Cooler white roofs – no complaints there

Maybe now NOAA will get rid of all remaining rooftop climate monitoring stations or stations sited over asphalt, like this one. As for the carbon emissions issue, that remains to be seen.

Global Model Confirms: Cool Roofs Can Offset Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Mitigate Global Warming

Cool roof in SolanoCan light-colored rooftops and roads really curb carbon emissions and combat global climate change? The idea has been around for years, but now, a new study by researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory that is the first to use a global model to study the question has found that implementing cool roofs and cool pavements in cities around the world can not only help cities stay cooler, they can also cool the world, with the potential of canceling the heating effect of up to two years of worldwide carbon dioxide emissions.

Because white roofs reflect far more of the sun’s heat than black ones, buildings with white roofs will stay cooler. If the building is air conditioned, less air conditioning will be required, thus saving energy. Even if there is no air conditioning, the heat absorbed by a black roof both heats the space below, making the space less comfortable, and is also carried into the city air by wind—raising the ambient temperature in what is known as the urban heat island effect. Additionally, there’s a third, less familiar way in which a black roof heats the world: it radiates energy directly into the atmosphere, which is then absorbed by the nearest clouds and ends up trapped by the greenhouse effect, contributing to global warming.

Today, U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced a series of initiatives at the Department of Energy to more broadly implement cool roof technologies on DOE facilities and buildings across the federal government. As part of the effort to make the federal government more energy efficient, Chu has directed all DOE offices to install cool roofs, whenever cost effective over the lifetime of the roof, when constructing new roofs or replacing old ones at DOE facilities.  Additionally, the Secretary has also issued a letter to the heads of other federal agencies, encouraging them to take similar steps at their facilities.

“Cool roofs are one of the quickest and lowest cost ways we can reduce our global carbon emissions and begin the hard work of slowing climate change,” said Chu. “By demonstrating the benefits of cool roofs on our facilities, the federal government can lead the nation toward more sustainable building practices, while reducing the federal carbon footprint and saving money for taxpayers.”

In the latest study, the Berkeley Lab researchers and their collaborators used a detailed global land surface model from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, which contained regional information on surface variables, such as topography, evaporation, radiation and temperature, as well as on cloud cover. For the northern hemisphere summer, they found that increasing the reflectivity of roof and pavement materials in cities with a population greater than 1 million would achieve a one-time offset of 57 gigatons (1gigaton equals 1 billion metric tons) of CO2 emissions (31 Gt from roofs and 26 Gt from pavements). That’s double the worldwide CO2 emissions in 2006 of 28 gigatons. Their results were published online in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

“These offsets help delay warming that would otherwise take place if actual CO2 emissions are not reduced,” says Surabi Menon, staff scientist at Berkeley Lab and lead author of the paper.

Co-author Hashem Akbari emphasizes that cool roofs and pavements are only a part of the solution: “Two years worth of emissions is huge, but compared to what we need to do, it’s just a dent in the problem,” says Akbari, the former head of the Berkeley Lab Heat Island Group and now Hydro-Quebec Industrial Research Professor at Concordia University in Montreal. “We’ve been dumping CO2 into the atmosphere for the last 200 years as if there’s no future.”

This study is a follow-up to a 2008 paper published in the journal Climate Change, which calculated the CO2 offset from cool surfaces by using a simplified model that assumed a global average for cloud cover. The earlier paper, co-authored by Akbari, Menon and Art Rosenfeld, a Berkeley Lab physicist who was then a member of the California Energy Commission, found that implementing cool roofs and pavements worldwide could offset 44 gigatons of CO2 (24 Gt from roofs and 20 Gt from pavements).

Equivalent to Getting 300 Millions Cars Off the Road

“If all eligible urban flat roofs in the tropics and temperate regions were gradually converted to white (and sloped roofs to cool colors), they would offset the heating effect of the emission of roughly 24 Gt of CO2, but one-time only,” says Rosenfeld, who returned to Berkeley Lab this year. “However, if we assume that roofs have a service life of 20 years, we can think of an equivalent annual rate of 1.2 Gt per year. That offsets the emissions of roughly 300 million cars (about the cars in the world) for 20 years!”

In both studies, the researchers used a conservative assumption of increasing the average albedo (solar reflectance) of all roofs by 0.25 and of pavements by 0.15. That means a black roof (which has an albedo of 0) would not have to be replaced by a pure white roof (which has an albedo of 1), but just a roof of a cooler color, a scenario that is more plausible to implement.

(Photo courtesy ...) [2]Lighter colored pavement is more reflective, resulting in a cooler surface temperature. (Photo courtesy ASU National Center of Excellence for SMART Innovations)

Roofs and pavements cover 50 to 65 percent of urban areas. Because they absorb so much heat, dark-colored roofs and roadways create what is called the urban heat island effect, where a city is significantly warmer than its surrounding rural areas. This additional heat also eventually contributes to global warming. More than half of the world’s population now lives in cities; by 2040 the proportion of urbanites is expected to reach 70 percent, adding urgency to the urban heat island problem.

The Berkeley Lab study found that global land surface temperature decreased by a modest amount—an average of roughly 0.01degrees Celsius, based on an albedo increase of .003 averaged over all global land surfaces. This relatively small temperature reduction is an indication that implementing cool surfaces can be only part of the solution to the global climate change problem, the researchers say. To put the number in context, consider that global temperatures are estimated to increase about 3 degrees Celsius in the next 40 to 60 years if CO2 emissions continue rising as they have. Preventing that warming would necessitate a 0.05 degree Celsius annual decrease in temperature between now and 2070.

Thus, even modest changes should not be dismissed. “Simply put, a cool roof will save money for homeowners and businesses through reduced air conditioning costs. The real question is not whether we should move toward cool roof technology: it’s why we haven’t done it sooner,” says Rosenfeld.

Other Studies Reach Similar Conclusions

Another recent study on cool roofs, led by Keith Oleson at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and published in Geophysical Research Letters, found that if every roof were painted entirely white, the CO2 emission offsets would be approximately 32 Gt for summer and about 30 Gt annually. While the NCAR study used a different model, the calculated CO2 emission offsets are similar to the results from the Berkeley Lab study and provide a useful and independent verification of the expected CO2 emission offsets from increasing the reflectivity of roofs.

Some observers have pointed out that cool roofs do not make sense in cooler climates because of “winter penalties,” since cooler buildings require more energy to heat. However, the energy savings from cooler buildings usually outweighs any increase in heating costs. Furthermore, in winter, there tends to be more cloud cover; also, the sun is lower and the days are shorter, so a flat roof’s exposure to the sun is significantly reduced.

“Cool roofs have worked for thousands of years in the Mediterranean and Middle Eastern cities, where demand for air conditioning is low,” says Akbari. “If you have a cool roof on your house, that will reduce your energy use from air conditioning and it’s a gift that keeps on giving for many, many years, for the life of the roof.”

Berkeley Lab is a U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory located in Berkeley, California. It conducts unclassified scientific research for DOE’s Office of Science and is managed by the University of California. Visit our website at www.lbl.gov/ [3].

The surface of a black roof (left) heats up 78F above the air  temperature, while the surface of a white roof (right) heats up only  12F. Additionally, with a black roof, far more heat flows both to the  city and into the atmosphere (arrow lengths are proportional to energy  radiated). [4]The surface of a black roof (left) heats up 78F above the air temperature, while the surface of a white roof (right) heats up only 12F. Additionally, with a black roof, far more heat flows both to the city and into the atmosphere (arrow lengths are proportional to energy radiated).

Additional information:


Article printed from Berkeley Lab News Center: http://newscenter.lbl.gov

URL to article: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases/2010/07/19/cool-roofs-offset-carbon-dioxide-emissions/

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/roof-solano-gov-center-CEC.jpg

[2] Image: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/Cool-Pavement-ASU.png

[3] www.lbl.gov/: http://www.lbl.gov/

[4] Image: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/White-Roof-Alliance-single-10.png

[5] here: http://energy.gov/news/9225.htm

[6] Cool Roof: http://videoglossary.lbl.gov/2009/cool-roof/

[7] “Radiative forcing and temperature response to changes in urban albedos and associated CO2 offsets”: http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1748-9326/5/1/014005/erl10_1_014005.html

[8] here: http://www.energy.ca.gov/2008publications/CEC-999-2008-020/CEC-999-2008-020.PDF

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

181 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Corcoran
July 19, 2010 7:36 pm

Everyone agrees the Urban Heat Island effect exists and warms the Earth. On that there’s no debate, unlike the catastrophic AGW hypothesis. Clearly, the only responsible action is to plow under our major urban areas and embrace a semi-rural lifestyle for all. It’s for the planet. Don’t put up a fuss, you don’t want to make Gaia cry, do you? I can feel her tears well up even now.

EthicallyCivil
July 19, 2010 7:53 pm

Many have asked — and the UMich article answers — what about the effect of high reflectance white paint on heat emission.
TiO2 paint is effectively black in the infrared, a trick Apollo used for thermal management. Reflects sunlight, emits IR.
Also, shiny coatings are horrible emitters… i.e. an unpainted tin or aluminum roof is hotter as it doesn’t radiate as well.

Dave Wendt
July 19, 2010 7:57 pm

Lighter colored rooftops to reduce albedo is a measure that could be implemented without a great deal of complication. Lightening paved surfaces, particularly those that handle vehicular traffic, is much more problematic. At present the only material that fills the bill as a lighter colored replacement for asphaltic concrete is concrete made with portland cement. Leaving aside the economic considerations that often mitigate against PCC, it should be obvious to anyone who’s been paying much attention for the last couple decades, that dramatically increasing the demand for portland cement at this point in the carbon demonization process is going to be a nonstarter.
AFAIK there are no paints or coatings presently available that are durable enough to last more than a few months if applied across full lanes of AC pavement. Up here in the Great White of MN, centerline and shoulder striping, on roads that see anything but the most modest levels of traffic, are repainted mostly annually. And though they are exposed to traffic wear, it is at a fraction of the level paint would see in the actual traffic lanes. Of course there are also the issues of traction and glare, and around here the contribution the black surface makes to keeping ice off of paved roads and parking lots during the majority of the year.
So go for those white roofs if it turns your crank, but before we get to far into trying to make all the roads white maybe some of these climate modeling deep thinkers might want to consult with some less intellectually gifted highway engineers from a few state DOTs who’ve actually built and tried to maintain a few roads in their time.

Spector
July 19, 2010 8:21 pm

RE: stevengoddard: (July 19, 2010 at 1:22 pm) “I keep my roof white all winter. The white color keeps the house cold, raising the heating bills.”
Maybe someone should try to develop a special smart durable liquid-crystal material that only goes reflective if the roof temperature rises above 25 degrees C. — Yes, such a material is most likely an expensive unobtainium.

TomRude
July 19, 2010 8:31 pm

Don Shaw writes: “If most commercial construction is flat black roofs without an “attic” above then some benefits are possible.”
Here is july 2010 experience from Canada:
I do not think cool roofs will end global warming… LOL
But we all know how inside a black car in summer is torture.
The cool roof effect is very real for houses with a flat roof and no attic such as most modernist homes, post and beam style, with skylights and miles of floor to ceiling glass windows. I can attest about it, on a commercial grade, high end building less than 10y old. Usually in summer, despite heat recovery/air recycling technology and of course AC connected to our swimming pool, the rooms were always managing to get stuffy after a while and we could feel heat radiating during the night, despite flat roof passive ventilation. Worse, when the tar roof membrane starts to loose its little white stones, the black tar appeared and it made the problem worse as only about 45inches separates the rooftop from the ceiling. We felt as if in a greenhouse… AC was working all the time even at night to keep at 26C, losing the battle and warming up our swimming pool so much that in the end, the house felt uncomfortable and the pool was way too hot unless you wanted hard boiled eggs…
So out of curiosity I decided to try and I used a RV roof coating product from WhiteKnight called Flexcoat acrylic product, in 5 gallons cans, covering about 3,500 sqft roof with 10 of them. One coat is enough: you just pour the stuff on the roof and cover with a roll. I first tried above our bedroom. The change was immediately noticeable. No more stuffyness, the room stayed cool during the day and at night. On the roof, to the touch, the coated areas were cool even in the noon sun while an adjacent untreated area would be boiling hot.
I covered the entire roof since the anticyclone kept being replenished by MPHs for days and the result is really fantastic: AC is running only when the sun set over our miles of glass sliding doors and only few times during the day to maintain a cool 22C while the pool temperature has remained comfortable. Considering it took me 3 days, 8 hours and $1,300, I can recommend it to anyone in our situation.

July 19, 2010 9:02 pm

Some 7 years ago, I had my house re-roofed, mainly because the concrete tiles were disintegrating. (The house was built in 1967/1968)
I chose “corrugated iron” as the new material, being lighter and stronger, as well as providing additional protection against burglars. As I’ve done a little work Engineering HVAC systems, I chose a green “eucalyptus” colour for the roof, which imitates to some extent the optical properties of nature. Not that I’m anticipating photosynthesis. 🙂 It reflects “excess” light without being painful to look at from the street; as would be white or “natural” galvanized steel. (If I were in a mean mood, I’d get on the roof and paint disruptive patterns to frustrate aerial surveys by local government. :-))
Instead of using minimum sarking (an aluminised foil) underneath the steel — a measure to reduce condensation on the underside — I chose instead an insulated (rock-wool) blanket with foil backing to be sandwiched between the steel and the battens. Not only does that provide substantial thermal insulation, it also makes the steel roof more quiet than the original tile roof in heavy rain.
As for the lab results in the article; nice to see somebody trying to do some real research about how much direct influence we have on regional climate and how we can manipulate that impact. Even if the conclusions have been “obvious” for centuries.

pat
July 19, 2010 9:22 pm

Believe me. On a personal application level this makes a huge difference. Been there done that. 7th grade science.

mr.artday
July 19, 2010 9:26 pm

It’s a nice idea but didn’t anyone think to find out what percentage of the U.S. is covered with buildings or roads? I think it is well below 10%.

LightRain
July 19, 2010 9:41 pm

It’s a *** WIN – WIN *** situation.
On April 1st everyone paints their roofs WHITE, then on November 1st they paint them BLACK.
Voila — think of all the employment, and with the government covering the costs in income tax credits everyone wins. More employment, cooler/warmer houses, what more could Al Gore ask for?

LightRain
July 19, 2010 9:43 pm

Jason Bair says:
July 19, 2010 at 1:15 pm
The difference in temp shouldn’t be surprising to anyone. Its much easier to walk barefoot on concrete than black asphalt. Concrete still heats up and contributes to UHI, but not as much as blacktop/black roofs.
——————————————–
White sand isn’t too cool to bare feet…

phlogiston
July 19, 2010 9:45 pm

To increase the beneficial effect the white paint and asphalt should be of the type containing TiO2, to have the NO2 scrubbing effect – as reported recently:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/07/road-surface-purifies-air-by-removing-nitrogen-oxides-nox/
The TiO2 also gives the white colour.

rickM
July 19, 2010 10:44 pm

Any government program designed to “save” money will inevitably cost more than it avoids…

londo
July 19, 2010 11:22 pm

I’m not sure this is a worthwhile approach but an even better “paint job” would be to use a paint who’s emissivity is high for long (IR) wavelength and low for short (VIS). Stuff like that does exist and I’ve played with it 25 year ago at the university. A roof like that would cool the house passively (though not much) but in comparison with a standard roof, it would make a great difference.

TomRude
July 19, 2010 11:43 pm

Got it: paint the Oil Sands white and the greens and Obama’s eco-minions will love Alberta!

WOJ
July 19, 2010 11:52 pm

OK you clever people,why are house radiators always white?

Keith Minto
July 20, 2010 12:07 am

This may be a problem for aircraft, but in my mind, applying retroreflective paint on roofs http://www.library.unt.edu/gpo/OTA/images/retrodiagram.gif has possibilities especially if the emissivity is high.
I am at 35deg S with very hot summers.

Ken Hall
July 20, 2010 12:31 am

How much did they pay scientists to learn that a black square heats up more in the sun than a white one?
This is a no-brainer. Of course having a city full of white roofs and white roads and pavements will be cooler than black ones.
What I would not like though is white roads or pavements. When driving along with a bright, but low sun, especially if it had been raining, then a white floor would be literally blinding. That would create very dangerous driving conditions.

Ken Hall
July 20, 2010 12:32 am

Just have reversible roof tiles. Black on one side (for winter) and white on the other (for summer)

July 20, 2010 12:43 am

Roof colour is just an aspect of Passive Solar building design principals that have been around for years. There are plenty of books, papers, research, local government advice sheets, ‘proper models’, etc on this subject – they could have saved a packet and just searched the Internet for it…
Or they could phoned the Australian government and asked for their handbook on it..
Basically the main driver in end efficiency is the sarking under the roof itself, then the level of insulation present in the roof immediately above the ceiling and how well that ‘rejects’ heat transfer up or down; with some ventilation. Basically in Summer you don’t want the heat coming down and in Winter you don’t want your heat going up.. You can also do things like play around the shading available and how the visible ‘height’ of the Sun is lower in Winter than Summer (location permitting).
Its quite effective when you get it right.

July 20, 2010 1:12 am

What does this mean for the folkes who want to line their roofs with black solar cells. I guess solar panels must warm the earth.

Don Shaw
July 20, 2010 3:35 am

Enough,
Yes, Solar cells warm the earth and should be treated accordingly

steveta_uk
July 20, 2010 3:42 am

“OK you clever people,why are house radiators always white?”
Because it looks nice.
Since all heat from the heating system will be lost to the room somehow, it makes little difference what colour the radiator is.
And anyways, you’re talking about white as visible wavelengths, and my radiators tend to run way cooler than that.
On another topic, does anyone else get depressed at the number of comments from folk who ask why the reflected sunlight doesn’t heat the air as well? Even here on WUWT there is evidently very little understanding of fairly simple physics.

Don Shaw
July 20, 2010 3:58 am

Keith says:
July 20, 2010 at 12:43 am
Yes, you are absolutely correct re insulation and venting for private homes. The scientists would have only needed to look at house construction in New Jersey. And that’s why I added venting and attic insulation to my 40 year house a long time ago.
Based on the press release, I suspect they were hung up on Chu’s earlier comments on painting roofs and roadways and got a stimulus for the computer study. I hope I am wrong but I suspect that they, like Chu, lack the common sense to find out how things are actually designed and constructed and that there are other means applied to reduce energy usage. A computer model is so much better and more impressive even if it does not model the real world.

Tenuc
July 20, 2010 6:08 am

Viscount Monckton of Brenchley has already done some ‘back of a fag packet’ calculations on this and concluded the idea is rubbish.
Extract from ‘‘Global warming’, painting your roof white, and the Chattanooga Chu-Chu’
“About 75% of the Earth is covered in water or ice. Not even the Chu-Chu can paint
water, though he probably thinks that with enough taxpayer subsidy he can walk on it.
And there’s no need to paint ice because it’s white already. That leaves 25% of the
surface.
Let’s cautiously assume that 2% of the land is covered in roads or buildings with roofs:
2% of 25% is 0.5% of the Earth’s surface. That’s how much of it we have to paint.
About 40% of the atmosphere is covered in clouds. They’re white too, so they already
reflect a lot of those glamor-puss photons right back into space where they came from.
Then we have to allow for the fact that most buildings and roads are not in the tropics,
where most of the sunlight comes in. We also have to allow for the fact that white paint is not a perfect reflector. And up to 30% of the land surface of the Earth is covered in snow for up to six months of the year. These factors bring us down to the equivalent of just 0.2% of the “global warming” at the Earth’s surface. Maybe.
Then we have to divide that by 2, because half of the incoming radiation from the Sun is long-wave already, and – however much white paint we throw around – it gets all up close and personal with those hunky heteroatomic molecules on the way in from space.
So, if we paint every road and every roof whiter than white, we’ll reduce “global
warming” by 0.1%. That’s all.
How much warming, in Fahrenheit degrees, will we prevent with the Chu-Chu’s cunning plan? Let’s pretend that the UN’s climate panel is right in assuming that “global warming” caused by humans is going to warm the world by 7 Fahrenheit degrees this century. Actually, it will probably be more like 1 Fahrenheit degree, but let’s clamber aboard the Chu-Chu’s bandwagon even as the wheels are noisily falling off.
Seven Fahrenheit it is, then. All that roof-painting will reduce that global warming by seven thousandths of a Fahrenheit degree. That’s 0.007 Fahrenheit degrees. Yup, that’s all. The world’s temperature monitoring stations won’t even be able to measure it.”
He also estimates that at $4 a gallon for the paint it’s going to cost $17 trillion to paint all the roofs to reduce global temperature by an estimated 0.007 Fahrenheit degrees.