Met Office Warning (2012): Climate Change Linked To Colder, Drier UK Winters
The Met Office’s ‘pitiful’ forecasts were under fire last night after it was revealed it told councils in November to expect ‘drier than usual’ conditions this winter. In the worst weather prediction since Michael Fish reassured the nation in October 1987 that there was no hurricane on the way, forecasters said the Somerset Levels – still under water after more than two months of flooding – and the rest of the West Country would be especially dry. Last night, it was confirmed the UK had instead suffered the wettest winter since records began. –Tamara Cohen, Daily Mail, 21 February 2014

UPDATE: Verity Jones from “Digging in the Clay” has this hilarious game addition…
See: http://diggingintheclay.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/place-your-bets/
MPs and environmental planners yesterday said the long-term forecast had been a ‘mistake which could have cost Britain dearly’ and questioned whether the forecasting methods were fit for purpose. The three-month forecasts are now sent only to contingency planners, such as councils, government departments, and insurance companies. Using the Met Office’s super-computer, which can perform 100trillion calculations a second, experts in November predicted there would be high-pressure weather systems across Britain ‘with a slight signal for below average precipitation’. –Tamara Cohen, Daily Mail, 21 February 2014
The reduction in Arctic sea ice caused by climate change is playing a role in the UK’s recent colder and drier winter weather, according to the Met Office. Speaking to MPs on the influential environmental audit committee about the state of the warming Arctic, Julia Slingo, the chief scientist at the Met Office, said that decreasing amounts of ice in the far north was contributing to colder winters in the UK and northern Europe as well as to drought. She added that more cold winters mean less water, and could exacerbate future droughts. –Adam Vaughan, The Guardian, 14 March 2012
Half of all UK households face the threat of drought restrictions in the new year if rainfall does not return to normal this winter. With temperatures in parts of England still exceptionally mild, there is now growing concern about what will happen if – as some forecasters expect – there is a second dry winter in a row. The latest drought scenarios follow some of the driest weather since the Met Office records began in 1910, with rainfall in much of central England below 60% of the average for the last year. Water companies and environment regulators are expecting the UK to have more frequent dry winters as a result of climate change. –Juliette Jowit, The Guardian, 17 November 2011

Half of all households in Britain could face water restrictions unless exceptionally heavy and prolonged rain falls by April, water companies and the environment agency have warned. The environment secretary, Caroline Spelman, will hold a crisis meeting next week after the Centre for Hydrology and Ecology (CEH) stated that the average rainfall so far this winter has been the lowest since 1972, and the English Midlands and Anglian regions have had their second driest years in nearly a century. Last year was the driest in south-east England in 90 years. One more dry winter could force then drier areas of the country will have to start looking at more drastic measures like desalination plants or transporting water from wetter areas in the north or west. –John Vidal, The Guardian, 14 February 2012

Surprised by how tough this winter has been? You’re in good company: Last fall the Climate Prediction Center of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicted that temperatures would be above normal from November through January across much of the Lower 48 states. –Peter Coy, Bloomberg, 18 February 2014
Meanwhile, the Met Office has continued to issue questionable long-term forecasts. In mid-November, two weeks before the first of the storms, it predicted persistent high pressure for the winter, which was ‘likely to lead to drier-than-normal conditions across the country’. Infamously, in April 2009, the Met Office promised a ‘barbecue summer’ – which then turned out to be a washout. It forecast the winter of 2010 to 2011 would be mild: it was the coldest for 120 years. At the beginning of 13 of the past 14 years, the Met Office has predicted the following 12 months would be significantly warmer than they have been. This, says the sceptic think-tank the Global Warming Policy Foundation, indicates ‘systemic’ bias. –David Rose, Mail on Sunday, 16 February 2014
Lord Smith, the embattled Chairman of the Environment Agency (EA), ignored multiple warnings that his policies would lead to serious flooding in Berkshire. The warnings came in 2009 from then Lead Member for the Environment at Windsor Council, Cllr Colin Rayner, who spoke exclusively to Breitbart London about numerous meetings with Smith, who has presided over some of the worst flooding to hit Britain in many years. Rayner claims to have told Smith that unless the Environment Agency took urgent action, the villages around Wraysbury, in the Thames valley, would flood. But Smith appears to have ignored Rayner’s warning, preferring instead to blame climate change for any future floods. —Breitbart News, 18 February 2014
It will hardly come as a surprise to anyone mopping up after the floods, but this has been the UK’s wettest winter since records began in 1910, the Met Office said on Thursday. –Pilita Clark, Financial Times, 21 February 2014
Based on the Met Office’s provisional numbers, it is true that, for the UK as a whole, this has been the wettest Dec – Feb period on record since 1910. However, the Met Office’s claims only tell half the story. Unless there is a Noah like deluge in the next week, the 3-month periods of Oct – Dec, and Nov – Jan, during the winter of 1929/30 will remain as by far the wettest on record. -–Paul Homewood, Not A Lot Of People Know That, 21 February 2014
=============================================================
This Newsbytes Summary from Dr. Benny Peiser and The GWPF

Anthony,
you might care to to add this image as well:http://diggingintheclay.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/place-your-bets/
They must have been talking about California’s winter, not the UK’s.
Why isn’t there a movement to defund the Met and prevent it’s invalid forecasts from
doing harm. Better no forecast than a wrong one. Besides, at this point, who would believe anything the Met says?
“..which can perform 100trillion calculations a second,…”
highly resolved and very fast crap is still crap.
And nothing will be done about it. As usual. No responsibility required,only an open checking account. Just toe the company line…
What a difference a year makes. It is as if people have no memory.
‘Besides, at this point, who would believe anything the Met says?” The UK political establishment who have invested so much political capital in Lysenkist science that they can’t pull out now. Pretty much the same as the US I gather. Oh – and those who take The Guardian and Huff Po seriously.
Government at work.
The weather forecasts are a joke here, the Met Office haven’t got a clue! That is why I bought a £30 weather station that tells me whether I need a coat or not. It was 1/2,000,000 the cost of the Met Office’s supercomputer but a lot more accurate!
Obviously the Met Office need more public money to embiggen their supercomputers to make their Bitcoin Min^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H tea leaf reading quicker, so they can iterate through all the dry/warm models as usual and have time to run the cold/wet models that they currently have to drop & exclude from the forecast mix because they run out of time before the date being forecast.
“..which can perform 100trillion calculations a second,…”
Can’t help but laugh. While the MET Office was bust applying egg to their faces, 3 of the most notorious climate skeptics around nailed this winter beautifully courtesy of WeatherBell. Joe Bastardi who was stolen from Accuweather when WeatherBell formed, I believe works mostly out of his basement with essentially nothing fancier than a laptop and old weather maps. TRuly hilarious.
Sure, they got the weather forecast wrong, but weather isn’t climate and they know they have the climate forecast right…
Alternatively, the game could be called “No Cluedo”!
What are they going to predict for next year? Dry or wet? Whatever they preditct, they will blam on CAGW, then what actualy happens will also be blamed on CAGW.
I’m pretty sure I read somewhere that this Met Office supercomputer has a Global Warming gizmo built into it. If that’s the case, well…it would, wouldn’t it?
I have said this before and I will say it again, prepare for the exact OPPOSITE of what the Met Office forecasts beyond around 2 weeks.
The Met Office’s 100 teraflop computer, running the latest weather/climate modeling software, has repeatedly demonstrated no predictive capability at as little as 3 months future intervals.
It produces products of less value than cow flop.
The computing capability is not at fault. The weather models are completely inadequate and have demonstrated they are emphatically invalid.
Rather than continue to calculate crap at blinding speed, the prodigious computing capability should be redirected to support real-world current needs such as improving the combustion efficiency of coal fired power plants, enhancing scrubber technologies, and reducing costs of the delivered kilowatts to the consumer.
“..which can perform 100trillion calculations a second,…”
In other words, they can get the wrong answer a lot quicker!
“The reduction in Arctic sea ice caused by climate change is playing a role in the UK’s recent colder and drier winter weather, according to the Met Office. Speaking to MPs on the influential environmental audit committee about the state of the warming Arctic, Julia Slingo, the chief scientist at the Met Office, said that decreasing amounts of ice in the far north was contributing to colder winters in the UK and northern Europe as well as to drought. “
Why didn’t they tell the computer about the reduction in Arctic sea ice before their November forecast? I don’t think it has reduced since then.
So….if neither the Met Office and NOAA can get any where close to forecasting the weather 3 months out…how can anybody seriously believe they can get it close to right decades out? Seriously…
Here is a link to the Met Office winter forecast for 2013/2014
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/m/8/A3_plots-precip-DJF-2.pdf
The MetO as the servant of the IPCC will never look at any non man made drivers of climate. IPCC is about man made change not any other process . If MetO starts looking at non man made process then it and its models become useless to the IPCC as they will no longer be able to base their man made change reports on MetO. Catch 22
For MetO and IPCC [by its remit] is it as if there is no sun in the sky. So no point looking for any research from MetO who will continue along the tram lines of co2 driven weather and so continue passing out co2 deathstar based predictions to COBRA and the county councils who are left high and dry with NO means to prepare for extreme events making the political class look weak and stupid
So what use would a MetO that incorporated some non co2 weighted processes like the sun in their models be to IPCC? Even if it improved predictions to the nation? None….. IPCC would have to conclude there is no fox to shoot and might as well pack up and use the money for something more interesting than co2 chasing….as long as the IPCC remit is so narrow MetO is stuck unless they are prepared to go outside the IPCC magic circle and so risk being called a denier. Which not only would be brave but career suicide. So Meto can only but play the co2 puppet while their long term forecasts to COBRA and the Counties [what they were originally being paid for] are not helping the nation. Rather the opposite.
Is MetO about providing the best forecasting for the UK or about providing unvalidated co2 weighted models for the ipcc so they can continue to write ‘co2 deathstar is coming’ reports? Who pays them? The UK or the IPCC?
When the Greenie-infested Met Office forecasts a dry winter, and the subsequent downpour causes catastrophic flooding because the Greenie-infested Environment Agency failed to carry out basic flood prevention measures, it makes the rest of the world think that Britain is being run by a bunch of student activists.
Come to think of it…
The Met Office has a tera-flop computer? Well that is exactly what has happened to their forecasts. Their forecasts used to be only a mega-flop. But with their tendency to issue incorrect forecasts more quickly, they will be instantaneously wrong in no time.
an amateur climatologist predicted the winter storms back in october 2013. He has no supercomputer but then he doesn’t have a co2 bias to blinker him either. He describes his reasoning for the winter storm predictions “from a Conservation of Angular Momentum consideration certainly lends itself to scope for the North of Britain to get some real batterings- we are set to have some of our biggest winter storms in years.”
http://forum.netweather.tv/topic/78219-late-autumn-and-winter-201314-mild-stormy-short-cold-snaps-later/
a farmers almanac predicted the usa winter in aug 2013 http://www.cbsnews.com/news/farmers-almanac-predicts-a-bitterly-cold-winter/
so MetO long term forecasts are worse than amateurs and almanacs? But they still maintain the co2 weighting and the co2 feedbacks and accelerators is settled science with 95% confidence. Maybe the £80m they get a year should be put out to tender?