Sorry no graphics, no abstract or paper (not published yet, due Friday the 27th, I hate it when they do this) the Penn State press release was rather spartan. So I’ll provide this one showing Mann’s previous work where the Medieval Warm Period doesn’t much show up at all:

So here’s the question, the press release below mentions sediments. Place your bets now on whether the Tiljander sediment series remains inverted or not. (h/t to Leif Svalgaard) – Anthony
Past regional cold and warm periods linked to natural climate drivers
Intervals of regional warmth and cold in the past are linked to the El Niño phenomenon and the so-called “North Atlantic Oscillation” in the Northern hemisphere’s jet stream, according to a team of climate scientists. These linkages may be important in assessing the regional effects of future climate change.
“Studying the past can potentially inform our understanding of what the future may hold,” said Michael Mann, Professor of meteorology, Penn State.
Mann stresses that an understanding of how past natural changes have influenced phenomena such as El Niño, can perhaps help to resolve current disparities between state-of the-art climate models regarding how human-caused climate change may impact this key climate pattern.
Mann and his team used a network of diverse climate proxies such as tree ring samples, ice cores, coral and sediments to reconstruct spatial patterns of ocean and land surface temperature over the past 1500 years. They found that the patterns of temperature change show dynamic connections to natural phenomena such as El Niño. They report their findings in today’s issue (Nov. 27) of Science.
Mann and his colleagues reproduced the relatively cool interval from the 1400s to the 1800s known as the “Little Ice Age” and the relatively mild conditions of the 900s to 1300s sometimes termed the “Medieval Warm Period.”
“However, these terms can be misleading,” said Mann. “Though the medieval period appears modestly warmer globally in comparison with the later centuries of the Little Ice Age, some key regions were in fact colder. For this reason, we prefer to use ‘Medieval Climate Anomaly’ to underscore that, while there were significant climate anomalies at the time, they were highly variable from region to region.”
The researchers found that 1,000 years ago, regions such as southern Greenland may have been as warm as today. However, a very large area covering much of the tropical Pacific was unusually cold at the same time, suggesting the cold La Niña phase of the El Niño phenomenon.
This regional cooling offset relative warmth in other locations, helping to explain previous observations that the globe and Northern hemisphere on average were not as warm as they are today.
Comparisons between the reconstructed temperature patterns and the results of theoretical climate model simulations suggest an important role for natural drivers of climate such as volcanoes and changes in solar output in explaining the past changes. The warmer conditions of the medieval era were tied to higher solar output and few volcanic eruptions, while the cooler conditions of the Little Ice Age resulted from lower solar output and frequent explosive volcanic eruptions.
These drivers had an even more important, though subtle, influence on regional temperature patterns through their impact on climate phenomena such as El Niño and the North Atlantic Oscillation. The modest increase in solar output during medieval times appears to have favored the tendency for the positive phase of the NAO associated with a more northerly jet stream over the North Atlantic. This brought greater warmth in winter to the North Atlantic and Eurasia. A tendency toward the opposite negative NAO phase helps to explain the enhanced winter cooling over a large part of Eurasia during the later Little Ice Age period.
The researchers also found that the model simulations failed to reproduce the medieval La Nina pattern seen in the temperature reconstructions. Other climate models focused more specifically on the mechanisms of El Niño do however reproduce that pattern. Those models favor the “Thermostat” mechanism, where the tropical Pacific counter-intuitively tends to the cold La Niña phase during periods of increased heating, such as provided by the increase in solar output and quiescent volcanism of the medieval era.
The researchers note that, if the thermostat response holds for the future human-caused climate change, it could have profound impacts on particular regions. It would, for example, make the projected tendency for increased drought in the Southwestern U.S. worse.
Other researchers on the project were Zhihua Zhang, former postdoctoral fellow in meteorology now at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Scott Rutherford, Roger Williams University; Raymond S. Bradley, University of Massachusetts; Malcolm K. Hughes and Fenbiao Ni, University of Arizona; Drew Shindell and Greg Faluvegi, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and Caspar Ammann, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
The National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, NOAA, and NASA supported this work.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Can anyone really believe these jokers anymore? GIGO and they keep on redefining the dump. I have no faith in trees proxies at all. To me its all junk science. Could you imagine the weight that would be given to paleodendroclimatology if not for this AGW supporting magic numbers methodology?
Re: Will, 20:50:38 – “What goes on?”
Google owns youtube now. Google is probably the most “progressive” organization on the planet since the Soviet Union collapsed. Their data is as reliable as Jones’ or Mann’s, but they don’t have to worry about “Peer Review”.
[Moderator, please note, this is me, I’ve just massaged my handle a bit to make it clear.]
Same old team. Is there no scientist who can do work without having to be part of a big team? Is this the only way each scientist can keep up his number count of “peer-reviewed” papers?
Isn’t this simply another variation of the “warmist” theme that the MWP was a regional anomaly rather than a global phenomenon? Maybe I misunderstood what I was reading, but my dim comprehension of the New Zealand cave studies and the Woods Hole ocean sediment findings indicated that the warming was global.
CH
I am reading W J Burroughs ‘Weather Cycles Real or Imaginary?’ and opposite page 20 is wonderful gently descending oscillating graph produced by smoothing random numbers using a low pass filter. What ! A respectable graph produced by random numbers !!
This Slutsky-Yule (yes it is getting near) effect was named after two statisticians who demonstrated in 1927 that 19th century trade cycles could be reproduced from a series of random numbers.
I found that amazing, just what degree of confidence does it take to produce a climate correlation graph that differs from that produced by a random number generator?
Will Mann’s effort pass the test ?
OT but highly unlikely ETS will pass Australian Senate now. If the Liberal skeptics stick to their guns they should easily win the next election in 2 years (unless of course most labour members become skeptics by then and it becomes a non-issue!). As climategate continues and temperatures do not rise support will surely erode to 0 eventually.
So Mann has got a new paper that reconstructs the Medieval Warm Period and changes it’s name? Maybe instead of working on spurious paleoclimatology to refashion a “Medieval Climate Anomaly” he could spend some time addressing the “Modern Ethics Anomaly”.
@ur momisugly Claude Harvey (22:44:15) :
“Isn’t this simply another variation of the “warmist” theme that the MWP was a regional anomaly rather than a global phenomenon? Maybe I misunderstood what I was reading, but my dim comprehension of the New Zealand cave studies and the Woods Hole ocean sediment findings indicated that the warming was global.”
Not to mention elephant seals breeding on the Antarctic continent during the MWP where it’s now too cold. The Team usually say that the MWP was confined to Europe & North America. I guess that means Antarctica, New Zealand and all those other places drifted away from each other over the last millennium. Or that my geography’s wrong as well as my history.
[Hi Ed! Miss you guys too. Unfortunately, Stinkjet raised the noise level too much and leaving was the only way I knew to shut him up. While he eventually gave me “permission” to return, I imagine that was just so I would and he could start up again.]
Sorry for the OT here. Luckily, you guys ban trolls.
Roger Knights (22:38:11) :
China promises reductions based on CO2 emissions/GDP. Afterall, if western history is any indication, CO2 emissions based on GDP have declined as prosperity increased. Its a no-brainer for China.
The west should agree and initiate measures when China reaches our already low ratios. But Obama and others will jump on China’s meaningless promise, and insread impose absolute reductions.
Konrad, anomaly is an astronomical term they got from Jim Hansen.
It’s the angle between the radius vector of an orbiting body and the major axis of the orbit measured from the perihelion in the direction of motion.
I think Mann got as far as “astronomical” in the sense of “big”.
Hope that helps 🙂
wow mainstream just now
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/27/the-global-cooling-cover-up/?feat=home_editorials
NickB. says:
November 26, 2009 at 8:46 pm
A few snippets aside, this sounds a lot like what “the deniers” have been saying for the last few years
No, Mann is setting up the next round of the shell game. He says the MWP was not particularly warm, and certainly not global – same propaganda as before. Same goal-oriented research. Good example of this in the Comments above.
Mann has identified the oscillations as a powerful tool for critics of his favoured theory, and is setting about ‘disarming’ them.
And his conclusion? Global Warming is even scarier than we thought. At least he’s consistent.
Vg (21:18:04) :
more hanky panky
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2009/11/26/skewed-science.aspx
Very interesting… and very damaging to CRU as the researchers “needed raw temperature measurements that had not been averaged or adjusted in any way”… and the results show how the CRU averaging, boxing, adjusting and cherry picking produces bogus results… it is wonderful to see that some researchers are using real minimum and maximum data…
Thank you for the link…
I hope the article get reposted in full on WUWT.
You have to wonder if Mr. Mann had that paper sitting the refrigerator, waiting for the day when the the emperor was discovered to have no clothes. He will now allow the MWP to be rehabilitated – but only on his terms (even a brand new name to boot).
Now discovered: the Mann Consistency Anomaly.
Well, Science has a policy that authors must honor all reasonable requests for data and methods. I wonder how many readers here would care to write a letter to Science requesting the data and methods?
I imagine that the editors mail boxes could be filled up with requests from readers here.
I just had some free nights and decided to watch “Connections,” the series James Burke made in the late 90s.
It is remarkable to see the weight he puts on climate in that series. Not an episode goes by without mention of the MWP and the LIA. In James Burke’s view it is the prinipal driving force behind so much of what happened in recorded history from the Middle Ages on. I would go so far as to say that those two climatic periods co-star through the entire series.
Maybe Mickey Mann had some free time on his hands too.
Talking about Mickeys, let’s not forget his more famous rodent namesake, who once said: “Arithmetic is being able to count to twenty without taking off your shoes.” Mr. Mann…
“The researchers found that 1,000 years ago, regions such as southern Greenland may have been as warm as today”
It’s a back track ;-|
Seems to me, that this backs up Linzdens Hypothesis of a self regulating Earth Iris.
Amazing that in one paper he has verified two of the sceptical arguments. I think he has redeeming qualities, and should be forgiven….. :-O
Reminder: Skeptic Tim Ball is on Coast to Coast AM in 30 minutes.
Mann never said there wasn’t a Medieval warm period.
Also, if you question the reliability of paleoclimate data, or say that it’s been “inverted,” what’s YOUR basis for estimating the magnitude of the medieval warm period?
I am sure you have all noticed the Mann gap by now… that is the variation between reality and fairy science.
Mann is not worth the time of day.
All of this group do need ethics reprogramming… but does anyone think they can be trusted to do anything honestly?
At this point we have polluted the scientific data and a significant number of former ‘scientists’ … we need to start over… or drop the entire BS.
This Mann guy, can he explain to me how grapes grew at Hadrian’s wall if it was so “mild”?
Always good to have a recent peer-reviewed paper in your resume when you’re looking for a new job.
Am I missing something or is he calling the MWP “regional”? From my reading of papers published in just the past year, it seems climate was doing much the same thing in both the Western and Eastern halves of the Northern Hemisphere. Both Alaska and Europe show changes due to warming during that period.
First dawn. Now, sunset of Mann. Your services are no longer needed, sir. Thank you for playing the game. We now return you to your regularly scheduled program.
“Mann and his team used a network of diverse climate proxies such as tree ring samples,”
Run Bambi,run, Mann is in the Forest