Spot the free thinker in this photo (photo courtesy ZombieTime)
Russell Steele over at NCWatch has an interesting post about “going against the herd”. He says “Bob Prechter, an expert in observing social behavior, thinks social herding is leading to some social hysteria over global warming. ”
I’ve seen some examples of this lately, especially in attacks from other bloggers on my www.surfacestations.org project. One of the most notable aspects of being in a “herd” is the anonymity it affords the individual animal. As long as the animal does not stray from the herd, it doesn’t become an easily visible target for a predator. At the same time, the herd forces a conformity for its individual members, stray from the herd, and you are liable to end up as chow. I guess it’s similar the “publish or perish” thinking on climate change these days, anything or anyone contrary to CO2 based warming theory gets attacked, and viciously.
A number of the climate blogs are just like that. Rabett Run and Open Mind are two prime examples. They are operated by what appear to be scientists, but done so anonymously using a false or hidden persona. Or maybe it’s just a way for them to vent emotionally, since peer reviewed journals don’t allow for anonymous opinions to be published. Or maybe it’s just plain cowardice. I’ve always believed that if you have an idea, you have to put your name behind it for it to be considered valid. This is why this blog and my website have my name on it.
In any event, if you visit these climate blogs, it’s pretty easy to get trampled by the herd if you try to establish a constructive and civil dialog, I’ve tried. Lots of immature comments, screeching attacks, anonymous piling on, and vulgarity are the norm there. I edit those things out or block such posts when they appear on this blog, so does Steve McIntyre on his Climate Audit blog no matter what side they come from.
Yet it seems that some in the climate community don’t have such decorum and prefer to attack anonymously. The climate blog RealClimate.org is the exception, as they list what scientists are involved, and edit out a lot of the ad hominem attacks.
But beyond that, anonymity and angry personal attacks seem to be business as usual.. This week, my surfacestations.org photo database server has been getting hit with Denial of Service (DOS) attacks in an attempt to knock it offline. None of my other servers on my network are getting attacked. So clearly, the pattern of anonymous attack seems to be the norm for the pro AGW based science community. That does not bode well for the state of science today.
I invite some of the regular readers here to visit these blogs and decide for yourself. BTW since this blog is sponsored by the local newspaper, it doesn’t allow for posting contact information. But you can get it on my website www.surfacestations.org using the “contact” link.
There’s an old saying that I think should apply to online interaction with people: “You can catch more flies with honey than you can with vinegar”
On the plus side, the entire climate blogosphere is abuzz with the hornet’s nest the pictures at surfacestations.org has stirred up. The first step in understanding and solving any new problem is getting people to talk about it. I’d say I’ve accomplished that if nothing else. Maybe the herd is thinning.