UPDATE: Response from CRU in interview with another website, see end of this post.
The details on this are still sketchy, we’ll probably never know what went on. But it appears that University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit has been hacked and many many files have been released by the hacker or person unknown.

UPDATED: Original image was for Met Office – corrected This image source: www.cru.uea.ac.uk
I’m currently traveling and writing this from an airport, but here is what I know so far:
An unknown person put postings on some climate skeptic websites that advertised an FTP file on a Russian FTP server, here is the message that was placed on the Air Vent today:
We feel that climate science is, in the current situation, too important to
be kept under wraps.
We hereby release a random selection of correspondence, code, and documents
The file was large, about 61 megabytes, containing hundreds of files.
It contained data, code, and emails from Phil Jones at CRU to and from many people.
I’ve seen the file, it appears to be genuine and from CRU. Others who have seen it concur- it appears genuine. There are so many files it appears unlikely that it is a hoax. The effort would be too great.
Here is some of the emails just posted at Climate Audit on this thread:
http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7801#comments
I’ve redacted email addresses and direct phone numbers for the moment. The emails all have US public universities in the email addresses, making them public/FOIA actionable I believe.
From: Phil Jones
To: mann@vxxxxx.xxx
Subject: Fwd: John L. Daly dead
Date: Thu Jan 29 14:17:01 2004
From: Timo H‰meranta
To:
Subject: John L. Daly dead
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:04:28 +0200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
Mike,
In an odd way this is cheering news ! One other thing about the CC paper – just found
another email – is that McKittrick says it is standard practice in Econometrics journals
to give all the data and codes !! According to legal advice IPR overrides this.
Cheers
Phil
“It is with deep sadness that the Daly Family have to announce the sudden death of John
Daly.Condolences may be sent to John’s email account (daly@john-daly.com)
“
Reported with great sadness
Timo H‰meranta
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Timo H‰meranta, LL.M.
Moderator, Climatesceptics
Martinlaaksontie 42 B 9
01620 Vantaa
Finland, Member State of the European Union
Moderator: timohame@yxxxxx.xxx
Private: timo.hameranta@xxxxx.xx
Home page: [1]personal.inet.fi/koti/hameranta/climate.htm
Moderator of the discussion group “Sceptical Climate Science”
[2]groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics
“To dwell only on horror scenarios of the future
shows only a lack of imagination”. (Kari Enqvist)
“If the facts change, I’ll change my opinion.
What do you do, Sir” (John Maynard Keynes)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0)xxxxxx
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) xxxxxx
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@xxx.xx.xx
NR4 7TJ
UK
—————————————————————————-
References
1. http://personal.inet.fi/koti/hameranta/climate.htm
2. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics
From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,mann@xxxxx.xxx, mhughes@xxxx.xxx
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@xxx.xx.xx,t.osborn@xxxx.xxx
Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or
first thing tomorrow.
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps
to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from
1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual
land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land
N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.
Cheers
Phil
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) xxxxx
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) xxxx
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@xxxx.xxx
NR4 7TJ
UK
—————————————————————————-
From: Jonathan Overpeck
To: “Michael E. Mann”
Subject: letter to Senate
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:49:31 -0700
Cc: Caspar M Ammann , Raymond Bradley , Keith Briffa , Tom Crowley , Malcolm Hughes , Phil Jones , mann@xxxxx.xxx, jto@xxxxx.xx.xxx, omichael@xxxxx.xxx, Tim Osborn , Kevin Trenberth , Tom Wigley
Hi all – I’m not too comfortable with this, and would rather not sign – at least not
without some real time to think it through and debate the issue. It is unprecedented and
political, and that worries me.
My vote would be that we don’t do this without a careful discussion first.
I think it would be more appropriate for the AGU or some other scientific org to do this –
e.g., in reaffirmation of the AGU statement (or whatever it’s called) on global climate
change.
Think about the next step – someone sends another letter to the Senators, then we respond,
then…
I’m not sure we want to go down this path. It would be much better for the AGU etc to do
it.
What are the precedents and outcomes of similar actions? I can imagine a special-interest
org or group doing this like all sorts of other political actions, but is it something for
scientists to do as individuals?
Just seems strange, and for that reason I’d advise against doing anything with out real
thought, and certainly a strong majority of co-authors in support.
Cheers, Peck
Dear fellow Eos co-authors,
Given the continued assault on the science of climate change by some on Capitol Hill,
Michael and I thought it would be worthwhile to send this letter to various members of
the U.S. Senate, accompanied by a copy of our Eos article.
Can we ask you to consider signing on with Michael and me (providing your preferred
title and affiliation). We would like to get this out ASAP.
Thanks in advance,
Michael M and Michael O
______________________________________________________________
Professor Michael E. Mann
Department of Environmental Sciences, Clark Hall
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22903
_______________________________________________________________________
e-mail: mann@xxxxxx.xxx Phone: (434) 924-7770 FAX: (434) xxx-xxxxx
http://www.evsc.virginia.edu/faculty/people/mann.shtml
Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:EOS.senate letter-final.doc (WDBN/MSWD) (00055FCF)
–
Jonathan T. Overpeck
Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth
Professor, Department of Geosciences
Mail and Fedex Address:
Institute for the Study of Planet Earth
715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85721
direct tel: +xxxx
fax: +1 520 792-8795
http://www.geo.arizona.edu/Faculty_Pages/Overpeck.J.html http://www.ispe.arizona.edu/
It appears that the proverbial Climate Science Cat is out of the bag.
Developing story – more later
UPDATE1: Steve McIntyre posted this on Climate Audit, I used a screen cap rtaher than direct link becuase CA is overloaded and slow at the moment.

UPDATE2: Response from CRU h/t to WUWT reader “Nev”
http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the_briefing_room/2009/11/hadleycru-says-leaked-data-is-real.html
The director of Britain’s leading Climate Research Unit, Phil Jones, has told Investigate magazine’s TGIF Edition tonight that his organization has been hacked, and the data flying all over the internet appears to be genuine.
In an exclusive interview, Jones told TGIF, “It was a hacker. We were aware of this about three or four days ago that someone had hacked into our system and taken and copied loads of data files and emails.”
“Have you alerted police”
“Not yet. We were not aware of what had been taken.”
Jones says he was first tipped off to the security breach by colleagues at the website RealClimate.
“Real Climate were given information, but took it down off their site and told me they would send it across to me. They didn’t do that. I only found out it had been released five minutes ago.”
TGIF asked Jones about the controversial email discussing “hiding the decline”, and Jones explained what he was trying to say….
UPDATE3: McIntyre has posted an article by Jean S at climateaudit.org which is terribly overloaded. We have mirrored it.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/20/mikes-nature-trick/
Sponsored IT training links:
Improve 646-205 exam score up to 100% using 642-813 dumps and 642-902 mock test.
I really hope that this is real, the left trying to destroy the West by using junk science has been around for a while, their claims of nuclear winter were proven false, their claims of ozone depletion were shown to be false and now it looks like their claims of global warming are proven to be wrong. Eventually even the left wing media around the world is going to stop taking their claims seriously.
Richard Black of the BBC has been muzzled. It is official the BBC is involved in a massive cover up.
Update 2309: Because comments were posted quoting excerpts apparently from the hacked Climate Research Unit e-mails, and because there are potential legal issues connected with publishing this material, we have temporarily removed all comments until we can ensure that watertight oversight is in place.
The thought police have shut his blog down entirely. The majority of post obviously do not fit with eco-fascism.
Could this really be happening in the UK – the so-called bastion of freedom of speech?
Evidently, free speech is no longer allowed in the UK.
For those who suspect a massive conspiracy to promote and eco-fascist agenda go no further – if it walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck it probably is a…
Has now hit The Times in the UK …
Sceptics publish climate e-mails ‘stolen from East Anglia University’
27 comments to date.
Jeremy (08:29:45) : Said
“I know everyone is concentrating on the science collusion fraud by boffins – but has anyone investigated the political angles – the strings that control CRU?”
I did a guest post on this very subject in this very forum, only a few weeks ago.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/10/20/revealed-the-uk-government-strategy-for-personal-carbon-rations/#more-11896
Tonyb
*********************
hotrod (08:38:22) :
Jim (08:12:26) :
I can’t find this story on Fox News or CNN. That’s a pity. I wonder why?
Fox has been carrying it since yesterday (it is in the sci tech area), CNN, and ABC still do not have a clue best I can tell. I periodically go over to CNN and run a search for “hacked” and have not returned any articles.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,576009,00.html
Larry
**************************
It’s actually fun to watch CNN and ABC throw themselved under the bus by avoiding criticism of liberal issues. Their ratings continue to tank because of their selective/slanted reporting.
One has to wonder what the powers-that-be at UEA think of this, it’s an embarrassment for them. One would think the Sir Brandon Gough, Chancellor of UEA, has to have serious thoughts about changing the director of CRU.
http://www.uea.ac.uk/vco/Chancellor
WHAT A SAD, SAD STATE OF AFFAIRS
Scientists have been trained with research grants the way Pavlov’s dogs were trained with dog biscuits.
The entire scientific community will suffer. The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) has used its control over budgets of federal research agencies (NASA, DOE, etc.) to distort rather than to promote the search for truth.
House-cleaning needs to start with NAS.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA PI for Apollo
http://www.omatumr.com
Jonathan May-Bowles (05:16:11): re: TRICK
Please read the upthread post here on WUWT on the “trick”. They are adding real temps. as a statistical “pad” to proxy tree ring-width data which are alleged to be independent indicators of real temps.! When the proxy data turn “negative”/”diverge” from the real temps. more recently [~1960], they also ignore the diverging ring-width proxy data in order to maintain the blade of the “hockey stick” by means of the real temp. pad.
Those are not the “good” kind of tricks.
I thought my point was reasonably lucid: If any of this material could legally be construed as intellectual property, which might include software or a draft paper in an attachment, for example, and this was developed as part of an employment at UEA, then UEA own the copyright.
Therefore anyone reproducing it without permission is in danger of committing an offence, depending on the laws of the country where the publication occurred there may be a defence of ‘fair use’, I dunno. I am not a lawyer.
Maybe its a cultural thing but over in the UK, stealing a private correspondence and circulating it to the public is widely regarded as dubious from a legal and an ethical standpoint.
CRU have acknowledged the hack and say the material circulating ‘seems’ to be genuine. I think it almost certainly is, but clearly it is out of their control now and they cannot guarantee that it has not been tampered with. Sorry, but that’s how it is when you deal with stolen merchandise.
The file, and quotes from it, are turning up all over the place and it is impossible for them to try to prosecute everyone.
Ah, so it’s OK to commit an offence, so long as your chances of getting caught are minimal? Interesting legal standpoint.
I mean, the stuff posted here as examples of a ‘vast hoax’ is a bit pathetic. 1 E-mail talking about a ‘trick’ used to hide a decline… to be honest, without knowing what the ‘trick’ is (adding in real temperatures? doesn’t sound like a trick to me) it’s hard to even construe that as disingenuous.
I mean, seriously…. is this it??!
I don’t know, I have only read a few that have been reproduced around and about and have no intention of spending a lot of time on this. Discard the confirmation bias blinkers and I have seen nothing that proves anything very much. The single, misinterpreted sentence lifted out of context from a decade-old stolen mail, does indeed seem to be pretty much ‘it’.
Dammit…. if the American people don’t own every jot and tittle and every hard drive that this pyramid scheme has one fingerprint on, then it’s time to start a new government
You do know that the leak was from the University of East Anglia, in the UK?
There is a little problem with the terminology now being used by the climate crackpots.
Not so long ago, we were told all about “global warming”…right, we suspected it was hogwash, now we know it was.
Just like acid rain…remember that one? Or the hole in the ozone layer…. yerrrs ok…
Now theyve morphed to “climate change”.
A catch all phrase to describe any bad weather anywhere and linking it to human activities.
The way i see it, they cant lose.
Why?
CO2 = global warming= Bad.
CO2 = global cooling = Bad.
Either way theyre “right” as CO2 is “Bad!” and theyll simply alter their stance to continue to make themselves “right”.
As for the comments regarding killing people made by some of these crazys ,simply because you dont believe in the same thing as they do, well, thats all too familiar in certain islamic religious fanatics currently running around and like a religion, “climate change” , AGW whatever, requires absolutely no proof, just a belief.
Madness, utter madness.
How on earth have we gotten into such a dire state of affairs?
It is truly amazing how much the BBC and the MSM are ignoring this story. Just goes to show how much in bed they are with the IPCC and the US Govt..makes me sick. I have had Fox news on all morning and there hasn’t been one mention of the scandal brewing. If any of the US stations were to carry the story Fox news would be the one. Will be waiting patiently for an on air segment..I do think Hannity and Glenn Beck need to jump on this considering how large their audience is currently.
Right.
Right.
Not a fact in contention; have you not had a chance to examine any of the material under discussion (or was yours simple a post ‘in the blind’ prior to any sort of personal education/investigation on/of this issue?)
????
Right (I think you in effect said this already – you’re repeating yourself …)
Your overall point, I’m afraid (at least to me) was muddled; pls repost.
.
.
Jeremy (07:47:11) :
Any news on when Phil Jones will resign – I figure that it will probably happen over the weekend (these things usually do)?
Jones, recipient of $330k in American taxpayer funding, will be advised not to resign or do anything drastic (like walking on a roof.) The savvy PR experts at Fenton Communications who are charged with running the AGW publicity campaign will try to keep Jones out of the spotlight. But as he is the director of the CRU and author of many compromising emails, political pressure for his head will grow.
Someone needs to be sacrificed to let the spinners go forward with their global agenda – that is bigger than the climate. So, look for a carefully staged “confession” from Jones down the road. Maybe a wide-eyed appeal for forgiveness for him and his rogue colleagues.
Don’t buy it. Formal charges from both sides of the Atlantic should be considered and in the very least, for the University of East Anglia to avoid becoming the laughing stock of academic research – they need to clean house at CRU.
BTW, Revkin has finally reported the story in a relatively even-handed way. Considering he’s made out as a media pawn by the “scientists.” With all the Times has invested in the AGW campaign they will fight this hard and attempt to claim their “science” unassailable even in the face of minor fraud. Note to Andy: You have been played sir.
At last; let the fine art of dissembling, the low road of obfuscating and the general tactic of making of off-point straw-man arguments begin!
Oops – mods, pls post this instead!
At last; let the fine art of dissembling, the low road of obfuscating and the general tactic of making of off-point straw-man arguments begin!
Some of us have been veritably starving, just waiting for the defense of CRUTape (TM MoshPit) to begin in ernest in a forum where censorship and editting are NOT practiced by the moderators as the norm …
.
.
ABC News just posted a piece… they are accepting comments.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=9145220
Comment on the copyright issue, look at item 8 from:
http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p01_uk_copyright_law
8. Acts that are allowed
Fair dealing is a term used to describe acts which are permitted to a certain degree without infringing the work, these acts are:
…
Criticism and news reporting
…
Seems like most of the use is criticism & news reporting, I’m not a lawyer though, don’t take this as legal advice.
It seems that this weekend would be a good time for WUWT readers to write a letter to Chancellor Gough at University of East Anglia, urging an immediate investigation into the implications of these emails. The Chancellor is responsible for protecting the integrity and reputation of the University.
UEA’s future and funding opportunities will be seriously compromised if he does nothing about the appearance of CRU hiding, manipulating and destroying data from public view.
http://www.uea.ac.uk/vco/Chancellor
A quick letter recommending investigation should start the ball rolling.
Cheers. (hatip to Climate Beagle)
The eMails are interesting stuff, indeed.
Did have a long night to read several hundred of them.
At the moment I’m digging thru the other files, looking for nuggets.
Hummh, shall I apply for a job at Hadley?
Looks like they need a good IT-Manager (with some good expertise re. security)
rgds
KlausB
Pragmatic (11:05:32) :
A quick letter recommending investigation should start the ball rolling.
When you use the contact address it’s interesting the alternate name that comes back since the contact is on vacation. Probably a coincidence. Made me wonder about also cc’ing the local MP to ensure the message would get through, but I couldn’t figure out quickly who would be the MP that covers UEA.
“It’s a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty – a kind of leaning over backwards. For example, if you’re doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid–not only what you think is right about it: other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you’ve eliminated by some other experiment, and how they worked – to make sure the other fellow can tell they have been eliminated.
Details that could throw doubt on your interpretation must be given, if you know them. You must do the best you can – if you know anything at all wrong, or possibly wrong – to explain it. If you make a theory, for example, and advertise it, or put it out, then you must also put down all the facts that disagree with it, as well as those that agree with it. There is also a more subtle problem. When you have put a lot of ideas together to make an elaborate theory, you want to make sure, when explaining what it fits, that those things it fits are not just the things that gave you the idea for the theory; but that the finished theory makes something else come out right, in addition.
In summary, the idea is to try to give all of the information to help others to judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgment in one particular direction or another.”
~~Richard Feynman
h/t Lubos Motl!!
Blockquote
End Blockquote
Phil, you “don’t know” and are not going to ~”spend a lot of time on this”, then advise everyone else to “discard the confirmation bias blinkers”, while you also seem to claim that you have indeed looked at things enough to announce with some credence that you “have seen nothing that proves anything very much”.
Please try to rise to the occasion. Read the WUWT post on the “trick”, Mike’s Nature Trick, or check my post just above this post of yours, which I think probably gives some indication of what the “tricks” are, although I will certainly stand to be corrected. One thing I didn’t mention is that the real temp. “pad” added to the proxy tree ring-width data is probably also known as a “graft”, which even Michael Mann – who Phil Jones essentially said is one of the tricksters [~”Mike’s Nature trick”] – has himself said that no one should ever do when dealing with proxy data vs real data.
Once you get the idea that you are probably being merely/solely propagandized by the AGW material, it’s really not that hard to see what’s going on.
the http://ftp.tomcity.ru/incoming/free/FOI2009.zip did not work.
Who has the current link for the files?
Bill Illis (06:51:45) :
I do not get the impression they really understand what is going on…..Gavin runs GISS’ models and I don’t see the in-depth knowledge in the emails that would be expected.
I also get that impression in their response to all this.
They are not grasping what is really going on and the amount of damage that this hack/leak has done to them.
I think if I lower my expectations of them then their emails, documents, and reaction to this issue, will make more sense.
Whereas Phil Jones has reportedly been the recipient of $330,000 in American taxpayer funding, the content of some of his emails would appear to be sufficient for an indictment for conspiracy to defraud the American taxpayer.