The Waxman-Markey pre-vote count – where you can help

OK folks, time to engage in our rights of citizenship. You know what to do. Phones and email contact info at the bottom. – Anthony

UPDATE2: test vote passes narrowly, 7 votes needed to defeat this bill – Anthony

UPDATE: C-SPAN1 is covering this live, there is a live media streaming page which you can access here:

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx

CSPAN also has live phone in. Phone in your comments: (202)585-3885 , -3886, -3887

http://legalplanet.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/waxman-and-markey.jpg
Waxman and Markey

From GreenHell blog the Waxman-Markey pre-vote count…

Waxman-markey pre-liminary head-count as of Thursday afternoon (courtesy Myron Ebell):

218 needed to win…

Yes

Yes = 175

Leaning Yes = 35

TOTAL = 210

Undecided = 20

No

No = 190

Leaning No = 14

TOTAL = 204

Undecided or Won’t Say:

Kirkpatrick Az

Boyd Fla

Brown Fla

Bishop Ga

R Kirk Ill

Foster Ill

Donnelly Ind

R Jones NC

McIntyre NC

R Frelinghuysen NJ

Tonko NY

Arcuri NY

Space Ohio (he voted for it in committee)

Carney Penna.

Davis Tenn

Al Green Tex

Jackson Lee Tex

Ortiz Tex

Eddie Bernice Johnson Tex

Kind Wisc

Leaning Yes:

Mitchell Az

Cardoza Calif

Costa Calif

Baca Calif

R Castle Del

Grayson Fla

Meek Fla

Kozmas Fla

Abercrombie Hi

Bean Ill

R Cao La

Kratovil Md

R Ehlers Mich

Kildee Mich

Schauer Mich

Peters Mich

Clay Mo

Skelton Mo

Thompson Miss

Shuler NC

Adler NJ

Lance NJ

Meeks NY

McMahon NY

Murphy NY

R McHugh NY

Maffei NY

Driehaus Ohio

Fudge Ohio

Kilroy Ohio

Cooper Tenn

Edwards Tex

Rodriguez Tex

Nye Va

Kagan Wisc

Leaning No:

Salazar Colo

Marshall Ga

Boswell Iowa

Minnick Idaho

Halvorson Ill

Etheridge NC

Kissell NC

Massa NY

Kaptur Ohio

Boccieri Ohio

R Gerlach Penna

Hinojosa Tex

Mollohan WV

Rahall WV

U.S. readers can use this link…

http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

…to contact their representative and senators regarding the Waxman-Markey bill.

The link makes it very easy to send an email or make a phone call.

Use the US Representatives link after clicking on the link above since this vote will occur in the House of Representatives.

A one or two sentence email, or a one minute call is all that is necessary. Just mention that you’re a constituent of the Representative or Senator, that it’s a bad bill, and ask him/her to please vote against it.

Elected folks keep score. They have their staffs keep a tally of pro and con calls, letters and emails. If they hear from enough people, it can make a difference.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

315 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
don't tarp me bro
June 26, 2009 8:23 am

This is urgent. Air france flight was due to global warming. Severe storms. I am surprised Joe Romms hasn’t linked Farah and jackson death to the interference of the deniers.
My conservative ag congressmen all vote against the bill. I appose global warming. I would rather ride a snow machine at Christmas than have to play golf.

ecliptic
June 26, 2009 8:28 am

There a two large elephants in the room:
• global governance. HR 2454 lays the groundwork for global taxation which is the same as global governance. This is your very worst nightmare ( though many folks are in denial of this fact )
• “Smart Grid”. HR 2454 creates the actual infrastructure of George Orwell’s “1984”. This is very bad.
visit, call, or email your congressman…
This is getting very serious.

Ryan C
June 26, 2009 8:31 am

Is anyone else having problem watching the C-SPAN live coverage. It just constantly buffers and mgiht play for 2 seconds and then starts buffering again.. I have a 5 bar connection to my network and an “excellent” connection to the network. I am located in Eastern Canada.

John Galt
June 26, 2009 8:39 am

It’s not fair the USA has so much and consumes so much. The obvious answer is to tear down this country so we are no better off than anybody else.
The not-so-obvious answer is to elevate everyone else up to our level, but that’s not part of the agenda.

Les Johnson
June 26, 2009 8:44 am

All: As a Canuck, all I can do is give some advice.
Advise your congressman of the example of the Liberal Party and its leader, in Canada, during the last election.
A major plank in that election was the “Green Shift”. It was similar to Waxman-Markey, in that it would tax carbon, and supposedly shift the revenues back to the less-privileged.
The Liberals lost the election, and fired the leader responsible for the “Green Shift”.
You could also note that Canada is much more “liberal” than the US.

Curious
June 26, 2009 8:46 am

I can’t stream CSPAN either. I have resorted to streaming the CSPAN Radio instead. Does not give you the live debate, but at least there is no Michael Jackson coverage….

Mickey Langan
June 26, 2009 8:47 am

My congressman is voting no (Pence, R-IN). I am focusing my energy on Sen Bayh, who I am afraid would support it in the Senate. I am asking him to ask Steve Fielding’s three questions, and am going to point him to the executive summary of the EPA comments.
It would be great if we could create a one-page talking points summary that could create an impact in the first paragraph. I am not sure that anything larger is going to survive the attention span of the AGW proponents.

don't tarp me bro
June 26, 2009 8:49 am

This became a freak show. According to Hot air. Waxman just dropped in 300 pages of ammendments this morning. Talk about voting blind.
http://www.rules.house.gov/111/SpecialRules/hr2998/waxman1_hr2998_111.pdf\
This is not what either side thinks they are voting for,
It is so excessive that real people would not hessitate and postpone the vote to give time to sort this out. Would you buy a house if it had 300 pages of changes to sign on closing day?

Ron
June 26, 2009 8:50 am

I have a request for anyone contacting their representatives this morning. We have heard from some who are asking when they call about the voulume of calls they are getting and the direction of the sentiment of those calls. If more people could do the same and post their findinds here, it would be interesting to hear those results and also ask them when there has been a strong volumn and sentiment, has it influenced anyone’s vote?

DAV
June 26, 2009 9:05 am

UPDATE: C-SPAN1 is covering this live, there is a live media streaming page which you can access here
I’m getting a black image. Maybe because it’s a local game?

Hu McCulloch
June 26, 2009 9:06 am

My rep’s office was only 5 min from my home, so I dropped in to register my opinion in person. If you can’t get through to your rep’s washington office, try phoning his/her local office, or better yet, visit. Contact info is available via http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml .
REPLY: Good for you, sir. – Anthony

AEGeneral
June 26, 2009 9:09 am

John G. Bell (07:44:39) :
Re: Mr Lynn (06:38:15)
I am a constituent of Stephen Cohen’s district in Tennessee and also got a 404 error.
http://cohen.house.gov/ does not allow the sending of emails. His official government site is broken. Does anyone know how to obtain his actual email address?

cohenforcongress.com is still up & running with a contact form, but who knows if it’s being monitored.
I imagine Cohen has been overwhelmed with e-mails & phone calls since King Willie resigned yesterday.

Matt in Wyoming
June 26, 2009 9:11 am

“MarkusR (07:30:58) :
You denialists are going to be responsible for the suffering and mass extinctions that AGW is bringing about onto this planet.”
Which one’s are the denialists? Those of us who don’t believe that global warming is caused or influenced by mans activities, or those of you who deny the earth is cooling?
If you call me a denialists because I won’t blindly follow the UN and Al Gore with out real scientific proof, then i am guilty as charged. However are you willing to say the same about yourself? that you are denying the reality of the temperature record and the failure of the models to predict this cooling?
Doubtful you have the courage to even admit you might be wrong.

philw1776
June 26, 2009 9:14 am

C-Span feed doesn’t work for me either. Buffers, plays 2-3 seconds, buffers…
Located in NH USA

Rebecca
June 26, 2009 9:14 am

Rush is talking about the supression of the report on his show now..not a huge fan but at least he has a very large audience that will start calling their reps.

June 26, 2009 9:24 am

Having the same CSPAN problem as reported above.

theduke
June 26, 2009 9:29 am

I live in California, but I just wrote Rodney Frelinghuysen, whose father succeeded my great-grandfather as congressman from the fifth district in N.J. (now the 11th.) If he votes in favor of this bill, I will write him again and suggest he spend some of his free time here at WUWT.
While this bill is a very dangerous bill, it is not as dangerous as the EPA’s pending endangerment finding. When the vote on this bill is completed, it is important for everyone to focus on and vigorously contest the EPA’s attempt to regulate CO2. If that ever happens, then the horse is out of the barn.

KlausB
June 26, 2009 9:33 am

Folks, can somebody tell when voting is expcted to start? Some europeans are too, really interested in the outcome.
I’m on a convent starting in a few minutes, nevertheless will have blackberry with me. Tks.

Pamela Gray
June 26, 2009 9:38 am

If this passes into law, or any of its spawn, I will officially change my registration from life long Dem to either Independent, or Republican and will forever vote against any legislature who voted for this bill. Hell, even if it doesn’t pass, I will vote against any legislature who voted for this bill, or who supported it (like Obama). This is a serious political life changer for me and the Dems are just whistling down the primrose path as they throw away their ONE chance to hold on to power. I have lost such faith in my party. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

Ron
June 26, 2009 9:40 am

CSPAN based on all the interest there seems to be, is suffering from some ‘pipe’ problems. . . . server bandwidth saturation or exceeding the maximum simultaneous connections.

June 26, 2009 9:40 am

Latest:
House Democrats narrowly won an important test vote Friday on groundbreaking legislation to combat global warming and usher in a new era of cleaner energy. Republican opponents said it included the largest tax increase ever.
The vote was 217-205 to send the White House-backed legislation to the full House. Thirty Democrats defected, reflecting the deep divisions over the plan.
We need 7 votes to stop this mess, otherwise we have to focus on the Senate.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D992ETLG0&show_article=1

Ric Locke
June 26, 2009 9:44 am

Not sure why anybody is bothering with this.
The bill will pass, with a small but real majority.
Tomorrow, all the stuff we’ve been celebrating here will be front-page news, with the subtitle “See, it’s working already!”
Regards,
Ric

RoyFOMR
June 26, 2009 9:46 am

don’t tarp me bro (08:49:26) :
This became a freak show. According to Hot air. Waxman just dropped in 300 pages of ammendments this morning. Talk about voting blind.
http://www.rules.house.gov/111/SpecialRules/hr2998/waxman1_hr2998
I had a quick read of it DTMB – seemed OK to me. He’s just adding a dash of last-minute, decoration and it really does work for me.
His sensitive purple-prose really does bring out those rich Greens.
For those too busy to soak up every word of the report, I have summarised it below.
AMENDMENT TO H.R. 2454
OFFERED BY MR. WAXMAN OF CALIFORNIA
(: (: (: 🙂 🙂
310 pages
Document Local : F:\WUWT62609.002.xml
Document Dated: June 26, 2009 (1:34 a.m.)

Ron
June 26, 2009 9:46 am

Remember. . .218 votes are required to send the bill to the senate but it looks like they might have them. It may not reflect true sentement as the House often passes tough to swallow legislation with the intent that the Senate will save them from themselves.

John G. Bell
June 26, 2009 9:52 am

Re: AEGeneral (09:09:05)
Could be. It did not work yesterday also. The Herenton machine is after Cohen. No chance that the DNC will support Cohen’s reelection. What will Rahm or Waxman offer Cohen? A blindfold?
This bill is pure politics. Now that Cohen’s future has been decided for him he is free to vote his mind. Or will he take charge of his fate and listen to his constituents?
404 ERROR! 🙂

Verified by MonsterInsights