
Well here we go again, you know the drill. Global warming at fault, other possibilities ignored, multiple press releases. Lake Tanganyika is the second largest lake in the world for fresh water, so naturally any change it is cause for “alarm”. Unfortunately in these press releases there is no mention of a possible increase in turbidity due to human action on and around the lake, decreasing the albedo to absorb more sunlight on the lake surface, warming it. At least somebody has already asked that question previously in peer reviewed literature where they describe the Lake Tanganyika problem as “watershed deforestation, road building, and other anthropogenic activities result in sediment inundation…“.
But in our current press releases, there is this hat tip to anthropogenic: “The team attributes the lake’s increased temperature and the decreased productivity during the 20th century to human-caused global warming.”
First from Brown University:
Brown Geologists Show Unprecedented Warming in Lake Tanganyika

PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] — Lake Tanganyika, the second oldest and the second-deepest lake in the world, could be in for some rough waters.
Geologists led by Brown University have determined the east African rift lake has experienced unprecedented warming during the last century, and its surface waters are the warmest on record. That finding is important, the scientists write in the journal Nature Geoscience, because the warm surface waters likely will affect fish stocks upon which millions of people in the region depend.
The team took core samples from the lakebed that laid out a 1,500-year history of the lake’s surface temperature. The data showed the lake’s surface temperature, 26 degrees Celsius (78.8°F), last measured in 2003, is the warmest the lake has been for a millennium and a half. The team also documented that Lake Tanganyika experienced its biggest temperature change in the 20th century, which has affected its unique ecosystem that relies upon the natural conveyance of nutrients from the depths to jumpstart the food chain upon which the fish survive.
“Our data show a consistent relationship between lake surface temperature and productivity (such as fish stocks),” said Jessica Tierney, a Brown graduate student who this spring earned her Ph.D. and is the paper’s lead author. “As the lake gets warmer, we expect productivity to decline, and we expect that it will affect the [fishing] industry.”
The research grew out of two coring expeditions sponsored by the Nyanza Project in 2001 and 2004. Cores were taken by Andrew Cohen, professor of geological sciences at the University of Arizona and director of the Nyanza project, and James Russell, professor of geological sciences at Brown, who is also Tierney’s adviser.

Lake Tanganyika is bordered by Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Tanzania, and Zambia — four of the poorest countries in the world, according to the United Nations Human Development Index. An estimated 10 million people live near the lake, and they depend upon it for drinking water and for food. Fishing is a crucial component for the region’s diet and livelihood: Up to 200,000 tons of sardines and four other fish species are harvested annually from Lake Tanganyika, a haul that makes up a significant portion of local residents’ diets, according to a 2001 report by the Lake Tanganyika Biodiversity Project.
Lake Tanganyika, one of the richest freshwater ecosystems in the world, is divided into two general levels. Most of the animal species live in the upper 100 meters, including the valuable sardines. Below that, the lake holds less and less oxygen, and at certain depths, it is anoxic, meaning it has no oxygen at all. What this all means is the lake is highly stratified and depends on wind to churn the waters and send nutrients from the depths toward the surface as food for algae, which supports the entire food web of the lake. But as Lake Tanganyika warms, the mixing of waters is lessened, the scientists find, meaning less nutrients are funneled from the depths toward the surface. Worse, more warming at the surface magnifies the difference in density between the two levels; even more wind is needed to churn the waters enough to ferry the nutrients toward the fish-dwelling upper layer.

The researchers’ data show that during the last 1,500 years, intervals of prolonged warming and cooling are linked with low and high algal productivity, respectively, indicating a clear link between past temperature changes and biological productivity in the lake.
“The people throughout southcentral Africa depend on the fish from Lake Tanganyika as a crucial source of protein,” noted Cohen, an author on the paper. “This resource is likely threatened by the lake’s unprecedented warming since the late 19th century and the associated loss of lake productivity.”
Climate change models show a general warming in the region, which, if accurate, would cause even greater warming of the Lake Tanganyika’s surface waters and more stratification in the lake as a whole. “So, as you move forward, you can imagine that density gradient increasing,” said Russell, an author on the paper.
Some researchers have posited that the declining fish stocks in Lake Tanganyika can be attributed mainly to overfishing, and Tierney and Russell say that may be a reason. But they note that the warming in the lake, and the lessened mixing of critical nutrients is exacerbating the stocks’ decline, if not causing it in the first place. “It’s almost impossible for it not to,” Russell said.
Other authors on the paper are Brown graduates Marc Mayes and Natacha Meyer; Christopher Johnson at the University of California, Los Angeles; and Peter Swarzenski, with the United States Geological Survey. The National Science Foundation and the Nyanza Project funded the research.
=======================================
Here is the University of Arizona version
=======================================
Twentieth-Century Warming in Lake Tanganyika is Unprecedented


Warming in the last century threatens one of Africa’s largest inland fisheries.
Lake Tanganyika’s surface waters are warmer than at any time in the previous 1,500 years, a University of Arizona researcher and his colleagues report online in Nature Geoscience.
The rise in temperature during the 20th century is driving a decline in the productivity of the lake, which hosts the second-largest inland fishery in Africa.
“People throughout south-central Africa depend on the fish from Lake Tanganyika as a crucial source of protein,” said study co-author Andrew S. Cohen, a UA professor of geosciences. “This resource is likely threatened by the lake’s unprecedented warming since the late 19th century and the associated loss of lake productivity.”
This is the first detailed record of temperature and its impacts on a tropical African ecosystem that allows scientists to compare the last 100 years with the previous 1,400 years, Cohen said.
The team attributes the lake’s increased temperature and the decreased productivity during the 20th century to human-caused global warming.
“We’ve got a global phenomenon driving something local that has a huge potential impact on the people that live in the region and on the animals that live in the lake,” he said.
The annual catch of the Lake Tanganyika fishery is estimated at about 198,000 tons per year, more than 20 times greater than the U.S. commercial fishery in the Great Lakes, he said. The nations of Burundi, Tanzania, Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo border the lake, which is the longest lake in the world and the second deepest.
The surface waters of Lake Tanganyika are the most biologically productive part of the lake. For the 1,400 years before 1900, those waters were no warmer than 75.7 F (24.3 degrees C). Since 1900, the lake’s surface waters warmed 3 degrees F, reaching 78.8 degrees F (26 degrees C) in 2003, the date of the researchers’ last measurement.
The researchers used sediment cores from the lake bed to reconstruct the 1,500-year history of the lake. The scientists analyzed the cores for chemicals produced by microbes and left in the sediments to determine the lake’s past temperature and productivity.
Because sediment is deposited in the lake in annual layers, the cores provide a detailed record of Lake Tanganyika’s past temperatures and productivity and of the regional wildfires.
The instrument record of lake temperatures from the 20th century agrees with the temperature analyses from the cores, Cohen said.
The cores were extracted as part of the UA’s Nyanza Project, a research training program that brought together U.S. and African scientists and students to study tropical lakes. The National Science Foundation funded the project.
“A big part of our mandate for the Nyanza Project was looking at the interconnectivity between climate, human activity, resources and biodiversity,” said Cohen, who directed the multi-year project.
Lake Tanganyika and similar tropical lakes are divided into two general levels. Most of the fish and other organisms live in the upper 300 feet (about 100 meters). At depths below that, the lake waters contain less and less oxygen. Below approximately 600 feet, the lake water, although nutrient-rich, has no oxygen and fish cannot live there.
During the region’s windy season, the winds make the lake’s surface waters slosh back and forth, mixing some of the deep water with the upper layers. This annual mixing resupplies the lake’s food web with nutrients and drives the lake’s productivity cycle, Cohen said.
However, as Lake Tanganyika warms, the upper waters of the lake become less dense. Therefore, stronger winds are required to churn the lake waters enough to mix the deeper waters with the upper layer. As a result, the upper layers of the lake are becoming increasingly nutrient-poor, reducing the lake’s productivity.
In addition, warmer water contains less dissolved oxygen, reducing the quality of the habitat for some fish species.
Other lakes in Africa are showing similar effects to those the team found in Lake Tanganyika, he said.
The finding has implications for lakes in more temperate climates.
“Increasingly, lakes in the U.S. are warming and they’re behaving more like these African lakes,” Cohen said. “There’s a potential for learning a lot about where we’re going by seeing where those lakes already are.”
The team’s article, “Late twentieth-century warming in Lake Tanganyika unprecedented since AD 500,” will be published in the June issue of Nature Geoscience.
Cohen’s co-authors on the paper are first author Jessica E. Tierney of Brown University in Providence, R.I.; Marc T. Mayes, Natacha Meyer and James M. Russell, also at Brown University; Christopher Johnson, a former University of Arizona student now at the University of California, Los Angeles; and Peter W. Swarzenski of the U.S. Geological Survey in Santa Cruz, Calif. The National Science Foundation funded the research.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
95% of the east African natural forest has been destroyed in recent times.
Now there is something that will impact on the local climate.
There is a strong possibility that the heating is GEOTHERMAL. Lake Tanganyika is estimated to be the second deepest in the world, at 1,470 metres (4,820 ft), after Lake Baikal in Siberia. Water is a good thermal conductor (convection), while surrounding ground is not. Secular magnetic changes 1950 -2000 show that there are geological movements in area of the East African rift valley.
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/NFC4.htm
Damn, what is with the U of A? That’s where I got my BS degree.
They’re becoming an embarassment.
Hopefully the College of Engineering and Mines, where I studied, is not infected by the geosciences faculty (have they been moved to the Humnaities and Social Sciences College, along with all the long-haired, 60s retread profs, or what?).
Who’s responsible for writing these kooky press releases at the U of A?
I just sent an e-mail to the editors.
Since the globe hasn’t seen much global warming these last ten years, major cities and airports excepted, alarmists must point to the supposed effects of such warming. After all, if we see the effects of warming then warming there must have been.
‘People that are really very weird can get into sensitive positions and have tremendous impact on history.’ Al Gore.
Need I say more! [ Hat-tip to Tom Bradby who gives this quote in another context, http://blog.itv.com/news/tombradby/ ]
If you say it is caused by global warming or even that it may be & put any reference to other possibilities in the small print you get funding from (ultimately) the government.
If you say it is not evidence of global warming you don’t.
What is a passably honest scientist who thinks the phenomenon really deserves study to say?
How nice that they give us a picture of Jessica Tierney rather than Andrew Cohen or James Russell – can’t think why. Yesterday I fell in love with the youngest British woman climber of Everest, Bonita Norris. http://www.bonitanorris.com/
It is more about grant money to the University to put out more educated idiots into the “PEER REVIEW” system.
What happened to the good honest here ‘s the data and this is what we did to come to our conclusions? Is there draught in the area? Less cloud cover affects more solar radiation and the replenishment of the lake through precipitaion. What were the water levels? How many measurements of surface water and where? shorelines would be much warmer compared to much deeper.
“barefootgirl says:
May 18, 2010 at 9:50 pm
Anyone actually read the paper? I wouldn’t just rely on the media coverage. From the first press release shown here, it seems they are mostly talking about fluctuation in productivity linked to temperature. In the second, they mention a link to GHGs. What does the actual paper say? I think until you actually READ the paper rather than these press releases you really don’t have anything to say.
First, welcome to WUWT- clearly, by your responses, you are new here and new to the new science reality.
Only those who have access, and who are capable will read the actual paper. The vast majority will see or hear only a twist on the press releases. The vast majority. For the same reason many here will not fork over $18 for the paper, neither will the media. They don’t need to- that’s what press releases are for. The vast majority of “journalists” will only appropriate the portions of the press releases that a) fit the space, b) fit the bias, c) fit the agenda. For a large part of the world readership, the actual content of the paper doesn’t matter; the science in it doesn’t matter. Even the truth of the science doesn’t matter.
All that is required of current science publication by branded institutions is that the paper be “peer-reviewed” by somebody who can advance the agenda. By the time the word gets out that the scientist wears no clothes, the press release has done its job. Scientists that allow these kinds of press releases to stand with their name on(in) them have abandoned their scientific credentials. The content of their papers is soon lost in the miasma of reports, citations, politics and spin. Modern science publication is coming as close to McLuhanism as any media can be. New PhDs need to be especially careful about allowing them themselves to be hijacked; the coming cleansing will sweep them up too.
Geoff Sherrington: You wrote a brief but pertinent comment on measurement error and the many and complex drivers of temperature in Lake Tanganyika. The AGW theory, with its own measurement errors and exclusion of other drivers, bears a family resemblance to this.
However did wider society allow science to spout this futurological drivel to us? When Captain Cook was sent to Tahiti to observe the transit of Venus, heads would have rolled if he’d reported, “Er, no, Venus didn’t turn up”. How red-faced would Oppenhiemer have been if the Manhattan project had resulted in a little clicking sound? Science used to (…in fairness, most of it still does…) depend on verifiable outcomes.
These latter-day Nostradamuses are getting away with murder, making careers out of predictions which can only be falsified after they can’t answer for their claptrap.
Just a reminder that Lake Tanganiyka is part of the East African Rift system. It has arguably some of the highest heat flow measurements throughout Africa. As memory serves heat flow in these modern rifts where the continental crust is thinner is in the order of 110 mw/m2 as compared to more normal ranges of 20 – 30 mw/m2 in the cratoninc portion of Africa. In a few hundred million years I wouldn’t be surprised to see that everything east of the rift system was rafted out into the Indian Ocean.
Its active as the hydrothermal activity suggests.
Haven’t read the paper but I would hope someone who works for the USGS can separate out crustal heating from atmospheric heating.
barefootgirl says:
May 18, 2010 at 9:50 pm
Anyone actually read the paper? I wouldn’t just rely on the media coverage. From the first press release shown here, it seems they are mostly talking about fluctuation in productivity linked to temperature. In the second, they mention a link to GHGs. What does the actual paper say? I think until you actually READ the paper rather than these press releases you really don’t have anything to say.
______________________________________________________________________
Fine, why don’t you spend the eighteen dollars for access and report back with the data they use to support their statements. I am out of work and broke so I can not.
MarcH says:
May 18, 2010 at 8:30 pm
“The results stretching back to 500AD are essentially based on interpretation of core from ONE borehole.”
I’ll see your ‘one borehole’ and raise you ‘two trees’.
A study of a single lake in Africa cannot be linked to AGW. A more interesting study would have been to compare two lakes in different parts of the world where humans have had no local impact. Hmmm…
“”Up to 200,000 tons of sardines and four other fish species are harvested annually from Lake Tanganyika, a haul that makes up a significant portion of local residents’ diets, according to a 2001 report by the Lake Tanganyika Biodiversity Project.””
And what was the annual harvest in 1901? How many “local residents” then?
The team attributes the lake’s increased temperature and the decreased productivity during the 20th century to human-caused global warming.
The authors forgot — “The Team” is always capitalized…
The concept of climate change has evolved to the point where it no longer needs co2 in order to create havoc. It is now a phenomenon in its own right. (possibly like dark matter). The phrase is most useful in obtaining grants for scientific studies and is more than capable of generating large amounts of money in order to perpetuate itself. It even has its own laws like azimovs robotics laws.
1)all projects that confim its existance of agw will supported and funded generously and without question
2) Any new project which is intended to support the first law will also be funded.
2) Any project containing the words “green” “renewable” or “endangered” etc will be seriously considered, provided that their findings do not conflict with the other two laws
“Unprecedented” – Without precedent.
“Precedent” – An act or instance that may be used as an example in dealing with subsequent similar instances.
Ergo – The use of the word “Unprecedented” is unscientific hogwash, it cannot be used without evidence of all subsequent instances being known. ‘All subsequent instances’ means a complete record back to the very beginning, in time, of the person, place or thing being studied.
Note – In the language of ‘New Age Psyence’ the use of the term “unprecedented” is called for whenever data suggests that something is (or might be) hotter, colder, wetter, drier, or whatever, today –or whenever– than it was yesterday –or whenever.
_________________
As noted by others, LOOK OUT FOR GREENLAND – the land is rising, the ice is melting, the weather is changing, the sky is falling. It’s “unprecedented”, really! (Well it IS if you’re a ‘Psyentist’.)
http://www.physorg.com/news193410777.html
So then, it must be WTWT. The lakes are warming, or at least their surface layers are, and through the magical powers of CAGW/CC they are apparently warming much faster than the air itself is. These nitwits confuse and conflate actual localized environmental effects man has, e.g. pollution, deforestation, over-fishing, etc. with an overall warming of the atmosphere of perhaps .3C (since at least 1/2 of the temp increase measured is due to UHI, faulty placement of sensors, and station drop-out) since the end of the LIA. I guess they no longer actually teach at these “Universities”, but more indoctrinate. Very sad.
@ur momisugly David L says: May 18, 2010 at 9:59 pm
Why does global warming only seem to occur in far away places like the arctic, central Africa, or the top of the Himalayas, but not here in Philadelphia?
Witnesses David, witnesses. When you’re mugging someone you don’t want too many people to see.
Though they have managed a pretty neat trick. To disprove AGW you must prove a negative, which if I remember correctly is a logical impossibility. And to top it off they make it as difficult as possible by doing research in the most remote places they can get to. Which means the average guy sitting in Philadelphia doesn’t have much of a chance to wander by and ask what they’re up to, much less verify what they’ve done.
I am still trying to figure out how they came up with an absolute temperature value measured to the tenth of a degree from sediment cores. Seems as if that is simply not possible, and the range of error must be quite large. No mention of that however in the press release. Perhaps I will try to get the real article through the university library.
It’s the turbidity changes that are affecting the temperature…. Not atmospheric temps… Certainly not CO2.
I am ashamed of people like this and I am tired of seeing my taxes used for things like this. Everyone who says they are out for grant money is right. What else can they do with their PhD but scam for grant money? They have never worked in a real job in their life. Academia, academia.
Forest clearing, population increases, over-fishing, fertilizer run off, and volcanic action could have all caused this. Anyone with any sense could see this and not just blame it on agw.
pesadilla says:
May 19, 2010 at 5:35 am
The concept of climate change has evolved to the point where it no longer needs co2 in order to create havoc. It is now a phenomenon in its own right. (possibly like dark matter). The phrase is most useful in obtaining grants for scientific studies and is more than capable of generating large amounts of money in order to perpetuate itself. It even has its own laws like azimovs robotics laws.
0)all projects that confim its existance of agw will supported and funded generously and without question
1) Any new project which is intended to support the first law will also be funded.
1) Any project containing the words “green” “renewable” or “endangered” etc will be seriously considered, provided that their findings do not conflict with the other two laws
Excellent! I have taken the liberty of renumbering the Laws of ACC (after messrs. Fibonacci, Wm. of Occ’m, & Codd and Date)