From the Carnegie Institution and Stanford University comes word of this paper in JGR.

Washington, D.C. — Coral reefs are extremely diverse ecosystems that support enormous biodiversity. But they are at risk. Carbon dioxide emissions are acidifying the ocean, threatening reefs and other marine organisms. New research led by Carnegie’s Kenneth Schneider analyzed the role of sea cucumbers in portions of the Great Barrier Reef and determined that their dietary process of dissolving calcium carbonate (CaCO3) from the surrounding reef accounts for about half of at the total nighttime dissolution for the reef. The work is published December 23 by the Journal of Geophysical Research.
Reefs are formed through the biological deposition of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). Many of the marine organisms living on and around a reef contribute to either its destruction or construction. Therefore it is crucial that the amount of calcium carbonate remain in balance. When this delicate balance is disrupted, the reef ceases to grow and its foundations can be weakened.
In order to fully understand a reef’s ability to deposit carbonate and grow, it is necessary to understand the roles that the various elements of sea life play in this process. This is especially important because increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is predicted to decrease the amount of carbonate available due to acidification.
The research group set out to examine the role that sea cucumbers play in the reef environment.
Schneider’s team included Carnegie’s Ken Caldeira, as well as Jacob Silverman, of the Israeli Limnology and Oceanography Institute; Maria Byrne and Erika Woolsey, both of the University of Sydney and the latter also from James Cook University; and Hampus Eriksson of Stockholm University.
They studied the growth and dissolution of One Tree Reef, which surrounds One Tree Island in Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. Focusing on an area of the reef known as “DK13”, they found that sea cucumbers were abundant. They collected some of these sea cucumbers and placed them in aquaria to study the effect on sea water resulting from the sand and rubble transported through their gut system as part of their digestive process.
As part of another ongoing study in this area, the team found that the coral reef was dissolving at night. They found that sea cucumbers play a crucial part in this process. They live off the bits of organic matter in the carbonate sand and rubble that they ingest; in this process, their digestive systems produce acids that dissolve parts of these carbonate minerals. The dissolved carbonate minerals are then released into the surrounding environment. The researchers found that these lowly organisms might be responsible for half of the CaCO3 of the reef observed at night.
The burning of coal, oil, and gas releases CO2 into the atmosphere, which is later absorbed by the ocean, causing the ocean to acidify. Ocean acidification is expected to slow reef growth. With slower reef growth, the dissolution of CaCO3 within the guts of sea cucumbers is expected to become even more important to the reef CaCO3 budget.
“Even though the sea cucumbers dissolve CaCO3 on the reef, in a lagoon such as the one at One Tree Reef, where there is limited seawater exchange with the surrounding ocean, they can be important in recycling of nutrients to support primary productivity. They also increase sea water buffer capacity to partially offset ocean acidification effects, helping to maintain the overall health of the coral reef,” Schneider said. “Although sea cucumbers may play a part in reef dissolution, they are also an important part of an incredible marine environment.”
This research was supported by the Moore foundation. The authors thank the University of Sydney’s One Tree Island Research Station facility.
The Department of Global Ecology was established in 2002 to help build the scientific foundations for a sustainable future. The department is located on the campus of Stanford University, but is an independent research organization funded by the Carnegie Institution. Its scientists conduct basic research on a wide range of large-scale environmental issues, including climate change, ocean acidification, biological invasions, and changes in biodiversity.
The Carnegie Institution for Science (carnegiescience.edu) is a private, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., with six research departments throughout the U.S. Since its founding in 1902, the Carnegie Institution has been a pioneering force in basic scientific research. Carnegie scientists are leaders in plant biology, developmental biology, astronomy, materials science, global ecology, and Earth and planetary science.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I am not sure about the point of this article. Sea cucumbers and many star fish feed off reefs and if invasive, often pose a danger until a predator adapts them to diet. This has been known for 70 years. And the so called acidification of the oceans, really reduced alkalinity, is primarily modelling as we have no accurate pre industrialization information.As far as the current status, oceanic calcium carbonate is quite stable.
The danger to reefs continues to be fertilizer, shore structures, dynamite, over-fishing and poor fishing practices, anchorages, and siltation. AGW does not even approach a level of concern when compared to any one of these elements.
I only have a stupendously juvenile response to that picture, so I guess I’ll just keep it to myself…
Para. 7 The researchers found that these lowly organisms might be responsible for half of the CaCO3 of the reef (dissolution?) observed at night.
acidify= to make or become acid. Bad Science, bad, bad.
Anthony-
The accompanying Pic is conflicting with my first cup of morning joe…
May i suggest a more appropriate photo of a Sea Cucumber?
http://images.nationalgeographic.com/wpf/media-live/photos/000/065/cache/sea-cucumber_6533_600x450.jpg
The Moore Foundation…
Adopt a Sea Cucumber… I named mine Bobbitt.
Wow. Talk about building on flawed premises.
Some people have wayyyy too much time on their hands.
These guys have a thing for “one tree`s” don`t they? One tree in Yamal, one tree in the great barrier reef, wonder whats next?
IIRC, a paper recently established that lowered alkalinity increased the dissolution of “dead” coral and shells, but accelerated the uptake of CaCO3 into new growth. I.e., the whole cycle ran at greater speed. There would thus be a decrease in the speed with which limestone and chalk was laid down, and an increase in the quantity and number of “living corals”, etc.
First, I would love to know how they measured that the reef was dissolving at night. That’s going to be a marginal effect when you are dealing with a saturated or supersaturated calcium carbonate condition. Added CO2 cannot cause a pH change that dissolves calcium carbonate as it is part of an extended equilibrium from CO2 to carbonic acid to bicarbonate to carbonate to calcium carbonate. More CO2 means more calcium carbonate deposition.
Only an outside source of protons (acid), such as the digestive juices of a sea cucumber, can cause dissolution. No surprise here! And the expelled carbonate solution would simply go towards deposition the next day when photosynthesis, which is an alkalizing process, neutralizes the acid released by the sea cucumbers.
SO, there is nothing unusual here and all is normal, except for any reference to added CO2 having any deleterious effects. The fact is that reefs have been thriving over the last 50 years as CO2 has been rising.
“This is especially important because increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is predicted to decrease the amount of carbonate available due to acidification.”
This is their money phrase (more funding, please). The acidification they refer to is simply impossible; marine organisms thrive with more CO2, which goes well with the fact that CO2 has been much higher during the vast majority of the last 600 million years, during which coral evolved and thrived.
Curious George says
Exactly right George!
This is what is called new science…
…take something that is already known
spin it a new and biased way
and presto chango…….new science
It is amazing that in hundreds of millions of years of higher CO2 levels than present, coral reefs managed to survive and thrive.
It is amazing that in hundreds of millions of years of oceans more acidic than now, coral reefs managed to survive and thrive.
Interesting, Anthony. In their rush to the press release, they omitted this very important sentence from the Abstract of the article (emphasis mine):
In other words, this appears to be one of the many, many ways that the ocean life is able to do things that ocean chemistry says are impossible …
w.
Ocean acidification from CO2 in the air is another non-problem. Equilibrium pH of a CO2 saturated solution with excess calcium carbonate at 20C is 8.2. There are in excess of 10000 gigatons of carbonate deposits (limestone) spread around the ocean. Thus at equilibrium, no matter how much CO2 we release the ocean pH will be near 8.2. What may be of concern is localized non-equilibrium conditions at reef sites but these should be easily solved if on the slight chance it is a problem simply by spreading some granulated CaCO3 pebbles around the reefs to protect them.
Mike Bromley,
Are you sure you meant “premises?” a boxful of flawed…yes, premises, that’s the word!,
Willis Eschenbach says:
December 26, 2011 at 11:11 am
“Even though the sea cucumbers dissolve CaCO3 on the reef, in a lagoon such as the one at One Tree Reef, where there is limited seawater exchange with the surrounding ocean, they can be important in recycling of nutrients to support primary productivity. They also increase sea water buffer capacity to partially offset ocean acidification effects, helping to maintain the overall health of the coral reef,” Schneider said. “Although sea cucumbers may play a part in reef dissolution, they are also an important part of an incredible marine environment.”
They did kind of slip it in at the end. Made me want to go back and check the list of co-authors to see if Emily Litella was in there somewhere.
I can tell the character of a man’s soul by the photos he posts to his blog…..thanks for the photo, Anthony! I showed my wife, she’s still laughing!
Regarding reefs…they are under assault from many forces, none of them conducive to health. I think pollution from sewage and farm runoff is probably the biggest threat for the foreseeable future. See:
http://www.int-res.com/articles/meps/21/m021p175.pdf.
There is also calcium available in seasalt, for biomineralization processes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sea_salt-e-dp_hg.svg
“Therefore it is crucial that the amount of calcium carbonate remain in balance…”
… so that the world will stay just the same and never, ever change. Because it has never changed before.
And it would be very, very wrong for our species, which owns the planet in the name of all flora and fauna, to allow the earth to change when we can spend gazillions of dollars and keep it the loving and nurturing place that it is, forever and ever, Amen.
I mean … Gaia bless you.
(joking)
“The researchers found that these lowly organisms might be responsible for half of the CaCO3 of the reef observed at night.”
———————————-
“lowly organisms”
Speciesism! Prejudice! Discrimination! These creatures are no better or worse than humans. We are all equal. They have the same rights humans enjoy: the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of CaCO3; the right not to be herded up and placed in aquaria; the right to obamacare. Only human fetuses are a lower order of existence, and as such, are not protected. It is ok to do away with them because they are, after all, future climate criminals.
“This is especially important because increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is predicted to decrease the amount of carbonate available due to acidification.”
Does this prediction fit retrospectively, to the days of coral reefs of the Sahara desert, fossilized and many meters thick? Or does this prediction only work for future coral reefs?
Sea slugs fried in their own slime is a delicacy in Korea. It is absolutely the most disgusting thing that you can put in your mouth.
So no danger of over-fishing in this instance, I guess that means the coral reefs are doomed even though they have been around for at least 250 million years.
As for manmade carbon dioxide supposedly acidifying the oceans and killing the coral reefs, please can we kill that arrant piece of total BS for once and for all.
Queen1 says:
December 26, 2011 at 10:12 am
“I only have a stupendously juvenile response to that picture, so I guess I’ll just keep it to myself…”
Funny. I had what was probably the same immediate response. Looks like the trophy collection from a hysterical mob of really, really angry man haters.