Australia's BOM backs down on warming at Antarctic bases

From the Australian. (h/t to Andrew Bolt)

Bureau blows hot and cold over Antarctica warm-up as Bureau of Metereology backs down from a claim that temperatures at Australia’s three bases in Antarctica have been warming over the past three decades

With weather stations like the ones below, it might be a bit hard to separate the real temperature signal of Antarctica from your local UHI. I wonder how much more cooling would be evident in the data had the weather stations been placed away from the “living pods”?

This picture on a postage stamp from Australia, celebrating the Australian Antarctic Territory in 1997, may help settle the issue. Note the Stevenson Screen near the “living pod” on the right.

http://www.cira.colostate.edu/cira/RAMM/hillger/AustralianAntarctic.L102.jpg

Here is the larger photo of the first day of issue card, the Stevenson Screen is also just visible above the snowbank in the lower right. Rather close to human habitation I’d say. Looks like its in the middle of a small AHI (Antarctic Heat Island).

Click for larger image

Click for larger image

They have propane heat, apparently:

Here is what Australia’s Mawson Station looked like circa 1956-1957:

mawson_station_1957

And here is what Mawson station looks like today, as of Feb09. It appears they dumped the “living pods”. Maybe a little “urban growth” going on there?

mawson_station_jan-feb09-2

Here’s another picture of a Stevenson Screen close to a building in Antarctica, from the British Antarctic Survey:

[10004058]

Location: Fossil Bluff, Alexander Island

Season: 1994/1995

Photographer: Pete Bucktrout

THE Bureau of Meteorology has backed down from a claim that temperatures at Australia’s three bases in Antarctica have been warming over the past three decades.

A senior bureau climatologist had accused The Weekend Australian of manufacturing a report that temperatures were cooling in East Antarctica, where Australia’s Mawson, Davis and Casey bases are located.

The trend of temperatures and ice conditions in Antarctica is central to the debate on global warming because substantial melting of the Antarctic ice cap, which contains 90 per cent of the world’s ice, would be required for sea levels to rise.

While calvings from ice shelves in parts of West Antarctica have generated headlines, evidence has emerged that temperatures are cooling in the east of the continent, which is four times the size of West Antarctica.

Contrary to widespread public perceptions, the area of sea ice around the continent is expanding.

The Weekend Australian reported last month a claim by Bureau of Meteorology senior climatologist Andrew Watkins that monitoring at Australia’s Antarctic bases since the 1950s indicated temperatures were rising. A study was then published by the British Antarctic Survey that concluded the ozone hole was responsible for the cooling and expansion of sea ice around much of the continent.

The head of the study project, John Turner, said at the time that the section of Antarctica that included the Australian bases was among the areas that had cooled.

Dr Watkins said The Weekend Australian had misrepresented the results of the BAS study, which made no findings about temperatures at Australian bases.

When it was pointed out to Dr Watkins that Professor Turner had been quoted directly, Dr Watkins said his bureau, and not the BAS, was the agency collecting temperature data.

“You kept going until you got the answer you wanted,” Dr Watkins said.

“You were told explicitly that the data collected by the Bureau of Metereology at the Australian bases shows a warming for maximum temperatures at all bases, and minimum temperatures at all but Mawson.”

However, Professor Turner told The Weekend Australian the data showed a cooling of the East Antarctica coast associated with the onset of the ozone layer from 1980 onwards. Professor Turner said the monthly mean temperatures for Casey station from 1980 to 2005 showed a cooling of 0.45C per decade. In autumn, the temperature trend has been a cooling of 0.93C per decade.

“These fairly small temperature trends seem to be consistent to me with the small increase in sea ice extent off the coast,” he said.

Dr Watkins did not dispute the figures referred to by Professor Turner.

Referring to the bureau’s data collection since the 1950s, Dr Watkins said Professor Turner’s figures were “only half of the full data set”.

However, Dr Watkins admitted that analysis of the data might show “an ozone-induced cooling trend in the latter half of the record” — a reference to the past three decades.

Dr Watkins declined to release the temperature data to The Weekend Australian. He said it had still to be fully analysed by the bureau.

Nationals Senate leader Barnaby Joyce said he hoped all government agencies would co-operate in helping to inform the global warming debate.

“These agencies need to be able to dispense the facts without fear or bias,” he said.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
77 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Geoff Sherrington
May 12, 2009 4:18 am

Francis (19:15:07) : 2 05 2009
What datum point do you use to show that the sea level is rising? AFAIK, if you use the centre of the Earth as a datum, it wobbles around with tides and gravity of other bodies and distrotions of the Earth shape, with a magnitude similar to tha effect of sea level rise being claimed. So what do you calibrate onto?

Geoff Sherrington
May 12, 2009 4:29 am

Malcolm Robinson (18:12:01) 5 05 2009
Wrong blog or not, there are still some very fine scientists in CSIRO and BOM and I applaud their progress of science. There are also a few scientists whose viwes are becoming less supportable. Little birds tell me that there have been meetings to reconcile the belief-driven with the evidence-driven, but that the meetings might have been a bit early. Give it time.
I once worked in a junior position for CSIRO and today I am very proud of the enduring work we did, though it was masterminded by others. The CSIRO and the BOM have the appropriate structures to bounce back and again be intellectually and actually dominant.
It would be juvenile to knock the good work of the past. Some has been at the cutting edge of world knowledge. But, as in idustry, cycles of performance can happen.