Distant Star’s Sound Waves Reveal Cycle Similar to Sun – but the cycle is fast, less than 1 year
Star known as HD49933 is located 100 light years away from Earth
View a video on the monitoring of the magnetic cycle of a distant star by the CoRoT satellite.
In a bid to unlock long-standing mysteries of the sun, including the impacts on Earth of its 11-year cycle, an international team of scientists has successfully probed a distant star.
By monitoring the star’s sound waves, the team has observed a magnetic cycle analogous to the sun’s solar cycle.
Results of the study, conducted by scientists at the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo., and colleagues in France and Spain, are published this week in the journal Science.
The research was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), which is NCAR’s sponsor, the CEA (the French Atomic Energy and Alternative Energies Commission), the French Stellar Physics National Research Plan, and the Spanish National Research Plan.
“This is an interesting study that was possible due to strong international cooperation,” says Steve Nelson, NSF program director for NCAR.
The scientists studied a star known as HD49933, which is located 100 light years away from Earth in the constellation Monoceros, the Unicorn, just east of Orion.
The team examined the star’s acoustic fluctuations, using a technique called “stellar seismology.”
They detected the signature of “starspots,” areas of intense magnetic activity on the surface that are similar to sunspots.
While scientists have previously observed these magnetic cycles in other stars, this was the first time they have discovered such a cycle using stellar seismology.
“Essentially, the star is ringing like a bell,” says NCAR scientist Travis Metcalfe, a co-author of the paper.
“As it moves through its starspot cycle, the tone and volume of the ringing changes in a very specific pattern, moving to higher tones with lower volume at the peak of its magnetic cycle.”
The technique could open the way to observing the magnetic activity of hundreds of stars, which could help evaluate new solar systems for the potential of supporting life.
Studying many stars this way could help scientists better understand how magnetic activity cycles can differ from star to star, as well as the processes behind such cycles.
The work could especially shed light on the magnetic activity processes that go on within the sun, furthering our understanding of its influence on Earth’s climate.
It could also lead to better predictions of the solar cycle and resulting geomagnetic storms that can cause major disruption to power grids and communication networks.
“We’ve discovered a magnetic activity cycle in this star, similar to what we see with the sun,” says co-author and NCAR scientist Savita Mathur. “This technique of listening to the stars will allow us to examine potentially hundreds of stars.”
In addition to NCAR, the team’s scientists are from France’s Center for Nuclear Studies of Saclay (CEA-Saclay), Paris/Meudon Observatory (OPM), the University of Toulouse, and Spain’s Institute of Astrophysics of the Canaries (IAC).
The team hopes to assess the potential for other stars in our galaxy to host planets, including some perhaps capable of sustaining life.
“Understanding the activity of stars harboring planets is necessary because magnetic conditions on the star’s surface could influence the habitable zone where life could develop,” says CEA-Saclay scientist Rafael Garcia, the study’s lead author.
The scientists examined 187 days of data captured by the international Convection Rotation and Planetary Transits (CoRoT) space mission.
Launched on December 27, 2006, CoRoT was developed and is operated by the French National Center for Space Studies (CNES) with contributions of Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Germany, Spain, and the European Space Agency.
CoRoT is equipped with a 27-centimeter (11-inch) diameter telescope and a 4-CCD (charge-coupled device) camera sensitive to tiny variations in the light intensity from stars.
The study authors found that HD49933 is much bigger and hotter than the sun, and its magnetic cycle is much shorter.
Whereas past surveys of stars have found cycles similar to the 11-year cycle of the sun, this star has a cycle of somewhat less than a year.
This is important to scientists because it may enable them to observe an entire cycle more quickly, thereby gleaning more information about magnetic patterns than if they could only observe part of a longer cycle.
The scientists plan to expand their observations by using other stars observed by CoRoT as well as data from NASA’s Kepler mission, launched in March 2009.
Kepler is seeking Earth-sized planets to survey. The mission will provide continuous data over three to five years from hundreds of stars that could potentially be hosting planets.
“If it turns out that a short magnetic cycle is common in stars, then we will potentially observe a large number of full cycles during Kepler’s mission,” says Metcalfe.
“The more stars and complete magnetic cycles we have to observe, the more we can place the sun into context and explore the impacts of magnetic activity on possible planets hosted by these stars.”
The team has spent the past six months exploring the structure and dynamics of HD49933 and classifying its size.
They will next verify their observations using ground-based telescopes to confirm the magnetic activity of the star.
When the star reemerges from behind the sun in September, they hope to measure the full length of the cycle.
The CoRoT mission was designed to collect up to 150 days of continuous data at a time, which was not enough to determine the exact length of the star’s cycle.
-NSF-
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Variable stars aren’t news. What makes this special, observed magnetic activity, not just brightness changes?
sound?
It would be interesting to compare stars, which have numerous physical characteristics, i.e., size, color, magnetic energy, and so on, that are similar to our Sun, but have different magnetic cycles from our Sun (as this post reports, our Sun has an 11 year magnetic cycle as opposed to this other star which apparently has a one year cycle), and attempt to explain why these stars have different magnetic cycles.
In other words, why do similar stars have different magnetic cycles?
Is it because, while appearing similar via our observation & measurement, there are different internal dynamics and structural differences, or, are there external differences (physical characteristics & dynamics the star is embedded in) which cause the different magnetic cycles?
This seems to be an interesting line of research because it allows Science to investigate whether its assumptions about helio-physical dynamics are correct or false.
How much to we really know about the dynamics of our own Sun?
So yet more examples of “we don’t know”. Why don’t we admit, we don’t know, it is OK to do that. I don’t know how to cook risotto (My first and only attempt failed)!
Economist needs education
http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2010/08/a_quantitative_1.html
wow. climate change must be happening very fast on those planets.
Anthony,
Thank you for keeping news of these fascinating scientific discoveries coming. They help to keep our wonder alive!
MikeEE
“Sound waves”? “Acoustic fluctuations”? I’m not questioning the science — I don’t understand it — but I’m not getting the terminology. Sound waves are vibrations that travel through the air, or some other medium. Are they translating magnetic pulses into sound waves? I can see that, but then they’re studying magnetic pulses, not “sound waves.”
Makes me feel like yelling out in frustration — but in space, nobody can hear you scream. (Unless you’re a star, apparently.)
Patrick Davis says:
August 27, 2010 at 9:37 am
“So yet more examples of “we don’t know”. Why don’t we admit, we don’t know, it is OK to do that. I don’t know how to cook risotto (My first and only attempt failed)!”
Science saying, “we don’t know,” is the first step to gaining new knowledge.
Science saying, “we know it all,” is the first step to dogma and blocking advances in scientific understanding.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/139/20100826/981/tsc-massive-solar-storm-to-hit-earth-in_1.html
Speaking of solar cycles, I just noted the story above on Yahoo. The alarm bells went off loudest when I noted the famous words “Most experts agree, although those who put the date of Solar Max in 2012 are getting the most press.” Ah yes, that famous phrase “most experts agree”. On which planet this reality might occur I have no idea, but it is not this planet.
I love it that they have the balls to announce two years in advance that for sure the sun will blast our planet with a satellite destroying, power line frying, circuit breaking EM blast………give or take a year. Or maybe decade or whenever Solar Cycle 24 really decides to arrive. Until then I won’t lose sleep over something that we humans can do nothing about.
What have these “sound wave” observations told us about our own Sun? I assume that’s been done and used to calibrate stellar observations…
As far as I can figure out, ‘sound waves’ will be the equivalent of acoustic waves (alternate regions of high/low pressure) moving through the coronosphere. Does that make sense?
Starspot cycles have been observed on dozens of other stars to date. This group and other groups have been developing asteroseismology techniques to interpret fluctuations in stellar light curves as interior activity.
James F. Evans:
“It would be interesting to compare stars, which have numerous physical characteristics, i.e., size, color, magnetic energy, and so on, that are similar to our Sun, but have different magnetic cycles from our Sun (as this post reports, our Sun has an 11 year magnetic cycle as opposed to this other star which apparently has a one year cycle), and attempt to explain why these stars have different magnetic cycles.
In other words, why do similar stars have different magnetic cycles?
Is it because, while appearing similar via our observation & measurement, there are different internal dynamics and structural differences, or, are there external differences (physical characteristics & dynamics the star is embedded in) which cause the different magnetic cycles?
================================
Given that a primary theory for the 11 year solar cycle and its variation plus and minus is that it is driven by the gravitational impact of the orbiting planets, it would be interesting to test this theory against another star where planet masses, orbits, etc. are known (if in fact we have that information for another star at this point).
What about the closest stars? Wouldn’t it be easier to watch the solar cycles of those?
Within 20 light years there are 109 stars and 8 brown dwarfs.
http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/nearstar.html
For those expressing confusion, stellar sound waves are transmitted to us through the aether, which is obviously compressible because dentists store it in high-pressure bottles.
Dr. Science, D- degree in junior high school physics.
Now see? All I needed was a reasonable explanation.
Substitute seismic for acoustic in the above story, and then you will understand. They are basically studying what would be called star quakes if stars had solid surfaces, but stars don’t have solid surfaces. They have plasma instead. It behaves kind of like a liquid.
A solar flare erupts sending out ripples that circle the star, like tossing in a pebble sends out ripples on a pond.
What they are talking about is measuring the frequency of the ripples.
They call it the p-mode acoustic field I suppose because they needed to call it something.
You’ve seen it used before and reported by Anthony when he pointed out sunspots erupting on the opposite side of the sun.
See helioseismology, star quakes, GONG experiment,
http://gong.nso.edu/
Our Sun is seated and that star is at the gym, that’s all. This theory is better than consensus. 🙂
Solar cycles on other stars is not a previously undiscovered concept. In 1992, Baliunas found a number of stars with Maunder Minimum like periods of relative inactivity. It is reported in this link:
http://atoc.colorado.edu/wxlab/atoc7500/Historical%20Overview%20-%20Solar%20Variability%20and%20Climate%20Change.htm
Here is the relevant passage:
“Studies of sun-like stars also point to eras of cyclic magnetic activity punctuated by periods, like our Maunder Minimum, of magnetic quiet. [Baliunas, 1992.]”
This is the 1992 reference:
Baliunas, S.L. et al. “Long-term variability of solar total irradiance: studies of solar-type stars.” Eos, 73:14 supplement, 245, 1992
It does, but why can’t it be explained in the original article? And if what you say is true, why not call it “pressure waves” instead of “sound waves”? Does it not dawn on the writer that talking about “sound waves” in a press release aimed at the general public might cause confusion? Or did it cause confusion in the writer’s mind, but since doing a bit of investigation would have involved work, he or she just left it as it was?
The interesting part of the story is this other star has such a short cycle.
See, depending on who you ask, we don’t know why the sun has an 11-12 year cycle.
So if we can figure out what the difference is between this star and our star, that will get us along way toward figuring it out.
re John says:
August 27, 2010 at 12:36 pm
And isn’t it a crime that Sallie Baliunas was viciously attacked by the global warmers.
If she we’re left unmolested think of how much more mature this science would be.
The desmogs, realclimates, and sciblogs allowed frauds like Frohlich and Lean to set the world back 20 years in the study of solar cycles.
‘The scientists studied a star known as HD49933, which is located 100 light years away from Earth in the constellation Monoceros, the Unicorn, just east of Orion.’
That crap is what is so much crap with SETI@Home. If the dudes and lovely dudettes from SETI@Home spent my computer listening to radio waves from the solar system dominated from HD49933, they’d be listening from radio waves comparable to our 19-century analog crap. But then the stupidoids say what if they were more advanced then us back then. Right like having already gone over to digital communication by flashing light in wireless mode and fiber optics for the old or more advanced stellar quantum communication?They’re using analog listening devices for a reason. :-()
The study authors found that HD49933 is much bigger and hotter than the sun, and its magnetic cycle is much shorter.
This is not a sun-like star at all. And it has been known for a long time that the bigger and hotter and younger the star is, the shorter is its period. If the star is massive enough it won’t even have a stellar cycle. Cool stars have periods longer than the Sun’s. These are generalizations and reality is a bit more complex. Two important characteristics are rotation period and depth of convection zone and these vary from star to star and especially change with age of the star. Stellar activity is important for the formation of planets, but planets do not seem to have any effect on the activity, unless we assume that planetary systems just conspire to produce the observed relationships with size and age. As many more stars will be examined shortly, the statistics will improve.