:31 am

“eadler says:
November 24, 2010 at 3:15 pm
I never heard of Fredrik Charpentier Ljungqvist, so I tried to find out using Google. It seems he is a graduate student in the department of history at Stockholm U.”
So he’s a grad student? In academia the graduate students are typically the ones that do all the work and publish all the papers. The PI typically does the final edits and tacks their name last on the paper. The most successful PI’s (principle investigator) have huge teams of grad students and post docs. The PI’s in these cases are typically way out of the loop in the research: they guide the overall broad research topics and function at a more general level. Except The Team. They are unique in having a closed group of PI’s that publish and referee each other.

Roger Carr
November 25, 2010 3:38 am

[Note: tonyb is a regular and well respected contributor to this site. ~dbs, mod.]
     That needed saying, dbs.

November 25, 2010 4:09 am

Rob, this is the instrumental record from given area:
http://climexp.knmi.nl/data/icrutem3_290-345E_60-85N_na.png
If Greenland (even as a “ground zero” for global warming) is not representing the Northern hemisphere, neither does Mann’s bristlecones.

Editor
November 25, 2010 4:25 am

Rob 1.47 and 2.17
I am seriously concerned at the reading comprehension of some of the people looking at this article. In the first line Anthony says;
“Nicola Scafetta sends this along, I found this figure quite interesting, but there are many more in the full PDF available below.”
That is a clue that there are many more in the full pdf available below.
Below at the bottom of the article is the obviously invisible (to some) line;
“Full report here (PDF) which goes to the link;
a_regional_approach_to_the_medieval_warm_period_and_the_little_ice_age
This links to the comprehensive selection of studies that might give a clue as to the nature of the story which is headed;
“A regional approach to the medieval warm period and the little ice age”
I have suggested that ‘Alan Simpson not from Friends of the Earth’ apologise to me for his unwarranted comment, perhaps you would like to do so in this instance to Anthony?
Tonyb

Editor
November 25, 2010 4:36 am

,
You are misunderstanding the word “calibrated.”. The Greenland reconstruction has been tied into (calibrated) CRUTEM3; it is not an anomaly series (diversion from) CRUTEM3.

Roger L.
November 25, 2010 4:37 am

From http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0459.2010.00399.x/abstract
A NEW RECONSTRUCTION OF TEMPERATURE VARIABILITY IN THE EXTRA-TROPICAL NORTHERN HEMISPHERE DURING THE LAST TWO MILLENNIA
1. FREDRIK CHARPENTIER LJUNGQVIST
Article first published online: 6 SEP 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0459.2010.00399.x
© The authors 2010 Geografiska Annaler: Series A © 2010 Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography
Issue
Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography
Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography
Volume 92, Issue 3, pages 339–351, September 2010
Additional Information(Show All)
How to CiteAuthor InformationPublication History
How to Cite
LJUNGQVIST, F. C. (2010), A NEW RECONSTRUCTION OF TEMPERATURE VARIABILITY IN THE EXTRA-TROPICAL NORTHERN HEMISPHERE DURING THE LAST TWO MILLENNIA. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography, 92: 339–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0459.2010.00399.x
Author Information
1.
Department of History, Stockholm University, Sweden
*Correspondence: Fredrik Charpentier Ljungqvist, Department of History, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: fredrik.c.l@historia.su.se
Publication History
1. Issue published online: 6 SEP 2010
2. Article first published online: 6 SEP 2010
3. Manuscript received Oct. 2009 revised and accepted Jan. 2010
cheers
Roger

redneck
November 25, 2010 5:46 am

E.M. Smith says:
“Billy Liar says:
Oh, dear! It may have slipped past the climate gatekeepers.
Here, let me fix that for you…
It may have slipped past the climategate keepers.”
I would suggest the following:
It may have slipped past the climate goalkeeper.
After all they are a team and the previous post suggests they all have their own hockey stick.

Pamela Gray
November 25, 2010 6:19 am

Rob, you do know that Anthony didn’t write the article or choose the graphs, yes?

P Walker
November 25, 2010 6:54 am

Pamela Gray , relax – now you can skate on your back porch .

Pamela Gray
November 25, 2010 7:23 am

Weather pattern variability (the natural oscillating range within a climate type) and climate change (as in ice ages), can only best be understood regionally. If one keeps focusing on some kind of global indices, you will miss opportunities to uncover mechanisms that could prove crucial to understanding these changes and mitigating against them.
I have no doubt that our next ice age will happen regionally at first. And it appears to me that both a sustained colder Pacific and a colder Atlantic are probably necessary. How would the Atlantic turn cold? Either winds must blow away the warm surface, revealing colder water beneath, or some cold current that feeds into the Atlantic begins feeding it big time. Clearly though, winds and water temperature needs to be conducive to ice growth and low summer melt in the Arctic and the surrounding upper latitudes.

John F. Hultquist
November 25, 2010 8:55 am

tonyb says: at 4:25 am
I am seriously concerned at the reading comprehension of some of the people . . .
I’ve made similar comments. My word last time was “astonished.”
Likewise, I was astonished at the remark about you being a “payed” (sic) alarmist.
I also find your posts informative and several are warmly tucked on my hard drive.

Pamela Gray
November 25, 2010 9:12 am

You may have to define “apology”. Too long of a word for someone who can’t spell “paid”.

November 25, 2010 10:33 am

~dbs, mod
[Note: tonyb is a regular and well respected contributor to this site. ~dbs, mod.]
Tony B is not only well respected contributor but a gentleman too, which I know from our personal correspondence.
Leif Svalgaard says:
November 24, 2010 at 8:04 pm
……………….
Here are two temperature’s reconstructions in more detail:
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/LL.htm

Robuk
November 25, 2010 11:11 am

Despite substantial uncertainties, especially for the period prior to 1600 when data are scarce, the warmest period prior to the 20th century very likely occurred between 950 and 1100, but temperatures were probably between 0.1°C and 0.2°C below the 1961 to 1990 mean and significantly below the level shown by instrumental data after 1980.
Is William Connolly still at it, School children refer to this crap.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period

Verified by MonsterInsights