21 thoughts on “Not Quite Friday Funny – Hansen’s hot product

  1. Scene: Hansen wearing his activist’s hat, is getting arrested at his stall while peddling his hot products.

  2. Great cartoon. How about one with Hansen lecturing the wicked witch, claiming that her broomstick causes bad weather. Keep ‘em coming.

  3. In that blue pant suit he looks just like Hilary Clinton. Without the fixed insincere smile…

  4. I wonder sometimes…our progressive friends cannot handle the sophisticated analysis that differentiates between “warming” and “man-caused increases in warming.” To them, all warming proves that mankind is causing it. And … WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!

  5. It saves as “Hansen The Hot”. That many have been his ancestor. We are presently dealing with Hansen The Hotter.

  6. Give Hansen some credit. If July 2012 was indeed 0.2 F warmer than July 1936 then this means that the anomaly( TN Nick Stokes) from 1850 (approximate end of the LIA) to 2012 is only 0.2 F higher in the 76 years since 1936!
    Assuming that the anomaly up to 1936 was all ‘natural’ and the 0.2 F since was all through anthropogenic greenhouse effects we can calculate that we’re causing a maximum decadal rise of 0.11C over 7.6 decades as 0.11/7.6=0.015 C/decade!
    Thank you Mr Hansen for proving that Mam-made global warming is not a problem!

  7. reminds me of the 70′s era commercial “It’s not nice to fool Mother Nature. If you think it’s butter, but it’s not, it’s Chiffon.”

    It’s not nice to fool Mother Nature. If you think it’s hotter, but it’s not, it’s Hansen! ;)

  8. Wendy says:
    August 9, 2012 at 11:01 am

    reminds me of the 70′s era commercial

    This would be because it is based on a (British) 70′s commercial for, I think, Stork margarine.

    Scene:
    Man of the house, eating bread and spread: “I can’t believe it’s not butter”.
    Lady of the house, wearing apron, wielding mixing bowl and wooden spoon: “I can, its easier to cream”.

  9. RoyFOMR says:
    August 9, 2012 at 10:34 am

    Thank you Mr Hansen for proving that Mam-made global warming is not a problem!

    What do breasts have to do with it? I would object strongly to any mitigation/reduction efforts!

  10. CO2 effects are lamorithgic. That means subsequent increases have less and less effect.CO2 has NOT been rising exponentially. CO2 s rise is linear.Radiative forcing from CO2 has NOT been increasing approximately linearly, since CO2 s effects are lamorithgic.The rate of sea level rise DOES show a correlation with atmospheric CO2. Both are rising linearly. But just because two things are rising linearly doesn’t mean they are related strongly.

Comments are closed.