Santa’s workshop at the North Pole is not under water, despite recent reports. A dramatic image captured by a University of Washington monitoring buoy reportedly shows a lake at the North Pole. But Santa doesn’t yet need to buy a snorkel.
“Every summer when the sun melts the surface the water has to go someplace, so it accumulates in these ponds,” said Jamie Morison, a polar scientist at the UW Applied Physics Laboratory and principal investigator since 2000 of the North Pole Environmental Observatory. “This doesn’t look particularly extreme.”

After media coverage in CBS News, The Atlantic and the U.K.’s Daily Mail, Morison returned from overseas travel late last week to a pile of media inquiries. Over the weekend the team posted an explanatory page on the project website.
One of the issues in interpreting the image, researchers said, is that the camera uses a fisheye lens.
“The picture is slightly distorted,” said Axel Schweiger, who heads the Applied Physics Laboratory’s Polar Science Center. “In the background you see what looks like mountains, and that’s where the scale problem comes in – those are actually ridges where the ice was pushed together.”
Researchers estimate the melt pond in the picture was just over 2 feet deep and a few hundred feet wide, which is not unusual to find on an Arctic ice floe in late July.
In the midst of all the concern, the pool drained late July 27. This is the normal cycle for a meltwater pond that forms from snow and ice — it eventually drains through cracks or holes in the ice it has pooled on.
The now-infamous buoy was first plunked into floating ice in April, at the beginning of the melt season, about 25 miles from the North Pole. Morison drilled a hole about three football fields away for a second camera, which is pointing in a different direction and shows a more typical scene. Since then the ice floe holding both cameras has drifted about 375 miles south.
- North Pole Environmental Observatory
- Watch an April interview with Jamie Morison when he was deploying the buoy
The U.S. National Science Foundation has funded an observatory since 2000 that makes yearly observations at fixed locations and installs 10 to 15 drifting buoys.
The buoys record weather, ice, and ocean data, and the webcams transmit images via satellite every 6 hours. Images show the ice, buoys and yardsticks placed in the snow to track the surface conditions throughout the summer melt season. Maybe the instruments will survive the summer without getting crushed by shifting ice to record data for another year. Maybe they will fall in the water and eventually wash ashore. Researchers place the buoys to try to maximize their useful lifetime.
While researchers say the so-called lake at the North Pole is not out of the ordinary, there is a lot of meltwater that could affect the sea ice in coming weeks, in the closely watched lead-up to the September ice minimum.
Last summer the sea-ice hit a record low in extent since measurements began in 1979. This year the melting started a bit later than usual, Schweiger said, but picked up in the last couple of weeks. Late summer is usually the strongest period of shrinking because the ice is already thin.
“Whether we’re going to see another record or not is still up in the air,” Schweiger said.
A. Schweiger, UW
An aerial photo taken July 16 shows extensive meltwater pools off the Alaskan coast.
He flew over the ice last month in a joint project with the U.S. Coast Guard to drop instruments that measure oceanic and atmospheric conditions and ice motion.
Morison was last on the ice in April when he deployed the buoys. His forecast for this summer, based on years of experience, is included on a list of expert predictions compiled by the National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration’s Seattle office.
Morison will not change his June estimate that this summer will come close to, but not pass, the 2012 record, but he is having his doubts. Looking at the photos from the recent flyover shows more melt along the Alaskan coast, and his experience suggests that ice is fragile.
“I think it’s going to be pretty close to last year,” Morison said. “Up in the Canada Basin the ice looks like Swiss cheese, with lots of holes. Even though the ice extent is pretty good, our thinking is that if there’s a big storm event we’re going to see a rapid breakup of that ice and it’s going to disappear pretty quickly.”
The UW team manages another sea-ice tracking tool. The U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center publishes daily images and calculations of sea-ice extent and area, while the UW group combines those satellite images and other data to tabulate sea-ice volume. For many people, the UW’s monthly updates are a go-to source for getting the latest numbers on sea ice.
And while the North Pole lake news stories don’t exactly hold water, UW researchers say that it at least shows public interest and concern.
“While the hoopla about Santa’s swimming pool was off the mark,” Morison said, “it is the long-term observational record from these buoys that provides the perspective needed to understand what really is going on.”
###
For more information, contact Morison at 206-543-1394 or morison@apl.washington.edu and Schweiger at 206-543-1312 or axel@apl.washington.edu.

So it wasn’t unusual and it wasn’t at the North Pole.
Apart from that is there anything left of this alarmist story?
The Arctic Sea ice extent (30% or greater, DMI) is apparently in resistance to melting:
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/plots/icecover/icecover_current.png
According to the DMI graph on WUWT’s Sea Ice Data page, this is looking like the coldest and shortest Arctic Summer for some considerable period of time.
I was quicker than you, Charles. :))
Does Hannah or Jamie Morison anywhere in this tepid walkback from all the media alarmism bother to mention where the buoy was located when that lake formed?
Seems to me that the statement should have led off with a mention that it was hundreds of miles away.
Seems very reasonable to me.
In other words, this is just weather.
Sea-ice extent at the North Pole has been measured since 1979, less than 40 years.
And news stories about sea-ice extent at the North Pole are effectively news stories about the worst storm in half a lifetime (Western lifetime).
OK, that would be worthy of the local news, on a slow news day, but it’s hardly worth a national news headline.
Of course a puddle on the arctic sea ice in the summer is far more serious than millions of children dying of disease, starvation and murder.
According to DMI data, the Arctic temp (North of 80 latitude) has already touched the freezing point (about 6 weeks earlier than average) and is currently tracking above: 2012, 2007, 2010 and 2008, which, if would put it about 1.5 KM^2 ABOVE 2012 by the end of September.
The once-in-50-year Arctic cyclone was the reason for last year’s record low. The chance of a 1-in-50-year Arctic cyclone occurring back to back is just 1 in 250; about the same same odds as Anthony Weiner getting elected mayor of New York…..
Wishful thinking is the refuge of CAGW zealots and sexting politicians…
BTW, I wonder why there’s no news coverage on Antarctica setting a satellite record ice extent this year…. Oh yeah, I remember, more wishful thinking…
Billy says: …
Billy, enviros see disease, starvation and murder as ways of limiting the CO2-spewing human population. Pools of ice water scare them.
The melt pool is exactly as I described it in my post about the original article. My information came from a 1950 book on the floating ice station. It is completely normal for water to form on top of the ice. This sort of event has been recorded ever since Man first explored the artic. In the 1950’s they dealt with the water on top of the ice by wearing wellington boots higher than the knees.
tonyb
and here i thought the ice was supposed to all be gone by now…
“by a University of Washington monitoring buoy”
That they were measuring it with a buoy should have been the first hint that water was expected.
“it is the long-term observational record from these buoys that provides the perspective needed to understand what really is going on.”
I thought the science was settled.
I’d like to thank Dr. Morison for his involvement and efforts, concerning the “North Pole Buoy.” Most especially I’m grateful that he hasn’t kept all the gathered data secret, but has made the gathering something that a layman like myself can see, on a daily basis.
I’m sure that it must be annoying, (but also hopefully amusing,) when the general public and/or media misinterprets what it sees, however I’m sure the same thing happens when weather maps are made public.
What is most important, I think, is the education of laymen like myself, so that we can become educated voters and make wise choices. Of course immediately people split into two parties, by interpreting the data in two ways.
Dr. Morison has been part of an increased awareness of the decrease of “old” ice and the increase of first-year “baby ice.” The question still remains as to whether this is a one-way process, or whether it a 30-year-thinning which will be followed by a 30-year thickening.
The fact the public is interested can be demonstrated by a surprising spike in viewers at my obscure website, when I posted about “Lake North Pole,” and then posted about how that melt-water pool so swiftly vanished:
http://sunriseswansong.wordpress.com/2013/07/24/north-pole-ice-melt-watching-the-summer-thaw/ and http://sunriseswansong.wordpress.com/2013/07/28/lake-north-pole-vanishes/
(The spike in views was from roughly 20 per day to roughly 400, with calm and quiet now returning.)
While the hoopla about “Lake North Pole” was fun to watch, because it teaches about human nature, (which is a chaotic system just as meteorology is,) the ice was fun to watch before the hoopla, and remains fun to watch after the hoopla, for the same reason watching cumulus billow in the sky is fun. Underlying all the science of meteorology is the simple fact that the study is a study of something which is very beautiful.
Didn’t some “expert” say a little while ago that the ice could be all gone by as early as 2013? Perhaps it’s just little old me! Referencing to Numberwatch, similarities to the definition of an economist link to climate scientists, “Someone who always has a ready answer as to why their previous prediction was wrong!” 🙂
It would seem we have here an honest researcher that was surprised by the media misinterpreting his data.
Misinformation he has moved to correct.
More scientists like this is what we need. Encourage them.
“…Last summer the sea-ice hit a record low in extent since measurements began in 1979. This year the melting started a bit later than usual,…” AND “…Morison will not change his June estimate that this summer will come close to, but not pass, the 2012 record, but he is having his doubts…”
Morison shouldhave his doubts as the latest data is tracking similar to 2006, not 2012. Unless there is some rapid ice loss within the next couple of weeks, it is difficult to see how this year will be a repeat of 2012.
When he flew over the ice he saw that while the extent was similar to previous years, it was fragile and susceptible to melt. So how does that compare to when he flew over it in the 60’s? What do you mean ‘nobody was checking back then’?
I just looked at the Antarctic Sea ice chart and it is more that 2 standard deviations above average.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/sea-ice-page/
It’s a travesty
Slightly off topic, but I am curious about the positioning of Camera 1 and Camera 2. I had always assumed (wrongly) that they looked in opposite directions, however judging from the position of the sun in the sky, and comparing that to the time noted at the top of the picture, I now conclude the cameras look in roughly the same direction. As one camera showed “Lake North Pole” and one didn’t, and as they show different pressure ridges in the background, they can’t be too close together. How far apart are they?
look at this arctic ice graph it has taken a upwards turn the warmers would not like this happening http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/arctic.sea.ice.interactive.html
Charles Nelson (11:24)
“This year the melting started a bit later than usual, Schweiger said, but picked up in the last couple of weeks. Late summer is usually the strongest period of shrinking because the ice is already thin.”
I wonder which chart Schweiger’s looking at.
tokyoboy says:
The Arctic Sea ice extent (30% or greater, DMI) is apparently in resistance to melting:
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/plots/icecover/icecover_current.png
by the look of the DMI data I’d estimate that the month of August will run like 2005 / 2006.
Much of the September extravaganza is meaningless hype. We need to look at the full year’s dataset with suitable filtering to remove short-term weather events to get and idea of how the year is progressing.
It is totally stupid and unscientific to take one day per year and ignore the other 364 days worth of data available. There are also cyclic influences which may by in or out of phase with the Sept min around the equinox. Looking at the wobbles this years I’d say there is a three month cycle that will be close to max in September. This will likely lead to a higher minimum than we have seen for serveral years and the media will go strangely quiet and talk of deep ocean heat or some such instead.
I’ll have a closer look at the data tonight, Short of time at mid-day.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.recent.arctic.png
Anomally looking a bit more stable than last year.
According to Asahi Shimbun, the Japanese equivalent of the Guardian, a research group of The University of Tokyo forecasted in June that the Arctic Sea ice extent this year would be 5-% lower than the ‘record low’ reached in 2012.
I’ll keep holding my breath to see if their wish come true.