Unprecedented: Climate takes an entire category in the 2013 Bloggies Awards – time to place your votes

WUWT nominated in two categories. The competition this year is more skeptical than ever!

2013_bloggies_science

This year, the choices are tougher, since there are so many favorites. Last year I thought it was tough because they threw big names in websites into the category (like Mashable, Gizmodo, Engadget, and Tech Crunch) while at the same time combined the separate Science and Technology categories into one new single category.

This year the category strategy seems to be “divide and conquer”.

You may recall that last year there was a clean sweep of the awards by truly skeptical blogs, and the big names were shut out. WUWT also won the Lifetime Achievement Award.

I know this is a tough choice, but if WUWT wins the science category this year, it will make three, and we won’t be eligible to win the award ever again. Success has its drawbacks I suppose. Of course WUWT can only win with your help, here’s how:

1. Visit http://2013.bloggi.es/ for the main voting page,

2. Locate the category thumbnails for the categories you want to vote on (you need to vote at least three categories to submit a vote). Here’s what the Sci-Tech Category looks like:

click_wuwt_2013

3. If you want to vote for WUWT (or any of the blog categories), click on the little grey circle in the lower right of the icon, and it turns into a checkbox and greys out the other thumbnails. Note the contest rotates the thumbnails for fairness in placement, so it may not look like the image order above.

Likewise WUWT is also in the Category for Weblog of the Year:

2013_WUWT_bloggies_weblog_of_year

If we win that category, there is a monetary prize involved, as they say: “Weblog of the Year receives a prize of 2,013 US cents (US$20.13)”. Wow. That is like 2013 times more money than I get from “big oil”!

4. Scroll up/down. Vote for any other blogs you like in any other categories the same way. You don’t have to vote for all other blog categories, as the system doesn’t require it, but please check out other categories. These other bloggers work very hard to deliver a quality product. Reward them if you feel they deserve it.

Here are some notable categories where climate related blogs have also made an appearance this year: For Australian category, Australian Climate Madness is a hands down no-brainer for me.

The investigative work Simon has done has been outstanding.

2013_bloggies_australian

For Best Canadian Blog, Small Dead Animals is an easy choice. Kate makes me (and thousands of other people) laugh with her one line demolitions:

2013_bloggies_canadian

The politics category is tougher, I’ll admit to liking all of them (Occupy Wall Street excepted, which is more of a manifesto than a blog). American Thinker goes in-depth on political issues, and sometimes covers climate, The GWPF goes even more in-depth, and is specific to climate, and James Delingpole is a fantastically entertaining vivisectionist of all things political, green, climatic and stupid.  I’ll admit to having Delingpole as a personal favorite, but YMMV.

2013_bloggies_politics

In the Humorous category XKCD, hands down, though again for the second year too bad Josh isn’t there.

Make your choices by clicking on the little grey circles.

5. Scroll all the way to the bottom of the page: (note – don’t use cursor keys, it will change your vote!)

6. Complete the captcha by typing the words displayed in your browser (not the ones above), put in a VALID email address. Press the yellow SUBMIT button. Note- you won’t get spammed by doing so. See the fine print under the email box.

7. Wait for an email in your inbox. That email contains a link to verify your vote. If you don’t get it within a half hour, check your spam filter. Mine went straight to spam, so you should check if you don’t see it.

8. Click on the link in your email to verify your vote. It will take you to the verification page on the website and you’ll get a success message.

9. Spread the word! Twitter, Facebook, mailing lists, friends, comments on other blogs, and most importantly, if you run a blog, I’d welcome a posting on this topic.

You know that some others who dislike what we do here will try to create anti-vote campaigns as they have done in the past. Success depends on whether there are more people who view WUWT as a science resource versus some that simply want to haul out the hate, and slap on the “denier” label, and edit user comments post facto so they can win the argument with nobody looking (they think).

10. Remember, while winning is fun, the way you play the game is just as important. Don’t cheat. Don’t encourage cheating, and simply let the chips fall where they may. May the best weblogs win.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

83 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TAG
February 25, 2013 2:48 pm

I have submitted my votes. it was quite straightforward and quick

Old Grey Badger
February 25, 2013 3:20 pm

I cannot believe Skeptical Science is one of the SciTech finalists. If they were to somehow win (not a chance though), that would be the first sign of the coming apocalypse.

Bobl
February 25, 2013 3:22 pm

Makes it very difficult to choose, very tough because I like Jo Nova’s site too. It’s a pity Jo didn’t get up in the Australian category so I could vote for both – But I have decided, and my votes in the ballot box now !

Heggs
February 25, 2013 3:25 pm

Done.

Oldspanky
February 25, 2013 3:32 pm

“Vivisectionist”? I wonder if your speech recognition software misfired?

Hilary Ostrov (aka hro001)
February 25, 2013 3:37 pm

GWPF and Delingpole both nominated in the Politics category?! Bob Ward and Keith Kloor will have their respective knickers in knots when they read about this! I love it!
Congrats to all skeptic bloggers who’ve made it to the finals. And may the best blogs win!

Mike Doner
February 25, 2013 3:40 pm

Done and verified.

mfo
February 25, 2013 3:48 pm

Surely there couldn’t be an attempt to divide the vote by putting the flatulent SkS up against four excellent and genuinely skeptical blogs?
Delingpole is effective in a rather crass way but I prefer American Thinker or The GWPF.

February 25, 2013 3:51 pm

I voted twice!



Just kidding.

February 25, 2013 3:54 pm

I have voted and it is verified. Can’t wait to see the winners.

PaulH
February 25, 2013 4:00 pm

Worked quickly for me, less than a minute before the confirmation email arrived.

Peter Crawford
February 25, 2013 4:06 pm

[snip – thanks but that comment is simply offensive to Ms. Nova – Anthony]

Britannic-no-see-um
February 25, 2013 4:08 pm

Good luck Anthony

February 25, 2013 4:08 pm

Voted & confirmed.

February 25, 2013 4:23 pm

I took great delight in voting. I wait for Heartland to return to DC to meet you again & listen to your talks at their conference… or maybe I’ll make it to Chicago this year. Anticipatory congrats! LOL

February 25, 2013 4:35 pm

Good luck, Anthony – my votes are in.

February 25, 2013 4:38 pm

Too bad there wasn’t a Police raid at Tallbloke Towers this year… 😉

February 25, 2013 5:02 pm

Done and verified.

February 25, 2013 5:12 pm

I voted for you in 2 categories. Good luck Anthony! Even if you don’t win you still get a trophy from the libs.

February 25, 2013 5:28 pm

I presume when WUWT wins its 3rd Best Science Blog award, WUWT will still be eligible for the Lifetime Achievement Award in the future, so don’t feel too bad.
BTW, I’d suggest buying 1/2oz of silver with your winnings. At least in couple of years or so, you’ll have doubled your money…
Congratulations, Anthony!

Jon
February 25, 2013 5:32 pm

Done and dusted. Good luck, Anthony!

GeoLurking
February 25, 2013 6:16 pm

My mail admin runs a pretty tight anti-spam set up. I have lost stuff several times due to the ferocity of it’s checks.
The verification E-mail came through with out a hitch. 😀

nigelf
February 25, 2013 6:18 pm

Done.

a jones
February 25, 2013 6:22 pm

Well yes voted, all very efficient:email came back almost instantly. So all done and dusted.
But as usual I do not know what it is about their captcha but it gets me every year. I know it is meant to stop bots but it catches out mere humans too, Took me three attempts this time, about par the course.
I think I need some training in how to read them.
Kindest Regards

February 25, 2013 6:45 pm

Both myself and Mrs TN voted the slate. Alas, with the exception of Mr Delingpole… Whilst he is indeed a fine vivisectionist, our preferences tend toward those thoughtful Americans at American Thinker(s).
Good Luck Anthony!

1 2 3 4
Verified by MonsterInsights