From the University of Cincinnati: UC Geographers Develop a System to Track the Dynamics of Drought
Detecting drought before it causes more catastrophe: the news could go down like a cool drink of water for regions feeling the heat.
UC ingot University of Cincinnati researchers are at work tracking drought patterns across the United States. Qiusheng Wu, a doctoral student and research assistant for the UC Department of Geography, and Hongxing Liu, a UC professor and head of the Department of Geography, will present details this week at the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers (AAG) in Tampa, Fla.
To trace the dynamics around agricultural drought, the UC researchers implemented an Event-based Spatial-Temporal Data Model (ESTDM) to detect, track and monitor conditions. The framework organizes data into objects, sequences, processes and events.
The data was collected from the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite, which was the first of its kind dedicated to measure moisture near the surface of the soil. The study focused on four years of data (2010-2014), which included the devastating Texas drought in 2011 and the 2014 California drought.
The satellite uses an L-band (1.4 Ghz) passive microwave radiometer to analyze the spatial and temporal variations of soil moisture and ocean salinity. “Recent studies have shown that many historical drought events in the U.S. are closely related to La Niña, a phenomenon known for its periodic cooling of sea surface temperatures in the tropical Pacific Ocean. So in addition to measuring soil moisture for drought monitoring, it is also important to measure ocean salinity,” explains Wu.
The satellite can penetrate the Earth’s surface up to 5 centimeters, providing a soil variable for each pixel, which represents 25 kilometers. The satellite’s data collection occurred over a three-day rotation.
The researchers were examining patterns of spreading drought to develop predictions for future drought events.
“Soil moisture is defined as the ratio between volume of water and volume of soil holding the water, which is expressed in percentages, so high soil moisture indicates wet while low soil moisture indicates dry.
“By studying the soil moisture data from the satellite, we can see where the droughts begin and end, and what might indicate patterns of how it can spread over one large area. The pattern might be used to predict the drought in another location, so that those areas could take precautions to avoid the impact of an oncoming drought,” says Wu.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – known as the leading international organization for the assessment of climate change – predicted in 2012 that droughts would intensify in some seasons and in many regions worldwide in the future due to reduced precipitation and/or increased evapotranspiration.
“Drought ranks among the most costly of all natural disasters. It has wide-ranging impacts on many sectors of society, affecting agriculture, economics, ecosystems services, energy, human health, recreation and water resources. By predicting the timing, severity and movement of drought events, we can provide fundamental information for planning and management in developing a response plan,” says Wu.
Future research will involve data gathered from a satellite that NASA is launching toward the end of the year, the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellite. The SMAP satellite integrates an L-band radar (1.26 GHz) and an L-band (1.41 GHz) radiometer as a single observation system combining the relative strengths of active and passive remote sensing for enhances soil moisture mapping. The combined radar-radiometer-based soil moisture product will be generated at about an intermediate 9-km resolution with three-day global revisit frequency. Wu says the accuracy, resolution and global coverage of SMAP soil moisture and freeze/thaw measurements would be invaluable across many science and applications disciplines including hydrology, climate and carbon cycle, and the meteorological, environmental and ecology applications communities.
The Association of American Geographers (AAG) is a nonprofit scientific and educational society that is dedicated to the advancement of geography. The meeting will feature more than 4,500 presentations, posters, workshops and field trips by leading scholars, experts and researchers. The AAG annual meeting has been held every year since the association’s founding in 1904.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
How do the measurements take into account hard surfaces like roads, towns, and buildings?
Even looking at 9km squares (?) won’t this always class places like L.A. as a drought area, since I doubt concrete and tarmac is very moist.
(I assume when they talk about 25km or 9km they mean a square of those dimensions).
“The meeting will feature more than 4,500 presentations, posters, workshops and field trips by leading scholars, experts and researchers. ”
The wording’s ambiguous. Does the 4,500 include the number of posters, or is it the number of presenters?
If it’s presenters, it seems a bit much. Let me assume that no one attends who isn’t doing a presentation. That’s 4,500 people at that seminar studying drought forecasting. I’m strongly in favour of knowledge, but surely some of the funds spent on wages for drought forecasters would be better spent on adapting to drought.
Oh, hooey. Rather than get close and personal with the drought, they get further away. That’s a cool drink of water, all right.
“By predicting the timing, severity and movement of drought events, we can provide fundamental information for planning and management in developing a response plan.”
“Send more money for our models!” (TO HELL WITH THE PEOPLE UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL TO THE DROUGHT)
IPCC: “Anything. Just – say – ANYTHING to keep our show on the road. They’re cancelling shows all over the world. In Poland and Germany we can’t even find a grade school auditorium to do a gig. Talk about … oh, just anything…. DIRT! How about dirt?”
Scientist-for-Hire [sly look, quickly pocketing the check]: Yeah, okay. Right. Dirt it is. We’ll link that to rain and you can wave some scarves around and say it was all done by human CO2… .
Result of Above Conversation: the above NONSENSE article.
Selected proof of “nonsense”:
1. “’… historical drought events in the U.S. are closely related to La Niña, … So … it is also important to measure ocean salinity,’
explainsillogically speculates Wu.”{edited}
2. Re: 5 cm of soil depth —
SO WHAT if the top layer of soil is dry?!! Have they never walked through a freshly plowed field after it has sat under sunny skies for a few days? Scooped up a handful of soil? They might learn something. The top 5 cm could be quite dry while the soil below it is moist.
3. Drought in some places, such as Envirostalinist-controlled California is contrived; it is not HEAT but diversion of water from farmland for dubious-at-best purposes, that is, government regulation CAUSES the drought.
Thus, this statement: “By predicting the timing, severity and movement of drought events, we can provide fundamental information for planning and management in developing a response plan,… .”
is not only fantastical “science,” it is also illogical nonsense.
Further, it reveals two things:
1) It’s all about CONTROL</b.; and
2) This study is a DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO GAIN SOME (“ANYTHING! — JUST SAY ANYTHING!”) LEGITIMACY FOR the IPCC’S JUNK COMPUTER MODELS.
(“We can ‘predict’ droughts! Looky here! Our computer simulations are NOT failed!!! LISTEN TO US!!!!!!”)
Pitiful.
I’m glad to see that map showing a deep red Texas was from 2011. We’re a bit better now.
In that case results depend on soil type. For example soil around Hajós, a fair wine district in Hungary, is loess covered by a foot of sand. I am sure the upper 2 inches can get bone dry pretty fast, while there’s still plenty of moisture below.
“UC” is Cincinnati? So, “UCLA” stands for what, exactly?
Gerry,
UCLA=University of California Los Angeles
Is this serious or is this instant alarmism from space?
So areas that sit on the edges of three or four regional weather patterns and soil types find that the regional weather patterns wobble back and forth. 30 years ago, North Texas was plains desert along with all the wildlife that comes with it: lizards, turtles, tarantulas, scorpions, bats etc. The weather pattern moved slightly and everyone planted green grass yards. The turtles, lizards spiders disappeared. Now it has wobbled back to desert and everyone whines about their yards and not being able to pull in record hay crops.
Cali is diff. The weather pattern wobbles every few years and concrete does not absorb very much. No water left in the soil because the gov has taken it and wastes it on Pelosi’s golf course and her winery.
I write response and disaster plans. I would like to know what they would put in their emergency response plan to a drought that is not already in every state and local plan and how they think their model has any impact….because it doesn’t.
I commend these folks for doing novel research. As I commend any researcher who tries to advance our scientific level of understanding. There is no guarantee that their results will prove to be practically applicable. But that is the nature of research,You generally do not know in advance what you will or won’t find out. It is disheartening to see the great number of people who trash any kind of research. Should we just do nothing?
I see a comment about their definition of soil moisture, but not their definition of drought.
“By studying the soil moisture data from the satellite, we can see where the droughts begin and end, and what might indicate patterns of how it can spread over one large area. The pattern might be used to predict the drought in another location, so that those areas could take precautions to avoid the impact of an oncoming drought,” says Wu”
Can’t see how measuring soil moisture to a depth of 2 inches, when in most areas, we already have measurements along with good estimates what soil moisture is MUCH, MUCH deeper than that(at depths that would be significant and define it as drought) will contribute towards forecasting.
Evapotranspiration in the cornbelt during the growing season, for instance would can be significant to the weather and climate to that huge region as corn roots are tapping into moisture several feet down.
Moisture in the top 2 inches is important but
1.We already have good measures, though this might help to fine tune those
2. Moisture in the top 2 inches dries out fast. The vertical moisture profile in the soil could be very wet/saturated still, while the top 2 inches dry out from several days of sunny, hot and windy.
Janice Moore, quite so. Fortunately, planting is in spring when surface soil holds winter moisture. If you ever watched a seed sprout, (or studied bean spouts at a grocery store) you realize the root grows faster than the crown at first. That is to get down far enough that the ambient soil moisture can be reached even on a nice warm sunny spring day. Same thing with summer rain. It is the part that soaks in that counts. same with watering a lawn. If you did not get the water to soak in at least two inches, you are just going to kill the grass by failing to encourage deep roots. Also the reason Sod is cut about 1.5 inches thick. Gives the regrowing roots a good chance of getting down fast to where it matters.
5 cm is about two inches. That is almost the recommended planting depth for many seeds (except grasses and forbs, which do extraordinarily well at putting roots first. Check out a few garden packets.
As nice as these satellite models might seem, they seem pretty useless for agriculture.
According to the map, the part of South Carolina I’m in is in “severe” draught.
It just rained over an inch yesterday. I tend to judge the level of draught by the level of water in the lakes. There’s no problem in that regard right now for sure, and the top 5 cm most places are fully saturated.
Dear Max L D (re: 12:06),
Good for you to try to find SOMETHING positive here. Yes, indeed, basic research is a good thing. This, however, is HIGHLY applied (to a political agenda of CONTROL) research.
You “… commend these folks for doing novel research… .”
I CONDEMN these folks for doing it on MY DIME.
Please forgive the fervent tone — it was elicited not by you but by the agenda-driven “science” above.
Your Ally for Truth in Science,
Janice
Thanks for all that great detail at 12:54pm, Rud Istvan. Some I knew, some was new!
#(:))
Add to mine of 1:24pm —
Even more than a political or power-driven, Envirostalinist, agenda, it is a get-the-taxpayers-to-fund-my-capital-investment (e.g., windmills or solar panel production), Enviroprofiteer-driven agenda.
Gotta keep that “human CO2 is evil” propaganda going. Without it — the whole investment scam crumbles into dust.
Oh, great! I forgot to spell “ev1l” with a 1 !!!111111
[No. You forgot to missspell “evil” with a 1. Mod]
Droughts will be variable with a few light showers. Here are some short-lived droughts in the USA from the past.
We are still doomed as there were mega-droughts in the US during the Medieval Warm Period too. We must take action now! / sac
Detecting drought before…anyone can even predict the weather
@ur momisugly Latitude — lol. Good point!
*******************************
GOOOOOOO!!!! JIMBO!
Thanks for MORE great info.!
#(:))
@Janice Moore says:
April 9, 2014 at 1:24 pm:
Janice, I well understand the negativity people have about research that may be remotely connected to climate. I have had more than my share of frustrated dealings with climate “scientists” who get nice positions on our dime and basically root each other on in one big incestuous fan club. But that doesn’t mean I give up on all researchers. There are some very good ones out there who are truly interested in advancing science. Someone has to pay for the research. I will give these folks the benefit of the doubt unless/until I see a decidedly political self-agenda as being the main purpose of their research.
Janice, you are welcome. In one life I am just a poor Wisconsin dairy farmer concerned about such things. Seed depth is a crucial input to our new computer controlled planters.
In a parallel life, I am also a fairly PO’d graduate of XXXXXX university with AB, JD, and MBA degrees who just told them last night that they had lost the last vestiges of hope for major donations from me (except very explicitly targeted) because of their email Climate appeal.
Hint, they just hired Naomi Oreskes. Another hint. War is hell, and sides take casualties
Their side just did.
Highest regards to another commen sense gardener, Janice.
This is why we are in so much of a mess today. People just gave them the benefit of the doubt until Climategate, Gleickgate, Himalayagate etc. 🙂