Or as my friend down under, Andrew Bolt, calls it: “Day of apathy”
![]()
Sydney yesterday demonstrated the depth of international passion about global warming through several highly pictorial stunts:
It was part of a series of events across Sydney yesterday by the environment movement 350.org. Australia was the first of 179 countries to take part in 4500 events worldwide as part of the International Day of Climate Action.
Counting the people in the picture, though, I’d say that this is not a global day of action, but global day of apathy. Or, let’s hope, a global day of mounting scepticism.
Left: People outside the Opera House take a stand on climate change yesterday. Top: Protesters at Manly and bottom, Marton Hidas at the Opera House. Photo: Adam Hollingworth, Janie Barrett
And that’s even without discounting for the tourists and the unfortunate children who were simply dragged there by parents warning them they may not have a future:
Among those on the Opera House steps showing their support was Rae Lawrence from Croydon, who brought her sons, Cameron, 6, and Nicholas, 8. ‘’We care about the future and I want them to have one to live in,’’ she said.
UPDATE
Apologies. From Greenpeace, this proof that the crowds in Sydney may have been even bigger than I sneeringly suggest:
![]()
UPDATE 2
The global day of apathy rolls on in Rome:
![]()
And in Kiev:
![]()
And Dunedin, just the one:
![]()
In Copenhagen, where the world’s leaders will meet in December to discuss slashing emissions – or not:
![]()
And Shanghai, city of 17 million, in a country that is now the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases:
![]()
But you know it’s a snoozer, media-wise, when “balloon boy”, his mom, and the death of Soupy Sales gets above the fold on Google News and “350” doesn’t:

UPDATE: Maybe I jinxed it, maybe it just took awhile for enough “critical mass” of stories to accumulate. Google has now elevated 350 day to top story status, even though it has far less the number of linked stories as the other top entries. An editorial decision, most likely.

Had I not seen Bolt’s column on it, I wouldn’t even have remembered to mention it myself. What did you do for “350 day”?
UPDATE 10/25: Bill McKIbben can’t do simple math.From 350.org website…seems to me the other two stories have a lot more new coverage. Lets see:
350 event: 322 news stories,
Church janitor: 854 news stories
Obama-Iran: 5255 news stories
So how does he get “for a little while, we’re the most talked about news story on the planet”?
As of this writing, they’ve only managed 661 news stories and have fallen off the Google above the fold section.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

What they were actually doing – though they weren’t aware of it – was they were visualising what 350 CO2 molecules look like in amongst the rest of the 999,650 molecules which constitute the atmosphere.
1 poor mis-informed human per CO2 molecule.
The other 999,650 molecules – or humans – just simply weren’t there, either because they know better, aren’t convinced of the big lie, or simply have more important business to attend to.
😉
OT (from SC24.com)
Sunspot 1029 is now starting to become more magnetically organized and there is now a chance for B-Class solar flares or an isolated C-Class flare. The X-Ray flux is bubbling up with B-Class flares.
The solar flux reached 76.9 today. This is the highest flux reading of Cycle 24 thus far. When will the solar flux crack 80? 100? Time will tell.
Update: A C-Class flare has taken place at 02:25 UTC Sunday. More to follow.
Frank (19:37:45) :
>……..and smell the deep solar minimum.
Are the 30 sunspots from yesterday due to Cycle 24 ?
Thanks for the reminder…
Be-e-e-elcchhhh!!!!
(There’s my contribution to 350 Day. CO2 level was gettin’ a little low around my neck of the woods. Had to do something to help get it back up to 350.)
Okay, okay, I confess. I forgot all about it and went fishing today. Was fishing on the list of the approved 350 Day activities?
Soupy Sales died ?
Re ‘350’, please see my comment in the thread above:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/10/24/spencer-agw-has-all-the-characteristics-of-an-urban-legend/#comment-210967
/Mr Lynn
SBS Worldwide News (Australia) had a segment on “International Day of Climate Action” and had a segment on the island of Kiribati.
http://player.sbs.com.au/naca/#/naca/wna/Latest/playlist/International-Day-of-Climate-Action/
A group of people had formed the numerals “350”. The reporter claimed “hundreds gathered today to form a number of special significance”. I took a screen shot and counted them: 167 plus or minus a few. So even “hundreds” is incorrect.
What did you do for “350 day”?
Me and the little lady & the kids went out on this boat tonight, when all of a sudden this huge creature, this giant crustacean from the palaeolithic era, comes out of the water.
We was so scared, Lord have mercy, I jumped up in the boat and I said “What on earth is that creature?!”
It stood above us looking down with these big red eyes… Oh it was so scary!
And I yelled, I said “What do you want from us monster?!” And the monster bent down and said:
“It’s tree fiddy day. Didn’t you know?”
Is it just me, or does the aerial shot of those buildings look like the Pope’s headpiece (Mitre)??
They’re painted white too.
tokyoboy (19:44:37) :
SC24 they are. And quite weak on the umbra so far. L&P affected, looks to be.
OT: Does anyone know the acknowledged percent of AGW CO2 in the atmosphere compared to the total CO2 in the atmosphere?
The science is in
The crowds were strong
From true pictures, much greater turnout than expected.
What showed up? About 3% of their hopes?
How about 1500 ppm? That’s what it was estimated to be during the Carbiniferous Period, when a lot of the coal was laid down. Somehow, the oceans managed to avoid becoming so acidic that life couldn’t live in the oceans, though that’s the impending catastrophe dogma du jour of the Global Warming religion.
@Retire Engineer. The answer to your questions: 1. None, 2.None. 305 didn’t penetrate my milieu. I might be the only one aware of its existence and I ain’t telling.
Oops. “Retired” Engineer
Norm/Calgary (20:46:48) :
3% of atmospheric CO2 is attributed to man. That would be 3% of 0.038% (0.038%=338PPMV) of the atmosphere.
I had no clue there was a 350 day and I pride myself on staying abreast of current events, particularly on AGW – I apparently missed the whole dang thing. Curious what the local green McCarthyites had for a turnout. Nothing on the radio today so will wait for Monday’s paper.
Norm/Calgary (20:46:48) :
3% of atmospheric CO2 is attributed to man. That would be 3% of 0.038% (0.038%=380PPMV) of the atmosphere.oops
Possibly OT. Just observe the bricks falling from the edifice of AGW. Possibly, depending on what the finger to wind says at the time. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6888165.ece
“Norm/Calgary (20:46:48) :
OT: Does anyone know the acknowledged percent of AGW CO2 in the atmosphere compared to the total CO2 in the atmosphere?”
I think the AGW CO2 bit is ~2% of the ~0.0385% of total CO2 in the atmosphere. So 2% of 0.0385% is, well, bugger all.
“Don S. (21:29:44) :
Possibly OT. Just observe the bricks falling from the edifice of AGW.”
So Copenhagen shall be an assembly of clownery, including our prime minister who said we should aim to curb CO2 emission by 25% against 1990 level by 2020? Surely much fun indeed.
“Norm/Calgary (20:46:48) :
OT: Does anyone know the acknowledged percent of AGW CO2 in the atmosphere compared to the total CO2 in the atmosphere?”
Norm, nothing is acknowledged. It is [b]believed[/b] that of annual CO2 input to the troposphere, 5% of that is anthropogenic, 95% from natural causes. Not enough research has been undertaken.
As we commonly say here in Australia, “that’s three-quarters of five-eights of sweet f**k all!!”
“Kaboom (21:44:27) :
[b]believed[/b]”
How shall I pronouce that??
3% of CO2 annually going into the atmosphere is anthropogenic.
There is some accumulation apparently, so up to 4% in total according to this recent article:
http://www.co2science.org/articles/V12/N31/EDIT.php
So yes, are we all thinking the same thing ?? 388 ppm X 0.04 is about 16 ppm and 362 ppm is above 350 ppm. So these nincompoops want to take natural CO2 out of the atmosphere too ??
I don’t actually care about that. It’s the fact that they want to force me to help pay for it that makes me beyond angry.
With all due respect, it is not insignificant. (And I speak as a skeptic.)
There’s a multifold CO2 exchange going on. In nature, the same amount is emitted as is reabsorbed (over the short geological run). When we we add 3% extra, some of it gets absorbed by the ocean, soil, and organism sinks, but some of it (a bit less than half) accumulates in the atmosphere. Maybe 3 Billion Metric Tons Carbon per year (the atmosphere has c. 760 BMTC).
So there’s an accumulation of a little under a half a percent per year. That adds up over the years.
Now, I do NOT believe this matters damnall because I think CO2 is a bit player, a mere fingerprint, not a primary driver. But that 3% does accumulate over time.