A look at oil production

Saudi Production Profile

Guest post by David Archibald

World conventional oil production peaked in 2005 and has been on a plateau at about that level ever since. This graph suggests that the market changed from inherent over-supply to inherent tightness in June 2004:

clip_image002

Figure 1: World Oil Production and Oil Price 1994 – 2011

World conventional oil production will at some stage tip over into decline. That may be this year or it may be as late as 2015. The decline in US production began over four decades ago in 1970, as predicted by King Hubbert in 1956.

The next big one to tip over into decline will be Saudi Arabia. In determining what that will look like and its consequences, the first thing to do is a logistic decline plot of Saudi production history. Figure 2 shows the result:

clip_image004

Figure 2: Saudi Arabia Logistic Decline Plot

Figure 2 shows that the Saudis have produced about half of their ultimate recoverable reserves. When half of a nation’s oil has been depleted, production rate decline is inexorable. From this plot, total ultimate recoverable reserves for Saudi Arabia are estimated to be 275 billion barrels. From this plot, Saudi Arabia is on the cusp of decline. So what will that decline look like?

clip_image006

Figure 3: Saudi Arabia Conceptual Crude, Condensate and Natural Gas Liquids Forecast

This figure was produced by Euan Mearns in 2008. The red volume on the bottom right is the Ghawar Field and the green is the rest of the heritage super giants. The steep fall in projected Ghawar production from about 2012 would be due to an expectation that the field is watering out on its crest as shown in this figure:

clip_image008

Figure 4: Two cross sections of a reservoir simulation of the northern part of the ‘Ain Dar region of the Ghawar Field

Figure 4 shows the progressive displacement of oil by water over the sixty years from 1940 to 2004. SW is water saturation. The reds are high oil saturation and the green shows where oil saturation is now down to about 50%. To recover further oil from the green areas requires enhanced oil recovery (EOR) tehniques such as carbon dioxide injection.

clip_image010

Figure 5: Regional cross section through the Ghawar Field

This figure is from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. The Ghawar Field is developed from a north-south trending horst block. It is 174 miles long by 16 miles wide. The producing horizon is the Arab D reservoir at about 7,000 feet.

clip_image012

Figure 6: Saudi Arabia Production Profile 1938 – 2040

From the foregoing, Figure 6 shows the production profile generated for Saudi Arabia. The production decline is 3% per annum which amounts to about 300,000 bopd per annum from the current level. The world can cope with that, but will the Saudis?

clip_image014

Figure 7: Saudi Arabia Population 1960 – 2040

Back in 1960, there were only about 4 million Saudis, now there are 27 million with population growth at 2.4% per annum compound. So, if the current trend continues, there will be 50 million of them by 2040. With population rising at 2.4% per annum and production falling at 3% per annum, we are starting with a net 5.4% per annum contraction in per capital oil production. The effect of that is captured by Figure 8 following.

clip_image016

Figure 8: Saudi Arabia cash available per capita

The forecast in Figure 8 is based on the oil price running up to $200 per barrel by 2018 and then plateauing at that level. The Saudi Govt increased social welfare payments in response to the Arab Spring. As a consequence, their budget is just about break even at the current oil price. If social outlays aren’t increased further, they pontentially have a lot of cash to play with for the next eight years or so, though they are also propping up Yemen with whom they share a land border. The crunch point is reached about 2026 when income falls below constant per capita outlays. As a society and as individuals, Saudis will then find their standard of living falling by 7% per annum compound. None shall weep for them.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

188 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
May 31, 2012 3:11 am

Funny that all Peak Oil theorists always present future oil production at Saudi Arabia declining from exactly the point from where they make the prediction. This has been the case for ten years already. Mind you, being skeptical of PO theories is exactly what made me slightly think that I should be skeptical of every long-term predictions, like, Global Warming. PO theorists have been wrong for 3 decades now. Not that PO won’t “happen”, it just will be a complete non-event.

jim
May 31, 2012 3:35 am

“The decline in US production began over four decades ago in 1970, as predicted by King Hubbert in 1956.”
Of course USA oil production has been increasing lately due to new technologies. We have cut our imports dramatically, with some predicting USA being energy independent in a decade or so.
The Malthusians have been wrong time after time, usually because of their ignoring man’s ability to solve problems. They also tend to think the world’s resources are flat instead of multidimensional: We not only have not yet explored the entire surface of the earth, but there is a whole new dimension in going deeper. A fourth new dimension is provided by improved extraction techniques. A fifth dimension is provided by increased efficiency in the use of resources. That is why man is unlikely to EVER run out of natural resources.
BTW: increasing world population provides more Eiensteins to solve problems.
Thanks
JK

Bill
May 31, 2012 3:49 am

Love your model projections David. I’m sure all the assumptions are spot on and that this is not just mental masturbation.

Ken Hall
May 31, 2012 3:52 am

There is also strong evidence that oil is produced from much deeper than we can drill, so on occasion, fields which have become depleted and then can refill from below and become productive again. I have not seen the abiotic oil theory destroyed either.

Tom
May 31, 2012 3:52 am

“Figure 4 shows the progressive displacement of oil by water over the sixty years from 1940 to 2004. SW is water saturation”
Does this imply that the “deserts will bloom” … water may be more valuable than oil in the Middle East… there has been talk of wars for water… Israel tried to control southern Lebanon for Litani River water and takes water from the Syria’s Golad Heights currently

A Lovell
May 31, 2012 3:58 am

jim says:
May 31, 2012 at 3:35 am
Well said Jim! I’m getting sick and tired of doom and gloom. Life is much more pleasant when one is optimistic. When you dig a little, most of these doomsday predictions never come to pass. We didn’t come out of the stone age because we ran out of stone!
As you say, the Malthusians have a very poor track record.

Dave Wendt
May 31, 2012 4:15 am

just a bit of contrary info
http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2012/05/bakken-2-oil-boom-comes-to-s-kansas.html
Bakken 2? Oil Prosperity Comes to South Kansas; Could Be Largest Economic Impact in State History
http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2012/05/oil-prosperity-update-for-eagle-ford.html
http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2012/05/center-of-gravity-in-oil-world-shifts.html
http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2012/05/new-frozen-frontier-awaits-offshore-oil.html
New and Frozen Frontier Awaits Offshore Oil Drilling in Alaska, Might Yield 1 Million Bbls/Day
North Dakota has increased production by close to half a million barrels a day

Garry Stotel
May 31, 2012 4:23 am

“World conventional oil production will at some stage tip over into decline” The key word is “conventional”…
And it will be a problem for SA more than for the World at large.

Jonathan Smith
May 31, 2012 4:31 am

A Lovell says:
May 31, 2012 at 3:58 am
The stone quote is a great one and very ironic as it is alleged to have been made by a Saudi oil minister in reference to mankind being unable to cope if oil ever ran out.

DirkH
May 31, 2012 4:32 am

jim says:
May 31, 2012 at 3:35 am
“BTW: increasing world population provides more Eiensteins to solve problems.”
Saudis?

Jim
May 31, 2012 4:41 am

The problem with using the the logistics curve to forecast is that one has to make an assumption of the total supply. The total supply keeps moving up over time, so that is why these guys are always off the mark.

Hollando
May 31, 2012 4:42 am

and in the long run, we’re all dead…

SMC
May 31, 2012 4:51 am

Jubail Industrial City, KSA is breaking ground on a major expansion called Jubail 2. This wouldn’t be happening if we (or the Saudi’s) were at ‘Peak Oil’. USA oil production, in the lower 48, is currently increasing due to the improved drilling techniques and ‘fracking’.

LazyTeenager
May 31, 2012 4:52 am

A Lovell says:
May 31, 2
When you dig a little, most of these doomsday predictions never come to pass.
—————
Neanderthals
Romans
Greeks
Macedonians
Persians
Egyptians
Mayans
Incas
Chinese dynasties many
Toltecs
Byzantines
Ottomans
Islam
British Empire
Amerindians
Zulus
I could go on forever about people who thought things would never end. But they did.
I bet the Romans figured those pesky barbarians could not possibly affect Rome. But they did. The biggest enemy is complacency.

SMC
May 31, 2012 4:55 am

Here is the address for the weekly EIA petroleum Status Report.
http://205.254.135.7/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/weekly_petroleum_status_report/wpsr.html

Dave_G
May 31, 2012 5:00 am

Off-limits places for oil recovery (specifically Antarctica) will be opened as-and-when mankind needs it to be. NOTHING can stand in the way of mankind if mankind wants it.

May 31, 2012 5:01 am

Lazy Teenager, you should read Nassim Taleb. What will get our civilization is much more probably something that is simply unknown and unpredictable right now to us. To extend some trend lines from 1950-2000 to the future is simply ridiculous. His Saudi graphs telling a narrative on how in “2026” they will have a “problem” to solve is beyond silly.

Shevva
May 31, 2012 5:05 am

@LazyTeenager – What a staw man, so which of them ran out of resources? Islam?
Go back under your bridge.

Kaboom
May 31, 2012 5:13 am

Of course the definition of what conventional oil production means changes over time, so any continuity in the graph is really fictional. In the beginning it was lifted out of pits with buckets, after all.

tmtisfree
May 31, 2012 5:28 am

World conventional oil production peaked in 2005

Data don’t say so.

G. Karst
May 31, 2012 5:34 am

So will someone please explain why the cancellation of the US/Canada pipeline is a good thing? Seems like a crisis is being engineered and the POTUS is complicit. Why is so much alarm over CO2 if we are soon to decline in fossil fuels? GK

more soylent green!
May 31, 2012 5:48 am

There is more oil in the USA and the world than anybody ever dreamed of. Domestically, we lack the political will to exploit it.
Peak Oil is just another Malthusian fantasy, used by the technocrats to get more people to pay attention to them and exploited by the politicians to get more power.

Shoretower
May 31, 2012 5:51 am

The problem with the “peak oilies” is that they never seem to account for technological change in their forecasts. If technology gives us a new tool with which to search for oil, or a means to extract more from existing reservoirs, or a way to extract oil that is presently unextractable (fracking, for example), then the whole “peak oil” equation changes completely. US oil production is now rising, not declining. M. King Hubbert was correct, within the bounds of his assumptions.

Corey S.
May 31, 2012 5:53 am

It appears that the USA is sitting on the largest deposit of Oil Shale in the world, with about half of it recoverable. Equal to the entire world’s reserves.
GAO: Recoverable Oil in Colorado, Utah, Wyoming ‘About Equal to Entire World’s Proven Oil Reserves’

“The Green River Formation–an assemblage of over 1,000 feet of sedimentary rocks that lie beneath parts of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming–contains the world’s largest deposits of oil shale,”Anu K. Mittal, the GAO’s director of natural resources and environment said in written testimony submitted to the House Science Subcommittee on Energy and Environment.
“USGS estimates that the Green River Formation contains about 3 trillion barrels of oil, and about half of this may be recoverable, depending on available technology and economic conditions,” Mittal testified.

GAO Report
This type of oil has been extracted for some time, and very well since 1880 in some countries. So, personally, I wouldn’t categorize this as the GAO does as “unconventional” since Unocal had produces oil from oil shale before being losing its lease:

Unocal operated the last large scale experimental mining and retorting facility in
the western United States from 1980 until its closure in 1991. The company produced 4.5 million barrels of oil from oil shale averaging 34 gallons of shale oil per ton of rock over the life of the project.

I think its time we opened it back up. Also, where were the environmentally concerned citizens and congress then? I guess it was OK then, but not now when we really need it.

Mervyn
May 31, 2012 5:57 am

Peak oil theory is absolute rubbish, and oil companies know it.
Oil is not a fossil fuel but an abiotic. It is a natural product that the earth generates constantly rather than a “fossil fuel” derived from decaying ancient forests and dead dinosaurs. The depths at which oil is being drilled clearly puts the ‘fossil fuel’ label to bed.
Oil production will only decline if governments and oil companies want production to decline.
The only threat to oil will be the gradual adoption of hydrogen fuel for vehicles, planes and everything else in the future. When the motor vehicle industry e.g. starts making Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles powered by hydrogen (which can now be safely stored) demand for oil will start declining big time.

1 2 3 8