Video follows of the July 23rd, 2012 Coronal Mass Ejection, said to be the fastest ever
From UC BERKELEY — Earth dodged a huge magnetic bullet from the sun on July 23, 2012.
According to University of California, Berkeley, and Chinese researchers, a rapid succession of coronal mass ejections — the most intense eruptions on the sun — sent a pulse of magnetized plasma barreling into space and through Earth’s orbit. Had the eruption come nine days earlier, when the ignition spot on the solar surface was aimed at Earth, it would have hit the planet, potentially wreaking havoc with the electrical grid, disabling satellites and GPS, and disrupting our increasingly electronic lives.
The solar bursts would have enveloped Earth in magnetic fireworks matching the largest magnetic storm ever reported on Earth, the so-called Carrington event of 1859. The dominant mode of communication at that time, the telegraph system, was knocked out across the United States, literally shocking telegraph operators. Meanwhile, the Northern Lights lit up the night sky as far south as Hawaii.
In a paper appearing today (Tuesday, March 18) in the journal Nature Communications, former UC Berkeley postdoctoral fellow and research physicist Ying D. Liu, now a professor at China’s State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, UC Berkeley research physicist Janet G. Luhmann and their colleagues report their analysis of the magnetic storm, which was detected by NASA’s STEREO A spacecraft.
“Had it hit Earth, it probably would have been like the big one in 1859, but the effect today, with our modern technologies, would have been tremendous,” said Luhmann, who is part of the STEREO (Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory) team and based at UC Berkeley’s Space Sciences Laboratory.
A study last year estimated that the cost of a solar storm like the Carrington Event could reach $2.6 trillion worldwide. A considerably smaller event on March 13, 1989, led to the collapse of Canada’s Hydro-Quebec power grid and a resulting loss of electricity to six million people for up to nine hours.
“An extreme space weather storm — a solar superstorm — is a low-probability, high-consequence event that poses severe threats to critical infrastructures of the modern society,” warned Liu, who is with the National Space Science Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing. “The cost of an extreme space weather event, if it hits Earth, could reach trillions of dollars with a potential recovery time of 4-10 years. Therefore, it is paramount to the security and economic interest of the modern society to understand solar superstorms.”
Fast-moving magnetic storm
Based on their analysis of the 2012 event, Liu, Luhmann and their STEREO colleagues concluded that a huge outburst on the sun on July 22 propelled a magnetic cloud through the solar wind at a peak speed of more than 2,000 kilometers per second, four times the typical speed of a magnetic storm. It tore through Earth’s orbit but, luckily, Earth and the other planets were on the other side of the sun at the time. Any planets in the line of sight would have suffered severe magnetic storms as the magnetic field of the outburst tangled with the planets’ own magnetic fields. The sun rotates every 25 days at the equator, so nine days earlier the ignition spot of the coronal mass ejections was pointed directly at Earth.
The researchers determined that the huge outburst resulted from at least two nearly simultaneous coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which typically release energies equivalent to that of about a billion hydrogen bombs. The speed with which the magnetic cloud plowed through the solar wind was so high, they concluded, because another mass ejection four days earlier had cleared the path of material that would have slowed it down.
“The authors believe this extreme event was due to the interaction of two CMEs separated by only 10 to 15 minutes,” said Joe Gurman, the project scientist for STEREO at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.
One reason the event was potentially so dangerous, aside from its high speed, is that it produced a very long-duration, southward-oriented magnetic field, Luhmann said. This orientation drives the largest magnetic storms when they hit Earth because the southward field merges violently with Earth’s northward field in a process called reconnection. Storms that normally might dump their energy only at the poles instead dump it into the radiation belts, ionosphere and upper atmosphere and create auroras down to the tropics.
“These gnarly, twisty ropes of magnetic field from coronal mass ejections come blasting from the sun through the ambient solar system, piling up material in front of them, and when this double whammy hits Earth, it skews the Earth’s magnetic field to odd directions, dumping energy all around the planet,” she said.
Detecting solar blasts
“People keep saying that these are rare natural hazards, but they are happening in the solar system even though we don’t always see them,” she added. “It’s like with earthquakes — it is hard to impress upon people the importance of preparing unless you suffer a magnitude 9 earthquake.”
All this activity would have been missed if STEREO A — the STEREO spacecraft ahead of us in Earth’s orbit and the twin to STEREO B, which trails in our orbit — had not been there to record the blast.
The goal of STEREO and other satellites probing the magnetic fields of the sun and Earth is to understand how and why the sun sends out these large solar storms and to be able to predict them during the sun’s 11-year solar cycle. This event was particularly unusual because it happened during a very calm solar period.
“Observations of solar superstorms have been extremely lacking and limited, and our current understanding of solar superstorms is very poor,” Liu said. “Questions fundamental to solar physics and space weather, such as how extreme events form and evolve and how severe it can be at the Earth, are not addressed because of the extreme lack of observations.”
The work was supported by NASA. Other coauthors of the paper are Stuart D. Bale, director of UC Berkeley’s Space Sciences Laboratory and professor of physics; Primož Kajdič and Benoit Lavraud of the Université de Toulouse; Emilia K. J. Kilpua of the University of Helsinki; Noé Lugaz, Charles J. Farrugia and Antoinette B. Galvin of the University of New Hampshire; Nariaki V. Nitta of Lockheed-Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory; Christian Möstl of the University of Graz and the Austria Space Research Institute of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.
============================================================
Observations of an extreme storm in interplanetary space caused by successive coronal mass ejections
doi:10.1038/ncomms4481 Liu et al.
Space weather refers to dynamic conditions on the Sun and in the space environment of the Earth, which are often driven by solar eruptions and their subsequent interplanetary disturbances. It has been unclear how an extreme space weather storm forms and how severe it can be. Here we report and investigate an extreme event with multi-point remote-sensing and in situ observations. The formation of the extreme storm showed striking novel features. We suggest that the in-transit interaction between two closely launched coronal mass ejections resulted in the extreme enhancement of the ejecta magnetic field observed near 1 AU at STEREO A. The fast transit to STEREO A (in only 18.6 h), or the unusually weak deceleration of the event, was caused by the preconditioning of the upstream solar wind by an earlier solar eruption. These results provide a new view crucial to solar physics and space weather as to how an extreme space weather event can arise from a combination of solar eruptions.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Paywalled with a rental option if interested. Yes, I said you can rent the paper just like a movie.
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140318/ncomms4481/full/ncomms4481.html#access
Forecast polar vortex on April 1. 17 km
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat_a_f/gif_files/gfs_z70_nh_f240.gif
Shouldn’t there be new standards for electronic equipment to ensure they are hardened against solar storm damage. Obviously, this would be a huge cost but what if one of these events happened in January and everyone’s furnace, stove, and vehicles no longer worked. I mean there is civilization ending and then there is 500 million people trying to walk south in the dead of winter.
Carrington Events. Now there are catastrophes the children should be warned against. And maybe we could let them know that they are not their fault.
=====================
“… well we’re at 400 ppm already and these things are just going to keep becoming more and more likely if we keep ignoring what’s happening to our climate. At some point we’re going to rue the day that we failed to take heed of these increasingly obvious warning or the dangers of CO2 – we have to stop this craziness!” – Al Gore
Put a tax on coronal mass ejections.
Problem solved.
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
As Maxwell Smart would have said, “Missed us by *that* much!”
If someone wishes to worry about the Apocalypse, this is the thing to worry about.
My understanding is that the shorter the length of wire is, the smaller the effect is. One reason telegraph operators got shocked in 1859 was that the telegraph lines were so long. They disconnected the lines from the power source, (some sort of battery,) but still got shocked.
I hope this means our modern laptops won’t sizzle and vanish in a puff of smoke, as the wires are far shorter.
Why ‘worry’ about something that happened in the past, about which at the time we were unaware?
Ignorance is bliss.
How long before Anthony gets the blame for this ?
Be a hoot if it was discovered that CO2 and other GHG’s negate or reduce the effects of CME’s.
given most drinking water systems need power to work and keep clean a big cme that blew the power would have a massive effect on society with no access to water or communication. people with guns would rule. its a much bigger munch scream than the co2 deathstar yet most the money goes into co2 not solar science.
The Pareto distribution, learn it, understand it and love it is named after the Italian civil engineer and economist Vilfredo Pareto, is a power law probability distribution that is used in description of social, scientific, geophysical, actuarial, and many other types of observable phenomena.
Live an antifragile lifestyle, things cannot be robust to Black Swan events.
Electric field strength is measured in volts x length^-1, length being of the conductor. Volts^2 x Resistance is the power dissipated in that conductor.
Wouldn’t the money spent for supposedly green energy, be better spent on both the science to research these events, and for the infrastructure necessary to mitigate and recover from one?
And while I also like basic research into other areas of space science, we should prioritize. Mars is not going anywhere. So the billions we have spend visiting Mars, would better be spent visiting asteroids that may have their sights on visiting Earth.
I’ll bet you that’s what caused the Carrington event.
I don’t think the issues will be quite as bad as people fear though. Power grids will likely be down, but I think only for days in most affected areas.
Does Nature publish anything that isn’t alarmist these day?
D. Matteson says:
March 22, 2014 at 8:50 am
Put a tax on coronal mass ejections.
Problem solved.
================
Obama will sign a Presidential Directive that they be made illegal. The EPA is drawing up regulations at this very moment to ban emission from the sun.
coulda, woulda shoulda.
@ur momisugly talldave2
You are not considering all the consequences.
In towns and cities, we need power to have water. Food comes by trucks, which need petrol, which need pumps, refineries and all matter of facilities which need power (not mentioning that all these are operated by electricity-consuming computers today).
Only three days without power in a big city will lead to water and food shortage. A massive CME may put the power grid off for many many days, and it will need electricity to be put back to work. All assuming that the necessary electric engines necessary to do the repairs will not be melted too. Now, imagine New York City without water for 4-5 days. And without light an night. And food not coming. Cars, trains (including tube) and airplanes stopping when out of fuel. No traffic lights, no way for police force to coordinate (no radio). And so on. What do you think will happen?
No, I do not think this is a no-worry scenario.
I remember once hearing a story of American techs dismantling a captured MIG fighter plane, and laughing that all its electronic gear was a set of incredibly intricate valves, rather than modern transistors and semiconductors.
Then someone pointed out that valves are thousands of times more resistant to electromagnetic pulses from nuclear explosions, which cause similar electrical disturbances, on a smaller scale, to large solar events.
Maybe we shouldn’t chuck that old valve radio after all… 🙂
Well someone, and hopefully someone knowledgeable about electro-magentics “needs” to explain to me what is meant by “magnetic reconnection”. I’ve ‘heard’ of ‘magnetic field lines’, and seen nice drawings of all these lines, sort of like iron filings on paper that many of us did with a magnet in junior high. But do these actually exist as “lines”? And can they sort of ‘fly around’, like streamers in a wind, “breaking connection” and then “reconnecting”? Or is this just another ‘scientific’ fantasy….
Because, (and here we need someone who is a Member of the IEEE to step in, perhaps), to my primitive understanding: – –
You cannot have magnetic fields in absence of some sort of charge or electrical current. Period.
And this has rather large (little play on words, there) implications regards our ‘connections’ (read: – electrical), with the Sun, the Planets (individually and collectively), the Solar System and Heliosphere, and beyond, the Galaxy.
Something about Plasma Physics, as well, I believe.
Right? Not sure how ‘permanently magnetized’ objects, like lodestones, figure into this, but I suspect it’s something to do with a re-orientation of their ‘charge’, etc….
Happy to be corrected in my un-learned assumptions.
Addendum: – Implications for the provenance of our “weather” and “climate”, as well, no?
I take it it’s a slow weekend?
REPLY: Must be, your blog still shows nothing other than the default “hello world” post. – A