Surprise: Explosive volcanic eruption under the Arctic ice found

I posted on a similar story about volcanic eruptions under Antarctic ice earlier this year. What is unique about this situation is that it was a large eruption that went completely undetected, and under pressures that they thought not possible. The big question is then; where did the heat from the volcano go, and what effect did it have on the sea ice environment? Another question is how much CO2 would such an eruption emit, and how long would it take to outgas? Research has been going on looking at volcanism in the ridge but this discovery of a significant eruption in 1999 is new and unexpected.

From Science and The Sea: “In the last few years, for example, scientists have found that a long ridge beneath the north polar ice cap is dotted with volcanoes, and with vents of superheated water that could be home to many new species.”

More info on the Gakkel Ridge here

Today’s Press release from EurekAlert:

International expedition discovers gigantic volcanic eruption in the Arctic Ocean



A “lonely ” seismometer drifts with the sea ice.

Click here for more information.


An international team of researchers was able to provide evidence of explosive volcanism in the deeps of the ice-covered Arctic Ocean for the first time. Researchers from an expedition to the Gakkel Ridge, led by the American Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), report in the current issue of the journal Nature that they discovered, with a specially developed camera, extensive layers of volcanic ash on the seafloor, which indicates a gigantic volcanic eruption.

“Explosive volcanic eruptions on land are nothing unusual and pose a great threat for whole areas,” explains Dr Vera Schlindwein of the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in the Helmholtz Association. She participated in the expedition as a geophysicist and has been, together with her team, examining the earthquake activity of the Arctic Ocean for many years. “The Vesuvius erupted in 79 AD and buried thriving Pompeii under a layer of ash and pumice. Far away in the Arctic Ocean, at 85° N 85° E, a similarly violent volcanic eruption happened almost undetected in 1999 – in this case, however, under a water layer of 4,000 m thickness.” So far, researchers have assumed that explosive volcanism cannot happen in water depths exceeding 3 kilometres because of high ambient pressure. “These are the first pyroclastic deposits we’ve ever found in such deep water, at oppressive pressures that inhibit the formation of steam, and many people thought this was not possible,” says Robert Reves-Sohn, staff member of the WHOI and lead scientist of the expedition carried out on the Swedish icebreaker Oden in 2007.

A major part of Earth’s volcanism happens at the so-called mid-ocean ridges and, therefore, completely undetected on the seafloor. There, the continental plates drift apart; liquid magma intrudes into the gap and constantly forms new seafloor through countless volcanic eruptions. Accompanied by smaller earthquakes, which go unregistered on land, lava flows onto the seafloor. These unspectacular eruptions usually last for only a few days or weeks.

The installation of a seismometer on an ice floe.

Click here for more information.

Volcanic ashes on the sea bed of Gakkel Ridge (Photo: WHOI)

Bathymetric chart of the Gakkel Ridge at 85°E. Photographic bottom surveys were conducted along profiles shown as thin, black lines. The photo showing volcanic ashes on the sea bed were taken at the site, which is marked with a red star and the letter a.
Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
87 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
suddenlysteve
June 27, 2008 11:08 am

Possible explanation for ice caps melting? It’s not global warming.

Chance Metz
June 27, 2008 5:33 pm

Nope it’s volcanoes and thsoe are not cuased by man though some may find a way to say we are casuing the to erupt more often smehow.

kim
June 27, 2008 5:56 pm

On the DotEarth video that Tony Edwards I think I see the effect of the 1999 volcanic explosion. You can see a big blue spot appear suddenly in 1999 and you can watch it migrate out of the Arctic Ocean, taking a chunk of multiyear ice with it in 2001. There is another possible small one in 1995 from about the same spot. Was there an increase in seaquake activity in 1995?
What I see is subtle, but I don’t think I’m imagining it.
===========================================

anna v
June 27, 2008 8:54 pm

here is a write up
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=81bb2fd3-63f1-476f-b0be-f48c0dc90304
given also above by DR, I stress the :
“The $5-million expedition was financed by the U.S. National Science Foundation and NASA, which hopes to use the know-how gained in its hunt for extraterrestrial life.”
Hence the politically for Nasa correct first part of the statement:
“The scientists say the heat released by the explosions is not contributing to the melting of the Arctic ice, but Sohn says the huge volumes of CO2 gas that belched out of the undersea volcanoes likely contributed to rising concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. How much, he couldn’t say.”
And here is the clincher:
“The scientists say they have explored just one small stretch of the Gakkel Ridge and hope to return in a few years.”
Note, a few years to return. Reminds one of the CO2 map cover up. One lovely map in 2003, and maybe some more in a few years. All contributed by the friendly NASA.

June 28, 2008 6:56 am

[…] the decline in sea ice has nothing to do with Anthropogenic Global Warming. Also, there is a lively system of volcanism under the Arctic Ocean to which we were heretofore unawares. It should also be pointed out that […]

Pamela Gray
June 28, 2008 6:55 pm

I just did a comparison check from one year ago on Arctic ice coverage. There is more ice now than a year ago. For all of it to melt this summer, surface temps really need to soar and now. If I were to place odds, melting ice would not be the favored bet. Ask any bookie.

anna v
June 29, 2008 12:35 pm

http://www.purdue.edu/climate/hestia/
Here is a good reason why we cannot find free maps of CO2 by month.
Somebody is planning to make money out of it with carbon credits etc.

statePoet1775
June 29, 2008 1:11 pm

anna v,
What great drama this is! The government, the government financed universities, and opportunistic entrepreneurs lined up on the AGW side and a few dissenters and apparently reality on the other side.
This along with the economic crisis and the stupid wars we are involved in may deal fascism a deadly blow in this country. I hope so; it has been cruising for a bruising for a long time.

Alec DesRoches
July 2, 2008 8:56 am

Hmmm…
I’ve read the July 1, 2007 was the since day record for Arctic Ice…July 2007 the single largest month for Ice loss.
I wonder if USGS picked up earthquakes in the arctice during the year prior????
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsww/Maps/ortho/270_90.php

October 14, 2008 6:11 am

[…] so-called missing tropical hotspot (as supposed proof against greenhouse theory) and (2) that sub-sea volcanoes along the Gakkel Ridge is likely to be the cause of accelerated melting of the Arctic summer sea ice. So what is the […]

October 17, 2008 3:49 am

[…] so-called missing tropical hotspot (as supposed proof against greenhouse theory) and (2) that sub-sea volcanoes along the Gakkel Ridge is likely to be the cause of accelerated melting of the Arctic summer sea ice. So what is the […]

icarus
November 19, 2008 8:23 pm

So a vast system of undersea volcanos, that is erupting constantly, absolutely cannot have an effect on the planet’s geo-physics but man’s activity is the primary driver?
Is that the bill of goods being sold by the UN’s IPCC?