Solar wind surprise: "This discovery is like finding it got hotter when the sun went down,"

This gives a whole new meaning to “Total Solar Irradiance”. Instead of TSI, perhaps we should call the energy transfer that comes from the sun to the earth TSE for “Total Solar Energy” so that it includes the solar wind, the geomagnetics, and other yet undiscovered linkages. Jack Eddy is smiling and holding up the patch cord he’s been given at last, wondering how long it will be before we find all the connectors.

solarwind

Scientists discover surprise in Earth’s upper atmosphere

From the UCLA Newsroom: By Stuart Wolpert

UCLA atmospheric scientists have discovered a previously unknown basic mode of energy transfer from the solar wind to the Earth’s magnetosphere. The research, federally funded by the National Science Foundation, could improve the safety and reliability of spacecraft that operate in the upper atmosphere.

“It’s like something else is heating the atmosphere besides the sun. This discovery is like finding it got hotter when the sun went down,” said Larry Lyons, UCLA professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences and a co-author of the research, which is in press in two companion papers in the Journal of Geophysical Research.

The sun, in addition to emitting radiation, emits a stream of ionized particles called the solar wind that affects the Earth and other planets in the solar system. The solar wind, which carries the particles from the sun’s magnetic field, known as the interplanetary magnetic field, takes about three or four days to reach the Earth. When the charged electrical particles approach the Earth, they carve out a highly magnetized region — the magnetosphere — which surrounds and protects the Earth.

Charged particles carry currents, which cause significant modifications in the Earth’s magnetosphere. This region is where communications spacecraft operate and where the energy releases in space known as substorms wreak havoc on satellites, power grids and communications systems.

The rate at which the solar wind transfers energy to the magnetosphere can vary widely, but what determines the rate of energy transfer is unclear.

“We thought it was known, but we came up with a major surprise,” said Lyons, who conducted the research with Heejeong Kim, an assistant researcher in the UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, and other colleagues.

“This is where everything gets started,” Lyons said. “Any important variations in the magnetosphere occur because there is a transfer of energy from the solar wind to the particles in the magnetosphere. The first critical step is to understand how the energy gets transferred from the solar wind to the magnetosphere.”

The interplanetary magnetic field fluctuates greatly in magnitude and direction.

Heejeong Kim and Larry Lyons
Heejeong Kim and Larry Lyons

“We all have thought for our entire careers — I learned it as a graduate student — that this energy transfer rate is primarily controlled by the direction of the interplanetary magnetic field,” Lyons said. “The closer to southward-pointing the magnetic field is, the stronger the energy transfer rate is, and the stronger the magnetic field is in that direction. If it is both southward and big, the energy transfer rate is even bigger.”

However, Lyons, Kim and their colleagues analyzed radar data that measure the strength of the interaction by measuring flows in the ionosphere, the part of Earth’s upper atmosphere ionized by solar radiation. The results surprised them.

“Any space physicist, including me, would have said a year ago there could not be substorms when the interplanetary magnetic field was staying northward, but that’s wrong,” Lyons said. “Generally, it’s correct, but when you have a fluctuating interplanetary magnetic field, you can have substorms going off once per hour.

“Heejeong used detailed statistical analysis to prove this phenomenon is real. Convection in the magnetosphere and ionosphere can be strongly driven by these fluctuations, independent of the direction of the interplanetary magnetic field.”

Convection describes the transfer of heat, or thermal energy, from one location to another through the movement of fluids such as liquids, gases or slow-flowing solids.

“The energy of the particles and the fields in the magnetosphere can vary by large amounts. It can be 10 times higher or 10 times lower from day to day, even from half-hour to half-hour. These are huge variations in particle intensities, magnetic field strength and electric field strength,” Lyons said.

The magnetosphere was discovered in 1957. By the late 1960s, it had become accepted among scientists that the energy transfer rate was controlled predominantly by the interplanetary magnetic field.

Lyons and Kim were planning to study something unrelated when they made the discovery.

“We were looking to do something else, when we saw life is not the way we expected it to be,” Lyons said. “The most exciting discoveries in science sometimes just drop in your lap. In our field, this finding is pretty earth-shaking. It’s an entire new mode of energy transfer, which is step one. The next step is to understand how it works. It must be a completely different process.”

The National Science Foundation has funded ground-based radars which send off radio waves that reflect off the ionosphere, allowing scientists to measure the speed at which the ions in the ionosphere are moving.

The radar stations are based in Greenland and Alaska. The NSF recently built the Poker Flat Research Range north of Fairbanks.

“The National Science Foundation’s radars have enabled us to make this discovery,” Lyons said. “We could not have done this without them.”

The direction of the interplanetary magnetic field is important, Lyons said. Is it going in the same direction as the magnetic field going through the Earth? Does the interplanetary magnetic field connect with the Earth’s magnetic field?

“We thought there could not be strong convection and that the energy necessary for a substorm could not develop unless the interplanetary magnetic field is southward,” Lyons said. “I’ve said it and taught it. Now I have to say, ‘But when you have these fluctuations, which is not a rare occurrence, you can have substorms going off once an hour.'”

Lyons and Kim used the radar measurements to study the strength of the interaction between the solar wind and the Earth’s magnetosphere.

One of their papers addresses convection and its affect on substorms to show it is a global phenomenon.

“When the interplanetary magnetic field is pointing northward, there is not much happening, but when the interplanetary magnetic field is southward, the flow speeds in the polar regions of the ionosphere are strong. You see much stronger convection. That is what we expect,” Lyons said. “We looked carefully at the data, and said, ‘Wait a minute! There are times when the field is northward and there are strong flows in the dayside polar ionosphere.'”

The dayside has the most direct contact with the solar wind.

“It’s not supposed to happen that way,” Lyons said. “We want to understand why that is.”

“Heejeong separated the data into when the solar wind was fluctuating a lot and when it was fluctuating a little,” he added. “When the interplanetary magnetic field fluctuations are low, she saw the pattern everyone knows, but when she analyzed the pattern when the interplanetary magnetic field was fluctuating strongly, that pattern completely disappeared. Instead, the strength of the flows depended on the strength of the fluctuations.

“So rather than the picture of the connection between the magnetic field of the sun and the Earth controlling the transfer of energy by the solar wind to the Earth’s magnetosphere, something else is happening that is equally interesting. The next question is discovering what that is. We have some ideas of what that may be, which we will test.”

###

Share

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

239 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SandyInDerby
September 10, 2009 10:10 am

“There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now, All that remains is more and more precise measurement.” – Lord Kelvin
Even great minds can be way off the mark.

Jim
September 10, 2009 10:13 am

Hmmm… They knew about DC solar current, but just discovered AC. Now the picture looks more complete. Now on to capacitors and inductors.

Nogw
September 10, 2009 10:13 am

a stream of ionized particles translated into laymen’s common sense language = AN ELECTRICAL CURRENT.

George Tobin
September 10, 2009 10:27 am

I suspect that any additional energy transfer will be deemed irrelevant to climate unless it confirms the preferred component analysis of bristlecone pines, Yamal tree rings, disturbed Finnish Lake sediments and no more than two selected Antarctic weather stations.

rbateman
September 10, 2009 10:29 am

Could that something else that is affecting the Earth also be what is affecting the Sun?
Having two bodies in the Solar System to watch for correlated effects would be a good test.
Hmmm……..
Nice find, UCLA.

Jeff Wood
September 10, 2009 10:31 am

Nogw’s post is interesting.
I am not remotely qualified to comment on the point, but there is a movement who hold that the Universe is essentially electrical in nature.:
http://thunderbolts.info/home.htm
I believe that engineers are inclined to sympathise with the views expressed there, and suspect the gravitational view of the Universe is seriously incomplete.

jorgekafkazar
September 10, 2009 10:36 am

What says Leif?

Dodgy Geezer
September 10, 2009 10:38 am

Off topic, but heard at a UK summer party:
“I know the Met Office forecast a barbeque summer – I need a barbeque right now to keep my hands warm…”

September 10, 2009 10:40 am

This news is not new for me…
http://www.biocab.org/Cosmic_Rays_Climate_Change.html
My hypothesis was the opposite to Svensmark’s and Shaviv’s hypotheses, but now you can see I was not wrong.

Richard111
September 10, 2009 10:44 am

What effect, if any, on the global energy budget?

Lance
September 10, 2009 10:45 am

It just goes to show, the more we learn today, the less we knew yesterday.
However, the science must be already settled.

bill
September 10, 2009 10:45 am

Cannot find Leifs entries on this But I’m sure he has said the energy transported by the solar wind is small. In the mean time there is this snippet:
[comet] Dust tails however point in a slightly different direction, suggesting they are moved by sunlight pressure, and not by the solar wind

Douglas DC
September 10, 2009 10:46 am

“There are things that the White man knows, but there are things that he
doesn’t know.”attr.-Standing Bear, Blackfoot Chief.
This sounds like no one even has a clue.
I am sympathetic to the Electrical Universe people..
BTW-back in February, was there not a Magnetar impact on the upper atmosphere-with resultant warming?…

September 10, 2009 10:47 am

Here a more complete assessment:
http://www.biocab.org/Cosmic_Rays_Graph.html

Joe Black
September 10, 2009 10:51 am

Jim (10:13:03) :
This means that now there is likely to be a big move to investigate global warming along the imaginary axis.

P Wilson
September 10, 2009 10:51 am

Here’s the question: How does this event reaching the magnetosphere affect the tropospheric climate?
In fact, the magnetosphere keeps the planet& climate stable. Without it, we’d be wobbling all over the place, and so would our climate. Apparently, the earth has decreased strength 40% (reputed) of its magnetosphere in the last 50 years. The solar wind blasts the earths magnetic field and alters its emissions and alters its orbial axis. There was a significant blast of this nature in 2001

Cathee Cornelison
September 10, 2009 10:58 am

“Jack Eddy is smiling and holding up the patch cord he’s been given at last, wondering how long it will be before we find all the connectors.”
I am thinking . . . probably never. We keep thinking we know everything about cells too. OOPS! Something new, again.

September 10, 2009 11:06 am

See the following for an examination of the influence of the earth and solar magnetic fields on global temperatures: http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/EarthMagneticField.htm

Robert Wood
September 10, 2009 11:14 am

My unit solar wind is 1 proton/cm^3 velocity 100 km/S gives a solar wind energy dump of 1.6x10E-4 Joules/m^2/S, or 1.6x10E-4 W/m^2

Barry L.
September 10, 2009 11:24 am

Lenz’a Law comes to mind… and the conservation of energy…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz's_law

William
September 10, 2009 11:40 am

Although the researchers do not provide the figure, I’m sure the amount of energy received by the earth through this mechanism will be tiny and have no bearing on the warming we’ve experienced over the last 30 years due to CO2.
Thanks
William

rbateman
September 10, 2009 11:45 am

Nasif Nahle (10:47:50) :
Possible double-whammy.
Solar wind dampened by inactivity and Interstellar medium, and Earth’s magnetic field also weakening over the last 50 years.
For the Sun, which came first chicken or egg – does the Sun’s activity alone depend on internal variations or is it directly affected by the Interstellar Medium during which the solar wind is backed off?
For Earth it’s neither here nor there: Lack of solar wind means we get more dosage of GCR’s irregardless of why the solar wind is backed off.
or—
For Earth it’s double indemnity as not only is the solar wind backed off but the intersellar medium backs of Earth’s magnetic field…double whammy. If this is correct it means David Archibald’s prediction of GCR’s counts going through the roof are a few bands of Interstellar Medium away.
Plenty to chew on.

September 10, 2009 11:54 am

Extract from above
“UCLA atmospheric scientists have discovered a previously unknown basic mode of energy transfer from the solar wind to the Earth’s magnetosphere. The research, federally funded by the National Science Foundation, could improve the safety and reliability of spacecraft that operate in the upper atmosphere.”
In 1945 the Jet stream was discovered.
We progress our knowledge in fits and starts, each advance illustrating how little we knew before. Nowhere is this more true than in climate science, where we are only at the beginning of the process and not at the end.
Tonyb

Steve in SC
September 10, 2009 11:57 am

By golly that Maxwell fellow may just have something there.

Zeke the Sneak
September 10, 2009 11:59 am

If I had my way, more discussions about Earth’s weather system would include the weather observed on other planets. For example,
1. Enormous dust devils on Mars, which has 1% of our atmosphere
2. Saturn’s hot northern pole, despite being in a shadow for 15 years
3. windspeeds on the gas giants (COLD!)
4. lightning on Venus
But that is a tall order.

1 2 3 10