BREAKING – major AAS solar announcement: Sun's Fading Spots Signal Big Drop in Solar Activity

“If we are right, this could be the last solar maximum we’ll see for a few decades,” Hill said. “That would affect everything from space exploration to Earth’s climate.”

Update: see the official press release here – “All three of these lines of research to point to the familiar sunspot cycle shutting down for a while.”

It looks like Livingston and Penn are getting some long deserved recognition. See their graph below:

Graph above from the WUWT solar reference page. Note: when the B gauss reading of sunspots hits 1500, they will no longer have enough contrast to be visible. That may occur at or near the years 2015-2017. WUWT carried a story in 2008 warning of this.

The American Astronomical Society meeting in Los Cruces, NM has just made a major announcement on the state of the sun. Sunspots may be on the way out and an extended solar minimum may be on the horizon.

From Space.com reporting from the conference:

Some unusual solar readings, including fading sunspots and weakening magnetic activity near the poles, could be indications that our sun is preparing to be less active in the coming years.

The results of three separate studies seem to show that even as the current sunspot cycle swells toward the solar maximum, the sun could be heading into a more-dormant period, with activity during the next 11-year sunspot cycle greatly reduced or even eliminated.

The results of the new studies were announced today (June 14) at the annual meeting of the solar physics division of the American Astronomical Society, which is being held this week at New Mexico State University in Las Cruces.

Currently, the sun is in the midst of the period designated as Cycle 24 and is ramping up toward the cycle’s period of maximum activity. However, the recent findings indicate that the activity in the next 11-year solar cycle, Cycle 25, could be greatly reduced. In fact, some scientists are questioning whether this drop in activity could lead to a second Maunder Minimum, which was a 70-year period from 1645 to 1715 when the sun showed virtually no sunspots.

“We expected to see the start of the zonal flow for Cycle 25 by now, but we see no sign of it,” Hill said. “This indicates that the start of Cycle 25 may be delayed to 2021 or 2022, or may not happen at all.”

If the models prove accurate and the trends continue, the implications could be far-reaching.

“If we are right, this could be the last solar maximum we’ll see for a few decades,” Hill said. “That would affect everything from space exploration to Earth’s climate.”

More on this as it unfolds. This article will be updated as new information becomes available.

See also these previous WUWT posts leading up to this:

Solar activity still driving in the slow lane

Sun’s magnetics remain in a funk: sunspots may be on their way out

The sun is still in a slump – still not conforming to NOAA “consensus” forecasts

Livingston and Penn in EOS: Are Sunspots Different During This Solar Minimum?

Livingston and Penn paper: “Sunspots may vanish by 2015″.

Sunspots Today: A Cheshire Cat – New Essay from Livingston and Penn

=======================================================================

As I have been saying for some time:

The long term Ap (the solar geomagnetic index) has been on a downtrend, ever since there was a step change in October 2005.

Thanks to Leif Svalgaard, we have a more extensive and “official” Ap dataset (NOAA’s SWPC shown above has some small issues) that I’ve plotted below. The step change in October 2005 is still visible and the value of 3.9 that occurred in April of 2009 is the lowest for the entire dataset. The Ap Index was the lowest in 75 years then.

Click for a larger image

Click for a larger image

And I’ve also plotted the 1991 to 2009 from BGS/Svalgaard to compare against the NOAA SWPC data:

Click for a larger image
Click for a larger image

============================================================

Dr. Leif Svalgaard writes:

Here are the abstracts of the three studies referred to in the announcement:

P16.10

Large-scale Zonal Flows During the Solar Minimum — Where Is Cycle 25?13

Frank Hill, R. Howe, R. Komm, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, T. P. Larson, J. Schou, M. J. Thompson

The so-called torsional oscillation is a pattern of migrating zonal flow bands that move from midlatitudes towards the equator and poles as the magnetic cycle progresses. Helioseismology allows us to probe these flows below the solar surface. The prolonged solar minimum following Cycle 23 was accompanied by a delay of 1.5 to 2 years in the migration of bands of faster rotation towards the equator. During the rising phase of Cycle 24, while the lower-level bands match those seen in the rising phase of Cycle 23, the rotation rate at middle and higher latitudes remains slower than it was at the corresponding phase in earlier cycles, perhaps reflecting the weakness of the polar fields. In addition, there is no evidence of the poleward flow associated with Cycle 25. We will present the latest results based on nearly sixteen years of global helioseismic observations from GONG and MDI, with recent results from HMI, and discuss the implications for the development of Cycle 25.

P17.21

A Decade of Diminishing Sunspot Vigor

W. C. Livingston, M. Penn, L. Svalgaard

s Convention Center

Sunspots are small dark areas on the solar disk where internal magnetism, 1500 to 3500 Gauss, has been

buoyed to the surface. (Spot life times are the order of one day to a couple of weeks or more. They are thought to be dark because convection inhibits the outward transport of energy there). Their “vigor” can be described by spot area, spot brightness intensity, and magnetic field. From 2001 to 2011 we have measured field strength and brightness at the darkest position in umbrae of 1750 spots using the Zeeman splitting of the Fe 1564.8 nm line. Only one observation per spot per day is carried out during our monthly telescope time of 3-4 days average. Over this interval the temporal mean magnetic field has declined about 500 Gauss and mean spot intensity has risen about 20%. We do not understand the physical mechanism behind these changes or the effect, if any, it will have on the Earth environment.

P18.04

Whither goes Cycle 24? A View from the Fe XIV Corona

Richard C. Altrock

Solar Cycle 24 had a historically prolonged and weak start. Observations of the Fe XIV corona from the Sacramento Peak site of the National Solar Observatory showed an abnormal pattern of emission compared to observations of Cycles 21, 22, and 23 from the same instrument. The previous three cycles had a strong, rapid “Rush to the Poles” in Fe XIV. Cycle 24 displays a delayed, weak, intermittent, and slow “Rush” that is mainly apparent in the northern hemisphere. If this Rush persists at its current rate, evidence from previous cycles indicates that solar maximum will occur in approximately early 2013. At lower latitudes, solar maximum previously occurred when the greatest number of Fe XIV emission regions* first reached approximately 20° latitude. Currently, the value of this parameter at 20° is approximately 0.15. Previous behavior of this parameter indicates that solar maximum should occur in approximately two years, or 2013. Thus, both techniques yield an expected time of solar maximum in early 2013.

*annual average number of Fe XIV emission features per day greater than 0.19

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

270 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 14, 2011 10:20 am

Oh snap.

John S.
June 14, 2011 10:21 am

Can you really predict the sunspot activity of the sun with any sort of precision? It seems to me like predicting how many bubbles in any given second a boiling pot will produce.

Hoser
June 14, 2011 10:24 am

What happens when wind turbines are unbalanced due to icing and PV farms are snowed over?

ew-3
June 14, 2011 10:25 am

Instead of de-industrializing the west and spending trillions on “global warming”, we should be thinking about how to survive in a world where our growing seasons are shorter by 30 to 60 days.

Jenn Oates
June 14, 2011 10:25 am

No surprise to those who have been paying attention, but still…it’s going to be an interesting decade.

Roberto Carioca
June 14, 2011 10:26 am

Haha Got it right sorry for been a show off (see my posting in previous post re this matter). We are looking at a serious cooling off. I believe it has started and is being held off by ocean heat release, but beware apparently a trransition to full ice age can occur in a 20 year period. Refs are available

June 14, 2011 10:26 am

This is why this is a great science blog. None of this is a surprise to regular readers.

June 14, 2011 10:26 am

It may be good science. I am not questioning that. However, it does provide excellent cover for the Warmista to withdraw from their ridiculous positions. I bet they do, pronto.

David Falkner
June 14, 2011 10:27 am

Repent sunners! 😉

June 14, 2011 10:30 am

Several years ago, there was a prediction that cycle 25 was going to be very weak based on a big drop in the speed of the solar conveyor.

Elftone
June 14, 2011 10:34 am

Wow:
“That would affect everything from space exploration to Earth’s climate.”
Did they say that out loud? That’s going to annoy the hell out of a lot of folks… ;D

malcolm
June 14, 2011 10:35 am

Hmmm. Sounds familiar: Catastrophic climate change, millions of climate refugees, crops failing etc. etc..
It’s 50 years too late to jump on the disaster novels bandwagon, though: from 1962, we have this

Curious Canuck
June 14, 2011 10:35 am

L&P can’t get a much clearer endorsement of their work. Climate change just might become the major new world challenge afterall, just not warming. Perhaps CO2 hasn’t saved us from the Ice Age we’re in like Big Climate been bragging about in Wikipedia afterall.

Michael D Smith
June 14, 2011 10:36 am

Haven’t you heard? 0.1% variation doesn’t matter (unless it’s CO2). These aren’t the droids you’re looking for.

Ray
June 14, 2011 10:36 am

That doesn’t sound good at all. So far it has not been so warm in North West. I started to built a greenhouse for our garden. That is the only way if we want any vegetables this year. The tomato plants are struggling.
Climate disruption is one thing from a weak sun but how would this affect the magnetic coupling to the planets? How would this affect the earth?

vboring
June 14, 2011 10:39 am

I wonder if Phil Jones will continue working long enough to admit to statistically significant cooling.

Ray
June 14, 2011 10:40 am

It is quite obvious that we will be hit by a long cold period. According to The Team’s models, their solution would be to emit as much CO2 as we can in order to avoid a planetary catastrophe. Then again, according to their funny science, if we emit more CO2 the planet will cool even more…

DavidS
June 14, 2011 10:41 am

Not necessarily suprising to those that follow this blog, but a very interesting statement from AAS none the less. If we do get a Maunder like minimum, maybe we should hope the warmistas are right!
It will be interesting to see how the MSM reprton this.

DonS
June 14, 2011 10:41 am

The new Smartgrid should be online just in time. Now it’s not only going to be dark, it’s going to be cold, too.

Curiousgeorge
June 14, 2011 10:42 am

Can’t wait to see the media and political spin on this. 😉

richard verney
June 14, 2011 10:43 am

I do not have substantial confidence in our predictive powers, either to be able to predict how much future solar activity there will be, nor to predict the effects of such activity (or lack of it). I am, however, convinced that a cold spell with shorter growing seasons will be far more of a problem to mankind than some warming of a few degrees (which warming would very probably have been beneficial to mankind).
If there is lower solar activity and if this causes cooling, given that people are more mobile than they use to be, we may well see a mass exodus to sunnier climes.

John
June 14, 2011 10:43 am

Be careful what you wish for….
If it turns out to be true that solar activity is going to be low for a while, then maybe the sun — in the last 5 years — really has had more than a negligible impact for cooling the planet.
If that is true, then maybe, in the absence of significant solar cooling, greenhouse gases have more of a warming effect that many of us on this website believe.
I’m not saying how this will play out, I don’t know, but until this latest article, I wasn’t yet prepared to think that the Sun could really be in something approaching Dalton or perhaps even Maunder Minimum solar cooling.

June 14, 2011 10:43 am

“We need not wait until 2030 to see whether the forecast of the next deep Gleissberg minimum is correct. A declining trend in solar activity and global temperature should become manifest long before the deepest point in the development. The current 11-year sunspot cycle 23 with its considerably weaker activity seems to be a first indication of the new trend, especially as it was predicted on the basis of solar motion cycles two decades ago. As to temperature, only El Niño periods should interrupt the downward trend, but even El Niños should become less frequent and strong. The outcome of this further long-range climate forecast solely based on solar activity may be considered to be a touchstone of the IPCC’s hypothesis of man-made global warming. ”
New Little Ice Age
Instead of Global Warming?

Landscheidt – Energy and Environment 14, 327-350. – 2003

June 14, 2011 10:43 am

“If the models prove accurate…” When are they going to learn that models of complex physical systems are no good, with such noisy data? They are just showing me the infant stage of their investigations, much less their understanding, with these graphs.

1 2 3 11
Verified by MonsterInsights