From the AAAS Science Magazine and the department of “we told you so” again, and again, and again, comes this “revelation”.
Warming may not swamp islands
by Christopher Pala Science 1 August 2014: Vol. 345 no. 6196 pp. 496-497 DOI: 10.1126/science.345.6196.496
In an interview with CNN last month, Anote Tong, the president of Kiribati, insisted that rising sea levels due to global warming will mean “total annihilation” for this nation of 33 coral islands in the Central Pacific and for other atoll island nations like Tuvalu and the Maldives.
In May, Kiribati bought 22 square kilometers of land in Fiji as a haven for displaced citizens, cementing Kiribati’s reputation as an early victim of climate change. No doubt, the sea is coming: Global sea levels are expected to rise up to 1 meter by 2100. But recent geologic studies suggest that the coral reefs supporting sandy atoll islands will grow and rise in tandem with the sea. The only Pacific atoll islanders who will have to move must do so for the same reason as millions of people on the continents: because they live too close to shore.
===========================================================
h/t Paul Ostergaard
Unfortunately, the article is paywalled, if anyone has access drop me a note please. See update below.
Besides the posts from Willis and Andy above on how atolls like Kiribati float and move (unless you kill all the coral, Alling et al. 2007 shows Kirbati is ground zero for El Nino warming, plus there’s contributing environmental mis-management), the biggest fly in the ointment for the claim made by the current president of Kiribati is the fact that the Maldives (which is also mostly atolls and also claims to be threatened by sea level rise, but it isn’t true) are building new airports for tourism.
One, Kooddoo, is already open for business.
The main airport is adding a new modern passenger terminal, seen in this concept video:
And then there’s this from Wikipedia about the Male airport:
The agreement signed between the Maldives government and GMR Group included the upgrading and renovation of the airport up to the standard of a global airport by the year 2014. GMIAL announced that the development plans included reclaiming more land at the eastern end of the runway; where a new terminal is to be built. This terminal will consist of 3 separate bridged buildings. Plans for a separate cargo terminal was also announced.[15]
The Maldives, for all its troubles and supposed climate worries, doesn’t seem to get the fact that the last thing you do is spend money on new airports, passenger terminals, and cargo terminals on the islands you are supposedly going to have to eventually abandon.
Having your hand out for “climate change trust money” while building new airports to handle increased tourism doesn’t wash. “Scam” is too nice of a word to use here.
==============================================================
UPDATE: The article has been made available to me, thanks Joel O’Bryan. Excerpts below.
Studies suggest that atoll islands will rise in step with a rising sea
By Christopher Pala, on South Tarawa
As the minibus wobbles over the dusty, pothole-filled road that runs the length of South Tarawa island, a song blasting over Kiribati’s state radio envisions an apocalypse for this fishhook-shaped atoll halfway between Honolulu and Fiji: “The angry sea will kill us all.” The song, which won a competition organized by Kiribati’s government, reflects the views of President Anote Tong, who has been warning for years of a knockout punch from climate change.
…
No doubt, the sea is coming: In a 2013 report, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted that global sea levels will rise up to 1 meter by 2100. But recent geologic studies suggest that the coral reefs supporting sandy atoll islands will grow and rise in tandem with the sea. The only islanders who will have to move must do so for the same reason as millions of people on the continents: because they live too close to shore.
Paul Kench, a geomorphologist who now heads the University of Auckland’s School of Environment in New Zealand, was the first to question the dire forecasts for Kiribati and similar island nations. In 1999, the World Bank asked him to evaluate the economic costs of sea-level rise and climate change to Pacific island nations. Kench, who had been studying how atoll islands evolve over time, says he had assumed that a rising ocean would engulf the islands, which consist of sand perched on reefs. “That’s what everyone thought, and nobody questioned it,” he says. But when he scoured the literature, he could not find a single study to support that scenario.
So Kench teamed up with Peter Cowell, a geomorphologist at the University of Sydney in Australia, to model what might happen. They found that during episodes of high seas—at high tide during El Niño events, which raise sea level in the Central Pacific, for example—storm waves would wash over higher and higher sections of atoll islands. But instead of eroding land, the waves would raise island elevation by depositing sand produced from broken coral, coralline algae, mollusks, and foraminifera.
Kench notes that reefs can grow 10 to 15 mill imeters a year—faster than the sea-level rise expected to occur later this century. “As long as the reef is healthy and generates an abundant supply of sand, there’s no reason a reef island can’t grow and keep up,” he argues. This equilibrium may not mean that all areas of atolls will remain habitable, says Scott Smithers, a geomorphologist at James Cook University, Townsville, in Australia. “The changes might happen at a rate that exceeds the recovery,” he says. But the geologic record is reassuring, Kench and others found when they drilled deep cores into reef islands to probe how they responded to past sea-level changes. In a February report in Geophysical Research Letters, the researchers found that the island of Jabat in the Marshall Islands emerged on a reef 4800 to 4000 years ago, when sea levels were rising as fast as they are expected to rise over the next century. Other support for the model has come from monitoring how shorelines respond to seasonal
…
Vanua Levu in Fiji is a less appealing refuge. The purchase was “a publicity stunt,” scoffs Teburoro Tito, a former president of Kiribati and member of the opposition party Protect the Maneaba. Already home to 270 farmers from the Solomon Islands, the steep, hilly tract may accommodate only a few hundred more people. If the optimists are right, no one from Kiribati will have to leave their country anyway.
■ Christopher Pala is a writer in Washington, D.C
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
From the article: “…the last thing you do is spend money on new airports, passenger terminals, and cargo terminals on the islands you are supposedly going to have to eventually abandon.”
There are probably counting on a lot of eco-tourists coming to see the island sinking.
Reblogged this on Catholic Glasses and commented:
Super obvious scam
I once had a lengthy email exchange with Mark Lynas (guardian environmental reporter / eco-activist / Maldives special advisor on sea level rises etc). Despite us both agreeing on the brilliance of Charles Darwin who did the seminary work on atoll formation, he remained utterly unshaken in his belief that the Maldives would drown despite being unable to put forward any good argument in contradiction to Darwin. I’m sure he still believes and espouses the same garbage.
Bugger Colorado Interactive Sea Level widget is still broken. That’s something I like to look at for these claims. Kiribati seems pretty cyclic, from when I last looked.
Taking too much water from the fresh water lens will cause subsidence.
“Unfortunately, the article is paywalled, if anyone has access drop me a note please.”
Here you go.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/75831381/Pala%20Warming%20may%20not%20swamp%20islands.pdf
The first sentence links to the same article twice:
From the AAAS Science Magazine and the department of “we told you so”
<a href=”http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/06/02/tuvalu-and-many-other-south-pacific-islands-are-not-sinking-claims-they-are-due-to-global-warming-driven-sea-level-rise-are-opportunistic/” target=”_blank”>again</a>,
and <a href=”http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/03/09/kiribati-on-the-move-not-sinking/” target=”_blank”>again</a>,
and <a href=”http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/03/09/kiribati-on-the-move-not-sinking/” target=”_blank”>again</a>, comes this “revelation”.
Maybe the third reference should be //wattsupwiththat.com/2012/05/01/kiribati-a-global-warming-refuge/ ?
Sent the Science article without reading it. I see now it was not a research article, just a feature. Apparently the main scientist behind the theory is Paul Kench, author of the 1999 World Bank report and also the Feb 2014 Geophysical Research Letters article referenced in the Pala feature. Here is the article.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/75831381/Kench%20geophysical%20research%20letters%202014%20atoll%20formation%20Marshall%20Island%20Jabat.pdf
Here is the abstract:
The timing and evolution of Jabat Island, Marshall Islands, was investigated using
morphostratigraphic analysis and radiometric dating. Results show the first evidence of island building in the Pacific during latter stages of Holocene sea level rise. A three-phase model of development of Jabat is presented. Initially, rapid accumulation of coarse sediments on Jabat occurred 4800–4000 years B.P. across a reef flat higher than present level, as sea level continued to rise. During the highstand, island margins and particularly the western margin accreted vertically to 2.5–3.0m above contemporary ridge elevations. This accumulation phase was dominated by sand-size sediments. Phase three involved deposition of gravel ridges on the northern reef, as sea level fell to present position. Jabat has remained geomorphically stable for the past 2000 years. Findings suggest reef platforms may accommodate the oldest reef islands in atoll systems,which may have profound implications for questions of prehistoric migration through Pacific archipelagos.
In a previous thread on this topic, one WUWTer pointed out that once modern buildings and roadways have been built, they make it impossible for the surface of the atoll to rise from sand deposition. And the buildings would suffer from any overwashing.
What’s new?
We knew this since Darwin’s time.
Check to see if the new airport design includes a prominent light switch on a podium. With this, they will be fully prepared for the ceremonial switching-off the lights (and don’t forget the press conference), as the last person leaves.
I’m sure Camp Thundercove at Diego Garcia wouldn’t have built massive runways and structures without any form of protection if they thought sea level rise was a genuine threat. Anyway they have tsunami warnings there (which they don’t share)
I mean how on Earth did they survive the approx 130 meter sea rise when the ice age ended in the first place?
?
Of course the President of the Maldives himself did say they weren’t sinking 2 years ago!
http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/44118
[…] Besides the posts from Willis and Andy above on how atolls like Kiribati float […]
Even though they behave as if they floated, they don’t, and I think this expression should be changed to avoid damaging skeptical views.
Doesn’t anyone read “The Voyage of the Beagle”?
Or the work on coral reefs?
From 2013, a significant increase global ice.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg
I’m far from the science of it, but I don’t think these revelations should surprise anybody who has thought about it.
Atolls such as discussed are actually SEA LEVEL FEATURES, and in fact should be considered as the PRODUCT of a rising sea level, rather than under its threat. Why else all those Maldivian Islands dotted about a vast area of Indian Ocean, none of them more than a few meters above the waves? Co-incidence? I recall pointing this out in New Scientist years ago, following the nonsense of the Maldives ‘underwater cabinet meeting’, and I don’t remember being seriously challenged.
Incidentally, all this seems to have been clear to Charles Darwin, who wrote a short but perceptive account, on the evidence of his eyes alone, and one trip. You can see his account in the “VOYAGE OF THE BEAGLE”. What a piece of literature! What a guy!
–
Mothcatcher
ImranCan says: July 31, 2014 at 10:21 pm
“I once had a lengthy email exchange with Mark Lynas (guardian environmental reporter / eco-activist / Maldives special advisor on sea level rises etc). Despite us both agreeing on the brilliance of Charles Darwin who did the seminary work on atoll formation, he remained utterly unshaken in his belief that the Maldives would drown despite being unable to put forward any good argument in contradiction to Darwin. I’m sure he still believes and espouses the same garbage.
It is almost impossible to get people to understand any argument, concept or fact which they are paid a lot of money to never accept.
Of course the president in the Maldives has to be a “denier”; who wants to invest in a sinking country?
“He added that foreign investors were concerned with the talks of a submerged Maldives.”
“He further vowed to work to retain investor confidence in the Maldives.”
(Thanks to David for the link http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/44118)
The Maldives must be a world champion in double standards; arranging a government conference under water to show the world what a desperate sinking state they are in, and at the same time encouraging airborne tourism, the very agent of their country’s destruction, according to the alarmists.
It is certainly a place where I will never spend any holiday time or money.
WUWT readers will of course remember the report from Auckland University (2010) showing that coral islands were not sinking after all:
http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/nz-research-shows-pacific-islands-not-shrinking-3577883
rogerknights says:
In a previous thread on this topic, one WUWTer pointed out that once modern buildings and roadways have been built, they make it impossible for the surface of the atoll to rise from sand deposition. And the buildings would suffer from any overwashing.
===
Thats exactly what struck me about the Male Int. airport promo video.
It looks like the runways are 30cm above sea level on an obviously perfectly calm day.
This kind of massive hard built structure is exactly what will _prevent_ the atolls from naturally adapting to sea level changes.
Also you don’t in what must be probably billions of dollars in a structure like that unless you are aiming to attract MASSIVE tourist throughput.
The last thing the coral and local reef ecology can stand is even more fishing and human garbage.
While trying to blame the rest of world it is clearly thier own actions and greed that is the main threat to the future of these atolls.
Total hypocracy.
Can you really blame them from trying pocket a ton of ‘guilt cash ‘ from the gullible alarmists ?
While of course such scare stories fit nicely into the ‘evil west’ narrative so much pushed by those looking to use ‘the cause ‘ for their political outlooks.
And then there’s this from Wikipedia about the Male airport:
The agreement signed between the Maldives government and GMR Group included the upgrading and renovation of the airport up to the standard of a global airport by the year 2014. GMIAL announced that the development plans included reclaiming more land at the eastern end of the runway; where a new terminal is to be built. This terminal will consist of 3 separate bridged buildings. Plans for a separate cargo terminal was also announced.[15]
====
Clearly GMR and the Maldivian govt. know full well that islands will not be disappearing. Though any future sea defences walls and modifications required to the infrastructure will surely be billed to the UN green slush fund and we in the West will be expected to foot the bill for this folley.
“In a 2013 report, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted that global sea levels will rise up to 1 meter by 2100.”
An unproven certainty?