NGOs: It's Worse Than We Thought

The official numbers of partygoers to the 17th Conference of Parties in Durban, South Africa, shape up like this:

Figure 1. Theoretical distribution of the 14,570 partygoers at the Durban 17th Conference of Partygoers. Numbers indicate total delegates from that group.

Slightly more government delegates than NGO representatives. However, as in all things climate, it’s a bit more complex than that.

Anthony points out in a recent post that the proposal on taxation submitted by Bolivia was in fact written by Oxfam. But it’s not just some random Oxfam connection. The Bolivian country delegation itself contains an Oxfam member. And they’re not the only country to do that. The Bangladesh country delegation has three Oxfam members. Belgium has two Oxfam members.

Belgium? I can understand Bolivia needing some help, but Belgium?

Are there really so few government and university climate experts in Belgium that you guys have to include two Oxfam members in your official government delegation? For shame, Belgium. Let those buggers pay their own way, why should the Belgian taxpayer have to stay home and pay for the Oxfam champagne and taxis and hotel rooms?

In total, Oxfam has no less than nine people in various official government delegations. World Resources Institute have two people in official country delegations, as does the Rainforest Alliance. Nature Conservancy and 350.org each have one. And then there are a host of small, local country NGO’s represented in various official government delegations.

Their numbers all pale next to the perennial Oscar winner, the group who almost always wins the Best Actor Award for their long-running mocumentary film series “Activists Pretending to be Scientists”, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). They have no less than fourteen WWF members masquerading as government delegates.

NGOs are not the only offenders in this regard. UNDP people seem to like to party. In addition to the official UNDP delegation, there are eight UNDP employees among the official country delegations.

The oddities don’t end there. Lebanon’s country delegation of 12 people includes the Head of Carbon Sales and Trading of the Standard Bank Plc.

India has four public school students in their delegation, along with the German AID representative.

The Ghana delegation includes someone described as a technician working for the Japan Broadcasting Corp.

Indonesia has someone from the Zoological Society of London.

Papua New Guinea has a representative from the Carbon War Room Corporation.

Italy has four members of the Euro-Mediterranean Center for Climate Change, and one bodyguard.

Ireland has a representative from the “Mary Robinson Foundation for Climate Justice”.

Grenada has two people from Climate Analytics GmbH, which seems to be a company whose business is to provide advice to countries on how to scam the carbon markets.

The overall winner has to be Guinea-Bissau. Their country delegation has 19 people. Only five of them seem to work for the Guinea-Bissau government. The delegation appears to be headed by a man who styles himself as:

Association member, Supreme Master Ching Hai International Association

Dang, that’s a hard one to overtop. The Guinea-Bissau  delegation also contains a man from the Global Environment Fund, a host of people with no given affiliation, the International Project Director, Awareness and Advocacy who works for the Centre for Climate Change and Environmental Studies, and mirabile dictu, someone whose affiliation is given simply as “Tianjin Police”.

I have put all of these oddities, along with many people with no given affiliation, in the category “Unknown”. My quick and unscientific analysis gave me the following counts of the actual as opposed to the nominal affiliations of the partygoers.

Figure 2. As in Figure 1, but with the NGO representatives and unknown people removed from the country delegations and placed in their own categories.

Six thousand official NGO representatives, including those masquerading as government representatives. Five thousand government delegates. Fifteen hundred media. A thousand mystery contestants, camp followers, and bodyguards. The beauty parlor is filled with sailors, the circus is in town, and the NGO folks outnumber everyone else.

Please, Congress, please, can we defund these climate parties? We’ve spent millions of dollars and burned millions of litres of jet fuel to haul these parasites to their annual party on some lovely tourist beach somewhere, Rio one year, Cancun the next, Bali the next.

The only thing we’ve gotten from them in return is fraud, waste, and mismanagement. Now, these unelected agenda-driven folks are agitating to tax a host of transactions worldwide. Congresspersons, could we ring the bell on this dangerous trend? International taxes enacted by the UN in any form are a very bad idea. Get rid of this band of thieves before they bankrupt us all.

w.

PS—The official data on the partygoers is available as Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3. My thanks to Ecotretas for the info.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

105 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
December 7, 2011 1:49 am

The Bob Dylan quote is perfect.

tom roche
December 7, 2011 1:51 am

Willis,
Any chance of a list and number of representatives of the various NGOs represented, those of us who support ome of these entities would like to see how our euros are spent.
[REPLY: The complete list of governmental parties is contained in parts 1 & 2 as cited at the end of the head post. -w.]

December 7, 2011 1:53 am

Portugal also has an NGO in it’s country delegation. I’m trying to find out who exactly pays the bill. The guy involved, Francisco Ferreira has written to me stating that Quercus is paying the bills. But I doubt he is telling all the truth. I’m trying to find out more about this, and if NGOs have to pay special bills for a seperate presence.
In the meantime, I will leave you with one of the most disgusting movies ever produced by an NGO, the same Quercus I mention, and that got included into the Portuguese delegation:
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_9mjBUSDng&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3%5D

RexAlan
December 7, 2011 2:05 am

Let me just say I’m not surprised with this breakdown of the attendees to the party.

December 7, 2011 2:10 am

Another interesting find about the list has been given by Anton Uriarte (in spanish): http://antonuriarte.blogspot.com/2011/11/la-expedicion-femenina-espanola.html
Spain’s delegation is comprised only of women! While there are four men on the list, all of them are local to the Spanish South Africa’s embassy. While a much bigger country than Portugal, they have a smaller delegation than ours. Might it be that women are really better managing these parties?
Ecotretas

Jack Thompson
December 7, 2011 2:12 am

This must be the daddy of all bandwaggons; when are people in authority going to wake up?

Baa Humbug
December 7, 2011 2:26 am

As Donna Laframboise has shown numerous times on her blog and lately in her excellent book “The Lazy Teenager” the IPCC should truthfully be known as the INGOPCC

Baa Humbug
December 7, 2011 2:28 am

oops the lazy one was me in my post at 2:25 am. The book title is “The Delinquent Teenager”

Philip Bradley
December 7, 2011 2:30 am

Cost must be at least $100 million. Plus the salaries of all the attendees.
These annual climate conferences are easily the biggest CO2 producing events on the planet.

Kelvin Vaughan
December 7, 2011 2:37 am

Are there any of those aliens there that are going to destroy the planet?

eo
December 7, 2011 2:45 am

The delegates are grouped into categories. Persons lsisted in the government delegations have lamost unlimited access to all events. Press, NGOs and even international organizations could not attend the negotiations, participate in the discussions, etc. So it has become a favorite strategy of NGOs to contact friendly government offices to include in the official delegations their own members so that they could effectively monitor the negotiations, the positions of the various government officials, etc that they could then target during and even after the conference itself. T

morgo
December 7, 2011 2:46 am

while this circus plays out Brisbane,s temp. today 7/12/2011 was 19.1 coldest since 1880 bring on the global warming sydney is going to beat all the records for the longest spell of cold weather not reaching above 23deg in over 5 days.northern nsw had coldest day on record today

boudumoon@hotmail.com
December 7, 2011 2:58 am

You gotta fight
For the right
To paaarty!

Hugh
December 7, 2011 2:58 am

Hilarious!
Evelyn Waugh, where are you when we need you?

richard verney
December 7, 2011 3:01 am

The sheer number of people involved is outrageous.
Why doe any country need more than 3 maximum 4 people to listen/negotiate?
What a waste of resources.

Billy Liar
December 7, 2011 3:07 am

Baa Humbug
Freudian slip?!

richard verney
December 7, 2011 3:07 am

Slightly off topic but last night I was watching the Chinese news channel. It did a piece on Durban and the usual AGW nonsense was being expressed. However, one particpant (a professor from Peking University) said that China would not be signing any deal before 2020. If that is the case, things may have moved on since if temperatures continue to flatline (or perhaps fall) through to 2020, the entire AGW argument will have less legs to stand on and many other countries may at that stage not be willing to commit to any deal.

December 7, 2011 3:24 am

Ecotretas,
That video is absolutely disgusting.

Red Etin
December 7, 2011 3:48 am

Durban should keep them going till they head to the World Water Congress, or whatever, next.

Frosty
December 7, 2011 3:51 am

While the worlds climaterati party in Durban, is anyone pointing out they have blood on their hands?
“Using Arable Land for Bio-fuels: Carbon Credits in the ‘Valley of Death’
The ugly effects of U.N.-backed ‘clean development’ in Honduras”
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28071

December 7, 2011 3:52 am

Willis has done an excellent job in portraying what these folks really are: an international band of Robbing Hood thieves, pursuing their agenda in high style with taxpayers footing the bill.

December 7, 2011 4:15 am

Excuse my ignorance but ‘NGO’ stands for…? Oxfam is…who?
Jeff

thingadonta
December 7, 2011 4:29 am

The trouble with Non govt organisations (NGOs) as a concept, is that if thier particular grind were significantly justified, they would be government organisations (GOs), and if they aren’t already represented within govt, then what are they for?
Its much the same problem with alternative medicine, if something works medically it becomes official medicine; if NGOs are relevent then they become govt.
The very small percentage of such matters which are ambiguous, or for one reason of another cant be represented by official govt ot offically taken up by medicine, should therefore have a similarly small representation commensurate with their relevance, say about 1%. The numbers of NGOs at copenhagen of course is nothing like this; imagine an orthodox medical conference with ~50% representation by alterative medicine. Woudn’t wash, would it? ‘Alternative earth science’, current climate science should be called, and it should have about 1% relevance.

1 2 3 5