From NASA Science News: Firefly Mission to Study Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes
High-energy bursts of gamma rays typically occur far out in space, perhaps near black holes or other high-energy cosmic phenomena. So imagine scientists’ surprise in the mid-1990s when they found these powerful gamma ray flashes happening right here on Earth, in the skies overhead.
They’re called Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes, or TGFs, and very little is known about them. They seem to have a connection with lightning, but TGFs themselves are something entirely different.
Right: An artist’s concept of TGFs. Credit: NASA/Robert Kilgore [more]
“In fact,” says Doug Rowland of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, “before the 1990s nobody knew they even existed. And yet they’re the most potent natural particle accelerators on Earth.”
Individual particles in a TGF acquire a huge amount of energy, sometimes in excess of 20 mega-electron volts (MeV). In contrast, the colorful auroras that light up the skies at high latitudes are powered by particles with less than one thousandth as much energy.
At this stage, there are more questions about TGFs than answers. What causes these high-energy flashes? Do they help trigger lightning–or does lightning trigger them? Could they be responsible for some of the high-energy particles in the Van Allen radiation belts, which can damage satellites?
To investigate, Rowland and his colleagues at GSFC, Siena College, Universities Space Research Association, and the Hawk Institute for Space Sciences are planning to launch a tiny, football-sized satellite called Firefly in 2010 or 2011. Because of its small size, Firefly will cost less than $1 million — about 100 times cheaper than what satellite missions normally cost. Part of the cost savings comes from launching Firefly under the National Science Foundation’s CubeSat program, which launches small satellites as “stowaways” aboard rockets carrying larger satellites into space, rather than requiring dedicated rocket launches.
Below: An artist’s concept of Firefly on the lookout for TGFs above a thunderstorm. Firefly will make simultaneous measurements of energetic electrons, gamma rays, and the radio and optical signatures of the lightning discharge. [more]
If successful, Firefly will return the first simultaneous measurements of TGFs and lightning. Most of what’s known about TGFs to date has been learned from missions meant to observe gamma rays coming from deep space, such as NASA’s Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, which discovered TGFs in 1994. As it stared out into space, Compton caught fleeting glimpses of gamma rays out of the corner of its eye, so to speak. The powerful flashes were coming–surprise!–from Earth’s atmosphere.
Subsequent data from Compton and other space telescopes have provided a tantalizingly incomplete picture of how TGFs occur:
In the skies above a thunderstorm, powerful electric fields generated by the storm stretch upward for many miles into the upper atmosphere. These electric fields accelerate free electrons, whisking them to speeds approaching the speed of light. When these ultra-high speed electrons collide with molecules in the air, the collisions release high-energy gamma rays as well as more electrons, setting up a cascade of collisions and perhaps more TGFs.
Right: Doug Rowland, principal investigator for Firefly stands next to the a life-sized model of the tiny satellite. Credit: NASA/Pat Izzo
To the eye, a TGF probably wouldn’t look like much. Unlike lightning, most of a TGF’s energy is released as invisible gamma rays, not visible light. They don’t produce colorful bursts of light like sprites and other lightning-related phenomena. Nevertheless, these unseen eruptions could help explain why brilliant lightning strikes occur.
A longstanding mystery about lightning is how a strike gets started. Scientists know that the turbulence inside a thundercloud separates electric charge, building up enormous voltages. But the voltage needed to ionize air and generate a spark is about 10 times greater than the voltage typically found inside storm clouds.
“We know how the clouds charge up,” Rowland says, “we just don’t know how they discharge. That is the mystery.”
TGFs could provide that spark. By generating a quick burst of electron flow, TGFs might help lightning strikes get started, Rowland suggests. “Perhaps this phenomenon is why we have lightning,” he says.
If so, there ought to be many more TGFs each day than currently known. Observations by Compton and other space telescopes indicate that there may be fewer than 100 TGFs worldwide each day. Lightning strikes millions of times per day worldwide. That’s quite a gap.
Then again, Compton and other space telescopes before Firefly weren’t actually looking for TGFs. So perhaps it’s not surprising that they didn’t find many. Firefly will specifically look for gamma ray flashes coming from the atmosphere, not space, conducting the first focused survey of TGF activity. Firefly’s sensors will even be able to detect flashes that are mostly obscured by the intervening air, which is a strong absorber of gamma rays (a fact that protects people on the ground from the energy in these flashes). Firefly’s survey will give scientists much better estimates of the number of TGFs worldwide and help determine if the link to lightning is real.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

sprites and jets and now tgfs – too bad they didn’t make it tgifs (terrestrial gamma-ray “intermitent” flashes or something along that line). It keeps getting stranger and stranger. It also makes me wonder just how much effect cosmic ray bursts have in the triggering (and maybe path determination) also.
Great name for a satellite. I have to wonder if they named the satellite after the really good, but short lived, TV show Firefly. If you haven’t seen that show, I strongly recommend you watch it and you’ll be hooked like I am on it. And after you watch the TV show, don’t forget the movie Serenity based on the TV show. Firefly fans are very rabid, so it wouldn’t surprise me to learn the satellites were named after the TV show. NASA has already named something Serenity after the movie. (I think it was an international space station module.) (And I think I’m right; but I could be wrong.)
Is it not comforting to know that our understanding of the physical world that surrounds us is not much better than the understanding a stone age dweller had.
It behoves us to be sanguine when we realise that we are dwarfed by our ignorance.
OT. Is the El Nino weakening??
http://www.osdpd.noaa.gov/data/sst/anomaly/2010/anomnight.2.1.2010.gif
I am curious. Has there been any study of atmospheric gamma ray flashes using high flying research aircraft, such as the ER-2? It strikes as a reasonable thing to try.
Mike Ramsey
Wade, as I am on it: perlease
But more seriously – why is it safe to sail boats with aluminium masts in thunderstorms, but not play golf with metal shafted clubs?
How often do lightning conductors get struck? There seems to be a role for tall metal objects to seep away charge.
Firefly, Rufus T., President of Fredonia
But seriously, it sounds a lot like Cherenkov Radiation.
This looks like it might be useful.
http://www.astro.psu.edu/~niel/astro550/001-hedrick-gammaray.pdf
From thunderstorms´ lighting. And do not forget the thermo-atmosphere, where the atmosphere´s temperature reaches 2500 K degrees!. All cosmology must be revisited. There isn´t any binding creed to believe in for open minded people.
There is neither a Rome nor a Pope anywhere to forbid us to seek for the truth.
Dogmas/laws are no other than relative references, correlations which only work within relative parameters. Real laws should be of general application.
Phantoms which can not be reproduced experimentally are just that: Phantoms, “tricks” devised for substituting positive reasoning. As such they reveal feeble minds who do not dare to simply admit: “I don´t know” and inmediately move ahead to find an empirical answer in the lab.
BTW, the other day, someone said that any progress in science must be the exclusive outcome of a long mathematical elaboration even involving one´s elbow wear solving a lot of differential equations.Such a person forgot that computers compute and solve mathematical problems using simple arithmetics..and that mathematical computations should be done AFTER not before experiments, and if complicated or if needing rounding, adjusting or massaging, something is wrong.
In the skies above a thunderstorm, powerful electric fields generated by the storm stretch upward for many miles into the upper atmosphere. These electric fields accelerate free electrons, whisking them to speeds approaching the speed of light. When these ultra-high speed electrons collide with molecules in the air, the collisions release high-energy gamma rays as well as more electrons
Is it the Sun?, is it Jupiter?, is it a phantom and “tricky” “black hole”?….is its Superman?…
No!, it’s our Earth!!!
Going back a few years, I do remember reading that someone was studying whether cosmic rays possibly lay down ion channels which allows lightning to do its thing. It somewhat resolved the order of magnitude discrepancy between the cloud charge and the dielectric strength of the atmosphere. Was this Svensmark?
Also, in 1997, I observed some awesome sprite, jet, and elves and was able to photograph a unique event. Here is my observation from that event on Aug 27, 2997:
” Another phenomenon, captured on film also, was this short-lived utterly intensely bright point like source that lasted between 3/4 to 1 second. This object left a “very bright star like” image on the photo. A second one of these was captured on a later frame. Both frames have clouds completely blotting out the stars in the background sky where these things occurred. I would estimate the brightness of the visually observed one to be a couple to several times the brightness of Sirius although “much finer” a point like source than Sirius. Strange looking! There was not the same glare to the eye as there is when looking at Sirius. The brightness of this object indeed had a light curve, starting out dim and very rapidly brightening, then suddenly disappearing at peak brightness. ”
Sprites and jets are my favorite as they require one to ‘hunt’ them…
(disclaimer, I am a low end amateur astronomer)
GV
I wonder if other planets in our solar system emit TGFs.
Mars ( http://www.universetoday.com/2009/06/18/lighning-detected-on-mars/ ) and Venus ( http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/display.cfm?News_ID=24415 ) both have lightening, so it could be possible.
John M Reynolds
Powerful gamma ray bursts, above the clouds and heading into space?
Well, now we know what happened to the mythical flying dragons. The gamma rays killed them, and when they fell to the ground there wasn’t enough left to leave buried remains or fossils!
Seriously though, if such bursts are consistent with lightning in general, this could impact theories of possible alien life evolving on gas giants and other planets where the liquid water zone is significantly above the ground. And it may need consideration in the proposed atmospheric colonization of Venus up in the “temperate zone,” among other things.
[quote]
In the skies above a thunderstorm, powerful electric fields generated by the storm stretch upward for many miles into the upper atmosphere. These electric fields accelerate free electrons, whisking them to speeds approaching the speed of light.
[/quote]
That’s quite an extraordinary claim. They’re basically saying that thunderstorms are particle accelerators capable of moving electrons at speeds rivaling the acceleration caused by supernovas.
The 20 meV energy these electrons have is found naturally in some cosmic rays. And 1% of cosmic rays are electrons. Assuming it’s cosmic rays causing this wouldn’t require thunderstorms to possess supernova-like abilities.
Another alternative would be the solar wind, which has 1000 times the power of the Earth’s auroras, exactly the energy stated in the article. I don’t know how you’d get a solar wind effect (other than the auroras) inside Earth’s atmosphere though.
Hopefully, they’ll make the data from this satellite available to the public. It’s a very interesting experiment.
Anyway, I’m linking my video to plasma physics because I think it’s related to the article.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUUvqtwL8hY&hl=en_US&fs=1&]
Does the world lighting count vary with the sunspot cycle
The more I think about this, I am reminded of N. Tesla; who veiwed the world I think, as a large generator. Free energy for us all, just by letting the armature & stator(earth), rotate as usual and somehow(his tower & grounding system?) as a means of tapping into a natural process; capturing electricity. Then transmit it through the air. This FTG effect sounds as if it is another way that the Earth naturaly discharges into space. I wonder if the AGW folks have a model for this as well…?
Way OT, but I had a good laugh over it. It seems it is time for 007 to come out of retirement!!! http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/02/01/scientist-climate-e-mails-possibly-stolen-spies/?test=latestnews
It would be nice one day just to hear the acknowledgment of the content of the e-mails. (In a reality based manner.)
Doesn’t lightning occur on Jupiter and other planets or moons? Seems like they would emit the same gamma rays.
Not sure if you have seen this from the telegraph.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7126586/Climategate-emails-stolen-by-foreign-spies.html
This thread will end like all sun or astronomical-related ones here – the EU (electric universe) street evangelists will crowd in with their electric gospel and Leif Svalgaard will heroically fight them off – wait and see…
Carbon-based life form (07:38:11) , possibly there is lightening on Jupiter or some moons that have atmospheres, but wouldn’t it be easier to see the effect on Mars and Venus which are closer to us? — John M Reynolds
Hi,
Here are the instructions for a cheap cosmic ray detector
http://scienceblogs.com/neurophilosophy/2007/09/science_manga_instructions_for.php
regards
P
James Sexton (07:37:34)
Also OT but hoping it’ll get it’s own thread….
http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/science_technology/leaked+climate+emails+aposhacked+by+spiesapos/3522437
The UK’s Channel 4 seems to have stolen the Beeb’s Leftist thunder by wheeling out the UK’s ex-Chief Scientist who espouses that the Climategate emails were hacked by a national “foreign intelligence agency” and also completes the online piece with some nice quotes from the Lesser Milliband.
Nonsense, utter nonsense.
This is a very similar process they are describing to what happens in a Geiger counter tube. In the Geiger-Müller tube you use the effect to detect radiation, but the physics and conditions required are almost identical. A rarefied gas is exposed to a high strength electrical field (the Geiger tubes I worked with had a potential of about 1100v across the tube). Once a detectable form or radiation passes through the wall of the tube and interacts with the gas it initiates an avalanche of sympathetic electron emissions as the high potential accelerates electrons toward the positive potential. As these electrons accelerate they crash into other gas atoms and strip off additional electrons in a cascade of emissions producing a detectable voltage pulse as all the electrons arrive at the positive pole.
If the mean free path between emission and absorption was long enough (as would be the case in the extremely rarefied gasses at very high altitudes, some of the emitted electrons would avoid interacting with gas molecules until they had been accelerated across great distances and very high electrical potentials. Due to the density gradient caused by the earths gravity field this escape would be more likely in an upward direction as the mean free path would get longer as you went upward.
Hmmm yet another “unknown”, seems things are not as settled as some would like to believe.
Larry
OT, but deserving attention:
Climate E-Mails Possibly Stolen by Spies, Say U.K. Experts
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/02/01/scientist-climate-e-mails-possibly-stolen-spies/