Maybe now NOAA will get rid of all remaining rooftop climate monitoring stations or stations sited over asphalt, like this one. As for the carbon emissions issue, that remains to be seen.
Global Model Confirms: Cool Roofs Can Offset Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Mitigate Global Warming
Can light-colored rooftops and roads really curb carbon emissions and combat global climate change? The idea has been around for years, but now, a new study by researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory that is the first to use a global model to study the question has found that implementing cool roofs and cool pavements in cities around the world can not only help cities stay cooler, they can also cool the world, with the potential of canceling the heating effect of up to two years of worldwide carbon dioxide emissions.
Because white roofs reflect far more of the sun’s heat than black ones, buildings with white roofs will stay cooler. If the building is air conditioned, less air conditioning will be required, thus saving energy. Even if there is no air conditioning, the heat absorbed by a black roof both heats the space below, making the space less comfortable, and is also carried into the city air by wind—raising the ambient temperature in what is known as the urban heat island effect. Additionally, there’s a third, less familiar way in which a black roof heats the world: it radiates energy directly into the atmosphere, which is then absorbed by the nearest clouds and ends up trapped by the greenhouse effect, contributing to global warming.
Today, U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced a series of initiatives at the Department of Energy to more broadly implement cool roof technologies on DOE facilities and buildings across the federal government. As part of the effort to make the federal government more energy efficient, Chu has directed all DOE offices to install cool roofs, whenever cost effective over the lifetime of the roof, when constructing new roofs or replacing old ones at DOE facilities. Additionally, the Secretary has also issued a letter to the heads of other federal agencies, encouraging them to take similar steps at their facilities.
“Cool roofs are one of the quickest and lowest cost ways we can reduce our global carbon emissions and begin the hard work of slowing climate change,” said Chu. “By demonstrating the benefits of cool roofs on our facilities, the federal government can lead the nation toward more sustainable building practices, while reducing the federal carbon footprint and saving money for taxpayers.”
In the latest study, the Berkeley Lab researchers and their collaborators used a detailed global land surface model from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, which contained regional information on surface variables, such as topography, evaporation, radiation and temperature, as well as on cloud cover. For the northern hemisphere summer, they found that increasing the reflectivity of roof and pavement materials in cities with a population greater than 1 million would achieve a one-time offset of 57 gigatons (1gigaton equals 1 billion metric tons) of CO2 emissions (31 Gt from roofs and 26 Gt from pavements). That’s double the worldwide CO2 emissions in 2006 of 28 gigatons. Their results were published online in the journal Environmental Research Letters.
“These offsets help delay warming that would otherwise take place if actual CO2 emissions are not reduced,” says Surabi Menon, staff scientist at Berkeley Lab and lead author of the paper.
Co-author Hashem Akbari emphasizes that cool roofs and pavements are only a part of the solution: “Two years worth of emissions is huge, but compared to what we need to do, it’s just a dent in the problem,” says Akbari, the former head of the Berkeley Lab Heat Island Group and now Hydro-Quebec Industrial Research Professor at Concordia University in Montreal. “We’ve been dumping CO2 into the atmosphere for the last 200 years as if there’s no future.”
This study is a follow-up to a 2008 paper published in the journal Climate Change, which calculated the CO2 offset from cool surfaces by using a simplified model that assumed a global average for cloud cover. The earlier paper, co-authored by Akbari, Menon and Art Rosenfeld, a Berkeley Lab physicist who was then a member of the California Energy Commission, found that implementing cool roofs and pavements worldwide could offset 44 gigatons of CO2 (24 Gt from roofs and 20 Gt from pavements).
Equivalent to Getting 300 Millions Cars Off the Road
“If all eligible urban flat roofs in the tropics and temperate regions were gradually converted to white (and sloped roofs to cool colors), they would offset the heating effect of the emission of roughly 24 Gt of CO2, but one-time only,” says Rosenfeld, who returned to Berkeley Lab this year. “However, if we assume that roofs have a service life of 20 years, we can think of an equivalent annual rate of 1.2 Gt per year. That offsets the emissions of roughly 300 million cars (about the cars in the world) for 20 years!”
In both studies, the researchers used a conservative assumption of increasing the average albedo (solar reflectance) of all roofs by 0.25 and of pavements by 0.15. That means a black roof (which has an albedo of 0) would not have to be replaced by a pure white roof (which has an albedo of 1), but just a roof of a cooler color, a scenario that is more plausible to implement.
[2]Lighter colored pavement is more reflective, resulting in a cooler surface temperature. (Photo courtesy ASU National Center of Excellence for SMART Innovations)
Roofs and pavements cover 50 to 65 percent of urban areas. Because they absorb so much heat, dark-colored roofs and roadways create what is called the urban heat island effect, where a city is significantly warmer than its surrounding rural areas. This additional heat also eventually contributes to global warming. More than half of the world’s population now lives in cities; by 2040 the proportion of urbanites is expected to reach 70 percent, adding urgency to the urban heat island problem.
The Berkeley Lab study found that global land surface temperature decreased by a modest amount—an average of roughly 0.01degrees Celsius, based on an albedo increase of .003 averaged over all global land surfaces. This relatively small temperature reduction is an indication that implementing cool surfaces can be only part of the solution to the global climate change problem, the researchers say. To put the number in context, consider that global temperatures are estimated to increase about 3 degrees Celsius in the next 40 to 60 years if CO2 emissions continue rising as they have. Preventing that warming would necessitate a 0.05 degree Celsius annual decrease in temperature between now and 2070.
Thus, even modest changes should not be dismissed. “Simply put, a cool roof will save money for homeowners and businesses through reduced air conditioning costs. The real question is not whether we should move toward cool roof technology: it’s why we haven’t done it sooner,” says Rosenfeld.
Other Studies Reach Similar Conclusions
Another recent study on cool roofs, led by Keith Oleson at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and published in Geophysical Research Letters, found that if every roof were painted entirely white, the CO2 emission offsets would be approximately 32 Gt for summer and about 30 Gt annually. While the NCAR study used a different model, the calculated CO2 emission offsets are similar to the results from the Berkeley Lab study and provide a useful and independent verification of the expected CO2 emission offsets from increasing the reflectivity of roofs.
Some observers have pointed out that cool roofs do not make sense in cooler climates because of “winter penalties,” since cooler buildings require more energy to heat. However, the energy savings from cooler buildings usually outweighs any increase in heating costs. Furthermore, in winter, there tends to be more cloud cover; also, the sun is lower and the days are shorter, so a flat roof’s exposure to the sun is significantly reduced.
“Cool roofs have worked for thousands of years in the Mediterranean and Middle Eastern cities, where demand for air conditioning is low,” says Akbari. “If you have a cool roof on your house, that will reduce your energy use from air conditioning and it’s a gift that keeps on giving for many, many years, for the life of the roof.”
Berkeley Lab is a U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory located in Berkeley, California. It conducts unclassified scientific research for DOE’s Office of Science and is managed by the University of California. Visit our website at www.lbl.gov/ [3].
[4]The surface of a black roof (left) heats up 78F above the air temperature, while the surface of a white roof (right) heats up only 12F. Additionally, with a black roof, far more heat flows both to the city and into the atmosphere (arrow lengths are proportional to energy radiated).
Additional information:
- Read the DOE Cool Roofs annnouncement here [5].
- Video glossary entry: Cool Roof [6]
- Read the 2010 paper by Surabi Menon, Hashem Akbari, Sarith Mahanama, Igor Sednev and Ronnen Levinson, “Radiative forcing and temperature response to changes in urban albedos and associated CO2 offsets” [7]
- Download the 2008 paper by Hashem Akbari, Surabi Menon and Art Rosenfeld, “Global cooling: increasing world-wide urban albedos to offset CO2” here [8].
Article printed from Berkeley Lab News Center: http://newscenter.lbl.gov
URL to article: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases/2010/07/19/cool-roofs-offset-carbon-dioxide-emissions/
URLs in this post:
[1] Image: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/roof-solano-gov-center-CEC.jpg
[2] Image: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/Cool-Pavement-ASU.png
[3] www.lbl.gov/: http://www.lbl.gov/
[4] Image: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/White-Roof-Alliance-single-10.png
[5] here: http://energy.gov/news/9225.htm
[6] Cool Roof: http://videoglossary.lbl.gov/2009/cool-roof/
[7] “Radiative forcing and temperature response to changes in urban albedos and associated CO2 offsets”: http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1748-9326/5/1/014005/erl10_1_014005.html
[8] here: http://www.energy.ca.gov/2008publications/CEC-999-2008-020/CEC-999-2008-020.PDF
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“My experience in the UK suggests that the primary snow removal mechanism is the movement of traffic, churning it into slush and pushing it to the sides of the road. The colour of the road under the snow doesn’t make any difference until the road surface has been exposed, when the snow at the edges does melt faster over black tarmac. Roads with light tarmac and concrete do not seem to suffer from snow retention any more than the roads in black tarmac (for equivalent traffic volumes). ”
—…—…—
Not true at the lower latitudes – where the physical (geographic) majority of the US streets and cities are located: You are relating to (your experiences in the limited) the UK totally bounded by Lat 50 to Lat 58. Madrid (Lat 40) and Lisbon are approximately the latitude of Montreal and Detroit — and THEY are considered the “far north” as far as the mid-summer heating impact of the sun goes in the US!
Jacksonville, New Orleans, El Paso and Los Angeles are the same latitude as mid Algeria – in the center of the Sahara Desert, Libya, and northern Egypt. There can be NO (logical or meaningful) “legal” or national requirement or laws or regulations or payments for this ridiculous idea because of the vast changing local environment atop every building and road across the US. Will that prevent Washington from mistakes in this issue – particularly because of the ig-Nobel people proposing it for political gain?
Of course not.
Read the full study: Do they mention the “benefits” of greater warmth in the winters balancing the mid-summer heat? CAGW theory holds that winters and nighttime temp’s get warmer, but summers no hotter. So what are the “real assumptions” behind this charade of “reducing” summer heat loads? Aren’t they from the same people who create the wind turbine economic justifications for rate subsidies? From the same people who create the myths of “creating green jobs”? Are warehouses and large (flat-topped) factories and buildings actually air-conditioned? The ones I’VE been working are not! Across the south, midwest, and west, are the buildings and factories wedged up against one another like they are in the (old and increasingly decrepit) Baltimore-Washington-Philly-New York-Boston corridor of ancient rust ruins?
EXCEPT in these Bos-Wash canyons of old buildings and wedged together streets, everything I fly over each day are spread out – with less than one percent being roads or building roofs. The rest? Trees, lawns, fields, lakes, forests, farms, national and local parks, and utility easements like under power lines, beside railroad tracks, and beside and between roads. Is THAT little number in this study? Who will pay the extra heating costs each winter?
Spector says:
July 23, 2010 at 5:40 am
“One should keep in mind that a dark, high emissivity road surface is also more prone to radiative cooling at night in the winter, as those who may have had the misfortune to encounter ‘black ice’ at high speed may know only too well.”
True, but the thermal emissivity of light-coloured roads may be just as high (or even higher). The reflectivity in the visible spectrum has no direct bearing on this. I suspect it’s more to do with the smoothness of the surface the ice coats. A rougher surface will also tend to lead moisture away by capillary wicking. It would be interesting to see what would happen if one painted those ice black spots with aluminium paint.
Has anybody bought into the “idea” of trying to DRIVE into the sun (morning or evening!) when it’s reflectivting OFF OF a reflective pavement?
Remember – The CAGW “concept” and theme itself is false: We do NOT need to spend ANY money “stopping” something that is a false premise, and we need to spend NO money against ANY theme that promises NO harm of any kind to ANYONE for temperature increases of less than 3-4 degrees.
RACookPE1978 says:
July 23, 2010 at 1:11 pm
“Has anybody bought into the “idea” of trying to DRIVE into the sun (morning or evening!) when it’s reflectivting OFF OF a reflective pavement?”
No, they haven’t, because no one has suggested it. Stop attacking strawmen. Light-coloured road surfaces are effective at increasing albedo and are pleasant to drive on. They do not reflect the low sun into your eyes. They are actually slightly easier on the eyes than black tarmac, because there is less of a confusing contrast between bright sky and dark road. We have both sorts of road here and I have driven on both and checked this point over the past few days. Furthermore, there are positive advantages in controlling the albedo of cities that have nothing to do with AGW, so rejection of the latter is not a good excuse for attacking the former.
Had two large buildings old roofs stripped and redone. Cost over $10,000 but well worth it as the several layers of old roofing leaked.
The new stuff is a very thick poly-something that can only be stuck together by heating then pressing with a heavy roller. Under that is 1/2″ of heavy expanded foam insulation with aluminum foil on its bottom side. (Not styrene foam, some other plastic.)
The top is white and the buildings are much easier to cool. The insulation and radiant heat reflecting foil should make the buildings easier to heat this winter.
An extra benefit with this stuff is that when it has snow or frost or water on, it’s nearly frictionless, so snow should slide off even though the roofs aren’t sloped much. For extra-extra benefit the several layers of old roofing on each building weighed around 6,000 pounds* (the loads of junk were weighed at the dump) and the new roofing weighs much less, so there won’t be a danger of the roofs caving in under a heavy snow load – if snow can stay put up there.
So I’ve done my part for the white roof campaign. My house has a galvanized steel roof, so that’s even more reflective.
*The smaller building had 7 or more layers built up, various sorts with tar paper or fiberglass and tar, lots and lots of tar. The bigger building had ‘only’ its original tar paper and tar layer and three layers of roll roofing, which is paper coated with tar and small granules of crushed rock.
$10K worth of re-roofing. Wow, that is some big bucks I guess the benefits will be in lower air-conditioning cost, right?