Thanks Neil, Michael, and Buzz

http://z.about.com/d/history1900s/1/7/Q/C/1/apollo11.jpg

America, and the world, is in your eternal debt.

My fond memories from this time would not be complete without the mention of another person.

Thanks Walter, to you too, wherever you are.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
188 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DonK31
July 21, 2009 10:15 am

When John Silver has 2 weeks’ summer vacation, does he pack up the car for a trip to the Grand Canyon, the beach, to the mountains… Or does he sit at home and watch National Geographic Channel on his 52″ plasma TV?

July 21, 2009 10:17 am

For All Mankind.
The documentary. Watch it and be proud.
Notice the great bold letters U S A as the behemoth Saturn V rocket lifts the best of this great country into the future.
Notice the very large US flags worn proudly on their space suits.
Ask yourself . . . .
Would this kind of unabashed visible pride in country be permitted today?
Ask yourself . . .
Would the words ‘men’ and ‘mankind’ left behind on the plaque be permitted in today’s PC world.?
Ask yourself . . .
Do we still have the right stuff?
If your response is a concerned furrowing of your brow I suspect you’re not alone.
My admiration for these men and the great country that made their success possible swells my heart to bursting.

Robert
July 21, 2009 10:18 am

I highly recommend the clip posted above by Hi-Sci_Fi – everyone should take ten minutes and watch it.
It reveals, of course, the far left views that informed his propaganda lo those many years. But it also shows the scale of his world governance goals.
From another voice, this would seem wildly ambitious and nuts. But we’re talking about a guy who almost single-handedly lost a war. After that, even a mission to convert the world to a Chomsky utopia might seem possible.
And his space coverage, good as it was, pales in comparison to his other agenda.

Ron de Haan
July 21, 2009 10:36 am

red432 (06:01:08) :
Chris Wright (02:29:27) :
It is disappointing that America and NASA seemed to lose their way in the decades that followed Apollo. Building up capability for low Earth orbit operations with the ISS and the shuttle was useful and perhaps necessary. But back in the time of Apollo it was almost assumed that we would have men on Mars by the eighties. Now, forty years later, it’s probably even more distant. I’ll probably never see it in my lifetime.
With that in mind, what could be a better tribute to Neil, Michael and Buzz than an international effort to put men on Mars by 2020?
How about exploring the oceans properly first or instead? Robots can do much better on Mars than people can. What if something goes wrong 3 weeks out? What if the astronauts go insane? (Some of the space station folks have come close to losing it.) What is the point of putting a fragile hairless ape on a frozen dead planet?
Going to Mars is very romantic, but there are much better ways to spend our money.
We could also cure malaria, or just make sure every child on the planet has clean drinking water… sorry to be a spoil sport.
Red432,
We can do it all and we are going to do it all.
Ocean exploration has made a gigantic boost the last 20 years.
We have the means to cure malaria and we can deliver clean drinking water and energy to every living soul.
The problem is that there are forces within the UN and our own Governments who don’t want that to happen.
It’s as clear as that.
And if any body might believe Obama “Spread the Wealth” and “Greening Society” will change that, forget it.
Fortunately we see a gigantic boost of private initiative on all levels.
It is driven by the internet and like the development of aviation, by prizes.
The most interesting trend we have seen the last 10 years is the private initiative is space flights started with the X-Prize initiative.
These guys will amaze us (they already do) and bring us to the Moon and to Mars.
They will do it at a mini budget, they will do it safer and with more passion.
Another initiative is the 100 mile per gallon car, a race that will be run this year.
We see private initiatives to bring drinking water to remote places and in the USA, even an evaluation of the surface stations network is undertaken by private initiative.
Who needs Government? Who needs the UN?
Screw them.

D. King
July 21, 2009 11:00 am

ralph ellis (07:15:17)
“It would be more environmentally friendly if we lived in mud huts…”
You may have stumbled onto a solution for the toilet tissue tax.

CharleyWhiskey
July 21, 2009 11:11 am

I worked directly on several of the Apollo program proposals as a summer intern in the Advanced Development Department of the Liquid Rocket Division of Aerojet General. My most interesting assignment was to calculate the probable temperature of the last fuel to be ejected from the tanks of the lunar excursion module, the concern being that the final bit might freeze in the exit line due to the rapid expansion of the forcing helium on the other side of a flexible membrane. The membrane was to be Teflon, which was brand new at the time so I had to go interview the head chemist to learn about its thermal characteristics. I watched the moon landing on TV the day that I returned to Pensacola as a flight instructor after a deployment to Viet Nam. The 1970s were a real letdown after all the action of the 1960s.

Nogw
July 21, 2009 11:13 am

Richard deSousa (10:08:13) :
I forgot to add that Walter Cronkite was a believer in global warming.

And I heard the same from Bill O’ Reilly a few days ago.

Dave
July 21, 2009 11:14 am

Actually, all of NASA, including Neil, Buzz and Mike, owes thanks to the American taxpayer.

John Silver
July 21, 2009 11:25 am

Patrick Davis (03:36:22) :
………………..
“Via the radio telescope in Parkes, NSW, Australia. The only one big enough and advanced enough to do the job at that time Apparently). And the tower was under great stress due to a storm too, so we all nearly didn’t get to see the event.”
Yep, I saw the movie “The Dish” with Sam Neill on TV last night. There was drama at radio telescope!

Douglas DC
July 21, 2009 11:29 am

When the Atomic Rocket NERVA project was banned-during the Nixon admin.
We lost our ability to easily “boldly go”. Think three months to Mars.Think eventually a ride to the nearest star.I for one do not want to study my navel
and contemplate what I am but to find out who we are.”Why don’t you fellows solve your little problems and light this candle! ” -Astronaut Alan B. Shepard.

July 21, 2009 11:45 am

42
“What is the point of putting a fragile hairless ape on a frozen dead planet?”
Hmmmm. Fragile?
I understand your concern.
But please consider the great men and women who have pushed and fought across daunting frontiers of every kind.
You and I are products of that courage and tenacity to discover what lies beyond the next ridge or across the vast oceans.
Often they died.
As will future explorers.
But it’s what we wonderful hairless apes do – and frequently quite well.

SteveSadlov
July 21, 2009 11:55 am

Steven Kopits (08:56:13) :
“The study found that the net heat emissions from the industrial age (from 1880 to 2000) correspond to 74% of the earth’s accumulated heat – that is, global warming.”
Before Steve M put in place his current highly restrictive posting policy I participated actively at Climate Audit, where I made a number of (OMG – speculative) posts regarding this. Anthropogenic Thermal Dissipation, Anthropogenic Surface Albedo Modification, and Irrigation are massive sources of “global warming.” It’s intuitively obvious.

Urederra
July 21, 2009 12:06 pm

John Ritson (02:13:12) :
This flight was worth the effort and risk (and CO2 emissions too).

I believe they use Hydrazine as a combustible and dinitrogen tetroxide as a comburent (Oxygen substitute, why the firefox spell checker doesn’t recognize comburent?) The combustion gases were mainly nitrogen and water.
A quick google search gives me that they may have been used methyl hydrazine instead of hydrazine, so maybe some CO2 was released after all. methyl hydrazine is more stable than anhydrous hydrazine, that is why they substituted the latter.
I am for Lunar colonies first rather than going to Mars right away, BTW.
Happy anniversary!

rbateman
July 21, 2009 12:18 pm

They did thier job, because Amercians did their job, American leaders did their job, and we all did it well.
Those 3 performed flawlessly.
We could do that again.
All of it.
Just give us a chance.
Thanks to the Apollo 11 crew for reminding us of what we are capable of, and what we need to get back to doing again.

July 21, 2009 12:23 pm

Who are those young guys in the photo? It couldn’t have been that long ago.
What a feat !

Allan M R MacRae
July 21, 2009 12:24 pm

I recall being home from university, visiting my mom and dad. That evening, we walked into the back yard, sat down and just stared up at the moon, each alone with our thoughts, united by this historic event.
It has been my privilege to live during this most interesting time.
For a moment, let’s take time to think about earlier generations:
Some of our grandparents lived through the advent of the first automobile, the first aircraft, World War 1, the Great Influenza Epidemic, the Great Depression, World War 2, the Korean conflict, and so on. Some of them even lived long enough to see the first man walk on the moon.
My grandparents and and my parents’ generation were sensible and strong. In comparison, recent generations have become weak and frivolous.
Our two latest “crises”, the global warming fraud and the subprime fiasco, are minor in comparison to the very real crises faced by previous generations. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that our parents or grandparents would have been stupid enough to fall for either one.
It’s time to toughen up and smarten up.
Some time ago, I wrote this for icecap.us
I re-post it here as a suggested solution for my friends and neighbours in America.
Nov 15, 2008
AN ENERGY STRATEGY FOR AMERICA
By Allan M.R. MacRae
The USA has two daunting problems – the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression; and President-Elect Obama’s energy policies, which will severely deepen the economic crisis. Obama stated in a San Francisco Chronicle television interview that he wants to implement an aggressive CO2 cap-and-trade system that could bankrupt coal companies. He further stated that energy prices will necessarily skyrocket. Obama believes that global warming is a critical issue, and he supports the use of solar energy, wind power and biodiesel. To his credit, Obama also supports a market approach and technological development.
In 2007, US primary energy consumption consisted of oil (40%), natural gas (25%), coal (24%), nuclear (8%) and hydroelectricity (2%). As a percentage of total proved reserves of fossil fuels, the US holds just over 2% of the world’s oil, 3% of natural gas, but almost 29% of global coal. See this:
Energy projects have been constrained due to fears of catastrophic global warming, allegedly caused by increased atmospheric CO2 from burning fossil fuels. However, global warming is just not happening anymore. For the last decade, average global temperatures have not increased. Since January 2007 all global warming has disappeared, as average temperatures plummeted to 1979 levels – when accurate satellite measurements began.
Global cooling is now occurring and is expected to continue for the next twenty to thirty years, due to the recent shift in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation from its warm to cool phase. See here:
and here
.
Despite shrill claims of ice cap melting, Arctic sea-ice extent is now at its highest seasonal level since modern satellite measurements began in 2002 – more evidence of global cooling.
For decades, the US has experienced a huge balance of trade deficit, due primarily to high oil imports. Energy self-sufficiency has been the goal of recent US Presidents, without success. There is now an opportunity to address both these serious challenges, by rejecting global warming myths and creating an energy strategy based on true, verifiable facts. Here is the outline of a responsible and economic Energy Strategy for America:
1. Reject CO2 taxes and cap-and-trade measures used to “fight global warming”. Examine the satellite data, the only accurate global temperature measurements in existence. Climate Dyslexics please note: The Earth is cooling, not warming. Global cooling should last for twenty to thirty years and could be severe.
2. Generate much more electrical energy from abundant US coal reserves. Use existing technologies to control real atmospheric pollution from SOx, NOx and particulates, but do not control CO2. In the future, if CO2 sequestration becomes economically attractive (for enhanced oil recovery) or is proved necessary (in the unlikely event that global warming becomes a real problem), retrofit the coal plants with expensive CO2 recovery equipment at that time.
3. As rechargeable battery technology continues to improve, electric and gasoline-electric light vehicles will become commonplace. The power infrastructure already exists to fuel this fleet, and refueling can be done during off-peak periods, when power plants are underutilized. This major change in the light vehicle fleet will shift energy consumption from foreign oil to domestic coal.
4. Re-examine corn ethanol and wind power, which do not work economically or effectively. Corn ethanol for motor fuel requires huge ongoing subsidies and severely distorts food prices. Wind power also requires big subsidies, and almost 100% backup with conventional power generation. Wind power can also cause critical instabilities in the electric power grid. Conduct a full-life-cycle energy balance on corn ethanol, wind power, biodiesel and solar energy, and also examine the environmental demands and pollution associated with these so-called “green” technologies.
5. Re-examine hydrogen. It is an energy medium, like electricity, but if implemented would require a huge new hydrogen infrastructure to be built at great cost, for no environmental or energy gain.
6. Avoid energy subsidies, especially ongoing operating subsidies, which distort economic decisions and create expensive industrial and environmental boondoggles. Wind power and corn ethanol may prove to be two such costly mistakes.
Instead of skyrocketing energy prices, this Energy Strategy for America will result in lower costs, improved balance of trade, and in time could even provide energy self-sufficiency for the USA.
Allan M.R. MacRae is a Professional Engineer and writer on energy and the environment. In 2002 he predicted in a newspaper article that global cooling would recur. He does not work in the coal industry, accepts no compensation for his writing and holds no coal investments.

grayuk
July 21, 2009 12:36 pm

40 years ago…my god…I feel old!
Well done to all involved, wish something similar was going on today instead of all this AGW crap!
Freezing cold once again in wet England!

D. King
July 21, 2009 12:48 pm

red432 (06:01:08) :
Going to Mars is very romantic, but there are much better ways to spend our money.
We could also cure malaria, or just make sure every child on the planet has clean drinking water… sorry to be a spoil sport.
You haven’t spoiled anything sport. Someone will probably use a
computer, like you’re using on this post, to solve these problems.

peter_dtm
July 21, 2009 12:53 pm

Ric Locke (08:24:30) : you got the accountants right. I HATE bean counters.
Walt Stone (09:32:38) : quote I don’t want men and women to risk their lives for science that can be otherwise be acquired remotely. end quote
I don’t care what you want; any more than you seem to care what I want. And I WANT TO GO. So will people like you please STOP telling us that your opinion about what risks WE decide take is more important than our right to CHOSE to take risks.
Between bean counters & the nannies the US’s lead has been squandered and MY right to apply to go into space has been taken from me.
I was 15 at the time; I beleive(d) in Science and Engineering. The spoilers have killed not just the NASA that put men on the moon but so many other achievements – like killing fConcorde; Nuclear Power; and Man’s ambitions.
So who does this UK citizen sue for breach of promise ? Because the US in 1969 PROMISED a world of opportunity and hope; and the bean counters & nannies have locked us in the kindergarten; the one lot because they do not understand investment; and the others because they are scared of anything new and different.
Thank you to all those in the NASA and the US of the 60’s who were allowed to create a dream; if only for a fleeting moment!

nanny_govt_sucks
July 21, 2009 12:53 pm

Walter Cronkite was a one-world-government nut. He may have had a nice, warm, reassuring speaking voice, but the mind behind that voice wanted to end national sovereignty. More:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/030242.html

Old PI
July 21, 2009 1:16 pm

I watched the landing in my living room at Holloman AFB, NM. I was a 23-YO NCO. My wife and 2-YO daughter watched with me. I will never forget that day.
For the nay-sayers that are harping about “waste”, consider: Everyone can look up at the stars, but only a very few ever look into the depth of the oceans, or all the other mentioned “science”. The stars and space fascinate everyone, not just a few. The science needed to put a man on the moon led to the very advances we use today in commemorating this event on our home computers, and so very much more.
Perhaps if we’d followed up landing on the moon by actually building and inhabiting a lunar-based observatory, we’d learned enough about the sun to kill “global warming” in the very beginning.

July 21, 2009 1:16 pm

Allan M R MacRae (12:24:19)
“Wind power also requires big subsidies, and almost 100% backup with conventional power generation. Wind power can also cause critical instabilities in the electric power grid.”
No longer, given a recent breakthrough in energy storage via high-speed flywheels. The device is under construction, and it is a bit premature to celebrate, but we should know by December or January if this works as advertised.
http://sowellslawblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/grid-scale-energy-storage-flywheel.html

Reply to  Roger Sowell
July 21, 2009 1:30 pm

Roger,
30 GWS perhaps?

Andrew
July 21, 2009 1:24 pm

When I was a small boy in Ohio, I used to look up at the night sky often and want to travel to the stars. Neil Armstrong was one of my heroes. Count me in for a big Thank You to Neil, Michael and Buzz.
Andrew

Sandy
July 21, 2009 1:25 pm

“No longer, given a recent breakthrough in energy storage via high-speed flywheels. The device is under construction, and it is a bit premature to celebrate, but we should know by December or January if this works as advertised.”
As advertised gets greenie dream dollars but it won’t work. Like windmills compared to the Moon Landings it will stand as a monument to the true childishness of this, my generation.

John Silver
July 21, 2009 1:29 pm

DonK31 (10:15:41) :
“When John Silver has 2 weeks’ summer vacation, does he pack up the car for a trip to the Grand Canyon, the beach, to the mountains… Or does he sit at home and watch National Geographic Channel on his 52″ plasma TV?”
Not comparable.
Risk management and cost-benefit analysis tells me stay home.
It’s all about bang/buck and avoid cruelty to animals.