CNN's View of Climate History

Some of you might notice that some other items of interest were left out… feel free to fill in the gaps.

 

A timeline of climate change science

By Matthew Knight for CNN

LONDON, England (CNN) Climatology was once a small and often overlooked branch of science. But important discoveries made as [early as] the early 19th century have contributed to what is the most important field of scientific study in the world today. Listed below are some key dates in climate change history.

1824

French physicist Joseph Fourier is first to describe a “greenhouse effect” in a paper delivered to Paris’s Académie Royale des Sciences.

1861

Irish physicist John Tyndall carries out research on radiant heat and the absorption of radiation by gases and vapors including CO2 and H2O. He shows that carbon dioxide can absorb in the infrared spectrum, and it can cause a change in temperature. Tyndall famously declares: “The solar heat possesses. . . the power of crossing an atmosphere. But when the heat is absorbed by the planet, it is so changed in quality that the rays emanating from the planet cannot get with the same freedom back into space. Thus the atmosphere admits of the entrance of the solar heat, but checks its exit. The result is a tendency to accumulate heat at the surface of the planet.”

1896

Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius first proposes the idea of a man-made greenhouse effect. He hypothesizes that the increase in the burning of coal since the beginning of industrialization could lead to an increase in atmospheric CO2 and heat up the earth. Arrhenius was trying to find out why the earth experienced ice ages. He thought the prospect of future generations living “under a milder sky” would be a desirable state of affairs.

1938

British engineer Guy Stewart Callendar compiles temperature statistics in a variety of regions and finds that over the previous century the mean temperature had risen markedly. He also discovers that CO2 levels had risen 10 percent during the same period. He concludes that CO2 was the most likely reason for the rise in temperature.

1955

John Hopkins University researcher Gilbert Plass proves that increased levels of carbon dioxide could raise atmospheric temperature. By 1959 Plass is boldly predicting that the earth’s temperature would rise more than 3 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of the century.

In the same year chemist Hans Suess detects the fossil carbon produced by burning fuels, although he and Roger Revelle – director of the Scripps Institute of Oceanography – declare that the oceans must be absorbing the majority of atmospheric carbon dioxide, they decide to conduct further research.

1958

Revelle and Suess employ geochemist Charles Keeling to continuously monitor CO2 levels in the atmosphere. After only two years of measurements in Antarctica an increase is visible. The graph becomes widely known as the Keeling Curve and becomes an icon of global warming debate and continues to chart the year on year rise in CO2 concentrations to this day.

1970

The first “Earth Day” takes place on April 22nd across America. Twenty million people participate in the event organized by Democratic Senator Gaylord Nelson. It follows and precedes a series of U.S. Department for Energy reports highlighting concern about global warming.

1979

The first World Climate Conference is held in Geneva attended by a range of scientists and leads to the establishment of the World Climate Program.

1985

Scientists at the World Climate Program conference at Villach in Austria confidently predict that increased CO2 concentrations will lead to a significant rise in the mean surface temperatures of the earth. A hole in the ozone layer is discovered over Antarctica.

1987

Officially the hottest year on record to date. Three years later the 1980s is confirmed as the hottest decade since records began.

1988

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is set up by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). The IPCC will provide reports based on scientific evidence which reflect existing viewpoints within the scientific community.

Parts of the Mississippi river are reduced to a trickle and Yellowstone National Park becomes a tinderbox. In June, Dr James Hansen of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies delivers his famous testimony to the U.S. Senate. Based on computer models and temperature measurements he is 99 percent sure that the [human caused] greenhouse effect has been detected and it is already changing the climate.

1990

The IPCC delivers its first assessment on the state of climate change, predicting an increase of 0.3 °C each decade in the 21st century — greater than any rise seen over the previous 10,000 years.

1992

The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development — better known as the Earth Summit — takes place in Rio de Janeiro attended by 172 countries. It is the first unified effort to get to grips with global warming and leads to negotiations which result in the Kyoto Protocol.

1995

The hottest year on record. Four years later the 1990s are confirmed as the hottest decade in 1000 years.

The IPCC report for that year states that “the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.”

1997

The Kyoto Protocol: Industrialized countries agree to cut their emissions of six key greenhouse gases by an average of 5.2 percent. Under the terms of the agreement each country — except developing countries — commits to a reduction by 2008 — 2012 compared to 1990 levels. Notably, the U.S. Congress vote 95 to 0 against any treaty which doesn’t commit developing countries to “meaningful” cuts in emissions.

2001

Newly elected U.S. President George W. Bush renounces the Kyoto Protocol stating that it will damage the U.S. economy. The third IPCC report declares that the evidence of global warming over the previous 50 years being fueled by human activities is stronger than ever.

2003

Europe experiences one the hottest summers on record causing widespread drought claiming the lives of over 30,000 people.

2005

Following ratification by Russia — the 19th country to do so — in November 2004, the Kyoto Protocol becomes a legally binding treaty. America and Australia continue their refusal to sign up claiming reducing emissions would damage their economies.

2007

175 countries in total have ratified the Kyoto Treaty. Under new Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Australia ratifies the treaty. The IPCC report for a fourth time states that “warming of the climate is unequivocal” and that the levels of temperature and sea rise in the 21st century will depend on the extent or limit of emissions in the coming years.

Former vice-president Al Gore and the IPCC jointly win the Nobel Peace Prize for services to environmentalism.

2008

160 square miles of the Wilkins Shelf breaks away from the Antarctic coast. Scientists are concerned that climate change may be happening faster than previously thought.

Following the Bali talks/roadmap, negotiators from 180 countries launch formal negotiations towards a new treaty to mitigate climate change at the Bangkok Climate Change Talks.

Find this article at:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/03/31/Intro.timeline/index.html

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

86 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeff Alberts
April 2, 2008 3:35 pm

Ångström cleaned Arrhenius’s clock 108 years ago.
http://www.esc.boun.edu.tr/files/55123co2.pdf

As much as I’d like to believe that, the article goes on to say that Ångström didn’t account for different pressures at different altitudes. And apparently the absorption bands at high altitudes do not overlap. I suppose this is why the models predict more warming in the upper atmosphere. Too bad it doesn’t seem to be happening.

GK
April 2, 2008 4:17 pm

2002 NASA`s Aqua satellite is launched which totally disproves the H2O positive feedback loop and therefore totally disproves the AGW hoax.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23411799-7583,00.html
2008 March – Global average temperature as documented by all 4 groups – have now fallen so much that the entire rise of the 20th century has been reversed.
2008 April – The AGW hoax reaches it’s peak, with what is undoubtedly the most ludicrous statement ever made in the history of all mankind :
Ted Turner: quote: “We’ll be eight degrees hottest in ten, not ten but 30 or 40 years and basically none of the crops will grow. Most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals.”
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/warming_creates_cannibals/
Jan 2010 – Global average temperatures have fallen 2 degrees and the new ice age know as a the “Gore Minimum” is creating famine around the world. Al Gore is facing Treason and Sedition charges. James Hansen and Robert Mann are facing fraud and deception charges. 184 countries have requested Al Gore’s extradition to face charges for his crimes against humanity.

Alan J
April 2, 2008 4:42 pm

Erik,
Ah, I see what you’re saying. I agree it’s a poorly worded title. But since most people tend to use the terms “anthropogenic global warming” and “climate change” synonymously anyway, I don’t think it’s that big an issue.

April 2, 2008 5:04 pm

the interesting thing about this is that in the early years, all the major milestones were scientific discoveries. The last 10 years of highlights in climate science are almost all political moves. Climate science seems to me to be currently more political than scientific.

SteveSadlov
April 2, 2008 5:16 pm

2020:
Road network starts to collapse.
2023:
Barbarian invasions commence.
2030:
The fief system is renewed.
2050:
The second Great Plague – 2 billion die

Andrew
April 2, 2008 5:22 pm

2007, Winter sea ice extent in Antarctica sets a record max….and no one even pays attention.
2008, A bit of Antarctic ice breaks up, and suddenly Antarctica is AGW central again.
Early 1950’s, Ernst Hofer discovers “Warming Island”
2005, The island reappears and gets “discovered” by Dennis Schimdt, who starts the Cult of Warming Island
http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2008/03/31/warming-island-another-global-warming-myth-exposed/
For a real history of climate science theories, see here:
http://icecap.us/docs/change/Historicalpersectives-CLIMATECHANGETHEORIES.pdf
Well, in fairness, they do say that Arrhenius predicted AGW would be a good thing.

Steve H
April 2, 2008 5:48 pm

Do not forget about Earth shine as a direct method of measuring the Earth’s changing albedo.

Now that we who live in Minnesota are slowly digging our way out of this winter’s snow, it is telescope time once again.

Editor
April 2, 2008 6:09 pm

AEGeneral:
“The solar cycle was discovered in 1843 by Samuel Heinrich Schwabe, who after 17 years of diligent observations of the sun noticed a periodic variation in the average number of sunspots seen from year to year on the solar disk (from Wiki)”
May not count – I noticed that Schwabe was just an amateur scientist at the time. Isn’t science supposed to be left to the true scientists? At least, that’s what I hear at RealClimate. So perhaps the solar cycle has not yet been described in a seminal paper and therefore cannot be implicated in climate change. 🙂

Michael
April 2, 2008 6:21 pm

2013, the state of Florida builds a wall across Interstate 75 and Interstate 95.

Steve H
April 2, 2008 6:23 pm

Most historical discoveries have been made by amateur scientists, because they do what they do, out of a love for the subject.
Professional scientists must justify their research and obtain grant money to earn their income.
If you are a professional, taking risks in your research is the last thing that you want do to. An amateur scientist has nothing to risk, so they take the time to study a subject which got their interest.
Today, at my own home, I obtain scientific data which was impossible for any professional to obtain only 20 years ago. I do it out of a quest for knowledge and a simple love of the subject.

Editor
April 2, 2008 6:38 pm

The first entry should be 1801, when British amateur astronomer William Herschel discovered a statistical correlation between wheat prices and sunspots. From the Christian Science Monitor last September:

In 1801, the eminent British astron­­omer reported that when sunspots dotted the sun’s surface, grain prices fell. When sunspots waned, prices rose.
He suggested that shifts in grain prices were a stand-in for shifts in climate. Large numbers of sunspots led to a warmer sun, he reasoned. With more warmth reaching Earth, crop yields would increase, depressing grain prices.

He thought he was looking at a direct effect rather than an indirect effect of the solar wind and Galactic Cosmic Radiation and cloud formation, but he nailed resulting correlation.
I believe an economist towards the end of the 19th century made the connection between sunspots, wheat prices and cloudiness, on the theory that sunspots caused cloudiness, resulting in less sun reaching the wheat, less wheat, and higher wheat prices. Can’t find the citation.

Pamela Gray
April 2, 2008 7:12 pm

Spring Break, 2008
Paraphrased from the Oregonian: Portland, Oregon experiences the latest snowfall in the last 50 plus years, with more to come.

Christopher
April 2, 2008 7:18 pm

Figured youd all get a kick out of this gem of an article out of BBC. Another cheerleader for global warming (aka punish the developed countries because they are rich)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7327393.stm

1engineer
April 2, 2008 8:47 pm

the most important field of scientific study in the world today.
Now that’s rich. Curing cancer? Curing AIDS? Heck, providing clean water for people to drink? I’d say any of those are more important than climate change science. The absolute hubris and condescension is astounding.

Kent
April 2, 2008 9:13 pm

Great catch Christopher had to go check to see if it was an April 1 joke.
They missunderstood the theory completely and only talk about earths weak magnetic field solar wind,while ignoring the main driver of the whole theory, the suns magnetic field as it relates to sunspot activity.

Pierre Gosselin (aka AGWscoffer)
April 3, 2008 12:24 am

Aaron,
I really think that if Barak Obama becomes Prez, then Gore will play a vital role in his government. Gore sees his movement threatened by skeptics, who are armed with huge amounts of data that are casting doubt on his science. So Gore naturally will try to take over these sources of data. He’ll order the data be changed so the data supports his science – no matter what the climate does. Gore is a trapped animal in a corner, and will do anything to survive, to save face. Look at his $300 million campaign. He’s in a state of panic.
The part about Gore taking over these climate data agencies I find, unfortunately, to be very plausible.
I’m not in the business of weather and climate, and so perhaps someone could tell us if such a takeover of weather and climate administrations is possible. Are there any checks and balances built into these aganecies, to assure we get unmanipulated data?
As much as hate to say it, I think Hillary would be the better choice of the two. I think the Clintons now realise that they’ve unleashed a left wing monster, and they no longer have control of it. The monster has turned on them. I think they’d be glad to chain it back down.

Philip_B
April 3, 2008 12:27 am

Interestingly Herschel’s sunspot – wheat price relationship holds today. Rice also hit a record price today.
This gets little coverage in the media, but we are on the verge of major social disruption due to food shortages.

Pierre Gosselin (aka AGWscoffer)
April 3, 2008 12:48 am
Pierre Gosselin (aka AGWscoffer)
April 3, 2008 12:51 am

Excerpt from aforementioned link (found via IceCap).
“But Monckton points out that in the U.K., Gore is not allowed to speak in public about his “green investment company” because to do so would violate racketeering laws by “peddling a false prospectus.” He says that fact came about after a British high court found Gore’s movie, An Inconvenient Truth, riddled with errors.”

Dodo
April 3, 2008 1:55 am

The BBC is at it again:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7327393.stm
Interesting story, but how did it happen that they forgot to call Svensmark himself. Non audiatur et altera pars in climate news.

Alan Chappell
April 3, 2008 2:35 am

The last time I looked Google Earth was still the same, we are covered 70% by water. That to me signifies that this is the greatest % of the planet.
Unfortunately Scientists are only interested in the 30% and they call this research? But then research on the 70% does not exist so don’t admit that its there. There are almost no records of what happens in or on the worlds oceans but the 3,000 temp. sensors placed by NASA, ( which I read have problems) Water depths of 3-4 miles are common, what effects Co2 at these depths, or even 50 ft.
I once was on a ship in the Pacific between Australia and New Zealand, the engine sea water intake temperature increased 18c at its highest point, we were in a volcano’s heat discharge we estimated at that time that the water was ‘heated’ for approx. 10 miles, the depth sounder showed no bottom, it was good only for depths of 3 miles, and this is only one of hundreds of volcano’s under the sea, discharging heat and Co2 into the atmosphere that ‘AGW science’ is not interested in.

TerryS
April 3, 2008 3:26 am

Re: Christopher
Just read the BBC article, it says the following:

“For example; sometimes the Sun ‘burps’ – it throws out a huge burst of charged particles,” he explained to BBC News.
“So we looked to see whether cloud cover increased after one of these bursts of rays from the Sun; we saw nothing.”

If the “burp” is a solar flare then there is an associated increase in X-rays, UV light and often a coronal mass ejection that you don’t get with cosmic rays. What effect (if any) does this have?
I believe there are plans to test the cosmic ray/cloud formation theory using the Large Hadron Collider when it is completed.
Strange isn’t it how those who have alternate theories to AGW have to put their theories to the test by rigorous experimentation and yet AGW climate “scientists” don’t even have to use a decent thermometer.

Tom in Florida
April 3, 2008 4:51 am

2012: Al Gore, using profits from his carbon trading scheme, buys the entire earth and declares it “his”.
2037: Asteroid destroys Earth, global warming argument ends.

Alex Cull
April 3, 2008 5:31 am

The BBC definitely has a AGW bias, it’s possible to see that in most climate-related reports they publish.
What surprises me (although perhaps it shouldn’t) about those who bang the drum about global warming, is their sense of proportion. Witness the concern about the inhabitants of Tuvalu, where no-one has yet (to my knowledge) died due to rising sea levels (ascribed to global warming.)
To put that in perspective, a report from the International Rescue Committee this year estimated that 45,000 people each month die as a result of the fighting in the Congo.
Of course, actual deaths due to boring old causes such as tribal violence, infectious diseases, malnutrition and general poverty pale into insignificance in comparison with the hypothetical millions who (could, might, will possibly) die (or perhaps not, it depends) as a result of climate change sometime in the future.

Gary
April 3, 2008 5:46 am

1976
Hays, J. D., J. Imbrie and N. J. Shackleton publish “Variations in the earth’s orbit: Pacemaker of the ice-ages” and demonstrate the primary cause of the great ice ages are variations in Earth’s orbital parameters – eccentricity, tilt, and precession – the Milankovitch cycles.
Leaving this milestone out of the list strongly suggests the author is a victim of “CO2-poisoning.”