The 2009 weblog awards – zilched

Kevin Aylward makes a surprising announcement. Guess I’ll have to settle for “nominee with a boatload of nominations“.

Update – The 2009 Weblog Awards are off

4 Jan 2010

It is with a great deal of regret that I must inform everyone that The 2009 Weblog Awards are canceled.

Unfortunately the resources required to handle the load of voting (nearly 1,000,000 votes in 2008) could not be adequately provisioned. Even if the servers and bandwidth required appeared today it would be at least a few weeks before everything could be ready for voting.

This has always been a very, very labor intensive process, and in recent years with our success a very expensive competition to run. It’s hard to have unlimited resources provisioned for seven days of voting. In the past we’ve had to provision expensive servers for several months to prepare for the crush of voting.

We really tried to solve the resource problems with new ideas (such as cloud computing) this year, but ultimately we were not able to make things work to our satisfaction. I’m very proud of the voting platform we built for The Weblog Awards over the years, and the quality voting experience we’ve been able to deliver. The one thing I will not do is compromise that voting experience.

Rather than run a competition that had a high possibility of technically failing, the more prudent choice seemed to be regroup and consider our alternatives for hosting these awards going forward.

Thank you to those who have supported The Weblog Awards over the years, we appreciate your support, and our sorry we couldn’t make things work this year.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

69 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom in cold Florida
January 4, 2010 4:03 pm

Well instead of voting perhaps we all should simply put $1 in the tip jar.

baldanders
January 4, 2010 4:04 pm

I’m not really very familiar with Pharyngula. Perhaps it is really “hate-filled.” I couldn’t say. But is the fact that it is “atheistic” very important?

Leon Brozyna
January 4, 2010 4:59 pm

Here’s a very unofficial count of the top five science blog sites based on number of nominations received:
1 — Climate Audit = 2,282
2 — WUWT = 1,734
3 — Denial Depot = 316
4 — Oil Drum = 193
5 — RC = 158
Note: Total includes both the nomination comment out of 142 comments as well as the number of “pluses” that were clicked on each nomination.

E.M.Smith
Editor
January 4, 2010 5:30 pm

E.M.Smith (14:34:02) : I’ll put up a posting on my blog in a few hours so if folks want to thrash on this they can do so without cluttering up Anthony’s site with religious “stuff”.
Folks wishing to follow up on the “religion” vs “atheist” angle are welcome to take that discussion here:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2010/01/04/darwin-expelled-and-religious-science/

Gail Combs
January 4, 2010 6:20 pm

Steamboat McGoo (13:23:56) :
“Darn, and after several of us took the time to get RealClimate nominated as the Best Religious Blog – and got it done! When the polls closed RC was a clear top contender in the finalist noms.
That would have been priceless….”

ROTFLMAO…. The tears are running down my face. I really needed that laugh.

January 4, 2010 6:48 pm

OH REALLY … isn’t that special?

January 4, 2010 7:02 pm


E.M.Smith (14:46:13) :

A telco often asks for 90 days lead time. If you pull teeth with a hammer you can get it down to 30 days. For ‘this week’ or ‘now’ you are SOL unless a very big account.
Oh, and if your router has a T1 interface card and you buy a T3 from the telco, that can be another month or three. If you have a slot to put it in, and don’t need a new 5 figure chassis…
So once you’ve sized and provisioned, if you get over run, you are ‘in the do’ for months. For a time critical event, you just drop packets and die.

In most all cases now, they haven ‘t run ‘copper’ (T1s or 3) for over a decade; you get fiber to a CSU/DSU (Channel service unit/Data service unit) and are tariffed (charged) for a T1 or what ever it was your contract called for out the other side. From that point forward it’s just routing changes or keyboard changes in the ‘nailed up’ cross-connect connection.
.
.

E.M.Smith
Editor
January 4, 2010 7:27 pm

_Jim (19:02:47) :
In most all cases now, they haven ‘t run ‘copper’ (T1s or 3) for over a decade; you get fiber to a CSU/DSU (Channel service unit/Data service unit) and are tariffed (charged) for a T1 or what ever it was your contract called for out the other side. From that point forward it’s just routing changes or keyboard changes in the ‘nailed up’ cross-connect connection.

I’ve configured CSU/DSU boxes. Nice if you have one, but lots of places are still wire, not fiber.
I’ve managed shops with big fiber infrastructure, and we had large blocks of copper still in the walls and the POP. Each layer just got added on top…
Yeah, for a ‘new build’ it’s all the new stuff ( I managed a 6000 person build out for a tech company about 6 years ago with multiple Cisco 6509s and 6513s with fiber cross connects in each building and a fibre MAN around the bay area to their other sites.) Nice stuff if you have it.
I’m just explaining how it might be a lead time issue, not saying it has to be. Especially as these folks are talking about a temp install and not talking big bucks established account.
(Built out one site with exactly the structure you are talking about. Fiber to a CSU / DSU with proportional billing and a ‘few hours’ SLA from the ISP. At the same site had a few dozen leased line T1s on copper… )
I’m old, but I’m not that out of contact…
Were I doing it, I’d host it at a COLO facility with a gazillion fiber feed and the ability to meter my share on an hour by hour basis. But we’re not talking about how I’d avoid the problems, we’re talking about how they might have ended up with the problems.
(I’d also run it on a virtual machine in a large virtual cluster environment with at least 2 ISPS and a big load balancer… if they had enough money 😉 and not buy any hardware at all.)

baldanders
January 4, 2010 10:38 pm

I disagree, Dr Doom. I think incompetence is more likely than a conspiracy to deny WUWT the crown. I’ve been working on stuff like this for a long time and one thing I’ve learned is that you should never underestimate incompetence. It’s fricking rampant.

Geoff Sherrington
January 4, 2010 10:39 pm

Tom Fuller (11:35:38) :
“I will ask the editors at Examiner.com if they are willing to host the awards this year”.
Why not ask the editors of “Nature”?

photon without a Higgs
January 4, 2010 11:20 pm

it saves people the anguish of deciding between CA and WUWT. Though WUWT would have won. 🙂

Kevin
January 5, 2010 12:29 am

Bah.
I’ll give you the results right here.
Best Global Warming Blog – WUWT
Best Conservative Blog – Ace of Spades
Best Liberal Blog – Google News
Blog most reeking of [snip] – realclimate.org
tada!

tallbloke
January 5, 2010 2:19 am

Tom in cold Florida (16:03:50) :
Well instead of voting perhaps we all should simply put $1 in the tip jar.

If everyone did that, Anthony would have enough to launch a class action lawsuit against the EPA.

January 5, 2010 5:28 am

Oh, great, so we’re (WUWT, TRF) the acting winners for another year. 😉

Steve in SC
January 5, 2010 6:00 am

Dr DoOm (21:17:35) :
Yes it is pretty evident that the fix is in.

J.Hansford
January 5, 2010 8:19 am

Good idea… If it can’t be done competently, it’s better left until it works… Otherwise people would be whinging…. Pity though. Hopefully it will return next year.

MartinGAtkins
January 5, 2010 8:38 am

cbullitt (14:05:26) :
McGoo and I and our accomplices take full responsibility.
http://tinyurl.com/yakeulq
I’m not first at much in my life so fair suck of the lemon.
My nomination for RC went in on 10th November 11:40 AM
Robert A. November 10, 2009 6:17 PM a close second.
cbullitt November 11, 2009 9:53 AM you came in third.
Your web page came out on the November 11.
http://cbullitt.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/the-gospel-of-mcgoo-unto-the-agw-mongers-giveth-the-finger/
It was a case of spontaneous mischief.

Indiana Bones
January 5, 2010 7:55 pm

Message to Kevin:
Sorry, but pulling a “tech overwhelmed me” just when your project is gaining major acceptance is – inexcusable. It’s a voting program kevin. Get a sponsor and lease the server space and sell advertising. You blew a lucrative opportunity!

January 6, 2010 2:59 pm

I was nominated and in the Top Ten in 2008 for Best European Blog (non UK) and didn’t even know until a nasty competitor started posting mean comments on my blog, i.e. maybe five days before voting ended! I hustled as many votes as I could and ended up in second to last place, before the blog from Greenland.
The “winner” had a crew of cronies voting endlessly from different IP addresses and as much as admitted it on his blog. He continued to be base and petty even after his big victory, via commentary on his blog and mine.
(Oh, Look at That! I see my crass former competitor has found your site as well…Luboš Motl [see above] )
Though the nomination was a nice, unexpected ego boost I was left with a bad taste in my mouth afterwards, though no fault of Weblog Awards (it would have been nice to have been informed of my nomination by them, however.) I’ve ended up here on this blog a few times now via Red Ice Creations and I thoroughly enjoy your writing and the info you’re delivering. Nomination or no, KUDOS to you and keep up the Great Work!