Study: Doomsday clock is ticking – Green tech is 10x behind in meeting Paris Climate agreement

Tenfold jump in green tech needed to meet global emissions targets

Green innovations must be developed and spread globally 10 times faster than in the past if we are to limit warming to below the Paris Agreement’s 2 degrees C target

DURHAM, N.C. – The global spread of green technologies must quicken significantly to avoid future rebounds in greenhouse gas emissions, a new Duke University study shows.

“Based on our calculations, we won’t meet the climate warming goals set by the Paris Agreement unless we speed up the spread of clean technology by a full order of magnitude, or about ten times faster than in the past,”

said Gabriele Manoli, a former postdoctoral associate at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment, who led the study.

“Radically new strategies to implement technological advances on a global scale and at unprecedented rates are needed if current emissions goals are to be achieved,” Manoli said.

The study used delayed differential equations to calculate the pace at which global per-capita emissions of carbon dioxide have increased since the Second Industrial Revolution — a period of rapid industrialization at the end of the 19th century and start of the 20th. The researchers then compared this pace to the speed of new innovations in low-carbon-emitting technologies.

Using these historical trends coupled with projections of future global population growth, Manoli and his colleagues were able to estimate the likely pace of future emissions increases and also determine the speed at which climate-friendly technological innovation and implementation must occur to hold warming below the Paris Agreement’s 2° C target.

“It’s no longer enough to have emissions-reducing technologies,” he said. “We must scale them up and spread them globally at unprecedented speeds.”

The researchers published their peer-reviewed findings December 29 in the open-access journal Earth’s Future.

The analysis shows that per-capita CO2 emissions have increased about 100 percent every 60 years — typically in big jumps — since the Second Industrial Revolution. This “punctuated growth” has occurred largely because of time lags in the spread of emission-curbing technological advances, which are compounded by the effects of rapid population growth.

“Sometimes these lags are technical in nature, but — as recent history amply demonstrates — they also can be caused by political or economic barriers,” Manoli explained. “Whatever the cause, our quantification of the delays historically associated with such challenges shows that a tenfold acceleration in the spread of green technologies is now necessary to cause some delay in the Doomsday Clock.

Manoli, who is now on the research staff at ETH Zurich’s Institute of Environmental Engineering, conducted the new study with Gabriel G. Katul, the Theodore S. Coile Professor of Hydrology and Micrometeorology, and Marco Marani, professor of ecohydrology. Katul and Marani are faculty members at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment with secondary appointments in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Duke’s Pratt School of Engineering.

###

Funding for the study came from the National Science Foundation (grants EAR-1344703 and EAR-1530233), and from the Duke WISeNet Program, sponsored by NSF grant DGE-1068871.

CITATION: “Delay-induced Rebounds in CO2 Emissions and Critical Time-Scales to Meet Global Warming Targets,” Gabriele Manoli, Gabriel G. Katul, Marco Marani. Earth’s Future. Dec. 29, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/eft2.2016EF000431

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
155 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David
January 3, 2017 3:09 pm

HURRY BEFORE THE SKY FALLS!!!

Henning Nielsen
Reply to  David
January 3, 2017 3:32 pm

Can’t somebody persuade the greenies to hold up the sky? Useless, but harmless activity. Hands up anyone who wants to save the planet, and keep them there.

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Henning Nielsen
January 3, 2017 4:08 pm

Hands Up , Don’t Fall ! Make the signs , join the march !
(grin)

Reply to  Henning Nielsen
January 4, 2017 2:50 am

The real harm though is the “shaping of minds” globally via education to perceive this is occurring and act accordingly, whatever the physical reality. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002467/246777E.pdf is a new UNESCO paper on what must be in textbooks.
Sustainable development has very little to do with physical reality and hard science. It has everything to do with the behavioral sciences as those NSF grants, properly understood, show.

Melvyn Dackombe
Reply to  Henning Nielsen
January 4, 2017 4:18 am

Henning, I prefer to call them ‘ Greens ‘, not Greenies. The term Greenies gives the impression they are sweet, innocent things, something they are not ( although perhaps mentally !! ).

Darrell Demick
Reply to  Henning Nielsen
January 4, 2017 6:37 am

I prefer to call them “Enviro-Nazis”. Hitler proved that if you feed lies to people over and over (and over and over and over), that they will eventually believe the lies. Harsh but historically accurate.

philincalifornia
Reply to  Henning Nielsen
January 4, 2017 9:25 am

Melvyn …
… I guess greenies weren’t pieces of snot from your nose, where you grew up as a kid !!!!!
I must qualify that though by saying that real environmentalism is fantastic and a truly worthy cause. Modern phony kleptomaniacal environmentalism, not so much.

Reply to  Henning Nielsen
January 4, 2017 4:10 pm

Melvyn Dackombe,

The term Greenies gives the impression they are sweet, innocent things, something they are not ( although perhaps mentally !! ).

In the world I come from, “greenies” are definitely not “sweet, innocent things.” They’re what you cough up from deep in your lungs when you’re sick. I think that’s more than appropriate.
Also greens, as in collard, mustard, etc. are a regional staple and are good for you.

Bloke down the pub
January 3, 2017 3:14 pm

Doomsday clock is ticking, we only have 10 months er 2 years, erm 400 days. Dammit how long are we meant to have now?

Henning Nielsen
Reply to  Bloke down the pub
January 3, 2017 3:34 pm

Rubber band doomsday timeframe, forever stretching, until one day -snap!

toorightmate
Reply to  Bloke down the pub
January 3, 2017 3:36 pm

The Doomsday Clock is solar powered.

Reply to  toorightmate
January 3, 2017 8:03 pm

Without battery backup.

J
Reply to  Bloke down the pub
January 3, 2017 6:48 pm

Well let’s see how long we have got, on that other WUWT thread before we saw that we have a new record high temperature 0.02 degrees higher than the last el nino year, 18 years ago. So at a miliKelvin per year, in the next century we should have about a tenth of a degree !
I think we have time to adapt.

Boulder Skeptic
Reply to  J
January 3, 2017 10:26 pm

There’s way too much actual science that shows CO2 in the amounts being emitted are not a problem now or in the forseeable future. They’re either doubling down on stupid…or, it’s one last gasp to try to scare everyone into self-collapsing western civilization. It’s hard to tell which.
Although it appears that common sense and actual science (rather than broken models and alarmist speculation) is winning some battles against the utter BS that is CAGW, without taking back the US government schools from the left, the successes will be short-lived. North Korea is likely watching how the US public schools and colleges work and are learning a lot.
I’m still de-programming my kids and they are post-college now. Most of you will be glad to hear I’m actually making progress and this site is part of my arsenal.

Goldrider
Reply to  J
January 4, 2017 6:13 am

I “adapted” yesterday. Spent 45 minutes on “hold” with my electric company to rescind a “green energy” sourcing option that was costing an extra $4.38 a month. They asked me why, and I told them.

Steve T
Reply to  J
January 4, 2017 7:00 am

J
January 3, 2017 at 6:48 pm
Well let’s see how long we have got, on that other WUWT thread before we saw that we have a new record high temperature 0.02 degrees higher than the last el nino year, 18 years ago. So at a miliKelvin per year, in the next century we should have about a tenth of a degree !
I think we have time to adapt.

Reading your post got me thinking, if each year (just about) has been “the hottest evvaah” since 1998, just how MUCH hotter has each year been to keep below the current record? Is this statistically significant enough to claim “the hottest ever” most years since 1998?
Just asking.
SteveT

philincalifornia
Reply to  Bloke down the pub
January 4, 2017 9:39 am

Is anyone ever going to tell these fkwits that you can’t calculate the “carbon reduction” (ha ha, yes I really did type that) required to keep temperature restricted to 2 degrees without knowing the sensitivity to a doubling of carbon dioxide ??
Yeah, I know, when did that stop the collection of incompetents, assorted morons, fr@uds and kleptomaniacs.

philincalifornia
Reply to  philincalifornia
January 4, 2017 9:40 am

…. and young duped people ?

Reply to  philincalifornia
January 4, 2017 10:07 am

Your mistake is thinking The Team cares about The Truth.
YUGH error on your part.
It’s The Cause that’s important, not honesty.

Bryan A
Reply to  philincalifornia
January 4, 2017 12:22 pm

Phil
That would be the job of the
Democratic
Unionist
Party
Electorate

philincalifornia
Reply to  philincalifornia
January 4, 2017 9:05 pm

Yes gentlemen thank you for your answers. Young people take note. Fr@uds, kleptomaniacs and incompetents – FOD ASAP.

Curious George
January 3, 2017 3:16 pm

Easy. Let the sun shine on solar power plants 24 hours a day (and vertically in Germany). Increase the number of windy days tenfold.
How to do that, I am not sure (nor is Gabriele Manoli), but that’s what the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society are for.

Felflames
Reply to  Curious George
January 4, 2017 5:07 am

Get all the greens to face the wind turbines.
That is enough air coming out to knock down mountains.
And since it is all hot air, putting some of them around the solar panels in winter will stop the panels freezing over.

Bryan A
Reply to  Curious George
January 4, 2017 12:26 pm

Fans of Wind Power could stand there and talk up a storm when one isn’t available
Fans of Solar could ride Bicycle Powered Generators to energise Full Spectrum Sun Lamps at night

NZPete54
January 3, 2017 3:17 pm

Yeah, right… can you imagine how much *more* money will be required to achieve this?
Can’t see it happening; “the times they are a changing”.

nn
January 3, 2017 3:18 pm

Green drivers. Grey tech.

RobbertBobbertGDQ
Reply to  nn
January 4, 2017 1:29 am

Green Drivers. Grey Tech.
That, double n is equal to double Gold.

H.R.
January 3, 2017 3:27 pm

I thought it was already too late, so why do we need to do anything?
I hope they are correct about a climate catastrophe. I’m counting on the End of The World before my first Ferrari payment is due, oh… and that line of credit thingy in Las Vegas.

TG
January 3, 2017 3:27 pm

Brought to you by the – Anything for a buck mafia!

Wharfplank
January 3, 2017 3:34 pm

Paul Erlich, is that you?

nigelf
January 3, 2017 3:36 pm

Well we know this isn’t going to happen so I guess the only thing to do is what we should have been focused on all along…adaptation.

Leonard Lane
January 3, 2017 3:46 pm

TG, right anything for a buck mafia. The faster they go with useless (or harmfully incorrect) studies the more ground we will have to make to repair the damage.

H.R.
Reply to  Leonard Lane
January 3, 2017 4:04 pm

Leonard Lane wrote
“The faster they go with useless (or harmfully incorrect) studies the more ground we will have to make to repair the damage.”
Look on the bright side, Leonard. Those papers will make a great mulch for all that “ground we will have to make.” What soil isn’t improved by loads of B.S.?

emsnews
Reply to  H.R.
January 3, 2017 5:29 pm

My ox team did honorable, healthy BS which made the garden very green. These ‘science’ guys produce toxic waste.

January 3, 2017 3:55 pm

The Dooms Day Clock.
Who set it?
Based on what?
Their own power or pocket book running out?

Dave in Canmore
January 3, 2017 3:58 pm

“Funding for the study came from the National Science Foundation”
If any part of the swamp actually gets drained, I hope the NSF is included. The amount of money these guys flush down the toilette makes me weep. The waste is even worse when you even start to imagine what good could have been done with that money.

Pop Piasa
January 3, 2017 3:59 pm

The Doomsday Clock?
I resent the progressives tying everything lately to some nuclear threat, directly or subliminally. Look at the latest “nuclear doomsday clock” speculation by the Moonbeam himself.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160127144457.htm
The joke could be on all of us (for a few moments) if CERN should somehow manage to open a rift in the space-time continuum and spawn a black hole.

Sheri
Reply to  Pop Piasa
January 4, 2017 5:25 am

Just think of the fun it would have been had previous generations had Doomsday Clocks—changing the minutes till “Doom” every time pestilence and disease broke out, crop failures, a total eclipse of the sun. Actually, none of us would be sitting here now. The people would have crawled into caves and just given up and died.

stas peterson BSME MBA MSMa
January 3, 2017 4:02 pm

Anybody that does not realize that controlled Fusion will be the common power source from mid century on is D.A.F.T.
Climate change is a truism; but catastrophic anthropogenic climate change is a total hoax! It is a non-sequitor to say that CAGW is imminent, so pay more taxes is certifiable,

Pop Piasa
Reply to  stas peterson BSME MBA MSMa
January 3, 2017 4:21 pm

I have wondered why current status of developmental science like fusion and molten salt nuclear is hard to find. I figure it’s about proprietary concerns, but it would be fascinating to see the current state of both techs.

Reply to  Pop Piasa
January 4, 2017 4:56 am

The Molten Salt Reactor is moving forward with some six firms and five nations. 1/3 the cost of LWRs, due its low pressure safety and lack of water cooling. In 1962 the AEC recommended all civilian nuclear energy be based on the MSR to JFK. http://www.egeneration.org

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Pop Piasa
January 4, 2017 10:23 am

The prospect of burning the waste from uranium fission is very promising also. If we can steer the “Turf Truckster” of energy development away from the blinding sun and wind detour and get back on the right road, society might just arrive at “Wally World” before it closes.

MarkG
Reply to  stas peterson BSME MBA MSMa
January 3, 2017 5:06 pm

Nuclear fusion has been thirty years away for at least fifty years. I’m guessing it will still be thirty years away in another fifty.

Tiburon
Reply to  MarkG
January 4, 2017 1:05 am

Agreed, if you’re talking about Tokomak and the like. Disagree, if you’re talking about DPF, such as being brought forward by Dr Eric Lerner and team. Dense Plasma Fusion – look it up. With some luck at the materials end, and no more than 5 years, and no one being mysteriously knocked off (as this tech is an ultimate in distributed democratic access to energy, hence an existential threat to the PTB- Powers-That-Be) – we could see prototype inside 5 years and production units in 10.

Reply to  MarkG
January 4, 2017 7:16 am

So, Tiburon, are you talking about the Mr. Fusion Doc Brown installed on his DeLorean Time Machine? If so, I want one. “My house is powered by beer!”

Bryan A
Reply to  MarkG
January 4, 2017 12:32 pm

And the current state of Climate Science is powered by CONfusion

Janice Moore
January 3, 2017 4:11 pm

Manoli and his colleagues were able to estimate …. the speed at which climate-friendly technological innovation and implementation must occur ….

Manoli:
emissions-reducing technologies … { } We must scale them up ….
FROM: Guglielmo Marconi, Enrico Fermi
TO: Gabriele Manoli
DATE: January 13, 2017
RE: KNOWN OR REASONABLY LIKELY TO BE KNOWN SOON “Green Technology”
Listen up, Signor Manoli. Read this slowly and maybe you will understand it.
The time to scale up a technology is –> after it is viable.
How can you WRITE SUCH

THINGS??!!!!

You are a disgrace to all those of Italian heritage!
What the blockquote is the

MATTER

with you?? Someone has a knife to your throat, maybe?

Per l’amor del cielo!

Get out while you can still think!!!! Nothing is worth selling your soul for!

Janice Moore
Reply to  Janice Moore
January 3, 2017 4:15 pm

Yes. They wrote it 10 days from now. You would not BELIEVE what they have discovered! 🙂

Henry Galt
Reply to  Janice Moore
January 3, 2017 4:30 pm

Members of the the House Ethics Committee? I really hope ‘they’ don’t get to D.T.
Lottsa money involved. For lottsa folks.

Janice Moore
Reply to  Janice Moore
January 3, 2017 4:49 pm

Henry. I do not understand what you MEAN. (smiling — and wondering…..)

Mark from the Midwest
January 3, 2017 4:17 pm

“The study used delayed differential equations to calculate the pace at which global per-capita emissions of carbon dioxide have increased since the Second Industrial Revolution …”
Hmmmm? so they’re using a method where the future conditions depend on the derivatives of the past conditions…. so it should work really well in a closed system…. hmmmm?

jimmy_jimmy
Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
January 3, 2017 7:10 pm

Like all those global climate models that work oh so well predicting the future…

Robert Westfall
January 3, 2017 4:20 pm

The first thing Trump can do to end this madness is cut off the National Science Foundation grants for environmental studies. As a taxpayer I am outraged.
From the end of this article:
Funding for the study came from the National Science Foundation (grants EAR-1344703 and EAR-1530233), and from the Duke WISeNet Program, sponsored by NSF grant DGE-1068871.

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  Robert Westfall
January 3, 2017 4:43 pm

This is a simple case of redistribution of wealth. IRS takes some of your wages, gives some to the NSF, gives some to a sub-unit, gives some to a university, gives some to a professor, gives some to a graduate student. Graduate student pays rent and buys pizza and beer. The beer is recycled.
What’s not to like?

John Law
Reply to  John F. Hultquist
January 4, 2017 12:36 am

Pissed up against the wall, got it!

Sheri
Reply to  John F. Hultquist
January 4, 2017 5:29 am

“What’s not to like” The part where the IRS takes some of my wages. 🙁

Catcracking
Reply to  John F. Hultquist
January 4, 2017 7:50 am

John,
You left off POST graduate students who cannot get a real job who need a subsidy.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Robert Westfall
January 3, 2017 5:04 pm

Is that maybe how progressive “trickle down ” occurs? Just wondering.

Gamecock
January 3, 2017 4:24 pm

“Radically new strategies to implement technological advances on a global scale and at unprecedented rates are needed if current emissions goals are to be achieved”
Nah. We have chosen C. Business as usual.
“It’s the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine.” – R.E.M.

Bryan A
Reply to  Gamecock
January 4, 2017 12:35 pm

World ends at 10, Film at 11

Gamecock
Reply to  Bryan A
January 4, 2017 4:45 pm

“Women, minorities hardest hit.”

rogerthesurf
January 3, 2017 4:24 pm

Right, and still no guarantee that any suitable technology will emerge inspite of this effort. (effort by the taxpayers that pay for these things I mean).
Cheers
Roger
http://www.thedemiseofchristchurch.com

January 3, 2017 4:24 pm

Great! Griff will show up soon with the Arctic Sea Ice Extent graph. Thanks a lot, Anthony.

Keith J
Reply to  Kamikazedave
January 3, 2017 5:26 pm

Less sea ice in the Arctic means more evaporation which means cooler oceans and more rain.

Boulder Skeptic
Reply to  Keith J
January 3, 2017 10:30 pm

c’mon Lat, that’s just weather, don’t cha know.

Robert from oz
Reply to  Kamikazedave
January 3, 2017 7:16 pm

Nah Griff is still sulking over that nice Susan lady that he needs to apologise to .

Griff
Reply to  Robert from oz
January 4, 2017 4:38 am

I stand by my comments on a certain polar bear expert.
(check out other sources on the effects of this year in Svalbard and Hudson Bay on the bears, not presented in certain places…).

Sheri
Reply to  Robert from oz
January 4, 2017 5:30 am

Griff seems to stand by a lot.

Darrell Demick
Reply to  Robert from oz
January 4, 2017 6:32 am

Griff is the epitome of a troll, which is why I call him by the more accurate moniker of “Skankhunt42”.
Remember, Skank, that the best way to fight a troll is to get them to say their name. You have mine ……

MarkW
Reply to  Robert from oz
January 4, 2017 9:28 am

Even after being proven 100% wrong, Griff doesn’t back down.
When you have a pay check to defend, you can’t ever admit to being wrong.

catweazle666
Reply to  Robert from oz
January 5, 2017 1:52 pm

“I stand by my comments on a certain polar bear expert.”
Yes, you would wouldn’t you, you vile, mendacious little scumbag?
You really are utterly shameless and without any vestige of a conscience.

Griff
Reply to  Kamikazedave
January 4, 2017 4:37 am

By popular request –
(you have to squint to see it on left as it only has a few days data into 2017!)comment image
Yep, still a record low. Still no ice around Svalbard.
PIOMAS data due out shortly is expected to show a worrying record low volume.
HYCOM thickness data (yes, its modelled) shows very thin ice and continued export through the Fram of the remaining thick ice.
Some of the experts out there (yes, experts) are predicting we’ve had another phase shift in the state of the ice and we’re in a whole new worrying state.
but that needn’t concern you folk, I’m sure.

Sheri
Reply to  Griff
January 4, 2017 5:32 am

It won’t concern people who realize that statistical analysis of data is not a psychic prediction fest, that trend lines are just lines, trends can reverse, etc. When dealing with chaotic systems, all bets are off on the accuracy of predictions in most cases.

Darrell Demick
Reply to  Griff
January 4, 2017 6:21 am

Skankhunt42, you are truly amazing. Focus on one single area/event, how does that pertain to the entire GLOBAL system?!?!? On average the areal extent of the Arctic ice mass has been dropping since 2000, however the areal extent of the Antarctic ice mass has been growing at a higher rate than the loss of Arctic areal extent since 2000. This is why the mean sea level has not changed appreciably, and definitely not as much as the apocalyptic lies spewed by the self-serving Al Gore.
Oh yea, 4,000 years ago the Arctic was ice-free, and the polar bears survived quite nicely. I am sure that there were some not-so-healthy polar bears even back then (love that picture that pops up on MSN every once in a while), unfortunately all of those self-serving special interest groups did not have social media to spread the lies 4,000 years ago.

Darrell Demick
Reply to  Griff
January 4, 2017 6:34 am

And please, Skank, provide us with the digitally modified picture of the polar bear on that tiny piece of ice floating in the ocean. At least I am giving you credit for NOT loading the one with the penguin floating in the Arctic (lol – now THAT was funny!!!!!).

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Griff
January 4, 2017 7:14 am

“we’re in a whole new worrying state”
Yes, we know what you and your ilk are worried about; you are worried that your climatist ideology and Warmunist gravy train will be ending soon, as well you should.

Dale S
Reply to  Griff
January 4, 2017 7:42 am

If you want us to worry, Griff, give us a reason to worry. There’s no obvious negative consequences from sea ice extent being under 13 million km2 this time of year.

MarkW
Reply to  Griff
January 4, 2017 9:30 am

One constant with the Griff. He will trot out whatever chart happens to support him today. When that chart stops supporting him, he will run and find a different one.
Reality doesn’t matter, history doesn’t matter, heck even intelligence and integrity don’t matter.
Paid trolls gotta keep to the message.

Bryan A
Reply to  Griff
January 4, 2017 12:39 pm

Musta stepped north from the Worrying state of California to the Worrying State of Oregon

philincalifornia
Reply to  Griff
January 4, 2017 9:11 pm

Yeah, where did all those man-made California drought fkwits go ??
…. oh, is it time for man-made California rainstorms yet? Attention span survey required …..

PiperPaul
January 3, 2017 4:32 pm

Oh noes! Solution? Spend trillions of dollars before January 20! For SavingThePlanet, of course.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  PiperPaul
January 3, 2017 6:34 pm

Seems to me the trick will be to identify and diffuse all of the economic and foreign policy time bombs that ‘the left’ has planted while in the oval office.

January 3, 2017 4:39 pm

The less generous side of my brain immediately suspects that some folks have been doing a bit of budgeting and discovered they have to earn research dollars ten times faster to be able to retire on the Riviera with an adequate supply of champagne. Perhaps the political earthquake in the US which funds most of this nonsense has led them to consider the possibility the taps may run dry soon. But this is all just me being suspicious. After all, as a skeptic I am apparently prone to believe in conspiracies.

Steve Fraser
Reply to  andrewpattullo
January 3, 2017 7:17 pm

They already have connections to Venice…

Greg Woods
January 3, 2017 4:39 pm

Think about how much we don’t know today, and imagine how much more we won’t know tomorrow…

Keith J
January 3, 2017 4:49 pm

How about ending these junkets for the CAGW acolytes? Let them do it online. The carbon offsets would be huge.

ossqss
January 3, 2017 4:50 pm

It would be interesting to see how their 401k/investments are distributed amongst green energy companies. Think about it 😉

1 2 3