UPDATE: A new website chronicles the issue here http://epahumantesting.com/
Exclusive to WUWT by David W. Schnare
Statement of ATI’s Lead Counsel
on
American Tradition Institute v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(US District Court, Easter District of Virginia No. 1:12-cv-1066)
There are few occasions in life that emerge directly from the core of an individual and almost never are those memorialized in a law suit. On Friday, September 21, 2012, I took five copies of a complaint to the Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse in Alexandria, Virginia, filing one of them with the court and having each of the rest stamped and then sent to four senior government officials, Attorney General Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney Neil H. MacBride, EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson and EPA General Counsel Scott Fulton. I sent them summons to appear and defend themselves in part because of my first name.
I was named after David Steiner, a man who died of starvation in Buchenwald concentration camp on May 3, 1945. Tattooed on his body was the number 59059. He was witness to horrors that, today, we have a hard time even contemplating, something that I thought would never exist on this planet again – the abhorrent practice of giving human subjects poisons in order to determine what subsequently happens to them.
I have always been deeply affected by the circumstances of my great-uncle’s death. It is a heavy burden to carry the name of such a victim. As I matured, I committed my life to giving to our civilization that which David Steiner was never able to give himself. I have given 37 years of service to the United States, most of that in an effort to protect human health and the environment as a professional at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
I was able to secure a position of responsibility and trust at EPA in large part because the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill offered me the opportunity to obtain graduate degrees and prepare myself for a career in public service. Until a few weeks ago, I had been a strong supporter of each. Then Steven Milloy asked me to represent him and other members of the American Tradition Institute who have stories much like mine, or otherwise cannot countenance such human experimentation.
Steve’s story is worse than death. His uncle, Zoran Galkanovic, was incarcerated at the Mauthausen concentration camp. Upon threat of death, Mr. Galkanovic was forced to rise each morning and identify those individuals at the concentration camp too ill to work, knowing they would subsequently be executed that very day. Because of the inhumanity forced on Mr. Galkanovic, Mr. Milloy has accepted as a family responsibility the fight against any government who subjects its citizens to inhumane treatment. Who knew it would be our government? Who knew it would be the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency? Who knew that human experimentation would be done on the campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill? Who knew it would be an official body of that University that approved this research?
On first blush, I simply could not believe Mr. Milloy. Then I looked carefully at the facts and at the law. This case involves the intentional exposure of human subjects to “fine particulate” matter, also known as PM2.5. EPA obtained their PM2.5 from a diesel truck. It is difficult to overstate the atrocity of this research. EPA parked a truck’s exhaust pipe directly beneath an intake pipe on the side of a building. The exhaust was sucked into the pipe, mixed with some additional air and then piped directly into the lungs of the human subjects. EPA actually has pictures of this gas chamber, a clear plastic pipe stuck into the mouth of a subject, his lips sealing it to his face, diesel fumes inhaled straight into his lungs.
Unbelievable as that may seem, consider the additional fact that EPA has officially concluded that this gas is a genotoxic carcinogen and that there is no exposure level below which it can be considered safe. In fact, EPA Administrator Jackson testified to Congress that of all deaths occurring in the United States, 1 in 4 “is attributable to PM2.5.” She told them “Particulate matter causes premature death. It doesn’t make you sick. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should.”
Under the law, under EPA regulations and under EPA policy, this human experimentation is strictly prohibited. To conduct human experimentation, the human subjects must be properly informed of the risks they face and these risks must be less than the potential benefit of the experiment. My family knows how that works too.
Few today know the ravages of Polio, but some of us are old enough to remember it too well. Susan Paidar was a childhood neighbor, the same age as one of my brothers. She died in an iron lung. And, she was one of the last victims of this terrible disease, in small part because of the courage of one of my brothers. In 1952, at age 6, my brother Rick was selected to be in the first human test group for the Salk vaccine. He was offered the possibility of never having to worry about polio again. He was a human subject and there was a real benefit from that human experimentation.
In the section describing the mandatory benefit that must be offered to the human subjects, EPA’s PM2.5 “informed consent” baldly states “there is no benefit.” Worse, the form never informs the subjects that they will be inhaling diesel fumes, never tells them the gas is a carcinogen, never tells them about all the other toxic substances in diesel exhaust pouring into their lungs, never tells them that because PM2.5 is genotoxic, it might cause disease in children they might wish to have.
Medical ethicist, Professor John D. Dunn, MD, JD, called EPA’s human experimentation “scandalously unethical and immoral” and said “There can be no further tolerance of this misconduct.” This is not the EPA I knew. This is not the University of North Carolina I knew. This is not the American Tradition of our nation. But, this is why I traveled to the U.S. Courthouse in Alexandria, Virginia – to put a stop to it.
David W. Schnare, Esq., MSPH, PhD.
Director
Environmental Law Center
American Tradition Institute.
=============================================================
Steve Milloy will have a related major announcement tomorrow at junkscience.com

If in fact these tests did occur as described, and Lisa Jackson did in fact say there is no safe level of exposure to this substance, then doesn’t that imply that each and every participant in this experiment is now dead or has cancer? If this experiment did occur as described, and all (or the vast majority) of participants are in fact healthy, then that implies that this substance isn’t all that dangerous.
You see I am very familiar with that machine. the round white thing on the mouth piece is a filter. You blow on it, not suck. The clip on your nose is so you can fully expand your lungs to blow on the device to measure how your lungs perform. If your claim was true, then having a filter on something blowing into your lungs would not be very effective if that was your desire.
REPLY: And how do you know it wasn’t modified for the purpose? Usually such things have removable, not permanent filter packs. I’ll take the word of an attorney who has to prove such things over the word of an activist. – Anthony
Yeah, not sure why I am wasting my time here, but I was mildly curious. Ive said my part. Take it or remain psyop’ed. But the facts are out there and the truth has no agenda.
Once again, it’s the evil party versus the stupid party. Why give the evil party and their media minions 2-1/2 days notice to formulate spin? IMHO this should have been filed on a Monday. But then again, they’ve known the PM 2.5 issue has been out there for awhile now.
Like dozens of other issues involving the Chicago machine and their enablers, a rational mind would think this would be the end of them, but humans have a remarkable capacity for ignorance.
Relative to what is known and the information freely available to us, we are now the most ignorant species this planet has ever known.
It’s amazing that with all the present diesel regulations in place that EPA would bother with this. It also looks as if, from what I see in comments, that diesel cleanup is actually a good thing.
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/deer_2004/session11/2004_deer_johnson2.pdf
http://refrigeratedtrans.com/fleet/trucks/2010_engine_emissions_compliance_1008/
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/hd.php
MILLOY: Did Obama’s EPA relaunch Tuskegee experiments … 4/18/12
UNC to investigate ghastly EPA human experiments
North Carolina Medical Board to investigate EPA physicians over …
EPA Reverses Controversial ‘Human Guinea Pig’ Rule 2010 (guess they ignored their own rule…
It was not clear to me when this study was conducted. But ever since the publication of the London Transport Workers Study in 1981, the EPA has been concerned that diesel exhaust could be carcinogenic.
In 2002 the EPA published a study of health effects of diesel exhaust. ( citation:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2002) Health assessment document for diesel engine exhaust. Prepared by the National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC, for the Office of Transportation and Air Quality; EPA/600/8-90/057F. Available from: National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA; PB2002-107661)
That study says: “Available evidence indicates that there are human health hazards associated with exposure to DE [diesel exhaust]. The hazards include acute exposure-related symptoms, chronic exposure related noncancer respiratory effects, and lung cancer. “ (from the Executive Summary)
If the study referred to in the post was conducted after 2002 , there was no excuse on the EPA’s part for intentionally exposing human subjects to even diluted diesel exhaust. (Note that the dilution is not specified. It could have even been at an urban street concentration.) Since the model the EPA uses for cancer is a “one-hit, no threshold” model. In other words one exposure to any level will cause some cancer.
Given the statement in the post that “EPA Administrator Jackson testified to Congress that of all deaths occurring in the United States, 1 in 4 “is attributable to PM2.5.” She told them “Particulate matter causes premature death. It doesn’t make you sick. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should.”” It will be interesting to see how the EPA defends their actions in court.
For those interested in the EPA’s assessment of health effects of diesel exhaust see:
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/dieselfinal.pdf
Why couldn’t it have been being used for before and after lung capacity tests? Which IS it would appear what its made for, and WOULD be exactly the kind of thing they would want to measure after exposure to what they claim are deadly chemicals.?
“EPA Administrator Jackson testified to Congress that of all deaths occurring in the United States, 1 in 4 “is attributable to PM2.5.” She told them “Particulate matter causes premature death. It doesn’t make you sick. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should.”
That is interesting. There are no symptoms from inhaling this particuate matter, just sudden death of one in four people. Science says. And for the public good, transportation and shipping must be removed. Science says. What a slinking unelected female pirate lusting for the plunder of what belongs to others, chanting scientese. Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum, that’s all I’m hearing.
Let’s listen to a real scientist. Dr. John Christy: ‘Oil & other carbon-based energies are simply the affordable means by which we satisfy our true addictions – long life, good health, plentiful food…’‘…internet services, freedom of mobility, comfortable homes with heating, cooling, lighting and even colossal entertainment systems, and so on. Carbon energy has made these possible’
Matt in Houston
September 23, 2012 at 7:57 pm
Don’t forget that in terms of shear dollar value, we are in the biggest financial meltdown in human history and yet not one person has been convicted for financial malfeasance.
If MF Global, Fast and Furious or the ‘community organizers’ / lawyers that blackmailed banks into making home loans they did not want make in the first place did not stir the Administrations DOJ into independent investigation what makes you think this will?
Gene Selkov says:
September 23, 2012 at 8:10 pm
“The really dramatic part of the story is that they have been telling us for umpteen years that an experiment like this would kill a person, and now Steve has caught them lying. Either it is an atrocious Nazi-style experiment (we know it’s not, but it is according to EPA) or EPA has been lying about the hazards of PM2.5 to uphold a regulation that is tantamount to extortion.
It’s checkmate, EPA.”
=============================================================================
Agree completely.
What a load of nonsense. I cycle 50K in the City most days and should be dead by now by that token. Everything is leathal in the right DOSE.
Who are the lab rats…….homeless folk, making an extra couple a bucks?
Gene Selkov says:
September 23, 2012 at 8:10 pm
“The really dramatic part of the story is that they have been telling us for umpteen years that an experiment like this would kill a person, and now Steve has caught them lying. Either it is an atrocious Nazi-style experiment (we know it’s not, but it is according to EPA) or EPA has been lying about the hazards of PM2.5 to uphold a regulation that is tantamount to extortion.
It’s checkmate, EPA.”
==========================================================================
Agree completely.
This is very, very weird. If breathing diesel exhaust is so dangerous, why are trucks allowed on the roads? Breathing diesel exhaust may well be dangerous, but may of us do it voluntarily every day.
Surely there is something more behind this legal action. Perhaps it is part of a campaign against the EPA, because measures proposed by the EPA to improve public health might cost some people money?
http://www.smithmag.net/planet/story.php?did=341949
This story has been simmering for a long while now. I’m glad someone is actually doing something about it.
David, couldn’t you have waited a few hours and let Steve run with this historic announcement on JunkScience.com first? He’s been working this story for a VERY LONG time. Though I’m glad the story will benefit from Anthony’s reach.
I read somewhere along the line that folks in our military submarines are exposed to very large amounts (waaaaay above 390ppm) for up to 6 months at a time. I wonder what this means if co2 is a pollutant?
September 23, 2012 at 7:55 pm | Juan Slayton says:
In fact, EPA Administrator Jackson testified to Congress that of all deaths occurring in the United States, 1 in 4 “is attributable to PM2.5.”
This statement does not pass the sniff test. Are we sure Ms Jackson has been accurately quoted?
——————————-
You can review the documents at JunkScience.com … the documented evidence has been posted there for some time already courtesy of Mr Milloy.
September 23, 2012 at 8:49 pm | John Brookes says:
Surely there is something more behind this legal action. Perhaps it is part of a campaign against the EPA, because measures proposed by the EPA to improve public health might cost some people money?
———————————-
Surely not another evil “denier” conspiracy Brooksie ? … review the documents before you sprout forth. The conduct of the EPA is appalling in the extreme.
EPA Human testing … http://epahumantesting.com/
May we be allowed to see a copy of the ATI v EPA complaint, as filed in the Virginia court, to see what actual allegations were made?
Caution, Anthony.
It may be the health of WUWT? which is in danger here.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/lcod.htm
Isn’t the EPA effectively doing a vast human subject experiment (though without a control group. . . not a problem for their type of ‘science’) by hypothesizing that the benefits of regulating and cutting CO2 will outweigh the human suffering caused by increases in the price of power and the economic strain put on our manufacturing and economy. Honestly, if I had to chose between the two ‘experiments’, I would have to get the details on their PM2.5 . . . it might be preferable the madness of the sacrifices at the altar of CAGW.