
In the discussion thread about CO2 and Antarctic cold, some references to CO2 ice in the ice caps of Mars were part of that discussion.
WUWT reader Lou Mackenzie sends word that we can now watch Mars ice caps and many other things ongoing with the planet with a new NASA widget. You’ll find it now at the lower right on the WUWT widget panel.
Here are the details:
Mars Today, created by Howard Houben of the Mars Global Circulation Model Group, is a poster produced daily by the Center for Mars Exploration at NASA’s Ames Research Center. The updated poster depicts current conditions on Mars and its relationship to Earth in six panels.
The upper left panel diagrams the current positions of Mars and Earth in their orbits around the Sun. Note that Mars has a highly elliptical orbit compared to the Earth. For much of the time, Mars is too close to the Sun (as viewed from Earth) to be observed by Earth-based telescopes. For a QuickTime animation [1.1 MB] of the orbits of Earth and Mars and their relative positions through 2000 and 2001 click here. The panel also shows the interplanetary trajectory of Mars Global Surveyor. That spacecraft entered Mars orbit in 1997. Much information on the Martian surface and atmosphere was being gathered by the Global Surveyor which began the mapping phase of its mission in spring 1999.
The upper middle panel shows two views of the positions of Mars and Earth from vantage points near the ecliptic (the plane of the Earth’s orbit). This allows visualization of the tilts of the rotation axes of the planets that are responsible for the seasons. Two views are necessary because Mars and Earth are tilted in nearly orthogonal directions. At this time, late spring in the Earth’s northern hemisphere, the north pole is pointed towards the sun. It is also late spring in the northern hemisphere of Mars and that planet’s north pole is pointed towards the sun at a similar angle. The changes in seasons on the Earth and Mars can be visualized in a 1.2 MB QuickTime animation of this panel through 2000 and 2001.
The panel on the upper right compares the apparent size of the Martian disc as viewed from Earth with the size of Earth’s disc as viewed from Mars. (Since the diameter of Mars is about half that of the Earth, Mars appears to be about half the size of the Earth when viewed from the same distance.) Both of these discs are compared to a circle 25 seconds of arc in diameter. This circle represents the largest possible apparent size of Mars as viewed from Earth (which is achieved only on those very rare occasions when the planets are both favorably positioned at the nearest points in their orbits). Even at these times, Mars — a very difficult telescopic object to observe in detail — is only about half the apparent size of the much more distant, but much larger planet Jupiter. For a QuickTime animation [1.5 MB] of this view of Mars through the years 2000 and 2001 click here.
The lower left hand panel displays a simulated image of Mars as it would appear at the present time to a very high resolution Earth-based telescope. At this time, (late northern spring), an extensive carbon dioxide frost cap is growing in the southern hemisphere. Sharp brightness contrasts have allowed telescopic observers to follow Martian surface features for many years. Unlike the Earth, the Martian atmosphere is usually free of obscuring clouds. One exception is the cold region surrounding the winter pole that may be covered by a polar hood of water or even carbon dioxide clouds. Another exception occurs during periods of widespread dust storm activity, usually in southern spring and summer.
The lower middle panel shows a model prediction of the meteorology at the present time (from the Ames Mars Climate Model). Daily average temperatures in the lower atmosphere are color coded, while predicted wind speeds and directions are indicated by the arrows. In the equatorial regions near the surface, the atmospheric flow is dominated by the Hadley circulation that transports air from the cold winter hemisphere southwards across the equator. Because the equator rotates at a faster speed than other parts of the planet, this leads to a tradewind-like pattern of easterlies in the winter hemisphere and westerlies in the summer hemisphere. Strong westerlies are also apparent in the region of the polar night while light easterlies are prevalent in the vicinity of the summer pole. For a QuickTime animation [2.6 MB] of the predicted Mars meteorology over a one-year period click here.
The lower right panel shows model predictions of the atmospheric water vapor column on Mars. At the present season — late northern spring — there is a nearly uniform distribution of water vapor over the low latitude regions of Mars best observed from Earth. The atmospheric inventory of water should continue to increase for several months as water sublimes off the permanent northern polar ice cap. For more information on Martian water, see the Mars water page. For a 2.5 MB QuickTime animation of the Martian water column predictions for 2000 and 2001 click here.
The statistics printed below the image indicate the apparent diameter of Mars (in seconds of arc); the angle between the Sun and the Earth as viewed from Mars (in degrees); an angular measure of the season in the Martian northern hemisphere (Ls= 0 at the vernal equinox, 90 at the summer solstice, 180 at the autumnal equinox, and 270 at the winter solstice); the sub-solar latitude in degrees (another indicator of the season); the longitude of the sub-Earth point in the image; and the latitude of the sub-Earth point.
Click here to display the full GIF or JPEG image. Both images are about 170 kB in size.
You can also display the classical 4-panel Mars Today poster (about 120 kB).
Watch a movie showing the widget in action for 2000 to 2001:

David Ball:
“What was it that Percival Lowell saw as far as the canals are concerned? A weather phenomenonid ”
One theory is that Professor Lowell was actually mapping the veins of his eyeballs.
Thanks, Anthony. Just a couple of quick things that jumped out at me:
“Note that Mars has a highly elliptical orbit compared to the Earth.”
OK, I guess. “Highly” is a pretty subjective term. Certainly more elliptical than Earth’s and most of the other planets, but less elliptical, for example, than Mercury, many of the asteroids, Pluto (that former planet), etc.
“For much of the time, Mars is too close to the Sun (as viewed from Earth) to be observed by Earth-based telescopes.”
I’m not sure this statement makes sense. I guess if they are talking about trying to do daily observations, then it is true that there are large periods when Mars is not observable by Earth-based telescopes. However, this is also true of the outer planets and has to do with the fact that they are too faint to be observed during daylight hours (unlike, for example, Venus), so it is strange to say it is because “Mars is too close to the Sun.” Second, Hubble has an advantage in avoiding scattered light and being able to shield observations from the Sun, but must also be careful about looking too closely toward the Sun (i.e., observations have to be within Hubble’s “safety zone” at a certain distance from the Sun). Certainly Hubble can significantly extend the viewing period, but Hubble also needs to have Mars far enough away that Hubble can resolve it, and there are blockout positions for Hubble, as well as any other Earth-orbiting observatory.
“It is also late spring in the northern hemisphere of Mars and that planet’s north pole is pointed towards the sun at a similar angle.”
I think it actually is early winter in Mars’ northern hemisphere.
1. Look at Mars’ tilt in the top middle panel (bottom), which shows the north pole being away from the sun.
2. Look at Mars’ tilt in the bottom middle panel, which shows the same thing.
3. Look at the “Statistics” area, which shows LS = 283.18 – just past the winter solstice of 270.
OT: Just had to laugh and post this. This from RC’s latest post from Gavin Schmidt:
The emboldened portion just kills me, and I think it speaks volumes!
OT
http://sealevel.colorado.edu/
Sea Level… Still no update one year later.
http://www.geo.unizh.ch/wgms/mbb/mbb10/sum07.html
Glaciers… At least three years behind.
It seems that these critical times would at least demand timely data updates.
OT, but interesting post on UHI at Jennifer Marohasy…
Hot City or Global Warming?
http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/hot-city-or-global-warming/
Overall one would have to say the Bureau data suggests no significant warming over the last century and in particular the last 3 decades in Victoria. On the other hand it does show significant UHI. Consider that an increase of 1.5C in the minimums for Melbourne over the last 3 decades corresponds to 5C per century. Averaging the minimum and maximum readings yields a rise from 14.7C to 15.7C over 30 years equating to 3.3C per century and Melbourne is far from the worst city in the world for UHI. Look also at how non linear the UHI rise really is. Compare that with a linear allowance of 0.06C per century. For that to be appropriate it would mean that only 1 in 50 sites is showing the same degree of UHI as does Melbourne and the other 49 show no UHI at all, even then the linear allowance is not correct.
As for the canals apparition that Percival Lowell claimes to have observed on Mars with the aid of an 18″ refractor and a 24″ Alvan Clark refractor, I don’t know of anyone else who was using such a large and exceptional instrument at the time in an area of good seeing. He even had the 24″ temporariy located in a site in Mexico with better seeing for the Dec 1896 opposition.
Who looked with Lowell at the time?
Well, have to say that I give credit to Real Climate for posting my response. I agree the commenters on that site and sometimes this one do not respond to or rebut claims responsibly. If you want to debate science then do it and give valid reasons for doing so. Insults and rants are not valid arguments. In my opinion the main object is to try and establish ” for the sake of all of us ” what is going on. It does not help when work like this and valid science is discredited “out of hand ” because it does not fit a particular agenda or belief.
Lets do this responsibly and look at both sides of the debate without being arseholes and admit ” painfull as it may be” when you are wrong. There is no shame in being honest.
Since the trend is OT: Can anyone explain the upward bump in the sea ice extent that seems to occur each June? Apologies if previously covered.
REPLY: Covered a half dozen times at least- seasonal adjustment to compensate for meltwater on top of the ice, which would ordinarily be viewed as “open water”. – Anthony
Very Off Topic… See Reports about the Star Betelgeuse may be ready to go Nova or Super Nova.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525695,00.html
Mega Cosmic Rays during a solar Minimum.
Draw your own conclusions.
Hey steve as your article explains it could have been 600 light years ago already. Not something that we have to give a — about really.
http://www.spacetoday.org/SolSys/Mars/MarsThePlanet/MarsCanals.html
“An example of confusion about Mars is found in the famous canals on Mars, They reportedly were first observed by Italian priest Pietro Secchi in 1876. Then Giovanni Schiaparelli published a map of Mars in 1877. He assigned names to bright and dark features which included a large number of straight-line features that Schiaparelli and Secchi called “canali.” The mistranslation in English-speaking countries of “canali” into “canal,” instead of the correct “channel,” brought a misleading connotation of artificial construction by Martians that had not been intended by Schiaparelli and Secchi.”
It is not easy keeping verb tenses straight when there is no universal time frame for cosmic events:
“It’s possible we’re observing the beginning of Betelgeuse’s final collapse now.
If so, the star, which is 600 light-years away, will already have exploded — and we’ll soon be in for a spectacular, and perfectly safe, interstellar fireworks show.”
That future perfect tense illustrates the problem, An event that is present or even future from the frame of reference of the earth, is past from the frame of reference within which the event occurred.
This seems to be a good site
http://www.astro.illinois.edu/~jkaler/sow/betelgeuse.html
press (09:58:34) :
Not exactly…. If (big IF) Betelgeuse went nova 600 years ago, then the GCRs will be arriving about the same time we see the nova… and it’s this year, during a deep solar minimum, it could have a major effect on cloud formation which would have a major effect on climate. Cold is a worse killer than heat.
If Betelgeuse were to supernova I have my doubts we’ll be ‘perfectly safe.’ The neutrino flux alone should be high enough to cause noticible effect on Earth.
Thanks, Anthony, for the new widget. It takes me back to when I was a kid first learning about the solar system.
The bit about Mars being in late northern spring looks like an error on the “Mars Today” web site. According to this site
http://www.dustymars.net/2010_MARS.htm
the southern summer solstice was May 22, 2009 (scroll down to “Calendar of Events”).
Now if can only persuade my wife to get me a telescope for her birthday… 🙂
David Ball, this article argues that the lines Lowell observed on both Mars and Venus were caused by his unusual observing technique, which resulted in him seeing the shadows of the blood vessels in his eye:
http://www.shpltd.co.uk/sheehan-venus.pdf
Smokey (05:28:41) :
From the RealClimate comment reported by press above:
Third and most important, Watt’s little science project was conducted with no understanding of the processing algorithms used for the data. He has no way of knowing whether any of the issues he has documented have any effect on the record. […]
That, folks, is a tantrum.
Yup. And given that I’ve published the relevant bits of the code along with the effects of that code on the product in postings here on WUWT which have been moderated and /or read, in many cases by our host, I think it is demonstrably false to say “no understanding of the processing algorithms”.
While I’d felt a bit like I was pushing the envelope into a “too tech” computer geek flavor … I’m now happy I did so; since is serves as an existence proof that the “processing algorithms” have been discussed here.