Cooler white roofs – no complaints there

Maybe now NOAA will get rid of all remaining rooftop climate monitoring stations or stations sited over asphalt, like this one. As for the carbon emissions issue, that remains to be seen.

Global Model Confirms: Cool Roofs Can Offset Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Mitigate Global Warming

Cool roof in SolanoCan light-colored rooftops and roads really curb carbon emissions and combat global climate change? The idea has been around for years, but now, a new study by researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory that is the first to use a global model to study the question has found that implementing cool roofs and cool pavements in cities around the world can not only help cities stay cooler, they can also cool the world, with the potential of canceling the heating effect of up to two years of worldwide carbon dioxide emissions.

Because white roofs reflect far more of the sun’s heat than black ones, buildings with white roofs will stay cooler. If the building is air conditioned, less air conditioning will be required, thus saving energy. Even if there is no air conditioning, the heat absorbed by a black roof both heats the space below, making the space less comfortable, and is also carried into the city air by wind—raising the ambient temperature in what is known as the urban heat island effect. Additionally, there’s a third, less familiar way in which a black roof heats the world: it radiates energy directly into the atmosphere, which is then absorbed by the nearest clouds and ends up trapped by the greenhouse effect, contributing to global warming.

Today, U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced a series of initiatives at the Department of Energy to more broadly implement cool roof technologies on DOE facilities and buildings across the federal government. As part of the effort to make the federal government more energy efficient, Chu has directed all DOE offices to install cool roofs, whenever cost effective over the lifetime of the roof, when constructing new roofs or replacing old ones at DOE facilities.  Additionally, the Secretary has also issued a letter to the heads of other federal agencies, encouraging them to take similar steps at their facilities.

“Cool roofs are one of the quickest and lowest cost ways we can reduce our global carbon emissions and begin the hard work of slowing climate change,” said Chu. “By demonstrating the benefits of cool roofs on our facilities, the federal government can lead the nation toward more sustainable building practices, while reducing the federal carbon footprint and saving money for taxpayers.”

In the latest study, the Berkeley Lab researchers and their collaborators used a detailed global land surface model from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, which contained regional information on surface variables, such as topography, evaporation, radiation and temperature, as well as on cloud cover. For the northern hemisphere summer, they found that increasing the reflectivity of roof and pavement materials in cities with a population greater than 1 million would achieve a one-time offset of 57 gigatons (1gigaton equals 1 billion metric tons) of CO2 emissions (31 Gt from roofs and 26 Gt from pavements). That’s double the worldwide CO2 emissions in 2006 of 28 gigatons. Their results were published online in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

“These offsets help delay warming that would otherwise take place if actual CO2 emissions are not reduced,” says Surabi Menon, staff scientist at Berkeley Lab and lead author of the paper.

Co-author Hashem Akbari emphasizes that cool roofs and pavements are only a part of the solution: “Two years worth of emissions is huge, but compared to what we need to do, it’s just a dent in the problem,” says Akbari, the former head of the Berkeley Lab Heat Island Group and now Hydro-Quebec Industrial Research Professor at Concordia University in Montreal. “We’ve been dumping CO2 into the atmosphere for the last 200 years as if there’s no future.”

This study is a follow-up to a 2008 paper published in the journal Climate Change, which calculated the CO2 offset from cool surfaces by using a simplified model that assumed a global average for cloud cover. The earlier paper, co-authored by Akbari, Menon and Art Rosenfeld, a Berkeley Lab physicist who was then a member of the California Energy Commission, found that implementing cool roofs and pavements worldwide could offset 44 gigatons of CO2 (24 Gt from roofs and 20 Gt from pavements).

Equivalent to Getting 300 Millions Cars Off the Road

“If all eligible urban flat roofs in the tropics and temperate regions were gradually converted to white (and sloped roofs to cool colors), they would offset the heating effect of the emission of roughly 24 Gt of CO2, but one-time only,” says Rosenfeld, who returned to Berkeley Lab this year. “However, if we assume that roofs have a service life of 20 years, we can think of an equivalent annual rate of 1.2 Gt per year. That offsets the emissions of roughly 300 million cars (about the cars in the world) for 20 years!”

In both studies, the researchers used a conservative assumption of increasing the average albedo (solar reflectance) of all roofs by 0.25 and of pavements by 0.15. That means a black roof (which has an albedo of 0) would not have to be replaced by a pure white roof (which has an albedo of 1), but just a roof of a cooler color, a scenario that is more plausible to implement.

(Photo courtesy ...) [2]Lighter colored pavement is more reflective, resulting in a cooler surface temperature. (Photo courtesy ASU National Center of Excellence for SMART Innovations)

Roofs and pavements cover 50 to 65 percent of urban areas. Because they absorb so much heat, dark-colored roofs and roadways create what is called the urban heat island effect, where a city is significantly warmer than its surrounding rural areas. This additional heat also eventually contributes to global warming. More than half of the world’s population now lives in cities; by 2040 the proportion of urbanites is expected to reach 70 percent, adding urgency to the urban heat island problem.

The Berkeley Lab study found that global land surface temperature decreased by a modest amount—an average of roughly 0.01degrees Celsius, based on an albedo increase of .003 averaged over all global land surfaces. This relatively small temperature reduction is an indication that implementing cool surfaces can be only part of the solution to the global climate change problem, the researchers say. To put the number in context, consider that global temperatures are estimated to increase about 3 degrees Celsius in the next 40 to 60 years if CO2 emissions continue rising as they have. Preventing that warming would necessitate a 0.05 degree Celsius annual decrease in temperature between now and 2070.

Thus, even modest changes should not be dismissed. “Simply put, a cool roof will save money for homeowners and businesses through reduced air conditioning costs. The real question is not whether we should move toward cool roof technology: it’s why we haven’t done it sooner,” says Rosenfeld.

Other Studies Reach Similar Conclusions

Another recent study on cool roofs, led by Keith Oleson at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and published in Geophysical Research Letters, found that if every roof were painted entirely white, the CO2 emission offsets would be approximately 32 Gt for summer and about 30 Gt annually. While the NCAR study used a different model, the calculated CO2 emission offsets are similar to the results from the Berkeley Lab study and provide a useful and independent verification of the expected CO2 emission offsets from increasing the reflectivity of roofs.

Some observers have pointed out that cool roofs do not make sense in cooler climates because of “winter penalties,” since cooler buildings require more energy to heat. However, the energy savings from cooler buildings usually outweighs any increase in heating costs. Furthermore, in winter, there tends to be more cloud cover; also, the sun is lower and the days are shorter, so a flat roof’s exposure to the sun is significantly reduced.

“Cool roofs have worked for thousands of years in the Mediterranean and Middle Eastern cities, where demand for air conditioning is low,” says Akbari. “If you have a cool roof on your house, that will reduce your energy use from air conditioning and it’s a gift that keeps on giving for many, many years, for the life of the roof.”

Berkeley Lab is a U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory located in Berkeley, California. It conducts unclassified scientific research for DOE’s Office of Science and is managed by the University of California. Visit our website at www.lbl.gov/ [3].

The surface of a black roof (left) heats up 78F above the air  temperature, while the surface of a white roof (right) heats up only  12F. Additionally, with a black roof, far more heat flows both to the  city and into the atmosphere (arrow lengths are proportional to energy  radiated). [4]The surface of a black roof (left) heats up 78F above the air temperature, while the surface of a white roof (right) heats up only 12F. Additionally, with a black roof, far more heat flows both to the city and into the atmosphere (arrow lengths are proportional to energy radiated).

Additional information:


Article printed from Berkeley Lab News Center: http://newscenter.lbl.gov

URL to article: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases/2010/07/19/cool-roofs-offset-carbon-dioxide-emissions/

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/roof-solano-gov-center-CEC.jpg

[2] Image: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/Cool-Pavement-ASU.png

[3] www.lbl.gov/: http://www.lbl.gov/

[4] Image: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/White-Roof-Alliance-single-10.png

[5] here: http://energy.gov/news/9225.htm

[6] Cool Roof: http://videoglossary.lbl.gov/2009/cool-roof/

[7] “Radiative forcing and temperature response to changes in urban albedos and associated CO2 offsets”: http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1748-9326/5/1/014005/erl10_1_014005.html

[8] here: http://www.energy.ca.gov/2008publications/CEC-999-2008-020/CEC-999-2008-020.PDF

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

181 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Editor
July 19, 2010 5:19 pm

crosspatch says:
July 19, 2010 at 5:09 pm
“Maybe it would be better to make them a color that more closely matches the summer albedo of the natural vegetation of the region of that city.
Hmm I wonder if painting surfaces green would be any better than black. Planting roof gardens seems like a good idea – just as long as you don’t plan to use them as weather stations too. I posted this link in the first few comments, but I think it is worth repeating:
http://diggingintheclay.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/thermal-absorption-a-black-and-white-and-green-issue/

CRS, Dr.P.H.
July 19, 2010 5:32 pm

Hmmmm….I had considered aluminized mylar as superior to white, but the University of Michigan boys shot me down! Damn them!
http://www.umich.edu/~lowbrows/reflections/2001/tryan.5.html
Bad enough that they have to continually punish the Fighting Illini on the football field!
This is a very interesting article comparing white vs. aluminized coatings.

crosspatch
July 19, 2010 5:38 pm

Speaking as someone who does a fair amount of desert camping, metalized is hotter than white. Put a mirror out in the full sun for a few hours around noon. That thing will be HOT. Same with a chrome bumper. Paint it white and it is much cooler. That is one reason why all the pipe for my desert shade structures is white. I got tired of burning my hands on the silver metal pipe.

John from CA
July 19, 2010 5:39 pm

Energy Citations Database
The objective of this [2001] study is to evaluate the life cycle costs and market barriers associated with using reflective paving materials in streets and parking lots as a way to reduce the urban heat island effect.
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=791839

crosspatch
July 19, 2010 5:42 pm

One other thing about a white roof in a Northern climate … white reflects in both directions. It is also reflecting heat that would be lost at night through radiation into space back into your house. So if you have 16 hours of night and 8 hours of day, that black roof is an efficient radiator into space for twice as many hours as it can be a collector of solar heat. If you paint it white, it is a much less efficient radiator. It will save you money in both heating AND air conditioning.
Still, I would go with some kind of a greenish brown or something, not stark white.

John from CA
July 19, 2010 5:49 pm

This is a great idea; http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/index.jsp
The Energy Citations Database (ECD) provides free access to over 2.6 million science research citations with continued growth through regular updates. There are over 221,000 electronic documents, primarily from 1943 forward, available via the database. Citations and documents are made publicly available by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).
ECD includes scientific and technical research results in disciplines of interest to DOE such as chemistry, physics, materials, environmental science, geology, engineering, mathematics, climatology, oceanography, and computer science. It includes bibliographic citations to report literature, conference papers, journal articles, books, dissertations, and patents.
Agency Information
ECD was created and developed by DOE’s Office of Scientific and Technical Information with the science-attentive citizen in mind. It contains energy and energy‑related scientific and technical information collected by the Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies, the Energy Research & Development Administration (ERDA) and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC).

Curiousgeorge
July 19, 2010 5:54 pm

This idea of roof lawn and garden: Problem is getting a mower up there, to say nothing of water, fertilizer, dirt, etc, plus having to substantially reinforce most roofs to handle a soaking wet 12″ deep or more layer of dirt. You’d have to water it nearly constantly as anyone who has planted anything in a container knows. Then there is root intrusion into the roof and so on. And don’t forget the bugs. It’s an astoundingly Stupid idea. Besides it’s been done before – Sod houses in the plains, remember?

Wilky
July 19, 2010 6:00 pm

Bird poop is white. Just set up bird feeders on the rooftops and the problem takes care of itself…

Curiousgeorge
July 19, 2010 6:04 pm

And as for painting everything white – ever hear of snow blindness?

Rick
July 19, 2010 6:11 pm

So, what about solar cells? Do they act like black roofs and heat the environment?

crosspatch
July 19, 2010 6:12 pm

Here is a picture of the Claremont Hotel in Berkeley, CA. That white paint made a huge difference in climate control costs.
http://www.claremontresort.com/hotel.shtml

Duncan
July 19, 2010 6:13 pm

“However, if we assume that roofs have a service life of 20 years, we can think of an equivalent annual rate of 1.2 Gt per year. That offsets the emissions of roughly 300 million cars (about the cars in the world) for 20 years!”
Um, so after I paint my roof white…
When I replace my white roof with a new white roof, this will further alleviate global warming?
*facepalm*

AJB
July 19, 2010 6:14 pm

So what’s new? Surely we’ve known all this since March 1804. From Note XXV on page 536 it seems being preoccupied with global warming is nothing new either 🙂

George E. Smith
July 19, 2010 6:15 pm

What is needed is to paint all roofs with 377 Ohm paint (120 pi). This will terminate ALL electromagnetic radiation; and reflect nothing; it will all just get sucked into a bottomless hole.
Of course nothing on the ground would be visible from a satellite either; but who wants to be watched anyway.

John from CA
July 19, 2010 6:23 pm

Curiousgeorge says:
July 19, 2010 at 5:54 pm
“This idea of roof lawn and garden…”
Hanging gardens like grape vines would take the load off the roof and distribute it to the structure of building.
lol, they already make light colored roofing material in rolls. This isn’t rocket science but its more expensive then seeds ; )

Theo Goodwin
July 19, 2010 6:26 pm

Does anyone know how an unpainted tin roof compares to a white roof? I an thinking about the silvery-gray tin that is common for roofing in the USA.

July 19, 2010 6:31 pm

What does painted roofs do to mitigate all those bare rocks and sand out there. Seems like this is just more fun and games for distracting people.
We learned long ago in Florida that white tile roofs were cooler, but that doesn’t say anything about heat energy transfer to the earth, or doubtful it contributes to a lowered albedo of the planet. By and large the earth cools at night giving up the heat it absorbs during the day. If it didn’t we would have all long ago melted.

Charles Higley
July 19, 2010 6:32 pm

This study sends up all kinds of Partially Baked Idea Science!
First: if the global models already are worthless, with many flaws, how can there be confidence in accessory changes and the results? I would like to see some real world tests before putting any value on such studies.
BUT a big second: we have to remember that white surfaces are also not good emitters compared to black and the buildings need to be able to shed the heat generated by energy usage in the building, which always ultimately is realized as heat energy.
Thus, making buildings white or reflective will make it more energy intensive to remove the generated heat from the buildings. I bet the gains from less absorbed energy are going to be significantly offset by the poorer shedding of internal energy.

spangled drongo
July 19, 2010 6:46 pm

Tommy says:
July 19, 2010 at 2:55 pm
“I just had an ironic thought…
“The latest plan to battle global warming: whitewash!”
But will there be any left after Climategate?

Curiousgeorge
July 19, 2010 6:58 pm

John from CA says:
July 19, 2010 at 6:23 pm
Vine covered Walmarts, etc. ? Somehow I don’t think it’s gonna happen.

Don Shaw
July 19, 2010 6:58 pm

I would hope the study is more comprehensive than reported since the actual construction varies throughout. It seems as though the scientists are oblivious to the facts?
For example most homes in the northeast have a vented (to atmosphere) attic above the living space in the upper floor. I believe that new homes have vents in the peak. The insulation is in the ceiling of the upper rooms. Often the attic space is power vented to remove the hotter air from the attic with a fan that is thermostatically controlled. I increased the venting in my roof about 20 years ago and noticed that the top floors were cooler during the summer.
Subsequently the trees have grown to provide shade in the summer while allowing the sun to shine on the roof in the winter. Cooling energy demand would be unaffected by the Lab improvements
I know from experience that the real world is not as simplistic as suggested in the article. Of course there are significant differences in construction depending on the geographic location.
Why is it that I am skeptical that the scientists at the Labs, have a clue about the actual construction home/building and the regional differences. If most commercial construction is flat black roofs without an “attic” above then some benefits are possible. As I recall the roof in the building I used to work had a tar seal to prevent leakage with a white stone covering that would not behave as assumed by the “scientists” at the lab. No white paint required and ?? albeto. There was a craw space above the uper floor with insulation. Would there be any benefit to paint white?

H
July 19, 2010 7:01 pm

Amazing. As discovered in the investigation of the CRU UEA emails, the answer is “Whitewash”!

Big Al
July 19, 2010 7:08 pm

When I re-roofed my house several years ago, I went from brown shingles to light gray ones. I find the attic is cooler of course and so are the upstairs rooms, It was a freebie because of the re-roofing .
I don’t think actually painting a roof would last very long. It would be a heck of a job. I suppose you could just pour buckets of paint at the peak of your roof and let it run down!

Daniel H
July 19, 2010 7:21 pm

We should also consider putting more humans on rooftops by encouraging more sunbathing. I was laying out in the park this weekend soaking up the rays and I felt sorry for the poor grass underneath my beach towel — being deprived of all that energy. Judging by how red my skin is today, I estimate that I soaked up enough solar energy to at least offset Al Gore’s carbon footprint by a few microseconds.
Now that’s progress!

July 19, 2010 7:28 pm

Here’s something to plug into your cost-benefit analysis: top-quality non-reflective asphalt shingles cost about $75 per square (100 square feet) and are guaranteed for 20 years; reflective asphalt shingles (a very pale gray) cost about $150 per square, and are guaranteed for 40 years. Not only do I need to factor in my A/C savings, but also the time value of money, and whether or not I’m even going to live that long….