David Archibald has written a new book. In short: Baby boomers enjoyed the most benign period in human history: fifty years of relative peace, cheap energy, plentiful grain supply, and a warming climate due to the highest solar activity for 8,000 years. The party is over—prepare for the twilight of abundance.
Archibald provides this overview.
The book’s preface provides a taste of the contents and gives some background to it.
Preface
This book had its origins back in 2005, when a fellow scientist requested that I attempt to replicate the work a German researcher had done on the Sun’s influence on climate. At the time, the solar physics community had a wide range of predictions of the level of future solar activity.
But strangely, the climate science community was not interested in what the Sun might do. I pressed on and made a few original contributions to science. The Sun cooperated, and solar activity has played out much as I predicted. It has become established—for those who are willing to look at the evidence—that climate will very closely follow our colder Sun. Climate is no longer a mystery to us. We can predict forward up to two solar cycles, that is about twenty-five years into the future. When models of solar activity are further refined, we may be able to predict climate forward beyond a hundred years.
I was a foot soldier in the solar science trench of the global warming battle. But that battle is only a part of the much larger culture wars. The culture wars are about the division of the spoils of civilization, about what Abraham Lincoln termed “that same old serpent that says you work and I eat, you toil and I will enjoy the fruits of it.” This struggle has been going on for at least as long as human beings have been speaking to each other, possibly for more than fifty thousand years. The forces of darkness have already lost the global warming battle—the actual science is “settled” in a way quite different from what they contend, and their pseudo-science and dissimulation have become impossible to hide from the public at large—but they are winning the culture wars, even to the extent of being able to steal from the future.
The scientific battle over global warming was won, and now the only thing that remained to be done was to shoot the wounded. That could give only so much pleasure, and the larger struggle called. So I turned my attention from climate to energy—always an interest of mine, as an Exxon-trained geologist. The Arab Spring brought attention to the fact that Egypt imports half its food, and that fact set me off down another line of inquiry, which in turn became a lecture entitled “The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse”. Those apocalyptic visions demanded a more lasting form—and thus this book.
While it has been an honor to serve on the side of the angels, that service has been tinged with a certain sadness—sadness that so many in the scientific community have been corrupted by a self-loathing for Western Civilization, what the French philosopher Julien Benda in 1927 termed “the treason of the intellectuals.”1 Ten years before Benda’s book, the German philosopher Oswald Spengler wrote The Decline of the West.2 Spengler dispensed with the traditional view of history as a linear progress from ancient to modern. The thesis of his book is that Western civilization is ending and we are witnessing the last season, the winter. Spengler’s contention is that this fate cannot be avoided, that we are facing complete civilizational exhaustion.
In this book I contend that the path to the broad sunlit uplands of permanent prosperity still lies before us—but to get there we have to choose that path. Nature is kind, and we could seamlessly switch from rocks that burn in chemical furnaces to a metal that burns in nuclear furnaces and maintain civilization at a level much like the one we experience now. But for that to happen, civilization has to slough off the treasonous elites, the corrupted and corrupting scribblers. Our civilization is not suffering from exhaustion so much as a sugar high. This book describes the twilight of abundance, the end of our self-indulgence as a civilization. What lies beyond that is of our own choosing.
It has been a wonderful journey of service and I have had many help me on the way. They include Bob Foster, Ray Evans, David Bellamy, Anthony Watts, Vaclav Klaus, Joseph Poprzeczny, Marek Chodakiewcz, Stefan Bjorklund, and the team at Regnery. Thanks to all.
I will give a bit further background to the book. Thanks to an introduction from James Delingpole, I had a meeting with the publisher, Regnery, in Washington in October 2012. At that meeting, the chief editor asked me,”Mr Archibald, what do hope to achieve with this book?”
I replied,”This may sound a bit whacko, but when I started out in climate science in 2005, I thought that if I get to the US Senate, that is as far as I could ever hope to get and I will be happy. I got to the US Senate in 2011 (I gave a lecture on climate in a US Senate hearing room thanks to Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute). With this book, I will write a strategic energy plan for the United States. That is step one. Step two is to implement the plan.”
If I can make it to the US Senate in six years from a cold start and 20,000 km away, anything is possible. So why not aim high?
This is the take-home message of the book: Humanity is in for a rough patch but we can come out the other side in decent shape if we have an eternity of low cost power from thorium molten salt reactors.
Once again, thanks very much to Anthony. I volunteered as his sidekick on his Australian tour a few years ago. I was invited back to Capitol Hill in September last year to give a lecture entitled Our Cooling Climate in a Congressional hearing room. The speaker’s notes are here.
One further thing. If you like the book and think that civilisation would be advanced by other people reading it, please put a review on the book’s Amazon page and that will contribute to how Amazon rates it.
Twilight of Abundance, now shipping on Amazon.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
twilight indeed, if Figueres gets her way: ***love the final line.
6 Mar: UK Daily Mail: Floods had a ‘silver lining’, says climate chief: UN sparks fury by making political point out of storms that battered Britain
‘They remind us solving climate change is not a partisan issue, she said
And Miss Figueres, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, added there was also an upside to the blast of Arctic air that blanketed America and Canada in snow, and the Australian bushfires, because they have forced climate change back on to the political agenda.
‘There’s no doubt that these events, that I call experiential evidence of climate change, does raise the issue to the highest political levels,’ she told the Guardian.
‘It’s unfortunate that we have to have these weather events, but there is a silver lining if you wish, that they remind us [that] solving climate change, addressing climate change in a timely way, is not a partisan issue.’…
Conservative MP Ian Liddell-Grainger, whose Bridgwater constituency in Somerset has borne the brunt of the flooding, said last night: ‘It is a complete insult to have this unelected, overpaid UN bureaucrat making glib comments at the expense of my constituents.
‘She hasn’t visited us here in Somerset, she knows nothing about what has happened here. She is taking advantage of this situation for political capital.
Apart from anything else, what she says is absolute rubbish. There is no evidence this is anything to do with climate change.’…
***Miss Figueres was speaking before an event in London, where she was due to meet major businesses including Unilever, Lafarge and Royal Dutch Shell.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2574345/UNs-Christiana-Figueres-says-floods-silver-lining.html
The “elites” already have a plan to survive the coming cold.
“The Herald”, a major Australian newspaper, recently posted an update about the ongoing scandal of large scale foreign buyouts of Australian farmland, some of which are believed to be government backed.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/divisions-grow-in-govt-over-farm-buyouts/story-fni0xqi4-1226740170681
The big question is – why? Why would the American and Chinese governments be so interested in large scale ownership of Australian farmland, land which the IPCC and Australian CSIRO predict will shortly become worthless desert?
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/9/27/science-environment/warming-hit-home-australians-ipcc
The reason of course is the land will not shortly become worthless. The land may shortly become very valuable indeed. As the sun cools, if history is any guide, Northern Hemisphere agricultural production will plummet.
Given the risk, what could a nation whose grain belt is vulnerable to global cooling do to protect its future food supply?
The obviously solution is to buy up farmland in another country, a country which is warm enough, so that even if global temperatures fall significantly, the land they purchased would remain highly productive. A country which respects the rule of law, and would continue to respect the rule of law, even in the face of a global disaster.
A country like Australia.
Sure the sun goes up and down. But it is not so bad. We live on a wonderful planet and nature is wonderful. China and India will continue to build their coal fired stations (making CO2). Germany is back into coal fired stations (increasing CO2 production) – and so is Australia. Thankfully then CO2 will continue to increase and that might help it be a little warmer, but more importantly plants will have more food (CO2) to increase their growth. Plants will even become more drought resistant as CO2 increases. We are headed for a greener future.
I would like to read the book, it looks to be extremely interesting, My preference is to have an electronic version, not hard cover – any common electronic format such as epub or mobi (but not Acrobat pdf, thanks). The cost is not an issue – just my reading preference.
What are the prospects for this ?
As a baby boomer circa 1946, i must agree, an amazingly benign period in history without any serious impediment to abundance of everything. I look forward to a good read…
I find that this book is mentioned on my Kindle, for US$15.24. “This item has not been released yet and is not eligible to be reviewed”. Might have to wait a while.
There is a tide in the affairs of men.
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.
On such a full sea are we now afloat,
And we must take the current when it serves,
Or lose our ventures….
Brutus in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar
Indeed!
the sun just perked up !
When is the kindle version coming out
Looks like the Kindle version may be released via Amazon.com on 24 March 14 – good news
Unless they were locked into a peasant, hunter-gatherer or similar society, it’s generally the case that over the last couple of thousand years each generation was better off than the previous one. I see no reason why that shouldn’t continue. Just compare the current rate of innovation with, say, 50 years ago.
Do we know anything about an Audio edition?
It’s true that the self-loathing that the 68′ generation nurtures is a menace and a threat to progress. They also know they are right and will never change their sanctimonious ways, but Nature will relieve us of them within a decade or so.
Then the rest of us, who love the culture, liberty, capitalism and wealth of the West, can get on with the business of doing useful things.
Be a bit careful David.. If we turn solely to thorium, what will there be to replenish the absolutely necessary CO2. If we have the wherewithal, it must never be allowed to drop to the dangerously low levels of the past 10,000+ years.
In fact, to maintain food supplies in world with an increasing population, we should be aiming to push it up significantly higher. 700ppm would be a decent starting point.
50 years ago a little used to by you a lot, now a lot byes you very little. 50 years ago a little was made to last a lot longer , now a lot lasts for very little, We need to stop planned obsolescence and make our resources last a lot longer so were not paying a lot for less
Told you so. We’re doomed.
“We can predict forward up to two solar cycles, that is about twenty-five years into the future.”
If my memory serves me, at the beginning of the current solar cycle the ‘predictions’ were that it would be as large as its predecessor and would peak sooner than it actually has.
Sure, they can make ‘predictions.’ So could Criswell. Just don’t expect any accuracy.
@ur momisugly View from the Solent says:
I would contend that our children already are not better off than we were, at least in the US. All of my children have multiple degrees, one an Architect, one a Doctor (doing AIDS research), and one a IT Security expert. Even so they are not experiencing the living standard that my wife and I experienced at a like age. My daughter (the Architect) lives in Fairfax County Va, she and her husband are both licensed architects with 10 years experience, yet they don’t make enough to afford a baby on their own. My wife and I are going to supplement their income in order for them to have a child and pay for child care, etc.
For my kids College was roughly 3x more expensive, relative to income than it was for us and they make far less (not actual income, but what that income will buy) than my wife and I did, In Fairfax my kids have a 50 year old, 1750 sq ft home that cost them the equivalent of almost 10 years combined annual income (relatively my first home cost roughly 4x my annual income) that they could not purchase until they were out of college for almost 8 years. My wife and I purchased our 1st home (a 1650 sqft, 3brdm, 2 car garage) before I left the military and we did that on my income alone as my wife was pregnant and was not working. When they were young I was the only one working outside the home for a period of ten years, yet we could afford a 2200 sqft home in a middle class neighborhood until my wife returned to work after the kids were all in school.
After I graduated from College I never again lived with nor received (or needed) financial help from my parents. All three of my kids have been ‘bounce backs’, some multiple times, and most of my friends and neighbors have had similar experiences.
I would contend that their generation will be the first to not be better off than the previous one, although not by much. I fear our grand children will be the 2nd generation and the difference will be greater.
I would put Thorium reactors well behind fast reactors in every conceivable way. Thorium reactors have no advantages over fast reactors in terms of cost, safety, or an unlimited energy supply.
They also lag far behind fast reactors in development.
Fast reactors can burn our nuclear wastes and provide 1000 years of energy for our country
just using what nuclear wastes we now have. And since fast reactors require such a small amount of uranium fuel, they can afford to very cost-effectively extract uranium from our oceans, even using today’s technology. And the oceans will NEVER run out of uranium. And fast reactors have
been around for decades, some even used to provide commercial power. Russia is selling and building them right now, as are several other countries.
As for conventional oil and gas, from what I’ve heard about new frackking possibilities
in Texas, we have many times greater resources there than in Bakkan and all the other frackking fields put together. Apparently an inconceivably enormous amount of oil and gas that can now be extracted using new deep drilling/frackking techniques.
“David Archibald is a Perth-based scientist working in the fields of oil exploration, medical research, climate science, and energy. A true polymath, …” (Amazon’s About the Author)
Hmm, a polymathic doomsayer without coattails. Epistemologists that I trust warn against all social engineering but the microscopic, and against prognosticators without doxastic comittment.
I am awaiting Leif Svalgaard’s opinion on this book.
Meh. Ehrlich-like pessimism in a different flavor.
” We can predict forward up to two solar cycles, that is about twenty-five years into the future. ”
IIRC, at the beginning of the current solar cycle the ‘predictions’ were that it would be as large as Cycle 23, and would peak much sooner than it actually did.
If a farmer could control the weather would he try to predict the future or can he plan the future?
Here’s the “missing” report 117
http://www.manicore.com/fichiers/Australian_Govt_Oil_supply_trends.pdf