UPDATE: A new website chronicles the issue here http://epahumantesting.com/
Exclusive to WUWT by David W. Schnare
Statement of ATI’s Lead Counsel
on
American Tradition Institute v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(US District Court, Easter District of Virginia No. 1:12-cv-1066)
There are few occasions in life that emerge directly from the core of an individual and almost never are those memorialized in a law suit. On Friday, September 21, 2012, I took five copies of a complaint to the Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse in Alexandria, Virginia, filing one of them with the court and having each of the rest stamped and then sent to four senior government officials, Attorney General Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney Neil H. MacBride, EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson and EPA General Counsel Scott Fulton. I sent them summons to appear and defend themselves in part because of my first name.
I was named after David Steiner, a man who died of starvation in Buchenwald concentration camp on May 3, 1945. Tattooed on his body was the number 59059. He was witness to horrors that, today, we have a hard time even contemplating, something that I thought would never exist on this planet again – the abhorrent practice of giving human subjects poisons in order to determine what subsequently happens to them.
I have always been deeply affected by the circumstances of my great-uncle’s death. It is a heavy burden to carry the name of such a victim. As I matured, I committed my life to giving to our civilization that which David Steiner was never able to give himself. I have given 37 years of service to the United States, most of that in an effort to protect human health and the environment as a professional at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
I was able to secure a position of responsibility and trust at EPA in large part because the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill offered me the opportunity to obtain graduate degrees and prepare myself for a career in public service. Until a few weeks ago, I had been a strong supporter of each. Then Steven Milloy asked me to represent him and other members of the American Tradition Institute who have stories much like mine, or otherwise cannot countenance such human experimentation.
Steve’s story is worse than death. His uncle, Zoran Galkanovic, was incarcerated at the Mauthausen concentration camp. Upon threat of death, Mr. Galkanovic was forced to rise each morning and identify those individuals at the concentration camp too ill to work, knowing they would subsequently be executed that very day. Because of the inhumanity forced on Mr. Galkanovic, Mr. Milloy has accepted as a family responsibility the fight against any government who subjects its citizens to inhumane treatment. Who knew it would be our government? Who knew it would be the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency? Who knew that human experimentation would be done on the campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill? Who knew it would be an official body of that University that approved this research?
On first blush, I simply could not believe Mr. Milloy. Then I looked carefully at the facts and at the law. This case involves the intentional exposure of human subjects to “fine particulate” matter, also known as PM2.5. EPA obtained their PM2.5 from a diesel truck. It is difficult to overstate the atrocity of this research. EPA parked a truck’s exhaust pipe directly beneath an intake pipe on the side of a building. The exhaust was sucked into the pipe, mixed with some additional air and then piped directly into the lungs of the human subjects. EPA actually has pictures of this gas chamber, a clear plastic pipe stuck into the mouth of a subject, his lips sealing it to his face, diesel fumes inhaled straight into his lungs.
Unbelievable as that may seem, consider the additional fact that EPA has officially concluded that this gas is a genotoxic carcinogen and that there is no exposure level below which it can be considered safe. In fact, EPA Administrator Jackson testified to Congress that of all deaths occurring in the United States, 1 in 4 “is attributable to PM2.5.” She told them “Particulate matter causes premature death. It doesn’t make you sick. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should.”
Under the law, under EPA regulations and under EPA policy, this human experimentation is strictly prohibited. To conduct human experimentation, the human subjects must be properly informed of the risks they face and these risks must be less than the potential benefit of the experiment. My family knows how that works too.
Few today know the ravages of Polio, but some of us are old enough to remember it too well. Susan Paidar was a childhood neighbor, the same age as one of my brothers. She died in an iron lung. And, she was one of the last victims of this terrible disease, in small part because of the courage of one of my brothers. In 1952, at age 6, my brother Rick was selected to be in the first human test group for the Salk vaccine. He was offered the possibility of never having to worry about polio again. He was a human subject and there was a real benefit from that human experimentation.
In the section describing the mandatory benefit that must be offered to the human subjects, EPA’s PM2.5 “informed consent” baldly states “there is no benefit.” Worse, the form never informs the subjects that they will be inhaling diesel fumes, never tells them the gas is a carcinogen, never tells them about all the other toxic substances in diesel exhaust pouring into their lungs, never tells them that because PM2.5 is genotoxic, it might cause disease in children they might wish to have.
Medical ethicist, Professor John D. Dunn, MD, JD, called EPA’s human experimentation “scandalously unethical and immoral” and said “There can be no further tolerance of this misconduct.” This is not the EPA I knew. This is not the University of North Carolina I knew. This is not the American Tradition of our nation. But, this is why I traveled to the U.S. Courthouse in Alexandria, Virginia – to put a stop to it.
David W. Schnare, Esq., MSPH, PhD.
Director
Environmental Law Center
American Tradition Institute.
=============================================================
Steve Milloy will have a related major announcement tomorrow at junkscience.com
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Reblogged this on biting tea and commented:
If this is true, it is huge.
Have the EPA socialist democrats gone completely mad?
Or just decided to follow in the footsteps of the infamous socialist democrats of 1938?:
Go get them, Dr. Schnare!!!
Is there a site set up for financial support?
MtK
Our government is truly becoming Orwellian.
Reblogged this on JustMEinT's General Blog and commented:
If this can be shown to be factual this IS HUGE
Go get ’em. Thank you!
That is a Pulmonary function test machine. People with cf use those to determine lung function. It has nothing to do with diesel or human experiments. I thought I was reading the onion.
REPLY: That’s the picture supplied by the EPA for the experiment, you must be an editor for the Onion – Anthony
We tend to forget how the EPA has already impacted us in the last few years without Congressional approval, may I add……
How do you think this impacted our economy?
Just look around you……… Vote, if you don’t, you did!
One should listen, closely, from the past 🙂
Loose cannon on the gun deck. And they call ‘climate change deniers’ sick or mentally deficient. This is galling, painful and disgusting. C’mon, all you Gleicks & McKibbens & Grists & Romms, get up on your high horse and bleat about THIS garbage for a change.
Evil is as evil does.
Well, let’s hope our judicial system isn’t as corrupt as our agencies. .
http://www.zmescience.com/ecology/environmental-issues/charbroiled-grill-pollutes-more-than-diesel-941232/ you SHOULD find that article scary.
Back in the mid 0’s in the greater Atlanta area we had lots of people suffering heart attacks from the “heat”… but they were all otherwise healthy and in the area normally downwind of the main city. I suffered my first asthma attack and was slowly succumbing to asthma in Clarkston (east on Ponce de Leon). When an online friend of ours moved us out it wasn’t more than 20 minutes after we left the south side of i285 that I started breathing normally. A rapidity I now associate with taking a full dose of Albuterol. (My asthma worsened due to a lung infection and a sudden change of humidity nearly three years ago. Sadly once the bronchia get muscular they get more frisky about irritants). Simply leaving the cloud of these pollutants negated the symptoms.
Turns out that the mammalian lung is one of the most efficient filters on earth. Those people who dropped from heart attacks that summer died because they were filtering too much particulate from the air into their slowly dehydrating blood streams.
I work with pesticides every day and not even the ones that make me gag have set my asthma off, yet spending a half mile behind a low exhaust diesel vehicle – even with windows closed and internal air cycle on the aircon – requires a dose of Albuterol. Molecular “atomization” of particulates is a danger in modern society. Even more dangerous is “nano tech” which attempts to find commercial and consumer use for intentionally molecularized aerosols, metals and other compounds.
Our bodies just aren’t designed for these materials to be in our environment… mesothelioma, miner’s lung, asthma. Anybody can name those three but there are hundreds more ailments that come from fine particulates.
A large portion of the organic particulates that become lodged in your lungs when you breathe must be removed from your lungs through your bloodstream. Lungs make HEPA look like a sham.
I do remember some out-cry about the OP’s article subject a couple years ago. The air intake source “just happened to be poorly placed” by a truck loading dock where the trucks were left running while empty for hours on end. It was all very specious to begin with.
Flim-flam it however you may, it still comes down to the simple fact that the building codes for such air equipment prohibit the intake of road-side air.
In fact, EPA Administrator Jackson testified to Congress that of all deaths occurring in the United States, 1 in 4 “is attributable to PM2.5.”
This statement does not pass the sniff test. Are we sure Ms Jackson has been accurately quoted?
If the claims in the article are accurate, this is huge.
I hope we can get some verification of the particulars.
If they are accurate there are some lifetime sentences lining up for Obama admin officials that administered the program. Of course under the corruption of this administration I have no expectation of rule of law being administered. So we are left with yet another reason Obama should be impeached.
I suppose we shall sit back and await the arrival of the evidence and the results of this.
I can believe that they would use a PF test to quantify lung function before and after the test, which is probably what we are seeing in the picture. I doubt they introduced the PM2.5 with such a machine, so this also raises questions in my mind as to other claims in the letter. Did they really use diesel exhaust to produce the PM2.5? Who would think that was a valid test since there are other combustion byproducts in it that could skew the results (putting aside the morality of exposing people to something the EPA considers a deadly substance)? I will reserve judgement on those issues until I can determine the exact protocol used by the EPA. But regardless, the human experiments did happen and that alone should concern everybody.
On the concept that PM2.5 is “genotoxic”……….even if we accept uncritically that this is the case, the idea that breathing it in will cause “disease in children they might wish to have” is not really credible. ALL (or almost all) cancers have a genetic componment, but very few are actually inherited (ie. the cells that develop mutations and then go on to become tumours) are rarely the cells that you pass on to your kids (namely sperm and eggs). Yes, I accept that perhaps breathing the stuff might lead to cancer in the individual, but the extension to children that you might have in the future is needlessly emotive and actually undermines the cold, hard, neutral tone that is probably required.
What, after forcing the closing of coal-fired electric plants by using debunked linear no-threshold exposure models to whip up fake harm numbers, now the EPA seeks empirical confirmation? By deliberately poisoning Americans with that which they have already affirmed as poisonous?
What’s next, they’ll research the effects of mercury vapor on Americans by forcing the exposure of many tens of millions of Americans to elevated levels, virtually the entire country, across all socio-economic ranges, including small children which are already proven to be harmed by it?
Whoops, gotta go, broken CFL to clean up…
My immediately reaction to this is that your delivery is so far over the top you risk making a public spectacle of yourself. Six paragraphs of personal family tragedy and Nazi atrocity before we managed to get a single fact about the actual problem out of you! Calm down! I came within an inch of clicking away and had tentatively formed the conclusion that I was reading the work of a deranged nut before you finally got around to telling us what the problem was.
From what you describe however it does sound like there may have been ethical issues with this experiment. I doubt a proposal along these lines would have made past the ethics committee where I work. So good luck with the court case. However you might want to consider scaling back on the personal family history of Nazi atrocities and heartbreaking polio anecdotes and getting to the point a bit quicker in future.
I hope this was this properly vetted. Seems a bit incredulous.
Don’t over-dramatise the diesel exhaust inhalation part of story. The key to its understanding is here: “The exhaust was sucked into the pipe, mixed with some additional air…”
I would expect them to mix in enough clean air to make the concentration of diesel exhaust similar to what you normally inhale if you live in a big city. That is the only kind of experiment that would make sense if they wanted to obtain the proof of anything. Remember, their goal was to prove that “normal” concentrations of diesel exhaust were hazardous. There is nothing atrocious in making a human subject inhale normal city air.
The really dramatic part of the story is that they have been telling us for umpteen years that an experiment like this would kill a person, and now Steve has caught them lying. Either it is an atrocious Nazi-style experiment (we know it’s not, but it is according to EPA) or EPA has been lying about the hazards of PM2.5 to uphold a regulation that is tantamount to extortion.
It’s checkmate, EPA.
I have just applied a huge multiplier to the respect I have long held for Steve Milloy.
So what if it’s a lung function machine? I know that too, but what’s to stop it bring rigged up to an external air source? All the better to fool people into thinking it is legitimate.
I have to say that I’d like to have more information. I’m not saying that some people might not do something this apparently appalling given the chance, but I find it difficult to believe that something that seems so blatantly wrong would be given the go ahead in an institution in a developed democracy. Surely there must be at least a fig leaf of a semi-plausible explanation.
I’m just saying let’s not get too carried away before some more facts are available.
Pulmonary Function Test http://www.kamelharpulmonary.com/medical-services/pulmonary-function-laboratory/
Does this mean you scooped Steve Milloy and “Junk Science”….
Reporters…. All alike 😉