We’ve seen instances of this before – wishing disaster upon humanity so that it can be used for climate propaganda. However, this tweet from Greg Blanchette sent to the attention of Michael Mann and “get a vasectomy to save the planet” guy Eric Holthaus is particularly galling.
( From: https://twitter.com/gregvlee/status/501936826995994624 )
Predictably, neither Mann nor Holthaus have said anything in their feeds against this inanity, suggesting they agree. Reading Mann’s Twitter feed is like a trip into some sort of alternate universe, where Mann’s ego is a black hole, with its gravity pulling in all rational thought and disintegrating it at the event horizon.
What does it say about climate scientists when they agree that death and destruction are a means of elevating climate communication and their cause? To me it says they are anti-human people.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I agree. With you, not them.
And we all know what the commentary will look like when the next big storm hits, as it ultimately must. It’ll be the end times for sure.
Ignorant Tweet. a) Hurricanes are weather, not climate. b) Hurricane damage would require major repairs, thus requiring the burning of fossil fuels.
Most climate activist are also self described “progressives”. So it’s always about population being too high, back to the turn of the 20th century & Margret Sanger. So a few people dying during hurricane is a good thing to these people. IMO.
Anti-human…in a nutshell that appears to summarize the attitude their behavior suggests.
Is their perfect world, then, one without humanity? Theirs excluded, of course.
It would be more credible if such people were to lead by example.
Progressives rooted for Ernst Stavro Blofeld when they watched “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service.”
Responses are hilarious.
Stuart Elliot says:
August 20, 2014 at 8:52 am
Yep, Send the Mannican down to N’orlins for the next inundation.
It is not just the Scientists either.
Look on any warmist site like the Guardian and those that support the official position, they are all “over population”, doom, gloom and “end of the world” supporters as well.
I am sure it is a form of Paranoia or other Insanity.
The Greens, the Climate Jihadis, the EcoFascists – call they what you will, they are all the enemies of humanity.
Michael D says:
August 20, 2014 at 8:47 am
“Ignorant Tweet. a) Hurricanes are weather, not climate. b) Hurricane damage would require major repairs, thus requiring the burning of fossil fuels.”
Yeah, but imagine the economic recovery due to all the broken windows.
It must be very difficult to be the bearer of gloom and doom and to have mother nature disappoint you year after year. Surely these prognosticators feel resentful and strike out at mother nature providing the world with year after year of benign and even wonderful weather. Where are the Katrina’s when you really need them? Is it too much to ask for a few thousand dead and half a million homeless?
Climate alarmists have a real problem right now with the record shattering time without a major hurricane hitting landfall in the US. 2005 was the last time a catagory 3 or higher hurricane has hit the US, thats over 3200 days, breaking the old record by over 900 days. How can they say extreme weather is increasing with global warming with this record in their face? You can’t get anymore extreme weather than a major hurricane. Major hurricanes are the most potentially dangerous and destructive and not to mention dramatic weather event news media like the weather channel can broadcast to scare people into thinking we need to change the weather. They feel stupid right now saying extreme weather will continue to increase with the record major hurricane lull out there, so they need that record to end to help their agenda. And don’t you also know, even though it has been a record lull, the next time a major hurricane does hit the US they will say its because of global warming causing more extreme weather. As dumb as that is, they will say it.
The roots are with the Ehrlichs and their acolytes. Prime among the latter, was Stephen Schneider, one of Mann’s heroes.
Meanwhile, out in the lazy, lapping mid-Atlantic Ocean, barely a breeze is stirring.
Climatologist worshiping at the alter of the Keres.
Can you imagine if he’d said something like: “I hope more black people get shot in Fergeson, it would motivate us to resolve the issue.” Can you imagine the scathing hate that would descend upon him? How about: “I hope more children are beheaded in Iraq, it would motivate us to act.” It’s the same ugly sentiment. It’s hate speech. And he’s hoping ruin on a huge percent of the nation, literally millions of people.
I’m not sure what it’d take to make Greg and Mikie Mann happy.
They seem to want major pain and dying here at home.
Would 2 thousand to 3 thousand American deaths be enough or do they want more like 40 thousand to 50 thousand so they can really, really, really enjoy climate change and make sure all those little poor people suffer?
By what I’ve been reading from greens in general 100 thousand deaths would be even better.
Idiots lie about hurricanes anyway.
We’ve had fewer, not more.
I believe this study supports your anti-human claim:
“Through the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), multiple children are born adding to worldwide carbon emissions.” “The ART industry is an often overlooked source of environmental degradation…” http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2014/05/20/medethics-2013-101716
I think good ole Greg should sacrifice himself in the Icelandic volcano that’s about to blow…..maybe that will appease the Gods! 😉
Hurricanes are bad for children and other living things.
They are all like this.
When I take the time to argue the CAGW concept with my local Alarmed about Climate activists, The conversation always comes around to the number of people on this planet, that resources are limited, that wealth is finite and that our environment is worse than it ever was.
Yet for all their anti humanist rhetoric they are still here, still having children and living the western high-energy lifestyle.. Yet they love to feel guilty and lecture the rest of this community.
I believe we could solve this social disorder by instituting a tax on do-gooders.
For no human condition is so pernicious.
I always wondered why the same people flailing their arms about for population control to stop global warming, are the same people who want open borders. Isn’t the main goal of the immigrants to increase their and as many family members as they can carbon footprint ? That is the whole point in coming here isn’t it?
One word comes to my mind and it is “desperation”. Maybe in capitals. My oh my are they reaching. First they wanted a super el-nino and now a huge hurricane season just to rationalize away the fact that the warming stopped 14-18 years ago.