Catastrophic Drought Looms for Capital City of Bolivia
![]()

Historical ecology of the Andes indicates desert-like setting on the horizon
Catastrophic drought is on the near-term horizon for the capital city of Bolivia, according to new research into the historical ecology of the Andes.
If temperatures rise more than 1.5 to 2 degrees Celsius (3 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit) above those of modern times, parts of Peru and Bolivia will become a desert-like setting.
The change would be disastrous for the water supply and agricultural capacity of the two million inhabitants of La Paz, Bolivia’s capital city, scientists say.
The results, derived from research funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and conducted by scientists affiliated with the Florida Institute of Technology (FIT), appear in the November issue of the journal Global Change Biology.
Climatologist Mark Bush of FIT led a research team investigating a 370,000-year record of climate and vegetation change in Andean ecosystems.
The scientists used fossilized pollen trapped in the sediments of Lake Titicaca, which sits on the border of Peru and Bolivia.
They found that during two of the last three interglacial periods, which occurred between 130,000-115,0000 years ago and 330,000-320,000 years ago, Lake Titicaca shrank by as much as 85 percent.
Adjacent shrubby grasslands were replaced by desert.

Foreshadowing: in many years, nearby Lake Poopo has dried up but for brief periods.
In each case, a steady warming occurred that caused trees to migrate upslope, just as they are doing today.
However, as the climate kept warming, the system suddenly flipped from woodland to desert.
“The evidence is clear that there was a sudden change to a much drier state,” said Bush.
Scientist Sherilyn Fritz at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln showed that during these warm episodes the algae living in Lake Titicaca shifted from freshwater species to ones tolerant of salty water. Paul Baker of Duke University identified peaks of carbonate deposition.
Both point to a sudden shallowing of the lake due to evaporative loss.
An environmental reconstruction demonstrates that with moderate warming, forests moved upslope. But as that warming continued, a climate tipping point was reached.
The system was thrown into a new, drier state that halted forest expansion.
The tipping point is caused by increased evaporative loss from Lake Titicaca.
As the lake contracts, the local climate effects attributable to a large lake–doubling of rainfall, among the most important–would be lost, says Bush.
Such tipping points have been postulated by other studies, but this work allowed the researchers to state when the system will change.
Based on the growth limits of Andean forests, they defined a tipping point that was exceeded within a 1.5 to 2 degrees Celsius warming above modern conditions.
Given a rate of warming in the Peruvian Andes of about 0.3-0.5 degrees Celsius per decade, the tipping point ahead would be reached between 2040 and 2050.
“The implications would be profound for some two million people,” says Paul Filmer, program director in NSF’s Division of Earth Sciences. Severe drought, and a loss of stored water in lakes in the region, would reduce yields from important agricultural regions and threaten drinking water supplies.
The research suggests that limiting wildfires would help delay the worst effects of the drought.
-NSF-

Lake Titicaca, and parts of Peru and Bolivia, are on the cusp of a major drought.

This woodland near the lake is similar to those of past times with temperatures like today’s.

Saltbush pollen, the most common type of pollen during times of near-desert conditions.

Lake Titicaca from space. Its outline may look very different in the future.

However, since the Holocene Optimum, each successive warm period has not been as warm as the last. We are slowly sinking towards colder, have probably passed the peak of this warm period, as the Sun has gone to a minimum state similar to the Dalton minimum, and should be worrying about the impact of increasingly cold climate.
We are looking in the wrong direction – typical human behavior.
“Given a rate of warming in the Peruvian Andes of about 0.3-0.5 degrees Celsius per decade
Just what have been the temperature trends in the Peruvian Andes for the last 30 – 50 years? Was a model used to forecast this tipping point? Did I miss something?
In the following article Paul Hudson discusses a study by Newcastle University wherby they determine that flooding is increasing due to global warming. Mr Hudson points out that Phillip Eden draws attention that the time period is too short and hence qustions the validity of the study?
Is this usual in self named climate science?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulhudson/2010/11/is-the-perceived-rise-in-flood.shtml#comments
“In each case, a steady warming occurred that caused trees to migrate upslope, just as they are doing today.”
Have they got a video of that? I’ve love to see it.
I concur with Charles Higley 11:06am. In addition, although presented as a catastrophe, it seems this supports the contention that temperatures warmer than those of today are just part of a natural cycle.
> … caused trees to migrate upslope…
What is this? A Monty Python sketch? Coconuts, trees, what’s the diff…
🙂
So, this has happened before I see.
Off Topic:
Report: Global Warming Issue From 2 Or 3 Years Ago May Still Be Problem
(http://www.theonion.com/articles/report-global-warming-issue-from-2-or-3-years-ago,18431/)
ends with this:
“Climate change is real, and we are killing our planet more every day,” said climatologist Helen Marcus, who has made similar statements in interviews in 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010. “We need to make a serious effort to stop it, or, you know, we’ll all die. There really isn’t much else to say.”
And yet the last two times this happened, there was no industrial complex burning fossil fuels to cause it. So why would this be any different?
It can’t be a tipping point if conditions revert back to previous states.
These indicators point to a depositional cycle which we geologists see all through the geological record, in strata all over the world.
Don’t these Muppets ever proof read what they write?
I guess letting go is the hardest thing to do. More of the same driveling hyperbole by the lunatic fringe. Tipping points and sophistry rolled into a package of psuedo-scientific ramblings.
Guys, its over. Here is the tipping point! When it gets about 3,632 °F our fuels will start to combust!
In all these studies when warming is observed, the assumption is that the warming causes the change in the environment. It would be equally valid to suggest that the warming is a symptom of other factors which also drive the desertification process. A purely hypothetical example would be a lack of cosmic rays leading to reduced cloud cover. This would result in both warmer and drier conditions. I’m not saying that’s what happened, merely that it doesn’t follow that warming will lead to more drying.
Dig deep buddies, this looks like Briffa’s LONELY TREE.
It seems these guys don’t navigate in the web:
http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/loops/wxloop.cgi?wv_east_enhanced+48+-update+3600
Abstract
We present a climatic reconstruction of Holocene lacustrine episodes in the Salinas del Bebedero basin (Argentina), based on geological and diatom information.
Morphological, sedimentological and diatom evidence between 11600 ± 140 yr BP and 325 ± 95 yr BP, allowed us to interpret the paleoenvironments of the basin. Episodes of high energy (sandy levels) are linked to large inflow of meltwater through the Desaguadero River, related to development of glaciers on the Andes. This inflow is characterized by peaks of relative abundance of the brackish water diatom Cyclotella choctawatcheeana Prasad. The values of C. choctawatcheeana decrease in deposits of low energy (clay levels), where it co-dominates with oligohalobous Fragilaria and Epithemia spp.
To the last two peaks of large inflow of meltwater, radiocarbon dates corrected to sidereal ages, are AD 1280/1420 and AD 1443/1656. These ages agree with two cold episodes clearly recorded in dendrological studies from the Patagonian Andes and were correlated to the Little Ice Age. Thus, older Holocene episodes of large inflow of water to the basin were correlated with the Neoglacial Advances defined by Mercer (1976) for the Andes. Authors: Miguel Gozales and Dora Maidiana
http://www.springerlink.com/content/m11m129238u61484/
That salt lake will be filled of water AGAIN in this Solar Minimum, though it will be surrounded by a dried PAMPA, with water from Bolivian andean heights.
“The results, derived from research funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and conducted by scientists affiliated with the Florida Institute of Technology (FIT), appear in the November issue of the journal Global Change Biology.”
Who even knew there was a journal Global Change Biology? Wouldn’t expect any sort of biased editorial processes viz which studies to publish in a journal who’s very existence is premised on global climate change.
Tipping point! 2040…………………….No! wait maybe 2050!….. shock horror!
A bit dramatic, to say the least – (same old, same old).
Making an extremely dubious extrapolation (0.3 – 0.5/decade) here aren’t we NSF?
What about human land-use, particularly deforestation, is that not the greatest factor?
Or, is the Aral Sea example uppermost in your minds but then, that was a human induced disaster too.
‘Although accurate reconstructions of Amazonian palaeoclimates are central to understanding the distribution and history of Neotropical biodiversity, current reconstructions based on proxy data are discordant and subject to intense debate.’
Journal of Quaternary Science. Special Issue: Late Quaternary ecosystem dynamics and carbon cycling in the tropics. Volume 19, Issue 7, pages 677–684, October 2004
Observations on Late Pleistocene cooling and precipitation in the lowland Neotropics
Mark B. Bush, Miles R. Silman
Article first published online: 27 SEP 2004
And if pigs grow wings, they can fly.
steveta_uk says:
November 12, 2010 at 11:17 am
“In each case, a steady warming occurred that caused trees to migrate upslope, just as they are doing today.”
Have they got a video of that? I’ve love to see it.
————————————
Ha ha ha, the best I could find was one of them migrating downslope:
Just an aside, Googled “Holocene Optimum”, into Wiki edit, noted the name of Connelly had changed “expected NOTHWARD SHIFT of thunderstorms” to “SOUTHWARD SHIFT”. Is there anywhere his sticky little fingers have not been.
too bad it’s getting colder and these people are freezing to death instead.
The above article says about the report;
“The research suggests that limiting wildfires would help delay the worst effects of the drought.”
I do not understand that. How would limiting wild fires help to delay the worst effects of the drought? By using less water to extinguish the fires? Or something else?
I would appreciate somebody providing an explanation of this.
Richard
Another tipping point apparently occurred sometime around or before 1000 to 1500 years ago, the date associated with submerged temples and roads found in Lake Titicaca at least a hundred feet deep.
Alarmism at its finest!
… and image, all this happened without any help from humans or AGW.
… but of course none of those mechanisms / forcing could be at play in our modern climate. That’s just unthinkable!
/sarc
Oh, lets forget that we are talking about a lake on top of a growing mountain! Sheesh…
“Lake Titicaca shrank by as much as 85 percent…in many years, nearby Lake Poopo has dried up…”
Tough snip.