Posted by John Goetz
CNN posted an AP story tonight on their website regarding the separation in early August of a 19-square-mile ice shelf from Elsmere Island. It starts:
TORONTO, Ontario (AP) — A chunk of ice shelf nearly the size of Manhattan has broken away from Ellesmere Island in Canada’s northern Arctic, another dramatic indication of how warmer temperatures are changing the polar frontier, scientists said Wednesday.
It sure sounds impressive and scary, but then most people probably think of New York City when they hear “Manhattan”. They might even think of the greater NYC Metro Area. But in reality, Manhattan is but one of the five Boroughs in NYC. And 19 square miles is roughly 4.4 x 4.4 miles. Is it really that impressive or alarming? It is actually smaller than the town limits of the little community I live in.
Furthermore, the ice did not actually melt. The article states that it is adrift in the arctic.
Here is the rest of the article:
“The Markham Ice Shelf was a big surprise because it suddenly disappeared. We went under cloud for a bit during our research and when the weather cleared up, all of a sudden there was no more ice shelf. It was a shocking event that underscores the rapidity of changes taking place in the Arctic,” said Muller.
Muller also said that two large sections of ice detached from the Serson Ice Shelf, shrinking that ice feature by 47 square miles — or 60 percent — and that the Ward Hunt Ice Shelf has also continued to break up, losing an additional eight square miles.
Muller reported last month that seven square miles of the 170-square-mile and 130-feet-thick Ward Hunt shelf had broken off.
This comes on the heels of unusual cracks in a northern Greenland glacier, rapid melting of a southern Greenland glacier, and a near record loss for Arctic sea ice this summer. And earlier this year a 160-square mile chunk of an Antarctic ice shelf disintegrated.
“Reduced sea ice conditions and unusually high air temperatures have facilitated the ice shelf losses this summer,” said Luke Copland, director of the Laboratory for Cryospheric Research at the University of Ottawa. “And extensive new cracks across remaining parts of the largest remaining ice shelf, the Ward Hunt, mean that it will continue to disintegrate in the coming years.”
Formed by accumulating snow and freezing meltwater, ice shelves are large platforms of thick, ancient sea ice that float on the ocean’s surface but are connected to land.
Ellesmere Island was once entirely ringed by a single enormous ice shelf that broke up in the early 1900s. All that is left today are the four much smaller shelves that together cover little more than 299 square miles.
Martin Jeffries of the U.S. National Science Foundation and University of Alaska Fairbanks said in a statement Tuesday that the summer’s ice shelf loss is equivalent to over three times the area of Manhattan, totaling 82 square miles — losses that have reduced Arctic Ocean ice cover to its second-biggest retreat since satellite measurements began 30 years ago.
“These changes are irreversible under the present climate and indicate that the environmental conditions that have kept these ice shelves in balance for thousands of years are no longer present,” said Muller.
During the last century, when ice shelves would break off, thick sea ice would eventually reform in their place.
“But today, warmer temperatures and a changing climate means there’s no hope for regrowth. A scary scenario,” said Muller.
The loss of these ice shelves means that rare ecosystems that depend on them are on the brink of extinction, said Warwick Vincent, director of Laval University’s Centre for Northern Studies and a researcher in the program ArcticNet.
“The Markham Ice Shelf had half the biomass for the entire Canadian Arctic Ice Shelf ecosystem as a habitat for cold, tolerant microbial life; algae that sit on top of the ice shelf and photosynthesis like plants would. Now that it’s disappeared, we’re looking at ecosystems on the verge of distinction,’ said Muller.
Along with decimating ecosystems, drifting ice shelves and warmer temperatures that will cause further melting ice pose a hazard to populated shipping routes in the Arctic region — a phenomenon that Canada’s Prime Minister Stephen Harper seems to welcome.
Harper announced last week that he plans to expand exploration of the region’s known oil and mineral deposits, a possibility that has become more evident as a result of melting sea ice. It is the burning of oil and other fossil fuels that scientists say is the chief cause of manmade warming and melting ice.
Harper also said Canada would toughen reporting requirements for ships entering its waters in the Far North, where some of those territorial claims are disputed by the United States and other countries.
I really like the comment “we’re looking at ecosystems on the verge of distinction“
This is the time of year when Arctic sea ice reaches its minimum. Yes, right now it stands at the second lowest level measured in nearly thirty years. But is what we find reported in this article truly alarming and out of the ordinary? I don’t know. I’m asking.
Talk amongst yourselves.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Mr. Watts asked if anyone knows whether the breakup of such shelves is a regular occurence.
Apparently no one here has any knowledge of that.
Lot’s of opinions, but no info on the question asked.
Reply (by JG); Actually, JG asked, not AW.
Large lumps of ice are easy to break from ice shelves. It needs a storm not higher temperatures. A few years ago NASA observed a wave front from a north Pacific storm travel south and break a large piece of ice from part of the Antarctic ice shelf. We only have 30 years of real time polar observation, via satellite, which is too short a time to get any measure of natural cyclic ice changes. We know that in 1903 Roald Amundsen sailed the NW passage and observed a great lack of ice whilst Franklin died in ferociously cold conditions a little over one hundred years before trying to find the NW passage. As a geologist all I can say is that CO2 never drove climate in the past so why would it do so now?
This hell in a handbasket sounds a lot like a tempest in a teapot.
The Markham Ice Shelf had half the biomass for the entire Canadian Arctic Ice Shelf ecosystem as a habitat for cold, tolerant microbial life
Right.
Save the Germs.
Along with decimating ecosystems, drifting ice shelves and warmer temperatures that will cause further melting ice pose a hazard to populated shipping routes in the Arctic region
Arctic melt threatening Arctic shipping. Um. Come again?
a habitat for cold, tolerant microbial life
Normally I don’t go pedantic on such things, but sometimes when the copy editor is asleep at the switch, the results are, well, risible.
(If it’s cold, how can it be tolerant? Would you care to replace that comma with a hyphen, laddie? Or at least just remove it!)
Cold and tolerant–kind of like my moderating style, or is it my dating style?
Pam,
You are a rare liberal since most of them (I’ve found) won’t argue for what they believe in (I think they just make a mental note to add me to the extermination list).
The Ice shelf can not be 4500 years old.
Here is a study from 1986. The shelves had collapsed.
http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic39-1-15.pdf
evanjones (20:15:43) :
Evan, you missed another low hanging fruit. IIRC, the etymology for “decimating” goes back to the Roman Empire where to reinspire troops that needed it, a commander would line them all up and kill every tenth. The remaining 90% would then put out greater than 111% effort and do better than before.
The author should have used the word “devastation.” I think decimation crept into common usage in the aftermath of Katrina as I only recall previous natural disasters(*) causing devastation.
* The failure of the New Orleans levee system means Katrina was partially an anthropogenic disaster. And the failure of people to heed the warnings means means it was a political disaster. A complete package!
BTW, the Arctic shipping reference was probably to ice bergs drifting south into shipping lanes. Think Titanic. However, that’s south of the Arctic Circle. Oh well.
“John Nicklin”: you know I recall reading somewhere (I wish I could recall the source) and this guy was lamenting that if this particular glacier would continue to retreat all along a large mountainous area it would be very bad for tourist business. I read this and nearly fell off my chair. Bad for tourists business? Yeah, because they shlep up there to go stare at the vast ice field and without the glacier to look at the locals figure that tourists will not come back. These type of people, in my imagination would have stood in front of the last ice age and held plackards reading “bad ice, bad ice, go home”. The foolishness that this discussion brings out of people is staggering. I am certain that if we did a sample poll of 10,000 Americans (for example) just asking on the street…..if the ice caps in the Arctic continue to melt in the winter months, a big number would say “no” they don’t and when asked why they would say “global warming” has put a stop that. I am certain.
“Jeff Alberts”, yes, I agree. I read a few years back when the hysteria was focussed on the South pole….that the main reason that a humungous berg larger than Manhatten had broken off was because the pressure from inland was so great – all due to increase of snow fall way inland….forcing the bergs to push out. But, the media all jumped on the story and claimed without a single drop of evidence that it was a sign of a warming world, when the fact was it was a sign that inland the snow had been higher.
But wait: I promise you that when this current hurricane season has blown itself out the press will publish op-eds (that’s about all they are) that will claim it is all because the earth is going over the tipping point, into the demonic grip of runaway global gore-gasses…..
“fred houpt”
Not 100% sure but I think that was the a 1980 article about the Franz Josef glacier in NZ.