Yesterday, almost unnoticed (except for Ric Werme in Tips and Notes) WUWT passed another mile marker in the travel of this blog.
Here’s the marker today:
75 million. The word “hits” isn’t really accurate, as it implies total HTTP requests of which there may be several in an HTML page (images, elements, etc). Whole technologies are dedicated to minimizing the number of HTTP requests per page.
The wordpress.com Blog Stats measure on the WUWT sidebar is actually full page views, not “hits” or HTTP requests.
Astute readers may notice this little smiley face at the bottom of each wordpress.com web page, which I’ve highlighted in yellow.
That little smiley face which is automatically inserted, besides denoting the general happy outlook of this blog, serves an important function. It is the last element in every page to load and gets logged by the wordpress.com statistics counter. What you see in the blog stats is the raw unadjusted page view count from wordpress.com, over which I have no influence or control.
The reason I point this out is that one well known paid disinformational blogger went ballistic the last time I announced such a milestone and proudly proclaimed that his blog “got more hits in a few months than WUWT did all time” (paraphrasing since I can’t find the blog post now). He put up a graph from his server log.
What he didn’t realize is that he was displaying his internal server log of HTTP requests, and it showed all the HTTP page requests, not full page views. Big difference. This Microsoft Tech net forum entry sums up the HTTP request issue pretty well:
“The average number of requests per page during testing was four. Therefore, the ratio of requests per second (RPS) to pages per second (PPS) can be calculated as r=(p*4)+x where r=RPS, p=PPS and x=background requests such as requests for search queries and non-cached pages.”
I don’t think that a general interner page would have only 4 requests per page. I validated that with a few sites:
- · Microsoft.com home page – more than 70 requests per page
- · hawaiianair.com home page – more than 50 requests per page
- · mysite on our intranet – more than 30 requests
For example, WUWT has a bunch of small images on the right sidebar, each of these requires a separate HTTP request. I count 24 images on the sidebar. The header image, plus any images in posts each count as an HTTP request, plus each post itself, drawn from the database, is an HTTP request, We typically have 15 stories on the front page. This sort of multiple HTTP requests per page is the same for most any blog.
Page views counted via the wordpress smiley, circumvent that problem.
So I figured I’d point all this out, lest the same erroneous hits -vs- page views argument be repeated again.
So while we are on the topic of smileys, let me just thank everyone for your continued support, with a hat tip to guest posters and those who leave comments in the Tips and Notes section. I especially thank our moderators, who toil in the background moderating hundreds, sometimes thousands, of comments per day.
For those that wish to help spread the message, here is what you can do.
- Repost excerpts with links on your own blog, this help builds traffic and reach for WUWT. If you don’t have a blog, get one. It is free and easy.
- If you can, please Re-Tweet and Facebook the WUWT posts – with the problems we are having with Google and Facebook, these help build rank.
- Put links to WUWT in comments on other blogs (assuming they won’t be snipped). Some blogs, like the one I mentioned above are so threatened that the proprietor will delete the links because he doesn’t want to give any link backs.
- If so inclined, visit the advertisers (such as the Amazon book links -soon to be a special subsection) and others shown here, they often have relevant and interesting topics, but sometimes it is just humorous bot context placement.
- If something important moves you here to make strong comments, write letters to the editor to your local newspaper. There is a strong division between the blogosphere and the rest of the news reading world. Invite them in.
Thanks for your consideration – Anthony
[UPDATE] I trust Anthony won’t mind my adding this graphic, showing today’s reach for WUWT compared to ClimateAudit, RealClimate, and SkepticalScience. – w.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

If there is a smiley displayed on my page view I cannot see it. Perhaps I have some blocking software that prevents it.
Thank YOU for being here–this site is a huge resource to me as a high school science teacher trying to go against the climate flow in textbooks and the STAR test, which I finished administering for the year today. I have to tell my students that it’s bunk, but this is what they’ll expect you to say on the STAR, a heckofa way to teach science.
If you average 30 hits per page load and only have 75 million hits, then you only have about 2.5 million page loads. How can it be that small? Or am I missing something.
Who would have guessed to look at Joe’s place from the description above? A search of “WUWT hits site:climateprogress.org” will yield:
http://climateprogress.org/2010/03/27/wattsupwiththat-hype-anti-science-webstats-alexa-hits-technorati/
TLDR*
*Too Long, Didn’t Request [smiley] 🙂
75,000,000… a nifty milestone indeed. Congrats, Anthony! Here’s to another 75,000,000
I especially thank our moderators, who toll in the background…
“Ask not for whom the bell tolls….” : > )
[Fixed, thanx. ~dbs, toiling mod.]
Nice milestone. It looks like WUWT is firnly planted on the web and is here to stay for a while.
One blog that is full bore CO2 is man kinds fault has a poster, Ludwig , he and the person who runs that blog http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com have had a real problem with how they count things. Now that they are a 9,000,000 comments and declineing others have done studies on how the stats from that blog are highly inflated.
Best to be very very honest with counts and facts.
Anthony,
I stumbled onto your blog back when you were first looking at the Stevenson screens un-whitewash and have been a regular visitor ever since. I estimate my number of HTTP requests must be on the order of 50,000.
phil@xxxx.
to
Jim@alnco2/co2.
We have another problem….75.000.000….hide the increase.
Anthony,
Congratulations.
Message received loud and clear
Great job Anthony! I really think this is a great blog, keep up the good work, it’s my main source of information for climate change.
Luck for the future!
@APACHEWHOKNOWS I do not know what happened to Charles Johnson, somebody must have slipped something into one of his drinks about 3 years ago. Up to then he was not totally off the wall. Since then he has been. Oh well. It is the right of every man to demonstrate that he is a true idiot. Charles does it well these days.
No big deal, but as with ShrNfr, there doesn’t seem to be a smiley on this page on my PC. I looked through the html and nothing jumped out at me as an attempt to put one there. The last things rendered on the page seem to be two divisions called “site-info” and “site-generator” within a div called “footer”, but with all the css and javascript, an attempt to post the smiley could well be buried somewhere in there.
Congrats on the new milestone, Anthony and team.
There is NO smiley at the bottom of any of my pages either. Am I being deprived of something? 🙂
I always wondered why there was a smiley face at the bottom of the page. Kudos to all the commenters that make it well worthwhile to scroll down to the bottom of the page 😉
Thanks Anthony, mods and contributors to this site!
Regarding the smiley, I scrolled right down to the bottom and there, under the solid black line, was a minute smiley, but without a yellow background.
In the words of Bart Simpson ‘I can’t help but feel partly responsible !
Congrats Anthony – still my favourite blog after four years.
http://stats.wordpress.com/g.gif?host=wattsupwiththat.com&rand=0.33628779875850634&blog=1799261&v=wpcom&user_id=0&post=37947&subd=wattsupwiththat&ref=http%3A//wattsupwiththat.com/
very exploitable. a little code to generate new random numbers and call for just the smiley would add as many hits as you like. it could even be done with html/java to automatically reload the smiley on a browser.
so don’t get too excited about stats. we know what one can do with stats.
keep up the good work. that’s what makes wuwt great.
if you were a minority of one you’d only seem more heroic.
[Reply: What you don’t see – and what can’t be gamed with fake stats – is the actual number of reader comments over the past four years: 576,000+. ~dbs, mod.]
Well, it´s there… at least for me. But I found it because I looked hard, for sure.
Obviously AW will have the final word on the question about the smiley, but it might well be a single-pixel graphic which is not noticeable under normal viewing. You’ll note that he mentioned in the text above that he had highlighted said graphic with yellow, which I took to mean that he did that for the purpose of making it visible.
Again, I’ll defer to Mr. Watts if the answer turns out to be something else. But I know a lot of websites use single-pixel graphics for a variety of purposes.
http://botd2.wordpress.com/botd.gif?blog=1799261&post=37947&lang=en&date=1302803458&ip=74.89.76.98&url=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/04/14/another-small-milestone-for-wuwt-2/
Out of curiosity, I looked at the images on this page and near the bottom of the list is the image “botd.gif” which is a 1px by 1px image. My bet is that’s the counter they use.
Congratulations Anthony!
I had to scroll all the way down (normally don’t) and there wasn’t a yellow smiley face for me either. There was what appeared to be a white on white smiley face as all I could see was the eyes and mouth.
REPLY: I used the yellow graphics highlighter on my example, to make it more visible – Anthony
Well, it is not a Drudge report, but for climate science, it is #1! best place to get the english version of the science behind the debate. Congratulations! And keep those counters humming!
I scrolled all the way down as well. Reminds me of the “lick your elbow” trivia! 😉
At less than 300 unique visitors a month on my personal site, all I can do is laugh! It’s way too incomparable to cry!
Congratulations once again!