Claim: U.S. corn yields are increasingly vulnerable to hot, dry weather – Data: corn yield trend positive

While a recent report tells us current droughts in the western USA hardly make the top ten, we have this from Stanford University, a claim about drought related crop insurance claims that doesn’t seem to match data on national yields and trend. While the 2012 drought had an impact, 2013 saw the third highest corn yield on record.

USDA_corn_yield

Data: http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/90C69DEC-38D6-31B4-9953-4C6EB5E82D79?pivot=short_desc

U.S. corn yields are growing more sensitive to heat and drought, according to research by environmental scientist David Lobell. Farmers are faced with difficult tradeoffs in adapting to a changing climate in which unfavorable weather will become more common.

By Laura Seaman (Stanford writer)

Research by David Lobell of Stanford’s Center on Food Security and the Environment indicates corn harvests will be affected by drought conditions, which are occurring more often. 

Corn yields in the central United States have become more sensitive to drought conditions in the past two decades, according to Stanford research. 

The study, which appears in the journal Science, was led by Stanford’s David Lobell, associate professor of environmental Earth system science and associate director of the Center on Food Security and the Environment. “The Corn Belt is phenomenally productive,” Lobell said, referring to the region of Midwestern states where much of the country’s corn is grown. “But in the past two decades we saw very small yield gains in non-irrigated corn under the hottest conditions. This suggests farmers may be pushing the limits of what’s possible under these conditions.”

He predicted that at current levels of temperature sensitivity, crops could lose 15 percent of their yield within 50 years, or as much as 30 percent if crops continue the trend of becoming more sensitive over time.

As Lobell explained, the quest to maximize crop yields has been a driving force behind agricultural research as the world’s population grows and climate change puts pressure on global food production. One big challenge for climate science is whether crops can adapt to climate change by becoming less sensitive to hotter and drier weather.

“The data clearly indicate that drought stress for corn and soy comes partly from low rain, but even more so from hot and dry air. Plants have to trade water to get carbon from the air to grow, and the terms of that trade become much less favorable when it’s hot,” said Lobell, also the lead author for a chapter in the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report, which details a consensus view on the current state and fate of the world’s climate.

Rain, temperature, humidity

The United States produces 40 percent of the world’s corn, mostly in Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana. As more than 80 percent of U.S. agricultural land relies on natural rainfall rather than irrigation, corn farmers in these regions depend on precipitation, air temperature and humidity for optimal plant growth.

According to the research, over the last few decades, corn in the United States has been modified with new traits, like more effective roots that better access water and built-in pest resistance to protect against soil insects. These traits allow farmers to plant seeds closer together in a field, and have helped farmers steadily raise yields in typical years.

But in drought conditions, densely planted corn can suffer higher stress and produce lower yields. In contrast, soybeans have not been planted more densely in recent decades and show no signs of increased sensitivity to drought, the report noted.

Drought conditions are expected to become even more challenging as temperatures continue to rise throughout the 21st century, the researchers said.

Lobell said, “Recent yield progress is overall a good news story. But because farm yields are improving fastest in favorable weather, the stakes for having such weather are rising. In other words, the negative impacts of hot and dry weather are rising at the same time that climate change is expected to bring more such weather.”

Extensive data

Lobell’s team examined an unprecedented amount of detailed field data from more than 1 million USDA crop insurance records between 1995 and 2012.

“The idea was pretty simple,” he said. “We determined which conditions really matter for corn and soy yields, and then tracked how farmers were doing at different levels of these conditions over time. But to do that well, you really need a lot of data, and this dataset was a beauty.”

Lobell said he hopes that the research can help inform researchers and policymakers so they can make better decisions.

“I think it’s exciting that data like this now exist to see what’s actually happening in fields. By taking advantage of this data, we can learn a lot fairly quickly,” he said. “Of course, our hope is to improve the situation. But these results challenge the idea that U.S. agriculture will just easily adapt to climate changes because we invest a lot and are really high-tech.”

Lobell and colleagues are also looking at ways crops may perform better under increasingly hot conditions. “But I wouldn’t expect any miracles,” he said. “It will take targeted efforts, and even then gains could be modest. There’s only so much a plant can do when it is hot and dry.”

Laura Seaman is the communications and external relations manager for Stanford’s Center on Food Security and the Environment, a joint program of Stanford’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies and the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.

For more Stanford experts on climate change and other topics, visit Stanford Experts.

-30-

This graph suggests to me that U.S. corn is far more tolerant of drought now than it was in the dustbowl years:

CornYieldTrend_US[1]

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

84 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Box of Rocks
May 3, 2014 5:43 am

Well duh.
Hot weather does effect corn yields. And wheat, barley and milo….
The million $ question is as the clilmate changes does where we grow corn change?

Speed
May 3, 2014 5:43 am

But how much higher would the yield have been without Global Warming?

Speed
May 3, 2014 5:45 am

Lobell’s team examined an unprecedented amount of detailed field data from more than 1 million USDA crop insurance records between 1995 and 2012.
There’s that word again. Unprecedented.

Raymond
May 3, 2014 5:46 am

This isn’t garbage research but forget about AG “Climate Change”, Corn production is going to suffer in the US as the Ogallala Aquafer is pumped down and/or if we get hit by one of the severe droughts Anthony wrote about a couple of days ago.

William Abbott
May 3, 2014 5:46 am

What nonsense! FRAUD! Anthony your graph at the bottom is eloquent refutation of Stanford’s Center on Food Security’s deceit. Lobell says, “there is only so much a plant can do when it is hot and dry.” Your graph say, “Corn plants can do quite a lot” Looks to me like corn yields have been doubling every thirty to forty years. Talk about miracles.

Mike Borch
May 3, 2014 5:51 am

I am a corn and soybean farmer from northern iowa. Technology in agriculture is expanding at a very rapid rate. The ability of the plant breeders to produce new and varied corn hybrids is remarkable. The goal is to DOUBLE the yields by 2050. I think there is an excellent chance that will happen if not before. The biggest threat we face is that government will get in our way!

May 3, 2014 5:51 am

Now that yield curve was a hockey stick if i ever saw one! Some of the increasing yields are due to the increase in CO2 levels, making photosynthesis more efficient. Did they take that into account?
http://lenbilen.com/2014/02/22/co2-the-life-giving-gas-not-carbon-pollution-a-limerick-and-explanation/

Doug Huffman
May 3, 2014 5:53 am

We, I, see the 2012 drop in yield and stipulate the drought correlation. Did I miss the drought as exclusive and sufficient cause for the drop in yield? Farmers do not farm on a level economic ground that may also cause the 2012 drop in yield.

May 3, 2014 6:01 am

The next step is for the EPA to restrict irrigation claiming some invented reason related to CO2 and climate change. Then the claim will be stated with authority that agricultural yield is being restricted by Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming.

Kirk c
May 3, 2014 6:06 am

This certainly has a lot of Spin added. Another way to look at this data is that corn yields have increased on average for the last 60 years by about 2 bu/ac every single year – thanks to genetics and crop technology. One must also assume this progress has to “max out” one day. I can cherry pick from the graph and conclude that since the mid 90’s, the average yield has in fact “peaked”and held steady at 140 bu/ac +/- 15% . That’s pretty reliable production over the last 20 years. Weather will always play a role in that 15% variation.

May 3, 2014 6:06 am

“The United States produces 40 percent of the world’s corn, mostly in Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana. As more than 80 percent of U.S. agricultural land relies on natural rainfall rather than irrigation, corn farmers in these regions depend on precipitation, air temperature and humidity for optimal plant growth”
That could be a problem, as the drought seasons come nearer.
As the temperature differential between the poles and equator grows larger due to the cooling from the top,
http://www.woodfortrees.org/graph/hadcrut4gl/from:1987/to:2015/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2002/to:2015/trend/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:1987/to:2015/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:2002/to:2015/trend/plot/rss/from:1987/to:2015/plot/rss/from:2002/to:2015/trend/plot/hadsst2gl/from:1987/to:2015/plot/hadsst2gl/from:2002/to:2015/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1987/to:2002/trend/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:1987/to:2002/trend/plot/hadsst2gl/from:1987/to:2002/trend/plot/rss/from:1987/to:2002/trend
very likely something will also change on earth. Predictably, there would be a small (?) shift of cloud formation and precipitation, more towards the equator, on average. At the equator insolation is 684 W/m2 whereas on average it is 342 W/m2. So, if there are more clouds in and around the equator, this will amplify the cooling effect due to less direct natural insolation of earth (clouds deflect a lot of radiation). Furthermore, in a cooling world there is more likely less moisture in the air, but even assuming equal amounts of water vapour available in the air, a lesser amount of clouds and precipitation will be available for spreading to higher latitudes. So, a natural consequence of global cooling is that at the higher latitudes it will become cooler and/or drier.
Better to move south when the droughts start kicking in.

Old Huemul
May 3, 2014 6:16 am

Corn is a C4 plant. As such, it economizes water under higher CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere. If the crop was already grown in relatively dry environments such as Mexico or the US Southwest, this also leads to increased photosynthesis. Under the more humid environment of the corn belt, increased CO2 would lead to small increases in photosynthesis, but large reduction in water requirement. Besides, of course, if the normal climate (as opposed to transient droughts) turns to be warmer (say, 2°C hotter), there are plenty of corn varieties currently grown in warmer climates (e.g. Argentina or Brazil) that could be adopted instead. That is only counting on existing varieties, not considering future plant breeding in the US, or development of new genetically modified varieties that are more resistant to heat and drought. The above is a delicate way of saying that the Lobell study is little more than BS.

Latitude
May 3, 2014 6:25 am

Old Huemul says:
May 3, 2014 at 6:16 am
Corn is a C4 plant
====
That should have been the first post……

Pamela Gray
May 3, 2014 6:33 am

Hot and dry? I thought the meme was hot and humid under anthropogenic climate warming. If the growing season air is getting hotter and dryer we likely are having an oceanic issue, IE oscillation, not an anthropogenic driven increased water vapor issue. Hot and dry summers usually mean cold winters caused by the double whammy of oceanic and atmospheric weather pattern oscillations. Let’s see now…did we have a cold winter in the corn belt area?
To these trough slopping, money trolling researchers I say lier lier pants on fire.

starzmom
May 3, 2014 6:34 am

In this article, the author suggests that a big factor in increasing yields is that new varieties of corn can be planted closer together, so there are more plants per acre. It is not a stretch to see that more plants per acre require more water per acre for the same productivity per plant. If so, even normal rainfall could be inadequate for the new crop density. Perhaps this is less a drought problem and more a crop management problem.
That said, in my work on western water law and irrigation, it became obvious to me that farmers were planting corn in marginally suitable areas, and depending on irrigation to tide them through the hot, dry days. When there were more hot, dry days than planned for, and available or allowable water use limited, crops failed. Farmers’ decisions are driven by lots of considerations, and one of those is the price of the product. As the corn prices have gone up, use of marginal areas for planting corn has also gone up. For the farmers, crop insurance lessens the risk that a bad crop management decision will have catastrophic financial impacts.
It seems to me the issues are more related to crop management practices (and its cousin, financial management) and the risks assumed (or not) by individual farmers. Reintroducing the financial risks might encourage farmers to go back to crops suitable for dry land farming in places not suitable for a water intensive crop such as corn.

May 3, 2014 6:37 am

Uploading daily weather forecast maps out to 2019, upload run is up to around end of November 2014 at this time. Free access to temperature and rainfall contour maps, ad free site, just the maps, and an explanation of how it works. Currently loading about three months of new maps per day, I have viewers that have made upwards of $750,000.00 playing in the futures markets. Not what I intended, it was for the use by the original producers that was my original intent.

Henry Galt
May 3, 2014 6:37 am

Assumption #1 – the public are as lazy/stupid as I, the ‘journalist’, am and will do no research to verify this hit-piece.
Assumption #2 – see assumption #1

May 3, 2014 6:38 am

“Some of the increasing yields are due to the increase in CO2 levels, making photosynthesis more efficient. Did they take that into account?”
C02 is a trace gas. It cant warm the earth or make plants grow.

Coach Springer
May 3, 2014 6:52 am

My goodness, Stanford has just demonstrated that corn crops prove that the Earth is getting less and hot and dry.

Rud Istvan
May 3, 2014 6:52 am

Lowell’s whole academic reputation is centered in this false thesis, developed by dubious data mining techniques. All his research grants are to support this spurious alarmism. Wrote about it in Gaias Limits.
As noted above, maize is a C4 which economies water with increased CO2. Second, corn does fine up to about 40C provided there is sufficient water for transpiration. Only the combination of hot and dry reduces yields, but over 80 percent of the effect (based on CYMMT field trials in Africa) is during anthesis (tasseling), a period that lasts 2-3 weeks. Not even the IPCC can find a connection between regional drought and CAGW, let alone on such brief time scales.For the US, there is a regional drought connection to various phases of the PDO and AMO and ENSO, reseach published a decade ago by USGS. That is the 2014 Kansas winter wheat problem. Finally, CYMMT for Africa and Monsanto for the US (in part because of the depleting Ogallalla) have been developing drought tolerant strains. The newest US hybrid in field tests 2012 did about 6% better yield under moderate drought conditions ( simulated by controlling center pivot irrigation) than the previous best. Due for market release this planting season. CYMMT strain improvements for Africa have already succeeded in improving yields about 40 percent in a region (centered on Kenya) where the ‘long rain’ (MAM) is too short to ever be optimal since maise takes 4-5 months to mature.

mkelly
May 3, 2014 6:52 am

non-irrigated corn under the hottest conditions.
So if you don’t water your crops they will not grow well. Who’d a think it.

Latitude
May 3, 2014 6:59 am

You just can’t win…..
=====
2013 saw the third highest corn yield on record.
=====
May 07, 2013 11:30
Rain is too much of a good thing for region’s farmers after last year’s drought
But now, after weeks of above-average rain, much of the nation’s corn belt is a muddy mess, leaving farmers frustrated and planting weeks behind schedule, potentially cutting into this year’s expected record crop.
http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/rain-is-too-much-of-a-good-thing-for-region/article_0ea4d64a-16bb-56a8-8686-746f5acc6eac.html

May 3, 2014 7:12 am

If this is true, we had better stop using corn for fuel right away, more fracking.

chris y
May 3, 2014 7:15 am

lenbilen says on May 3, 2014 at 5:51 am
“Now that yield curve was a hockey stick if i ever saw one!”
Great point!
I think this is a perfect Mannian proxy for global temperature. Even though it samples less than 0.5% of the globe’s surface area, it *must* be tele-connected with global temperatures. Throw in a dash of stationarity (absent global warming, assume that corn production would have been flat), a smidgen of hockey stick data processing that extracts this proxy from the swamp of traditional Mannian proxies (aka ‘noise’), and voila! The next SPM cover photo for AR6 emerges. Why, even the inflection point coincides with the IPCC’s canonical 1950’s decade when mankind took control of the climate.
What’s not to like?

JP
May 3, 2014 7:15 am

Almost all of the corn and bean farmers in my neck of the woods (Northern Indiana) irrigate – or at the very least having irrigation pumps and lines in place. This allows the farmers to water their fields when it counts the most. Yes, in drought conditions like we saw a few years ago, these systems were working overtime. However, they were not built for drought, but normal conditions. If Mother Nature fails to come through at the right time, the farmers can do it themselves.
The larger industrial farms in my area possess huge grain silos. One farm built 3 250,000 bushel silos and a fourth is being built. These silos are full. The warmer weather of the last 35 years have in no way detracted from yields – quite the opposite. As a matter of fact, the demand for corn products has created a real estate bubble in farm lands. You wouldn’t believe what an acre of farm land sells for. Outside of Energy, Big Ag and its attendant industries are going through a Golden Age of sorts (new tractors, combines, infrastructure upgrades, and very, very good incomes).

1 2 3 4
Verified by MonsterInsights